Bio
Morra Aarons Mele is the founder of Women Online, a consulting firm for companies, not for profits and political campaigns seeking to mobilize women...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Before she takes the stage: Emily's List poll finds Palin choice lessens McCain in women voters eyes

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Before Sarah Palin takes the stage, it's important to look at polling on what women voters think of Sarah Palin. EMILY's List released new polls this morning. To me, here is the most important point: 

Governor Palin's inclusion on the ticket squanders
John McCain's previous advantage over Barack Obama with regard to
experience and readiness to lead.
When women voters learn that
Palin's total experience in elective office includes two years as
governor of Alaska, six years as mayor of a small suburban city, and
four years on the city council, and that she has never served in
Washington D.C. and has no foreign policy or national security
experience, they express notable concern. In fact, a majority (52%) say
that this information alone makes them less favorable to Palin (34%
much less favorable, 18% somewhat less favorable).

This speaks volumes to the fallacy of John McCain's decision making process, if he was going after women voters in choosing her as his nominee. Women voters don't just vote for other women, John. Now, there's no doubt Palin has got women talking about her. I'm sure copies of Ok and Us Magazine and the National Enquirer are flying off the shelves. Perez Hilton is blogging all Sarah scandal, all the time. But women voters buy tabloids, we don't vote on what they say.

We respect judgement and experience. Myrna the Minx has a great post highlighting how McCain's choice of Palin "confirms McCain’s penchant for making impulsive and erratic decisions.
It is widely acknowledged that McCain wanted Lieberman or Ridge to be
his selection for vice president, but after his campaign aides
convinced him that he needed a “pro-life” candidate, he picked Palin
after speaking to her once (or maybe twice) and without submitting her
to a full vetting process." 

And here's what does matter: on the most basic provision for women's issues, Palin has let women down. Jill Zimon notes that Palin cut funding for children, youth and women. 

Now, as I have written elsewhere, reality may not matter for Palin. Her image alone may help McCain attain victory. But as the new polling shows, women voters do embrace reality, and the McCain campaign is going to have to deal with this at some point. 

I don't doubt Palin can win elections. I doubt she and McCain have the good judgement to lead our country out of our doldrums. When I see the sea of tabloid coverage aligning "Palin" and "Scandal" I question it even more.  For someone who staked his qualifications to lead by attacking "celebrity," it seems McCain's aligned himself with a pretty darn big celebrity himself.

  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
miteegirl 5 pts

Related to the that is the complete lack of ANY response from the Palin supporters regarding McCain's speech today.

Nothing.

**Crickets**

Not a single post where McCain is the main subject since the accouncement of liveblogging his speech that was published yesterday at 1:00 pm.

What's up?  No one has the run down on how McCain did? 

Inquiring minds want to know what you thought.

judithL 5 pts

 For someone who staked his qualifications to lead by attacking "celebrity," it seems McCain's aligned himself with a pretty darn big celebrity himself.

I watched all 8 nights of both partie's conventions and what has struck me the most is that the Republicans repeatedly preach one set of values, and live another.  Sarah Palin indeed has become a celebrity in her own right, but she was not to be outdone by the number of corporate, sports and country music celebreties the Republican's trotted out for their little party.

McCain is against earmarks?  Gov. Palin has quite a record in that regard.

McCain thinks experience is the best qualification?  Palin falls short. 

The Republican's mocked Obama's "Grecian" Columns but they missed two obvious things, - the staging at the Democratic National Convention sure resembled (to my eye) Colorado's Capitol building(or for the matter, the White House and many other govenrnment bldgs in the US) and in viewing a clip of the Republican Convention ala Bush-in-the-Round, I saw very similar columns. If they were going to mock the Dems, at least it should have been for cheap immitation - not delusions of grandeure.

Palin-the-PitBull showed not only her ignorance with her derisive remark about community organization, but her own high opinion of herself.  Talk about delusions of grandeure and celebrity.

And just to set the record straight, the Republican party doesn't corner the market on giving birth to, adopting, loving and raising special needs children.

Remember, life is a journey, not a destination. Here's to Living Well! www.themadgoddess.blogspot.com ( http://www.themadgoddess.blogspot.com/ ) & www.lwbms.blogspot.com ( http://www.lwbms.blogspot.com/ )

nakedanarchists 5 pts

..."Women voters embrace reality".  Concisely said!

How was that missed by the McCain "vetting" process, with demographic information widely available?  Women's voting records and patterns are the impeccably documented.  Duh.  http://nakedanarchists.wordpress.com ( http://nakedanarchists.wordpress.com/ )

miteegirl 5 pts

It's too long to re-post here, but Karl Rove doesn't believe Sarah Palin has the experience to run or that McCain is acting presidential.  That is, if he uses his own standards:

Link ( http://www.blogher.com/karl-rove-doesnt-think-sara... )

evilslutopia 5 pts

For someone who staked his qualifications to lead by attacking
"celebrity," it seems McCain's aligned himself with a pretty darn big
celebrity himself.

We thought the same thing ( http://evilslutopia.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-celebr... ).

The Evil Slut Clique
Evilslutopia ( http://evilslutopia.blogspot.com )