Blog
PunditMom
Bio
Joanne Bamberger is a recovering attorney, writer, political analyst and political/media consultant living in the shadow of the nation’s capital....
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Regular Voting Irregularities?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

If problems with voting machines and tricks by one party to keep people of another party from voting happen in every election, at what point do we stop calling them "irregularities?"

The list of problems is longer than my eight-year-old's Christmas list -- flyers trying to convince voters that Republicans vote on November 4 and Democrats on November 5, lawsuits being filed because there aren't enough polling places and voting machines to handle the increased turn-out, poll workers insisting that voters can't cast ballots unless they have a driver's license, precincts and counties defying orders to keep polling places open long enough so people can do their early voting on the way home from work, machines flipping votes from one party to another -- all on their own (I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't fix that vote for you).

And those are just the tip of the iceberg. I've been thinking about this a lot, and had a 'mad as hell' moment over at Twitter wondering, if we're a nation founded on and committed to the whole process of voting, why we do so little to protect everyone's right to do it?

I'm not the only one having angina over this. Voter suppression and intimidation have many bloggers reaching for the Rolaids.

Julie at MOMocrats, and some of her friends in Texas, have already experienced outright suppression tactics that could also compromise the information embedded on the magnetic strip on your driver's license:

It started ... with a seemingly innocuous twitter message I received from a friend, someone who is an attorney and politically active.

My friend wrote, "[I]s there a new law requiring scanning driver's license before you vote to make sure it matches voters id?"

That question indicated to me a potential problem on possibly five levels. If it was happening at the polls, it meant we had a situation that needed investigating. So I pulled on my Sherlock Holmes hat, and hit the phone, keyboard and pavement. I was surprised by what I found.

I found a potentially serious issue: possible voter suppression.

Myrna the Minx at Reno and Its Discontents is seeing it in her state, too. She says that things are looking a little bleak for some of the Republican candidates on the ballot there and reports that the GOP isn't taking it well:

The Democratic takeover of Washoe County has Republicans across the state reeling because it opens the door for Sen. Barack Obama to win Nevada’s five electoral votes on Nov. 4. ... GOP officials are considering a law suit to challenge the validity of new voter registrations that has turned a 17,500-voter registration advantage for Republicans in August 2007 into a 1,300-registration advantage for Democrats.

Myrna and some others aren't taking this sitting down. A bevy of great social networking minds have come up with two ways to try to put some confidence back into the system -- the Voter Suppression Wiki and the Tweet the Vote Report.

Both efforts will use social media to monitor and report on problems that come up for voters as they try to cast their ballots so something can actually be done to stop and fix problems as they come up. Or, at the very least, to put all the information out there about what's really happening with efforts to compromise the time we get every four years to have a say in who lives in the White House.

Taking back and protecting our own votes! I'm starting to feel a little better already!

Joanne Bamberger is a Contributing Editor for Politics & News. When she's not spreading her political wonkiness here, you can find her at her blog, PunditMom, as well as other blogs too numerous to mention!

BlogHer is non-partisan but our bloggers (including me) aren't! Follow our coverage of Politics & News.

  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
PunditMom 5 pts

... that I didn't learn about until after I wrote the post is being sponsored by The Motherhood. ( http://www.themotherhood.com/ )

They've created a "Moms Call in the Vote" ( http://www.themotherhood.com/circle.php?l=8734 )Circle, that will enable moms across the country to call in to a special number and record and report on their voting experiences, good and bad.  You've heard of citizen journalists?  Now, they're upping the ante -- we'll be mom citizen journalists!

jalee123 5 pts

A lot of people are going to be keeping an eye on the polls on Election Day.  I'm volunteering with Election Protection on Tuesday, a nonpartisan coalition formed after the 2000 elections to protect voters' rights.  Election Protection sends volunteers to the polls to hand out a Voters' Bill of Rights, to answer voter questions and to make sure things are running smoothly.  In addition to the poll monitors, Election Protection sets up a national Legal Command Center, and local branches as well, staffed with lawyers and law students who will respond quickly to problems reported to them by the poll monitors and be available by phone to answer any questions voters might have that poll monitors are unable to answer.  

 If you have problems on Election Day, please call 1-866-OUR-VOTE (1-800-687-8683) and report them!  We can also answer any questions you might have about ID requirements in your state, poll opening/closing times, etc.  Election Protection is focused on rapid response, it is important that any problems are resolved immediately.  If you want to find out about efforts in your state, you can visit http://www.866ourvote.org ( http://jalee123.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/armies-of... ).  I also blogged about this here ( http://jalee123.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/armies-of... ).

Maria Niles 6 pts

Yes - I should clarify - like Julie we are in California. The rumor being circulated is that if you show up in an Obama t-shirt you will be turned away and not permitted to vote without the information that you can simply turn the shirt inside out or remove a button. Although I suppose it could be seen as a heads up not to wear campaign gear the effect it is having (as intended) is that it is creating fear that there will be efforts to suppress your vote and that it can be done so you don't know your rights at the polling place and don't protest or question if you are turned away. It's conditioning you to expect and accept it when it happens.

PunditMom 5 pts

At least in on state, the turning-you-T-shirt-inside-out story isn't a rumor -- it's true ( http://momocrats.typepad.com/momocrats/2008/10/ear... ). I think some are hoping that if they can suppress as many voters as possible, they'll get an edge. :(

PunditMom ( http://punditmom1.blogspot.com )

Maria Niles 6 pts

At a family gathering recently I had relatives repeating the rumors flying around that you will not be allowed to vote if you have on a campaign tee (you could be asked to turn it inside out but not denied the ability to vote). And my first-time voter & non-driving niece was scrambling to get a state ID when it is not required as a form of ID here (other forms are acceptable).

I had read that suppression tactics like these are being targeted to the black community and was shocked to find that they are working even in my well-informed politically active family.

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )