Some Democrats are saying Sarah Palin's a token, but she's not a token to me. She's not a token to those who voted her into office time after time, first to the city council, then as mayor, and now governor of Alaska.
Sarah's not a token to millions across America who volunteer countless hours to community groups and local government, along with raising their children.
Sarah's not a token to working moms. In one example, when she moved into the governor's mansion Palin let the personal chef go--she said she and her family can make their own meals, a step to preserve her family life despite her responsibilities, and a can-do attitude we can all admire.
Sarah's not a token to Second Amendment Sisters who know the police can't be everywhere and want to defend themselves--in urban and rural areas alike.
Sarah's not a token to feminists for life, taking the responsibility to bring up her Down Syndrome baby.
Sarah's not a token to those of us who are disgusted with corrupt government, where pay to play is the norm. Where we have failed in Illinois, Palin has succeeded in Alaska. (no thanks to Barack Obama who embraced business as usual in his corrupt home state at every opportunity, where Democrats hold every major office) She's a David against the Goliath of entrenched interests.
Sarah's not a token to porkbusters around the country, underscoring Sen. McCain's maverick message to the powers that be of both parties--stop the wasteful spending, no more earmarks that put legislators' and their cronies' priorities ahead of the people's. And you gotta love a governor who put her predecessor's jet up on eBay for auction.
Sarah's not a token to those who appreciate real bipartisan efforts. Alaskans had been trying to get agreement on the path of a pipeline to bring oil the the continental US for 30 years--she got it done, at a time when Americans are forking over $4.00 a gallon for gas. She has a real record of executive leadership, not a phony one, not an evasive one.
Sarah Palin is not a token. If her name were Stan she'd still be a force. Her being a woman is a plus. And it's historic, even Hillary has graciously acknowledged that, as has Geraldine Ferraro, and she has acknowledged them. Her high approval ratings reflect that she has touched and impressed many all around the country.
Those on the left who profoundly demean her in this way demean all women by assuming the only reason she would be chosen is because of gender. That is the kind of empty, divisive politics the country is tired of. Disagree on the issues, fine. A lot of us ladies agree with her a lot. But make no mistake, Sarah Palin is a trailblazer. She didn't get where she is with a boost by virtue of being someone's wife, or coming from a political family. She earned a scholarship to college and has worked hard all her life.
Sarah is the fresh air the country needs. She is the real emblem of hope and change, and joins Sen. McCain in his bid to reform Washington and get things done for the country.
P.S. Here's to the first dude!:):
Like my husband — up here they refer to him as the "first dude," not the first gentleman. And Todd... And he is such a dude. He's a four-time winner of the Iron Dog snow machine race, which is the the world's longest and they say toughest snow machine race, 2,000 miles across Alaska. A whole new chapter here when Todd is asked to do things like — and he graciously complies and he has a good time doing it — hosting, as he did a couple of weeks ago down in Juneau, our capital city, the former first ladies tea party. And he does just great at things like that, as well as working in oil fields, with snow machines and in commercial fishing.
P.P.S. The supposed scandal debunked. Read it all, but here's an excerpt:
Trooper Wooten was under investigation more than a year before Palin put in her two cents. After being sworn in as governor, the investigation concluded--five days suspension.
The record clearly indicates a serious and concentrated pattern of unacceptable, and at times, illegal activity occurring over a lengthy period, which establishes a course of conduct totally at odds with the ethics of our profession,” Col. Julia Grimes, then head of Alaska State Troopers, wrote in March 1, 2006, letter suspending Wooten for 10 days. After the union protested it, the suspension was reduced to five days.
She warned that if he messed up again, he’d be fired.
P.P.S. Who's behind the anti-Palin smear site? And Kos stoops to new lows.
Comments
Sarah isn't the Fresh Air.
Sarah isn't the Fresh Air. She is the Stale Halitosis of the notion that government should outlaw reproductive choice and teach bible fables in science classes.
Straight Talk Express is now Republican
Bandwagon
Look... please stop repeating all the same Republican defenses to Palin as the VP choice and make up your own mind. Palin is not a maverick pick, she's a token pick for McCain who hopes to get Hillary voters and win an election regardless of whether she is the best choice for the country, but Hillary voters are smarter than that. So much for "Country First" This choice is a blessing for Obama because it contradicts all the arguments that McCain brought up about Obama.. and what Country First is he talking about? Its interesting to me that there is no diversity at this convention. Why is that? and I'm not talking about the few wealthy black people sprinkled throughout the convention. America is full of all ethnic backgrounds and cultures but I see none of that represented at this convention. Maybe its because it doesn't fit into the "values" of the Republican Base. No one wants to say it but I will... I'd love to hear your responses.
If I were a supporter
Your views are the views I'd espouse if I'd voted for her in AK - you do her well.
But I see the other side of the coin on pretty much every single note struck here, esp. as one of the 299 million Americans who live outside AK.
Her distance away form DC and mystique around AK intrigue, but do not sustain me.
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
thank you for your comment
As I understand it, evolution is taught in the Alaska schools, creationism is not, but the state has a policy, which Palin endorses, of allowing free discussion. Science doesn't occur in a void. I would add, physics for example, still starts with a black box--they make assumptions and go from there.
Choice always starts with an individual. There are lots of choices.
Anne
If there is discussion, then
If there is discussion, then we should discuss all of the points of view.
-Evolution
-Christian/Muslim/Jewish creationism (because this is the same story from the same source)
-Hindu creationism
-Inuit creationism
-Aborigine creationism
-Native American creationism
-Chinese creationism
-Greek creationism
-Scientology's theories of how the world was created
-And any others
This should accompanied by a curriculum teaching critical thinking and evaluation, philosophy and world history.
Humanities and defining "Discussion"
Discussion of what, Anne? Of how the world came into existence?
There are scientific theories - they belong in a science curriculum. There are theories related to humanities - they belong in a humanities elective and not before a student has taken all the required courses for graduating from high school. Then, as an elective, the humanities class as you've described would be wonderful.
How many parochial schools in Alaska teach creationism in their science classes?
I stand by my comment.
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
Willful ignorance
Please do not take part in it.
There is no discussion. Creationism is not a scientific construct. You want discussion of it? Offer electives in comparative views of how the world was created but do not dilute the teaching of the discipline of science and do not spend public dollars on religious materials and teaching time unless its allocated equally among all major religions.
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
Distance from DC
Hi Jill,
I think distance from DC is a positive. (Hasn't Barack been saying Washington is broken? Perhaps that's why he spent so much time on the campaign trail rather than in the Senate)
As far as the AK intrigue, she took on the old boys and won and they are back after her. In the case of the head of state trooper firing, she fired her own appointee. And as far as the state trooper, the husband of her sister, he had been on notice for more than a year prior to her term as governor for his behavior, which included death threats to her sister and father. I linked to information on that above, but here it is again. The link includes official documents. You be the judge.
Anne
Anne - I'm respecting you, you respect me,
pls?
I saw your link, thank you - you don't need to reproduce it.
These are the sweeping generalizations being pushed out of AK and her supporters. Some of us like a whole lot more detail and not just adjectives.
As for the outside DC, sorry - don't buy it when so many quotes from her reflect a totally Alaskan-centric focus. Again, I'm one of 299 million Americans who don't live in AK - I need someone in DC who understands DC. Being an outsider has more than one connotation and they aren't all positive.
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
I need someone in DC who understands DC?
Who understands DC unless you have been born and raised in the Whitehouse? Even then? Why would Obama understand DC more than Palin? He has hardly even served in the US Senate at all...About 4 months before he hit the campaign trail. He even admits he stays away.
Do you feel this way about all gubernatorial candidates for the President? Are you saying Carter didn't understand DC either or is it different because he lives in the continental US?
I really don't understand your thinking here at all.
http://theopenwindow1.blogspot.com/
I don't want to be putting
I don't want to be putting words in Jill's mouth, so I'll just clarify how I interpreted "someone in DC who understands DC."
I took this to mean someone who understands how our branches of government are structured and how they interact with each other. Someone who understands what a President and Vice President does (on a day to day level) and how to leverage those positions (as well as the positions in the Cabinet) to get something done without shredding our Constitution.
Someone who is familiar with the process of how to negotiate and work across the aisle. Someone who understands that mechanics and operations of national government. Someone who understands how legislation provides the underpinning for kickstarting important projects and initiatives.
Someone who has been in the company of foreign leaders and has observed how international diplomacy works.
Someone who is willing to not ONLY give orders, but who also works through others and with others to get the most people committed to a cause. Someone who works from the bottom up AS WELL AS the top down. Not someone who makes threats in order to get things done, or twists arms, and therefore creates more partisanship.
That's my interpretation, anyway.
If our only requirements were that 1) someone not be familiar with Washington, and 2) someone be willing to speak their mind, we would be sending my crazy uncle to DC as President or Vice President. And he has (corporate) executive experience, too.
Trust me. You don't want that.
That was good!
:)
Thanks - yes - I would say that's good. And to the extent that Gov. Palin doesn't yet appear to have given much evidence of really respecting the three branches of government and appearing to be more enamored of the unitary executive concept, this lack of experience in DC is really striking, and relevant, to me.
But you know - we each decide how we decide. I'm not sure what more we can do or should do with one another other than be exposed to the different ways people do this - and maybe see which methods produce the leaders we decide are the best.
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
Some arguments can come back
to bite -
Who has missed the most votes in the Senate while campaigning? John (since we're apparently on a first name basis with the candidates). Perhaps he thinks by not voting it will reinforce his "maverick" claim.
I'm amused by the efforts of Republicans to attack Obama with arguments that are often worse for McCain and Palin. The more you show me that it's all you've got the more I want to go out and get fitted for a dress for an inauguration ball ;)
ConsumerPop Marketing
PopConsumer (Politics, Current Events & Links)
Beyond Help (Music, TV & Pop Culture)
I read you Maria
And I think that your comment makes the case that if we each debated the merits and deficits of either ticket as they impact us and expose one another to the different ways of looking at the candidates, without telling each other what we think is best for ALL of America (and yeah, I'm guilty of that too), the better off the selection will be - since, after all, we're the ones who will be governed - shouldn't the vote represent that?
Is this too obvious? I guess I feel like people really want to drive our internal messages but there's no way to influence that unless the speaker is speaker sincerely and transparently - that's part of why I know what Denise (just as an ex., there are many more), is so influential on me, even if I don't make the same decision.
Ok- now I have to figure out how to follow my own advice!
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
Might be giving me too much credit, Jill
I was just attempting to point out in a snarky way that much of the arguing is superficial, silly and often hypocritical talking points spin.
Candidates running for office who hold office don't do their jobs. All of them. Sarah Palin is now going to not show up for her job, too. As long as we set the terms of the debate as neener, neener I'm rubber, you're glue... then our democracy is in a sad state.
What does that have to do with how the candidates think we should approach Iraq, health care, the economy or the environment. This is what I hate about politics - the politics. And it saddens me that that nonsense works on some people.
ConsumerPop Marketing
PopConsumer (Politics, Current Events & Links)
Beyond Help (Music, TV & Pop Culture)
You got me thinking
That's all - I didn't meant to imply that you said that - only that I free associated that way. Sorry.
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
No apologies necessary!
I just thought you might be reading something more high-minded into my comment when I was just being snarky, that's all. You keep on being a smarty pants and free associating ;)
ConsumerPop Marketing
PopConsumer (Politics, Current Events & Links)
Beyond Help (Music, TV & Pop Culture)
No discussion?
No discussion?
There are millions of believers in the US. I believe in evolution, I've never thought there was a conflct with the big bang theory of whatever the latest scientific creation theory is. But others do.Electives are good. I don't have a big disagreement with you.
And yes, I think the major religions should be taught in a history of philosophy class in public schools, as should the bible as a great work of literature. I know they taught a bible class at Harvard when I was there as a necessity to understand Western literature.
You make a good argument for school choice:)
As far as science, I am all for more in the schools. When Barack Obama headed the $160 million Annenberg challenge he turned down math-science grants for Hispanic kids, in favor of giving to essentially political organizations. The Chicago schools remain among the worst in the country.
When Barack Obama headed
When Barack Obama headed the $160 million Annenberg challenge he turned down math-science grants for Hispanic kids, in favor of giving to essentially political organizations.
Non-partisan source for this issue, please? Please point to the documents that prove this.
I live in Chicago (in the city, not in the suburbs), I work in education, and this is news to me.
Again watch those glowy sweeping terms, Anne
No, actually, I don't make a good argument for school choice - school choice is understood as givign taxpayer dollars to parents to spend as they please on education. I don't believe in that.
Again - willfull ignorance you are playing here Anne - I do not advocate the teaching of religion in public school and that is obvious. What I wrote was that if you want creationism included in a public school curriculum, it would only be considered if it is offered as I described although I still doubt I'd support such a class without scrutinizing how it fit into the entire high school curriculum.
I believe that if you want creationism taught at all, it's either in an elective with all other religions and not in a science class of any type, or its in your parochial or private school that you pay for with your money, not mine.
Did you answer the question about creationsim in parochial schools in AK? Or your top private schools - what do that do?
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
Your points are well taken Jill...
I think it is natural to expect Alaska focused quotes from Palin in the public record. She has forged her career there. And of course her first speech is biographical, as is tht of any other major political figure when they step on the national stage.
the links include transcripts of official documents, not just opinion.
I would say Sen. McCain understands DC very well. He is on the ticket too. And the reason he picked Palin is that her judgment and courage in taking on corrruption in Alaska matches his in DC, and will translate well.
I would also add that as a governor she has executive skills and experience to balance DC. Not everything that comes out of DC is good as we know. Most of us live outside of DC thank God.
Alaska focus
Anne - no - it's not expected if an individual is pursuing a position in a government charged with governing 299 million people outside of AK. What the quotes of Palin's demonstrate to me is an absence of thought ot aspiration to be in DC or govern 299 million people whose interests may be in direct conflict with Alaskans.
She'll need to work on discussing and devising complete responses to such concerns. I look forward to those.
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
Here is a link with sources
http://globallabor.blogspot.com/2008/08/key-chicago-annenberg-challenge....
Also more sources here at the University of Chicago. And this piece from Slate, which is not a rightie site, authored by a scholar from the non-partisan Thomas Fordham Institute.
I would ask--do you see great improvement in the Chicago Public Schools? A school system where huge percentages of kids do not graduate?
Thomas Fordham
Anne - I'll give the benefit of the doubt to you and just advise you about the Fordham foundation.
It is the most stridently in favor of privitzation of education that exists as a non-profit. I will say, they've been very critical, thank goodness, of the charter schools in Ohio and that gives us hope that as far as trying to develop charter schools as true charters, they have an interest. But their efforts to transform public education into one driven by school choice - in the sense I described earlier, is known to most people who know anything about the foundation.
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
Actually, I have seen an
Actually, I have seen an improvement in CPS (Chicago Public Schools) since the 1970's. I wish I could say that there has been more. CPS' enormous size (over 400,000 students), the socioeconomic status of its students (2/3rds from lower income families), and the diversity of its population (the students in my local public school speak 25 different languages at home) means that it is also an enormous challenge to manage. The size of CPS' student population is larger than many American towns.
This is significant because educational research shows that it is MUCH easier to obtain higher performance in smaller districts, schools and classrooms. Size is one of our largest challenges.
Adding to this complexity are the long standing tensions between CPS administration and the teacher's union. And there are faults on both sides. I think more teachers should be evaluated on their classroom skills and held accountable/fired if they don't measure up, but the union makes this extremely difficult. On the other hand, the administration does many things to make teachers' work more difficult and doesn't seem to support teachers very strongly. So teachers feel pulled between parents, kids, principals, and administators with fewer resources and more complexity in their classrooms that more homogeneous suburban schools are blessed with.
Even with our size, diversity and complexity, we have a higher graduation rate than other school districts close to our size, including Detroit, Baltimore, New York, Milwaukee, Cleveland, Los Angeles, Miami, Dallas, Denver and Houston. We have a public high school in the Top 20 of the Greatest US Public High Schools as ranked by Newsweek (and no other school district our size does). Lower performing schools are being weeded out and closed down while other schools are being reinvigorated and invested in.
Do we still have problems? Yes, a district of our and diversity size will always have problem, I imagine. But we are working pretty hard on many different programs at many different schools in the district to address these.
Thank you. I will read
Thank you. I will read these documents and get back to you.
By the way, could you point to the specific line in these documents that records where he turned down math-science grants for Hispanic kids, in favor of giving to essentially political organizations? Because in the first tax document alone, I'm seeing that the CAC gave at least 8 million dollars to grassroots organizations that are running education reform and enrichment programs in Chicago Public Schools.
It seems that you are a responsible person and that you don't make claims lightly. So, I'm guessing that you know where that data is within these documents.
Thanks.
Anne - how do you feel about
Small schools reform? I know that's been part of the education reform movement in Alaska - what's your opinion of it?
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
Any academic has their own credibility on the
line
vis a via the Fordham scholars. But I would again point out that the Annenberg challenge report itself said that after $160 million there was no discernable improvement in Chicago schools.
As for the exact line, no, as the documents are being examined at the UIC, which has not made them available online. I understand this from Stanley Kurtz on the Milt Rosenberg show on WGN Chicago reporting on his iniitial examination of documents which were only made available this last week to the public. He looked at the grants that were turned down.
As far as enrichment and the grassroots, that is al well and good, but is no substitute for basic classroom instruction. The monies would better have been spent there, and perhaps for merit pay for classroom teachers as well.
The point of school choice it to let parents be consumers and introduce competition in the schools. Parents have little leverage now if they can't afford private schools and their school is failing their child.
Small schools may help some, but to me the key is choice. It brings accountability and tranparency and excellence.
Alaska's experienece w/small schools
I think you mention in the original post that you are from Alaska, yes? So I'm interested to know from you, what you think about that specific to Alaska school reform effort.
Parents will not be able to afford private schools even if we had 100% of our taxpayer money given to them to choose as they desire. But as I amsure you know, the primary objection to such suggestions is that it is my money and I do not want my money spent on religious institutions of any kind. Likewise, geographic realities make such 100% consumer-driven markets untenable as far as providing any semblance of equality in educational opportunity.
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
I'm from the Chicago suburbs
In Barack Obama's backyard.
A small point. Private and parochial school parents pay taxes too...for schools their kids do not attend.
In effect they pay twice.
I am sure all parents want a say in how their money is spent. Not to mention all taxpayers.
In Chicago many private schools are less expensive than the public schools, and deliver a better education.
Online learning is becoming more prevalent, as is home schooling--by eco-conscious parents, parents of gifted children, as well as religious adherents.