Bio
The short version: Jill Miller Zimon writes the topical blog, Writes Like She Talks (www.writeslikeshetalks.com) and often highlights the paucity of...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Real dads edit parenting magazines

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

The New York Times covers the entrance of Nick Friedman into the parenting magazine frays:

Though 85 percent of Scholastic Parent & Child readers are
women, they will now be getting advice on parenting from a man:
Scholastic named Nick Friedman the first male editor of the magazine
last month.

In the magazine world, gender roles still hold strong: men tend to edit magazines read by men, and women those for women.

Mr. Friedman said that although he added a male perspective, with columns titled Dad’s Home, for example, he also understood mothers.

“More
and more dads are involved in child-rearing today,” he said. With two
children, ages 13 and 19, “I have a built-in research department. And
my wife is a preschool teacher in Brooklyn, so there’s a lot of
child-rearing conversation that occurs at the dinner table every night.”

Mr.
Friedman is still something of a rarity in the parents’ magazine world.
Parents and American Baby were both founded by men, but Patrick Taylor,
a spokesman for the Meredith Corporation, the publisher of the magazines, said a check of the archives had not turned up any male editors in chief.

The article goes on with some other data about who heads up the parenting publications.

I've been writing for a regional parenting publication, Cleveland Family, since 2003 and its editor has always been female (there have been three or four since I started) but its publisher is a man. I've also had work published in other regional parenting pubs and most have had female editors but at least two - one in CT and one in PA - had male editors.

What do we think? Does this really matter?  Of course the audience is key, and we're not talking about magazines that have the word "mother" or some version of "mother" in them but rather definitely have the more generic "parent" or some version of "parent" in the title.

It would be great to hear from the male BlogHers especially.

  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Jill Miller Zimon 5 pts

If I read correctly what you're writing, you like including people who are impacted and I agree.  I do like having father's input - after all, although I know it's easier to take care of my kids sometimes when the spouse is away, I still appreciate that he exists and DOES do plenty of the parenting.  So for sure they should be addressed in magazines and have a seat at the table, as we're asking for at news roundtables - though these are not exactly apples to apples.

I think you're probably right re: having women at the roundtable regularly v. having the moderator job only  or having that be something where we'd then be told, ok - you are the moderator, no need for women on the panel. Obviously that's not okay.

I have a friend who left a comment at my blog on this topic re: Meet the PRess who stressed that we have the best and brightest and that should hopefully take care of it in a perfect world, but the problem is, right now, there is no trust that people who don't look like us or live our lives will by default remember to include us when analyzing situations.  Until then, we have to keep being vocal.

So in that sense, yeah for the dads getting on the parenting mags' staff and yeah to the women getting on the roundtable shows.

JillWrites Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com )

BarbD 5 pts

I move more in an online than print world, and with a 22-year old, I'm past the age where I read parenting magazines, anyway!

Still, I welcome fathers' voices to the world of parenting publications.  It was pretty lonely going for my family in the mid-80's with a non-traditional parenting arrangement (stay-at-home dad and working mom).  I find it refreshing to hear more from dads, and think it's great that sites like MyParentingSource ( http://www.myparentingsource.com/default.aspx ) include a father as one of its parent coaches ( http://www.myparentingsource.com/community/blogs/c... ).

As for Meet the Press, I'm much more interested in women getting a seat at the table -- regularly.  It seems to me that the television media doesn't do a very good job of seeking out qualified women for these kinds of roles.  Just another reason why I tend to get my news and commentary from NPR.  I don't think you can beat The Diane Rehm Show for inclusive, topical discussions.

Jill Miller Zimon 5 pts

 Laura, you totally nail the conundrum. I felt the same way watching David Gregory this weekend on Meet the Press. Did anyone else catch this?

There he was, the new moderator, when we know there were a couple of women in the running for the moderator (at least a couple) and NBC really could have made itself stand out for a Sunday morning news show by having a female moderator.

But no - they picked Gregory. Ok - he's fine - he's done the time. Whatever.

But then who was on his roundtable? 

Four women.

So - i started to think - would we as women, rather have the female moderator and a crap shoot for roundtable participants, or not have the moderator but be slam-dunk guaranteed that the roundtable will always have at least one or two women?

I don't actually know!

Jill Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com )

rebellious thinker 5 pts

From the purely feminist angle, this is a good thing--as there should not be "male" jobs so there should not be "female"jobs. But on a non-ideological level, enough guys--back off and let us have some places where we can still reach the top (okay, as high as we can go until the big boss says "stop"). So we are supposed to applaud a man taking a woman's job? Is there an opening over at GQ for a woman editor?

Laura, www.RebelliousThoughtsofaWoman.com ( http://www.rebelliousthoughtsofawoman.com/ )