Bio
Laina Dawes is a contributing editor for Blogher and is also a music journalist whose writings can be found at Exclaim! Canada and...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Reading While Black or White: Do Readers Prefer Books Written by their Own?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

I wrote a post on my blog last month about a disturbing book review I read a few months ago. The reviewer dismissed Heidi W. Durrow's novel, The Girl Who Fell From the Sky because he couldn't relate to the biracial protagonist:

Durrow herself is biracial, and she writes capably on this subject. Still, she doesn’t always succeed in making you feel for her characters or believe her plot. Or perhaps I failed to more completely identify because I’m a white man. Other readers may be more powerfully moved, feeling to the bone the slights, grievances and complications that escape me.

I wrote that perhaps the reviewer shouldn't have reviewed the book -- or the magazine in which it was published shouldn't have published the review. Or perhaps the reviewer should have passed it on to someone who had a bit more objectivity. The reviewer gave the book 63 out of 100, and I wondered if the mark reflected the reviewer's inability to look outside his own navel. Just sayin.'

The review really bothered me, in part because I have lived in a world where the majority of books I was required to read in public school, high school, and university were written by white people. I have also reviewed books and music composed by white and non-black folks, and it never occurred to me to turn down a gig because I did not "comprehend" their life experiences. I can't afford to do that. If I did, I wouldn't have anything to write.

As a writer who just completed a non-fiction book, it worries me that, while I am confident in my subject matter, my book could be immediately dismissed because the reviewer does not know or care about the experiences of black women in the metal and hardcore music scene. It's a possibility, and one that I will eventually have to face.

Thea Lim, the deputy editor at Racialicious, recently responded to a writer who wondered if writers automatically write for "their own" -- that is to say, whether Black, Latino, White and Asian writers write for their ethno-cultural communities, assuming that the readers will look like they do. Do the characters in the book automatically come from the same ethno-cultural background as the writer? Says the questioner:

.... when I write fiction, I write white characters. When I read fiction I read them as white characters unless/until I am expressly told otherwise. This feels like an ignorant move on my part but at the same time, I feel that that’s what I do because I am white, and that people of other ethnicities read fiction as their ethnicity (or perhaps not, since the field is dominated a lot by dead white guys, but that’s another issue), and they write characters as their ethnicity.

Lim responds that she doesn't believe that white writers are consciously writing for "their own;" but that white writers' idea of what constitutes the "general public" means that essentially, they are writing for people they feel share their background and experiences. The thought that they have to write to an audience who does not share their cultural background is not even a consideration. Those who, because of economical, ethno-cultural or socio-economical differences, have lived lives completely opposite to the writer's (lives often not positively acknowledged in the public sphere) are invisible. These white writers assume that their "general public" MUST have these commonalities. These writers do not have to alter their narrative ... but POC writers do. From Lim's response:

Sidebar: I tend to have very little patience with white readers who tell me they didn’t like a piece of lit of color because they felt it “didn’t speak to them” or “it made them feel bad.” Readers of color learn the contortions necessary to be able to take part in Great Literature which may, in its whiteness, act as if we do not exist. Considering the amount of daily work this requires, I don’t think it is too much to ask of white readers that they twist their heads around every now and then to try and meet literature of color where it is.

I believe it is possible that people -- who want to -- can read, understand and learn about other cultures through books. In school, it seems to me, that is why we read the books we did. I certainly could not relate to Huckleberry Finn, and wondered why my teacher freely used the

  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Grace Hwang Lynch 7 pts

As an Asian American, I see a similar pattern of historical novels set in China making the bestseller list, while many excellent works chronicling the more subtle and messy aspects of life as Asians in America don't seem to appeal to the "mainstream" readers.

I think we all read at some level to 1) understand ourselves (ie, the interest in reading about things that are familiar to us) and 2) to see universalities in the human experience. Good literature tells stories of what it means to be alive, and we all can learn some things from each other.

Glad you wrote about this.

Grace Hwang Lynch blogs about life in an Asian mixed race family at www.HapaMama.com ( http://www.HapaMama.com )

Tina Scott 5 pts

I love this post because it is challenging all races to grow up! The only way we are going to learn to accept one another and value our differences is through education. Literature is one of the ways we can do this.... I appreciate Jenna Hatfield's comment... that's the spirit!!!

niceladyjewelry 5 pts

I, too, went through most of my high school years without knowing anything about literature produced by African American writers. I was raised on what was normal for the sixties classroom. Hopefully that has changed. These days, I am an avid reader with varied tastes.

My daughter has taught Russian Lit and passed a lot of books on to me; so I came to love Tolstoy, Dostoevsky and Gogol. I've read Bebe Moore Campbell and Maya Angelou. Two of my favorite books are Damage (Hart) and Writing Down the Bones (Greenberg.)

While everyone loves Evanovich, I couldn't get past the first book I bought of hers because her black characters were either pimps, prostitutes or criminals.

So my answer is..... I am black and I read everything.... except Evanovich.

lainad 5 pts

I have to say that the attitude of the Paste reviewer is similar to people who don't listen to certain kinds of music for the same reason: They believe that it is racially coded (blacks listen to R&B and Hip-Hop and whites listen to rock and country). I also think because it actually takes work not to stereotype and that some people find it eaiser to compartmentalize people in to little boxes - makes life easier and provides justification for their narrowmindedness.

I have previously worked within the publishing industry and from my experiences, I agree that you would think that POC's who either own their own presses or in positions of infuence, do not actively promote minority authors. Why? Money is a huge factor. Business is business and if they think that no one will buy the products than there is not reason to promote them.It is also a largely white industry and if you enter most likely, you are going to do what you need to do to keep your career and advance. That means not rocking the boat.

Also, there are still racial stereotypes in which some beleive that blacks do not purchase and read books - or if they do, they are the "ghetto lit" genre. I also think that some in the literary industry also think that no black person or other POC is going to purchase books because they are not relevant to what they think is "black culture" or experiences. So they do not bother to market to the communities in which they beleive are not ecomonically viable.

I am somehwat lucky tht my publisher beleives in my project but I also know that the it is going to be difficult to market. But I was aware of that even before I put pen to paper!

Contributing Editor - Race, Ethnicity & Culture

Blog: Writing is Fighting: www.lainad.typepad.com ( http://www.lainad.typepad.com/ )

Writer: Hellbound:

MLOKnitting 5 pts

Anyone who loves to read doesn't care about the background of the author - unless it can help you understand the book better or enjoy it more.

Some of my favorite authors do not share my ethnicity. Let's see, Kyra Davis and Octavia Butler come immediately to mind. I knew their protagonists were not "white" but had no idea whether they were or not while I was reading their excellent books!

The thing that I think contributes to this problem of a "WASP-only" viewpoint is the lack of bravery among some publishers. Shoot, it wasn't really that long ago that James Tiptree Jr. couldn't publish under her own name! And that was in a rather open publishing world for its time.

Even romance writers had to take male nom de plumes for years in order to get published.

I want more books from more viewpoints. I even like my fluffy reading to be from multiple viewpoints.

Perhaps the real issue isn't the reviewers, per se, but the publishers who are not brave enough to publish from a diverse background.

Even within the publishing world, when minorities have been in charge, they haven't opened the doors to more minority viewpoints. This could have been due to political situations or simple oversight, but, well, the reviewer in question was just an asshat.

MLO / Melissa

Books, Movies, Games, Ovarian Cancer, and Life in General at http://www.mloknitting.com/

Lisse 5 pts

Isn't part of the point of reading to explore worlds and experiences different from your own?

What else is storytelling for?

- Lisse

@ Home in the World: International Adoption and Other Travels ( http://homeintheworld.typepad.com )

natalied6579 5 pts

You wrote: "Are books and movies that, while real and raw, emphasize negative racial stereotypes more popular with non-black audiences than books and movies depicting blacks as average, everyday people?"

I think, without a doubt, yes. The human mind tends to think in binary oppositions. While it is easy to make exceptions to this kind of thinking, exceptions are never the rule. This is why stereotypes are so prevalent in modern society. It takes too much time and mental energy to try to completely understand the ranges of experience in the world.

The pieces that tend to be successful are sensationalized, reductive, and often conform to stereotypical views of the other because it is easier to classify someone as "other" than it is to see the similarities between human beings while also being forced to contemplate what makes someone different and how their cultural experience both mirrors and contradicts one's own.

I am reminded of James Baldwin's novel Giovanni's Room where the protagonist is homosexual and white. I recall there being maybe one Black character in the novel but it's been a long time since I have read it. I have read that part of Baldwin's decision to use white characters was that the homosexual themes would alienate Baldwin's black readership but, by making the character white, there was enough of a separation.

Obviously, this is a topic I could go on and on about. Great article.

Barbara-The Middle Ages 5 pts

I had never thought of this before -- but as a white writer/reader, of course, I probably never had to. That said, I am exceedingly drawn to books from other racial/cultural perspectives. I would pick a book based on that rather than the other way around. This is how I've come to feel the world is smaller than it is, more intimate. This is a positive experience for me rather than an alienating one. So I can't relate to the sentiments of those who avoid them.

But, let's face it, women will read books written by both men and women, but there are lots of lines in the sand whereby men won't read books written by women. A poorly-written male-dominated spy thriller can be flaunted by any reader in the subway -- but a well-written romance?

Anyway, I think it's still critical that everyone write the story they are compelled to write, as the chances of getting published and being successful are as tenuous as winning the lottery, regardless of race or sex or faith.

Excellent article -- and good luck!

The Middle Ages ( http://themiddle-ages.blogspot.com/ )      Two Friends--different ages, different husbands, different opinions

JennaHatfield 10 pts

I don't know if it's because of my life experience or what my subconscious thought process is but I seek out books written by people with different life experiences than mine. Sometimes that's a race issue, sometimes it's a religious issue, sometimes it's a country of origin issue. How on Earth do people expect to learn things if they don't ever step outside of their own immediate box? Sad.

Jenna Hatfield (@FireMom ( http://twitter.com/FireMom )), from Stop, Drop and Blog ( http://stopdropandblog.com ) and The Chronicles of Munchkin Land ( http://thechroniclesofmunchkinland.com ), is a freelance writer and newspaper photographer.

mochadad 5 pts

I was at a Barnes & Noble and I noticed a table where a black author had set up her books for autographs. Many people walked to the table, but no one walked away with a book. I overheard a couple of white women say, "The book looks interesting. Too bad it's only for blacks."

It's sad that we accept or dismiss a book solely on the writer's ethnicity. Writing captures the best and worst of the human spirit and good writing is able to transcend race.

Mocha Dad

http://www.mochadad.com ( http://www.mochadad.com/ )

Nordette Adams 6 pts

Nothing intelligent to add except that I wonder about the intelligence of people who think they can't read, appreciate, or review literature by people from other ethnic groups.

Good post, Laina. I tweeted it ( http://twitter.com/Reads4Pleasure/status/168919834... ).

Nordette Adams ( http://www.bookotopia.com ) is a BlogHer CE ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... ) & you can find her other stuff through Her 411 ( http://her411.com ).