Bio
io9 is strung out on Sci-Fi. Part adoring fan and part discerning critic, the site appeals to both the hardcore obsessive and the generally curious. A...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

The Science of Stuffing a Stocking

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

This post originally appeared on io9.

In experiments with M&Ms and D&D dice, our intrepid researchers push the barriers of densely-packed packages. And fail. But at least they discover the ideal shape for packing the maximum number of objects into a stocking.

stuffing a stocking

Every Christmas, parents are not only driven batty trying to hunt down intentionally rare toys and figure out which edition of an action figure their kid wants most, but they have to come up with "stocking stuffers" as well. Stockings are long, narrow, lumpy pieces of fabric. They squish whatever is in the bottom of them. Their threads catch on whatever is put in them. And if a parent has to stuff more than one, it's guaranteed that they won't pack evenly -- spawning family dramas that will end with one of their grown children hurling a glass of brandy at the fireplace and running off to Fiji to sell beaded necklaces.

It turns out that the best way to avoid this family drama is to fill the stockings with only spherical gifts. Repeated, increasingly frustrated testing shows that spheres are the ideal shape for filling random spaces - especially when hapharzardly thrown in. (Obviously, meticulously packed cubes will fill a cubic container best, but the holidays don't give us the luxury of regular shape.) Carelessly thrown spheres will fill 64 percent of a space. Spheres that are packed carefully, stacked up the way that cannonballs are, fill 74 percent of a given area. Thorough tests have been done, including ones in which scientists "carefully modified" M&M candies to get the desired 74 percent density.


Recently scientists have tried packing other polygons into packages using various techniques, hoping to beat the packing barrier. They used 12-sided dodecahedrons, 4-sided pyramids, 8-sided polyhedrons and 20-sided isocohedrons. D&D players will have recognized these shapes as they read them, and come up with a question about the experiment. The answer is yes, they scientists used "commercially available" dice. No word on if they rolled a natural twenty.

The scientists tried packing in many ways, from throwing the dice in randomly, shaking the container to let the dice setlle, using a machine to shake the dice in case human hands weren't precise enough, and even letting the dice settle in the containers through liquid and then draining off the liquid. The best case, cubes and tetrahedrons shaken by a machine, packed to a fullness of 64 percent - not any tighter a squeeze than with the spheres. Spheres randomly thrown into the containers packed 59 percent of the space, nine percent better than the average for other solids.

And so the stately sphere is still the shape to beat. Fill your loved one's stockings with oranges, marbles, and those little foil-covered chocolate balls to let them know that you love them to maximum efficiency.

Read the full scientific paper via Clark University.

Send an email to Esther, the author of this post, at einglisarkell@gmail.com.

  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Jane Byers Goodwin 5 pts

My siblings and I each had the same stocking every year. A few years ago, Mom dug them out and gave each of us our original stocking. I hang it with my kids' stockings - the same ones they've had since their first Christmas - and the stocking Mom made for Tim a few weeks before we got married; his family didn't do stockings. We were horrified.

As for stockings being flimsy? You're not using the right kind of stocking! Remind me to make you some strong quilted ones for next year. Seriously. Remind me.

"Don't be content with being average. Average is as close to the bottom as it is to the top."

Jane blogs as "Mamacita" at Scheiss Weekly, ( http://janegoodwin.net )hitting the fan like nobody can.

Melissa Ford 5 pts

I always wondered about stuffing stockings because they look so flimsy -- don't heavy gifts inside rip it off the mantel?

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her novel about blogging is Life from Scratch ( http://www.life-from-scratch.com/ ).

denverlori 5 pts

I'm thinking a LOT of Buckey Balls may fill up 100 percent of that stocking...

Lori Werhane

www.denverlori.wordpress.com ( http://www.denverlori.wordpress.com )
www.loriwerhanephotography.smugmug.com ( http://www.loriwerhanephotography.smugmug.com )

Denise 9 pts moderator

My stocking is one of those old red ones from the mall - with my name in Gold glitter. The glitter is still on there after 30 years!

And I agree, those are still the easiest to stuff.

~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager
Life. Flow. Fluctuate.

TeresaS 5 pts

The old red fabric ones are still the easiest to stuff. I remember you use to get them at the mall where you saw Santa. His helpers wrote your name in green glitter pen. The glitter eventually wore off and you were left with your name left in green. Mine from 1963 or so is still up in my attic. My husband has his too. I always remember an orange stuffed in the toe of the stocking. However, these stockings were wide enough (an no snags on the inside) to accommodate all shape and sizes of Christmas treasures.

Teresa

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

That if we went that route the fake husband would take "paper bag" to mean any kind of paper bag and I'd end up with a yard waste bag (you know -- the ones that are 3 feet tall) waiting for me. He needs rules. Firm rules.

Contributing Editor Karen Ballum also blogs at Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca ).

Denise 9 pts moderator

Because wow!

And I'm thinking this might be a good idea. I wonder if I could convince my family to move to paper bags.

~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager
Life. Flow. Fluctuate.

texasebeth 6 pts

We had stockings hung up with our names on them, they were just empty. The reason the grocery bags were on the kitchen table was so we could open them first thing too.

Most of the time we weren't allowed to open our presents until we were all dressed for the day. When we were really little we opend presents in our jammies but most of the pictures from about age 6 on, we were dressed for the day. I know by the time we were in high school it was no presents until after everyone was showered, dressed, breakfast eaten and the kitchen cleaned up.

I'll have to drop by my dad's house and look for some photos.

Elizabeth

@texasebeth ( http://twitter.com/texasebeth )  and My Life, such as it is.... ( http://texasebeth.blogspot.com )

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

Wow! That's interesting. We always had stockings. We were allowed to open them when we got up which is why we loved them -- no waiting! ;)

Contributing Editor Karen Ballum also blogs at Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca ).

texasebeth 6 pts

I never knew you actually put stuff in your stocking when I was growing up. I thought they were just for decoration.

At my grandmother's (Mom's side) house our "real" Christmas stockings were big brown paper grocery bags stuffed full (literally), stapled shut and your name was written on the front in black Marks-A-Lot. They were always located on the kitchen table. I have photos somewhere at Dad's house.

My dad's parents didn't really do the stocking thing that I remember.

Elizabeth

@texasebeth ( http://twitter.com/texasebeth )  and My Life, such as it is.... ( http://texasebeth.blogspot.com )

Denise 9 pts moderator

I might have to do a trial run and see how much I can get into one... and I'll video tape it. I do have many sphere-shaped gifts so... fingers crossed!

~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager
Life. Flow. Fluctuate.