1 Man, older and less educated than the woman
1 Woman, at least 5 years younger (be sure to check freshness date!) and smarter than the man
0 Couples of the same sex
0 Previous divorces
0 Cougars
Place man and woman in same home. Stir. Voila! Enjoy your happy, lasting marriage!
Or so claims the newest study on what makes good marriages, according to the BBC. (I love that the headline says that men should choose younger, smarter women in order to be happy, but it doesn't say whether this makes women happy or not.)
Using only the soundest scientific methodology, researchers at Bath University studied interviews of more than 1,500 married people or couples who were in a long term relationship. Following up with 2/3 of these couples, researchers found that men married to women at least five years older than them (formerly referred to as "hags" or "shrews," but now re-labeled "cougars" - more on that in a moment), were more than three times as likely to be divorced than couples who were the same age. Couples in which the male is older than the lady, as nature intended, have higher "odds of marital bliss." Oh, and sometimes couples choose partners "on the basis of love, physical attraction, similarity of taste, beliefs and attitudes, and shared values." But whatever. That's not important.
Upon reading this article, two things crossed my mind: 1. Why the fuck do people spend money doing inane "research" like this? The amount of money that is wasted just blows my mind. In fact, the article links to two other exciting stories about marriage and happiness, which reinforce the notion that we could more efficiently use money as fireplace tinder (Marriage makes both sexes happy and Wedded bliss 'only lasts a year'.); and 2. This is possibly some of the worst headline-not-matching-article-stories I've read in a long time. I'll never stop recommending a 2008 article in Bitch magazine by Beth Skwarecki (who writes the Science and miscellanea blog - awesome!) on how to "deconstruct bunk reporting". It is a must-read for anyone who cares about how the mainstream media promotes gender stereotypes through their headlines.
I wonder if these magic relationships work better because these smart women realize that a) statistically speaking, men tend to die younger than women; and b) statistically speaking, the older their husbands are, the sooner they are likely to die, leaving them free to do whatever they want for a longer period of time. Hence they are more cheerful or something, which makes their dim husbands feel good, so everyone is happier. Which reminds me that, once again, I screwed up big time. I married a dude who is not only seven months younger than me, but a lot smarter than I am. We will be together for 15 years in February. What a sham life I've been leading! Maybe we are happy because he looks like he is about five years older than me. Seriously, someone should do a study to see if a couple is less likely to get divorced if the husband looks older than the wife. That would totally change everything!
Judy Grundstrom at Just JudyJudyJusy is so on the same page as me with this. She wrote:
The Telegraph’s headline was, “Men should marry young, smart women, say scientists” and the BBC’s was, “ ‘Younger Wife’ for Marital Bliss”. This not only takes the position that readers of both of these publications are male, but that men better take note at this important new research. I can only imagine the headlines if the research told women to marry younger men, possibly, “Look Out For Cougar Attacks As Women Need Young Husbands”.
Yes, speaking of cougars.... Linda Franklin is the Real Cougar Woman, and she invites all cougars and cougar wanna-bes to join the fabulous world of cougardom at The Real Cougar Woman: "This is the place where fabulous females over 40 come to unleash their Real Cougar." Assuming that marrying a man who looks at least five years older than me works the same way as marrying a man who actually is five years older than me (and I will be shattered if a pricey study does not happen to confirm my anecdote and invalidate the relationship of every woman who married an older man who looks younger than her), I will not have the chance to join Franklin's cougar community because I am likely to remain married when I am 40. Bummer. But have no fear. I am also not a mom, so I am not eligible to participate in what is sure to be the greatest event ever in New York City - the "Annual New York's Hottest Mom Contest For Cougars Over 35 and Kittens Under."
The contest is sponsored by Q104.3 (which is New York's oldies station!). Their press release notes that this contest is today in Times Square! Like, for reals! Men, if you decide to go, whether to seek a deceptively young-looking wife (since 35 is sooooo fucking old) or one who is legitimately at least five years younger than you, "There will be a cougars category awarded for moms over 35 and a Kittens for those sexy moms that are under. Hundreds are expected to attend and judge the annual mom-fest which will bring together some of New York City's finest looking mothers."
Hopefully, these moms will never have been married though, as a past divorce increases chances for a future one, according to our informative friends at Bath University. I do not know, however, if one factor might cancel out another. Like, if the wife is more than five years younger than the husband, but looks at least half her age and has a PhD, if that at all negates the effects of a past divorce. These variables are so complicated. I hope someone decides to study that issue soon.
One thing is for sure - Mindy at The Mommy Blog is not going to enter the contest, nor will she schedule media appearances with the winners. "I mean, really. For fuck’s sake," she wrote. Yeah. I'm with Mindy. And I'm going to commission a study on the impact of winning the title of "Hottest Cougar Mom" on marriage.
Suzanne also blogs at Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants and is reliving her youth at Always. Off the Beaten (Subway) Track, her book about unusual things to see and do in NYC, does not include any Hot Cougar Contests or Times Square.
Comments
Guess we're doomed to fail
Me being older, and all.
Man, if only I had read that study before I went and fell in love with the guy! I could have headed off any needless pain by just saying no, I'm sorry - I need someone old and stupid.
Dammit.
Mom-101
Cool Mom Picks.com
I married a man older than
I married a man older than I. Though I wonder if I have a chance at true love with my condition?
Yup, the ol' uterus is tilted. A bene?
On pins and needles for the next study. Until then I self loathe. . .
http://www.thecluelesscrafter.com/
Please Don't Label Me...
My husband is six years younger than me. We've known each other for 19 years. Which of us is smarter is yet to be determined. Come to think of it, it's probably me because the two of us met when I was raising four teenagers on my own. Anyone taking all that on has got to be either really dumb, have a screw loose, or be a candidate for sainthood.
All that said, why must I be labeled? Especially as some kind cat? And why the need for a beauty contest? I am so much more than what I look like, whether I'm a mom, or the age differential between me and my husband. I'm complex enough that I haven't quite figured myself out yet. So don't try to put little check-boxes next to my characteristics and then squeeze me into a pre-defined category. That's about as meaningful as trying to squeeze into my high-school prom dress.
Adela www.theblacktortoise.com
Eek. I Meant *Younger*
in my post above.
I must be senile already. I should have expected as much.
http://www.thecluelesscrafter.com/
hehehe
You basically made the most important point in the beginning with
That's basically what this "study" was about.. How MEN can be happier in marriage. Women don't actually figure in at all other than the fact that men need to get married to them. Perhaps there's a parallel study (of course there isn't :D) about what parameters women require to be happy in their marriages.
The "findings" are obvious, however. Since most guys select women visually, of course they're going to stay married longer to younger women because younger women become older "more slowly" than older women. Guys are going to remain "content" longer because it takes the younger woman longer for her looks to change.
It's also obvious that she needs to be smarter than he is. If she's dumber, assuming that he's not a Rocket Scientist to begin with, you end up with two people that can't effectively communicate and without communication, a relationship's doomed.
The 5 years part I don't necessarily agree with because there's no magic formula that X-5 years makes you compatible with a female for a relationship. I think the conclusions were necessarily skewed because when guys stop dating gals their age, we practically always go younger instead of older. Assuming that we learned what we didn't like from our previous relationship, we would have selected a more compatible female from the pool of YOUNGER women, which means that the relationship to the new gal is better because we chose from the position of an educated opinion and not merely because she was much younger than we are.
~ Bill
I blog at billcammack.com
SHOULD WOMEN BE CALLED COUGARS
I am married to a man three years younger then me.
I invite you to come read my post titled, SHOULD WOMEN BE CALLED COUGARS: http://www.isdisnormal.com/2009/07/29/feeling-cougar/.
No to "cougars"
No, I don't think women should be called cougars. It is ridiculous. Thanks for sharing your link. “reeeeaaarrrr” :)
Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Oth
Sure, why not?
I get a kick out of the term personally - and yes, I fall into the cougar category. It was all I could do a couple of weeks ago not to laugh out loud when a guy referred to me as a cougar in the grocery store. I'm fairly certain he didn't realize I could hear him when he told his friend, "Dude, check the cougar with the pink hair - I would totally do her." Shoot, he seemed to mean it as a compliment, so it's all good...
Sure, why not?
sorry - double post!
The Doomed Wives Club
I noticed an interesting theme here: almost all the lovely comments on this post are from women like me who married younger men. Perhaps we should start a "Doomed Wives Group" or something like that on BlogHer. Then researchers can find us and document our horrible sad lives as women who foolishly married men "on the basis of love, physical attraction, similarity of taste, beliefs and attitudes, and shared values" rather solely based on age and IQ. Actually, let's go one step further and include people who want to form long-lasting partnerships with someone who is the same sex. The Doomed Partners Group...
Bill, of course, is right that the survey is not designed to find out what makes women happy, although I'd argue that the idea that marrying a younger woman is guaranteed to make a man is happy is as ridiculous as saying that all men prefer blondes.
Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Oth
And then there's the sleep issue!
My husband told me last night, about a study he'd read that confirmed that men who sleep in the same bed with their wives are more likely to have atrophied brains. So not only do we need to worry about birth order, who's dumber when we marry, but we also have to make sure we give our husbands their own beds.
Maybe we should run a study on the people conducting these studies, eh?
I suspect that'll reveal more than the studies themselves!
Greatest.Study.Ever!
OMG. I cannot imagine what the funding requests for that study looked like.
Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Oth
Research leads to employment for some
You might consider it blowing money on research, but someone got paid. In todays times people need to make a living and a research enables this process. I use to work for a variety of research companies, and I made a decent part time living doing it, and it placed food on my table.
I think you are more affected by the outcome of the statistics then the actual research itself, I hardly doubt the statistics are lying or are inaccurate in the findings of this particular study.
try not to take it so hard, and look at it as a paid study that someone made a living from, and that was the end result