Bio
AV Flox is a Peruvian transplant living in Los Angeles. She is the editrix-in-command of Sex and the 405, a site that shows you what your newspaper w...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Remember The Human: Christina Aguilera's Brazen Sexuality and Our Reaction To It

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Unsurprisingly, I am mesmerized by the new Christina Aguilera video “Not Myself Tonight.”

No, that's a misstatement. I am mesmerized by the response to Christina Aguilera's video “Not Myself Tonight.” Look beyond the allegations that she's hijacked elements of Lady Gaga and late '80s/early '90s Madonna and zero in on the reaction to the brazen sexuality presented in the video.

A bejeweled ball gag, canes and crops, that chic Atsuko Kudo latex number, the Betony Vernon petting double ring (a charming piece that holds your fingers in the focus position common in meditation, and most convenient for a proper handjob), a bowl of liquid latex, exquisite collars, those glorious ballet stilettos -– these are just a few of the items showcased in the orgiastic lead single of her album Bionic.

And its got the nation's panties up in a bunch.

Sexuality, despite the assertion of many to the contrary, is not something with which our society is entirely comfortable. We're still waging wars about whether we can teach our children about sex in schools, allowing an artist's sexual preference to influence our decisions about the scope of his talent, and just last month a Kotex commercial that spoke a little too frankly about vaginas was banned from two major networks.

When I interviewed 30 Seconds to Mars' Jared Leto, I joked that their album This Is War, seemed to explore very sensual themes between the lines of their call to arms.

“I think rock and roll has gotten really asexual,” he told me, growing serious. “That’s obviously a big part of all of our lives, and I thought it important to address some of that.”

This Is War toed the line. Similarly, Lady Gaga has walked to the edge, but despite some of her more provocative lyrics and ensembles, she manages to put a space between herself and sex via absurdism, irony and kitsch. Say what you like about Aguilera making a desperate attempt to become relevant by clawing at Gaga motifs: the truth is that a closer look reveals that the two performers are tracing very different trajectories in their work, whether or not they're wearing the same dress.

FROM BUBBLEGUM POP TO DIRRTY GIRL TO HOLLYWOOD SIREN

Aguilera is no stranger to the backlash that comes when sexual expression suddenly finds its way into your work. Though a commercial success from the moment RCA Records picked her up, Aguilera was displeased with the lack of input she had on her music and image. After parting from her management and taking creative control in 2002, Aguilera completed her second studio album Stripped, which did more that raise a few eyebrows.

The sexually provocative album, accompanied by the singer's numerous appearances on the pages of magazines in various stages of undress, took a toll on Aguilera's popularity in the United States. The album ended up going four times platinum nevertheless, but the distaste remained, becoming apparent once again when Aguilera finally released Back to Basics four years later, a well-received double CD with accompanying videos and publicity that offered up the singer in '20s Hollywood glam.

Critics called it “maturing,” and comments such as the following that appeared in AllMusic began to surface in music publications around the country:

Back to Basics also makes clear that Stripped was a necessary artistic move for Christina: she needed to get that out of her system in order to create her own style, one that is self-consciously stylized, stylish, and sexy.

She needed to get unabashed sexual exploration out of her system so she could adopt a more conservative image and thus be sexy. That's an interesting statement.

I don't write about music or trends –- so why am I telling you all this?

Because it matters.

BACK TO BASICS, ON TO MOTHERHOOD AND BEYOND TO BIONIC

Aguilera married music marketing exec Jordan Bratman in 2005, just a year before the release of Back to Basics. She continued touring and released a hits album and a DVD before giving birth to her son Max in 2008. Then the focus shifted to motherhood. She stayed under the radar for about two years before she began to work on her newest album Bionic.

Naturally, much speculation surrounded the release of the album. Aguilera was even pulled into the unfolding mystery of iamamiwhoami (a viral campaign promoting an artist who to date remains anonymous), a series of clips so utterly bizarre, nothing else could have better illustrated

  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
littlespy 5 pts

It's an interesting video and one I think I'd be a little more impressed by if it didn't buy in to a trend of fetish imagery at the moment (courtesy of Gaga and Rihanna). In the light of those videos it just seems a bit copycat. I like the song and I think that Christina is a real talent and clearly a very switched on woman, but as has been noted by other commenters, does this really represent her sexuality or even her sexuality or the normal titilation expected of female performers - scanty costumes, faux lesbianism and oh so dangerous fetishism. It's daring but it doesn't feel honest to me.

Amethystmoon 5 pts

I think we all have many layers to who we are, and most certaily with our sexuality, we are often very different than what you normally see at play groups, work, etc...

The video plays perfectly to the fact there is more to women than our "normal" self. And, as an artist, she has done a great job expressing the many faces of herself.

Let's stop judging other women for what they choose to do, and start celebrating the fact that women have a choice to do/be what they want!

gorgona 5 pts

This was interesting. It was HOt, you can do a lot of great things with Final Cut Pro 5.

Gena Haskett 8 pts

The woman has authentic voice and talent - she is not a CPU creation/stage doll. There is a part of me that feels she could have performed and communicated the same thing without the gizmo in her mouth and the glitter in her crotch.

But it is her mouth and her choice of expression.

Christina is not a manufactured performer so I expect her to change and evolve. There will be times when I'll listen and times when I will turn away. My choice.

My problem with the video is that the video did not support or enhance the song. The best music videos transcends the sum of the two original sources. I don't think it is a good music video.

What I saw was a woman replicating male ideas of imagined female sexual emancipation.

There is nothing wrong with that and some women have the same imaging mode. Was this her vision of sexual emancipation or the designer/director's vision?

I don't know how else to say it but it did not look authentic. Doing the homage thing is cool but at some point you "the performer" has got to put her mark on it.

I don't think Christina or the video was successful in that regard.

Gena Haskett is a BlogHer CE.
Blogs:Out On The Stoop ( http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com ) and Create Video Notebook
( http://createvideonotebook.blogspot.com )

rebelliousarabgirl 5 pts

I feel that this video is a bad reincarnation of Madonna's 1990's weird phase.

Nordette Adams 10 pts

Maybe the folks who are upset about her being a mom with hips, breasts and multiple needs never got over her time with the Mickey Mouse Club ( http://www.entertainmentwise.com/photos/45618/1/br... ). Or is this about the bisexual imagery? I think Christina's been nudging the envelope for a while, trying to escape. And the platinum blonde hair and scanty clothes are not new either.

Tilt Ya Head Back ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9Yc3pv-uI0 ) wasn't about having your hair shampooed, and she certainly has other songs about sex. I don't get the outrage.

Nordette Adams ( http://www.bookotopia.com ) is a BlogHer CE ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... ) & you can find her other stuff through Her 411 ( http://her411.com ).

wahminsc 5 pts

I hate hearing the 'what about the children?' argument. Motherhood does not mean the end of me as a sexual being and I'm sure it's the same for other women.

I think the discomfort with Christina's sexuality comes from remembering her as the sweet little girl from MMC. We all grew up, so why can't she?

I love the song and video. More power to her!

It's a crazy life and I love it!

WAHM Life - a little of everything ( http://www.sherylthompson.com )

This WAHM is Getting Healthier ( http://sherriet.blogspot.com )

Wicked Shawn 5 pts

it appears she was given the artistic freedom to create. She said in one of her interviews she was expecting and prepared for backlash in the US. She seems to be an intelligent woman. To paraphrase..."greater than the sum of her parts.."

Often those who cry foul are simply the ones who have fought off their own sexuality, building a resentment for anyone who embraces theirs. At any rate, judging Christina Aguilera for living her life as she chooses by the standards of a wife or mother who is living in some small mid-western town would be a bit ridiculous. Unless Christina, who is the only one who has lived her life, comes out and says, "I wish I hadn't done this" I will assume it was the right thing for her to do at this time in her life and career.

kranARI 5 pts

I love it! And agree with all the above of course. It's great to watch a mom/performer be able to exist simultaneously. She's able to embrace her sexuality, take risks = aka do her job the way she loves it AND have a family.

avflox 8 pts

How do you know what "herself" is?

AV Flox is the editor of Sex and the 405--what your newspaper would look like if it had a sex section.

anopencupboard 5 pts

I agree that artists have the right to explore whatever topic they choose, irrespective of their personal roles as parents. "But she's a mom!" has absolutely nothing to do with it.

That said, I found the video to be scattered, derivative and irritating in its shameless product placement. This is Madonna's "Justify My Love," "Vogue" and "Like a Prayer" all rolled into one, with much less cohesion and plot. I resent the product placement for whatever cellphone she used to capture the extraneous pyromaniac moment, as well as the obvious ad for her own perfume (!).

Whatever happened to the music video as an artistic genre in and of itself? Has everything become a vehicle for advertising?

....................................................................
anopencupboard.com ( http://www.anopencupboard.com ): home is where the food is.

HappyHer 5 pts

I think Christina looks absolutely adorable and has done a wonderful job portraying "Not Myself".

Don't we all have a bit of Madonna, Lady Gaga, and Gwen Stefani inside us? We want to have fun, we want to express ourselves and we ARE sexual beings.

This video was a genius enactment of that. I can't wait to see what she comes up with next.

Tracy Morrow
Intimacy Specialist
http://www.HappyHer.com/Blog