Bio
Morra Aarons Mele is the founder of Women Online, a consulting firm for companies, not for profits and political campaigns seeking to mobilize women...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Republican Women: Who do you want?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 15
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

“There is so much excitement here it's insane” wrote Faboo Mama of the aura around her neighborhood on Super Tuesday. Pretty much sums up the attitude of most Democratic women I know when it comes to voting in this year’s primaries.

Have you ever read an article linking the women’s vote to John McCain’s success? Scanning the press coverage, you’d think the only votes he gets are from white Republican men (but not Conservatives!). McCain won both men and women in yesterday's primaries, but the press just never covers gender splits for the Republicans. Only the Democrats, it seems, have blacks, Latinos, and women voting. Republican candidates have “moderates” and “conservatives.”

Maybe this is because fewer Republican women vote in primaries. While Democratic women have been up to 61% of the primary voting population in the Democratic race, only in South Carolina did Republican women approach half the voting population. Margie Omero writes, “What should really concern Republicans is that in nearly every participating in the primary dropped from 2000, the last time no incumbent was running. We don't have as many 2000 figures for the Democratic contests, but a trend seems to be emerging on the Republican side. Women are becoming even less likely to vote in Republican primary contests.”

So Republican women aren’t jazzed about their primary candidates, but look at this: only 23% of Republican women think the country would be better off if we had more women in office. The National Leadership Index is published by Harvard’s Center for Public Leadership each year. Thumbing through it today, I noticed:

Republican women are least likely to believe the country would be better off with more women in leadership positions: 74% of Democratic women and 68% of Independent women voters think the US would be better off if we had more women in leadership positions, but only 23% of Republican women think this. And this discrepancy is “not attributable the difference in their attitudes toward Hillary Clinton.”

GOP women: Who is your ideal candidate?

Anecdotally, women bloggers I’ve read have been almost universally anti-McCain, not to mention the ire he raises from high profile Conservatives like Ann Coulter to Michelle Malkin. So I was interested when BlogHer Shannon wrote yesterday, “all the conservative hatred of McCain has baffled me. I'm a staunch conservative, and I'm really proud to support him. I can't say I agree with every decision of his, but I respect that he seems to make decisions based on what he thinks is best--NOT the polls. And in order to make my decision this election, I decided to go with the candidate that makes me feel the SAFEST. If--God forbid--there is another 9/11, I want John McCain at the helm. Truly--I'm curious--I'd love to hear from conservatives who dislike McCain. I'm trying to understand it.”

The responses were telling: Dana Tuske:

His refusal to give a straight answer about his opposition for the Bush tax cuts disturbed me. I don't why it was so difficult for him to admit he opposed them initially.
I'm still miffed about McCain/Kennedy and the H-5A plan that American companies could hire foreign workers if they could prove there were no Americans that could perform those jobs. After that proposal, I'm not certain that McCain can really lower unemployment rates if he's so willing to allow illegals to work in this country. Sure, he wants to build a fence and enforce border control -- and I applaud him for that. But the method to his madness seems very backwards. I don't trust him with this just yet.
McCain claims he was a Reagan Revolution foot soldier, but I have doubts about his ability to uplift our economy. He doesn't seem to concerned with the mortgage crisis. He has only said that government action is needed but hasn't given any details.
I'm not fully convinced that troop surges are the answer in Iraq. I dread the day my brother is called back to active duty for another term in the Middle East.
With a flailing economy, how can we afford this war? And if we are really making progress, I'd like to see the results. I'd like to read about this progress instead of seeing another name on the list of those who have been killed. I supported going to battle to end terrorism, but I think we're beyond that point. This war has turned into something else and I'm starting to wonder why McCain would be "prepared to have troops in Iraq for 100

  • 15
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
alyssaroyse 5 pts

name calling, blame throwing and personally evasive tactics around individual responsibility have never in the history of the world contributed to a solution. we all - republicans and democrats, Christians and Jews, men and women, black and white, old and young - have far more common ground on which we come together than divergent ground that divides us. language like this does nothing but prop up decrepit walls of prejudice that divide and enrage us. they fuel destructive fires rather than illuminating an ameliorative option.

i am truly sorry that you have chosen such language, as it obfuscates any legitimate message you may have.

i have no doubt that many of your grievances are legitimate, i'm willing to bet that i might agree with a lot of them. but by choosing to use such language you are making it impossible to listen to your words, understand their meaning, respect their intent and accept any underlying invitation to work for progress - however thickly veiled.

it makes me sad. it makes me realize that we ask so much of our politicians, and take so little responsibility ourselves.

i've never voted republican in my life. but i have also never assumed that they are any different from me, except a few opinions. and that is insignificant in the face of our shared humanity.
___________
Alyssa Royse
JUST CAUSE
make some good news!
www.JustCauseIt.com ( http://www.JustCauseIt.com )

suebob 7 pts

I don't like this incivility and this name-calling either.

While I do agree with democratz that this administration has been disastrous on almost every level, I still think that we, as people, need to learn to speak to each other with open hearts, or we are all just falling into the same old trap of us v. them.

DanaFiles 5 pts

First of all, I don't understand why you deliberately replace the 'C' in Republican with a 'K' unless you are trying to liken them to the Ku Klux Klan -- and I sincerely hope this is not your intention.

Please remember that there are Republicans who love America and want this country to change directions. We want America, the country we hold dear to our hearts, to overcome all the problems we've created -- and by "we" I mean you and me and every American.

I used to think that sticking to "my own side" would absolve me of any wrong doing the other party created, and that was wrong. We're in this together. We always will be in this together. And hopefully we all will realize this before it's too late.

I'm not saying we will always agree. I'm saying that passing the blame back and forth isn't getting us anywhere. Both Democrats and Republicans have made mistakes in this government, and more mistakes will be made. But if we can stop dividing ourselves and starting uniting together, more good can be done.

We need to fight for the ability to work together. How do we do that? I think this is the magic question.

www.democratz.org 5 pts

I will not concede that members of the Republiklan party act pro life. Instead these people act to force birth upon women they do not know. Why must these people stick their noses in other women's private parts?

No, not pro life and their concern appears to end after the birth anyway when they don't want to help unemployed people, disabled people, retired people with government that we the people have elected. 49 million people who work, pay taxes, who voted against the smirking chimp in the white house want government to help the poor. How moral can a Republiklan party that stole two elections, appear anyway? Thou shalt not steal.

I don't find much compassion from the members of the Republiklan party. A lot of these people like to spout their hatred even against people making the minimum wage and call them losers. Oh I have read such vile statements from regressive Republiklan party members.

You cannot call your party pro life when the mad chimp in the white house launched an illegal war based upon lies, for oil and to destroy the New Deal and the Great Society to replace such with the Republiklan Ordeal and the Grate Society, and slaughtered 1 million innocent Iraqi people. The British Lancet magazine conducted a survey and the Republiklan party slaughtered a million innocent people.

Now I realize that John McLame will run on national defense but any sane citizen realizes that the Republiklan party lost the twin towers on 9-11-2001 and we should not trust any new Republiklan party leader on national defense when they failed a first time. Twasn't the Democratic party that lost the Towers.

I voted for Barack Obama because CORPORATE SHILLARY appears indebted to Big Pharma and the Health insurance industry.

So let the games begin. Sure the regressives in the Republiklan party will vote for McLame but the indies will vote for the Democrat in droves because of the unworthy war, the loss of the towers and the poor economy.

Just today the Republiklan party showed contempt for unemployed, retired and disabled people when they forced the stimulus package to not include unemployed people so they will not get 13 more weeks of unemployment insurance and the retired and disabled people on social security to only get half as much of a check $300 when the rest of America gets a $600 check.

I say God damn the Republiklan party for their actions and to purgatory with them when they meet their makers.

Oh does this look like hate? Harry Truman said once, I strongly criticize the Republiklan party and they see it as hate.

See our website at http://www.democratz.org and our stores at http://store.democratz.org and http://store2.democratz.org and our web log at http://blog.democratz.org

Erin Kotecki Vest 5 pts

...because I would think there is nothing that would turn this average Obama supporter away quicker than to liken it to a cult or religion.

I think the momentum with which this campaign has propelled itself forward is baffling those in the wake. Why can't it be that people want a fundamental change in "politics as usual?" I mean, considering what has gone on over the course of the past 7 years, is that really that hard to believe? That people are so sick and tired of business as usual and they want and crave something to believe in?

I'm as cynical and as skeptical as they come. This campaign started for me when I watched Obama speak at the DNC. I've reviewed his policy. I've reviewed his stance on the issues.

This isn't smoke and mirrors, despite what the critics try and make you believe. he no more or less qualified than any governor that's taken office. And he knows what sells.

He can inspire, so why shouldn't he?

Politics & News Contributing Editor
Queen of Spain ( http://queenofspainblog.com/ )

DanaFiles 5 pts

Wow.

Is it wrong that the beginning made me laugh? "Chicago Savior, Barack the Democrat?" It still makes me giggle. I suppose this is the opposite of fundamental Christian extremism?

Jaelithe wrote a great post about why she chooses Obama, I linked it here ( http://www.blogher.com/politics-women-and-powerful... ).

I can understand a person being moved by Obama's way with words, but I can't comprehend the sort of "worship" of him that's taking place.

Morra Aarons Mele 5 pts

What do you make of this? Jake Tapper...

And Obama Wept ( http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/02/an... )
February 07, 2008 9:43 AM

Inspiration is nice. But some folks seem to be getting out of hand.

It's as if Tom Daschle descended from on high saying, "Be not afraid; for behold I bring you good tidings of great joy which shall be to all the people: for there is born to you this day in the city of Chicago a Savior, who is Barack the Democrat."

Obama supporter Kathleen Geier writes that she's "getting increasingly weirded out by some of Obama's supporters. On listservs I'm on, some people who should know better – hard-bitten, not-so-young cynics, even – are gushing about Barack…

Describing various encounters with Obama supporters, she writes, "Excuse me, but this sounds more like a cult than a political campaign. The language used here is the language of evangelical Christianity – the Obama volunteers speak of 'coming to Obama' in the same way born-again Christians talk about 'coming to Jesus.'...So I say, we should all get a grip, stop all this unseemly mooning over Barack, see him and the political landscape he is a part of in a cooler, clearer, and more realistic light, and get to work."

Joe Klein, writing at Time, notes "something just a wee bit creepy about the mass messianism" he sees in Obama's Super Tuesday speech.

DanaFiles 5 pts

Sue, I thought Huckabee was a dream in the beginning, and then he lost me with his "change the constitution to God's word" business. In theory, it's a great concept, but with so many different religions, how would that work?

As a Catholic, we profess our faith to believe in One Holy Catholic and Apostolic church, would Huckabee use the Catholic bible's word? Or the Baptist bible? Or something else?

My faith is important to me, but like you I know when I'm being pandered to.

Praise and Coffee 5 pts

This is a big one.
To see Romney step out and listen to McCain's speech as I type.

I like McCain. Initially I was all about Huckabee, and may still be on the same page with him on matters of faith.
But....I am put off by the USE of that faith to get elected. It bears striking resemblence to the 'tv evangelists" that I cannot stomach...and I am an 'on fire for God Christian' ladies.
However, I tend to back off when I feel manipulated, and to an extent I do with MH. Wish that wasn't so.

I have to admit though, I liked McCain in 2000.

What a day!
Sue

www.praiseandcoffee.com ( http://www.praiseandcoffee.com )

DanaFiles 5 pts

It is a mess. It will be one big crazy, let's-put-this-in-the-history-books, mess!

I don't know what the hell I'll do come November.

DanaFiles 5 pts

I agree with a little of what Ingraham said (about the Reagan Revolution/foot soldier thing), but I think it was inappropriate to use Romney's exit speech as a dig-fest against McCain. What does that say about Mitt? That he and his campaign are sore losers?

There's a time and place for disagreement, but down right booing? What are they, three years old? (Although, my three-year-old is a good sport, he'd tell me, "No booing. That's not nice!")

Morra Aarons Mele 5 pts

That's interesting...and yet, I'd say for many Democrats, McCain would trump Hillary. What a fine mess.

Morra Aarons Mele 5 pts

These folks do not improve the GOP's reputation, from CPAC ( http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/07/romney-dr... ):
Romney Drops Out: Tearful Conservatives In Shock

February 7, 2008 02:02 PM

There was a palpable sense of shock both in the audience and among the advisers after Mitt Romney abruptly announced on Thursday that he was exiting the presidential race.

Screams of "no" and tears came from the crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington D.C. One attendee lamented the "bombshell."

As the speech was made, Romney's wife sat quietly in the front row. Cameras zoomed in on her mostly expressionless face, occasionally broken by a slight smile. But not all of the campaign's associates were as composed. Behind the curtains, Bay Buchanan wiped the moist from her eyes. "This is rough," she told the Huffington Post, "very rough."

But the writing may have been on the wall. After the speech, a Romney staffer told the Huffington Post that the former Massachusetts Governor had initiated pay cuts a few weeks back, even though he had invested millions of his own wealth. In addition, he had asked married staffers who were unable to move freely around the country to take diminished roles in the campaign. (Romney spokesman Kevin Madden denied the staffer's account.) A reporter who was on the Romney beat said the campaign had contemplated actually cutting staff but decided against the move.

As Romney finished his address at the CPAC conference, aides filtered into the ballroom to take one last look. Some offered condolences and hugs. Others stood in shock.

Already the attention in the crowd was shifting to the prospect of John McCain as the prohibitive nominee. The Arizona Senator's upcoming speech had loomed over much of Romney's event. Romney's introductory speaker, Laura Ingraham, had set the stage by taking digs at McCain, declaring, among other things:

"It is not enough to say you were a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution. The question is what have you done for conservatism lately."

And: "An obsession with endless bipartisan compromise does not keep us free."

The Romney faithful were equally apoplectic. McCain's name was booed loudly when it was mentioned, even though CPAC officials had pleaded for cordiality.

"It is like now I have to choose between the left and the radical left," said Jeffrey Goldberg, a Michigan Republican and Romney supporter. "John McCain's appearance here will be like David Duke going before the NAACP."

DanaFiles 5 pts

Morra, you beat me to the punch! I was going to write a post touching on Shannon's question to me, and more reasoning. In fact, I may still do that for next week.

But really, if McCain (and he probably will from what I gather) wins the nomination, I may contemplate voting for him because of my pro-life stand (I appreciate that McCain is against abortion except in cases of rape and incest.)

But I expect more from the Republicans. The past eight years have been fairly disappointing. I don't think I can justify half-assed Republican ways anymore.

On the contrary, I'm hoping Obama wins the Democratic nomination because if he manages to beat McCain, I would still feel comfortable with him in the White House.

No matter who wins or loses, I'll still be a pro-life conservative. I will still fight to end needless abortions.

I just don't want to be forced into voting for the better of two undesirable candidates, say McCain and Clinton.

And it's not that I hate Hillary. I just don't trust her. I have visions of the old Clinton days and the lying and scheming haunt me to this day.