Bio
I'm a mom of two living in the beautiful San Francisco bay area. My son is 7 and my daughter is 5. I've been working online in various incarnations f...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Christine O'Donnell, Krystal Ball: Sexism and the Midterm Elections

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

It appears there will be a net loss of women in Congress for the first time in 30 years. This is a huge blow to the many organizations that work so hard to elect and support women in office -- and it’s especially tough considering that women from both parties took a hit during this election cycle in terms of misogyny and sexism in the media. The hits were coming so hard that they prompted the launch of Name It. Change It. was started to help keep track of sexist attacks on female politicians and hold people accountable for those attacks.

Republican U.S. Senate candidate from Delaware Christine O'Donnell, a favorite among the conservative Tea Party movement, appears at an election night rally in Dover, Delaware, November 2, 2010. Democrat Christopher Coons won the U.S. Senate race in Delaware on Tuesday, the NBC and CNN TV networks projected, beating out Republican and Tea Party favorite O'Donnell and keeping for Democrats a seat once held by Vice President Joe Biden.  REUTERS/Jason Reed  (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS ELECTIONS)

Two of the highest-profile attacks were towards candidates from both parties. Krystal Ball, who was running for the U.S. House of Representatives in Virginia’s first district, and Sarah Palin protege Christine O’Donnell, who was running for the U.S. Senate in Delaware. Both women lost by pretty large margins after some of the most talked-about photos of the election cycle surfaced.

Photos of Ball surfaced that had been taken at a Halloween costume party, when she was only 22, with her then husband, that were slightly provocative and gained her campaign national attention. Ball accused her opponent of leaking the pictures.

The attack on conservative Christine O’Donnell was even worse, with photos AND a raunchy story published on Gawker.com who’s author claimed to have spent the night with Christine O’Donnell. The story was an obvious attempt to humiliate O’Donnell, and in turn women everywhere.

Both these stories were actually non-stories, even if every single word of what was written in Gawker about O’Donnell was true. By posing provocatively at a costume party or having a drunken hook up with a guy (where O’Donnell still managed to stick to her principles by NOT sleeping with him) they did nothing wrong. Yet both incidents were used as tools to try and shame both candidates and hurt their campaigns.

Though both women did end up losing their prospective races, neither lost because of those scandalous attempts at degrading them. They lost because it was a tough night for Democrats and a tough night for some Tea Party candidates. Ball and O’Donnell’s losses had little to do with those photos and everything to do with their political ideologies and the ideologies of the districts they were running in.

Tuesday was a huge blow to women in office because most of those women are Democrats, and Tuesday was a big blow to Democrats. Chalk it up to yet one more reason why we need more women in office.

Though sexism and misogyny were in heavy play during this election cycle I don’t think it really had that much of an affect on the results. What the sexist attacks did do was start a new conversation about misogyny. As we enter a new era of politics where Facebook friends can dust off an old dusty picture of you at a New Year's Eve party in high school, scan it and post it on Facebook for the whole world to see in under five minutes, its a conversation we need to continue.

The resources to find and use this kind of sexist material is only gong to grow with the use of social media and online social networks. In the cases of Krystal Ball and Christine O’Donnell the attacks did not make much of a difference. Both women were behind in the polls and were already climbing uphill battles. But next time, it could make a difference. And that is why talking about the attacks and calling out the people behind them and the media that perpetrates them are so vital now, before the next election cycle begins. Women and men need to make it clear that unless the breaking scandalous penthouse story has some direct bearing on a candidate's

  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
theoutcast 5 pts

This is a great post!

Women are always playing defense. Calling this out is very important. But I don't think we will see progress on this issue until a woman is raised and praised for her politics alone -- and it becomes "trendy to do so".

Left-leaning stations focused way too much on these candidates who would have never gotten elected based on their ideologies.

The time wasted could have been spent informing us about other female candidates. Instead they passed around all the gossip, too.

I want the real stories. Politically-minded women are such an ignored part of the media's market. What a shame.

Heather blogs about Motherhood & Other Offensive Situations at http://www.ultimateoutcasts.com.

kbojar 5 pts

Great points, Jill. What we are dealing with here is the old double standard. For young men it's just ”sowing wildly oats.” For young women it’s shameful.

So we must challenge this. Exploring one’s sexuality is the project of youth. Why should young men get a free pass and young women be stigmatized? Our society is changing here, but not fast enough. Feminist young men could play a role here. Are they up to the challenge?

Karen Bojar

http://www.the-next-stage.com/

Jill Miller Zimon 5 pts

You are so right - exactly. Lots of work to do - maybe we have more consciousness now. Sure hope so.

Jill Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com )

In The Arena: Jill Miller Zimon, Pepper Pike City Council Member ( http://jillmillerzimon.blogspot.com )

Jill Miller Zimon 5 pts

Very thoughtful assessment of what unfolded, Meghan. I really appreciate.

The only thing I would add is that I'd like to see more exposure of the people who pursue these kinds of attacks and more open discussion about what motivates people to do such things, when the attacks are so clearly gratuitous in that they often add nothing of value to the voter's knowledge base but it is hoped by those who perpetrate the attacks, that there might be some negative effect on the subject of the attack.

This is bullying, pure and simple - this is not political competition as it should be to serve the voters. And I feel strongly that we should be drawing attention to that.

If we don't like politics as usual then we have to show that we won't tolerate the tactics that go with politics as usual. It's not enough to just say, "well, that's politics." It's only politics if we let it be. There are people behind those releases of information intended to shame the candidates.

I really want to urge that THEY be the focus of these incidents, not the people they're trying to embarrass or intimidate.

Jill Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com )

In The Arena: Jill Miller Zimon, Pepper Pike City Council Member ( http://jillmillerzimon.blogspot.com )