- Share This Post
- Pin It
- 0
-
Sparkle (0)
Well, hell - go, Selma!
So Selma Hayek decided to take a moment and feed another woman's child. Go her, say I. Why? Because that child needed milk, and probably won't ever again in his life have the quality of nutrition she stopped to provide him.
Is it a political statement? Maybe. But only in the sense that motherhood is political. Which it is. Most definitely.
However, I can't imagine anyone premeditating something like this. It would be awful to think that way. I much prefer the idea that a mother in need found a mother who could and did provide for her child. More, that we'd all do the same, if put in the same position - and with as little forethought as this act appeared to have.
But then, I guess we're a long way off from the day that mothers helping other mothers doesn't make international front page news.
Why do you think it's front page news? Because she breastfed on international news? That she breastfed a starving child? Other?
