Within the past number of months I have mentioned a couple of times here that despite all the drama within the Democratic presidential nomination, it was great that people are finally talking about race. Now I wonder if I spoke too soon. We are now seeing a downhill slide into the depths of depravity (okay, that's a little extreme) that while it is not entirely surprising it is still dissapointing. One (well, uh, me) still tends to think that racists are low-class ignoramuses that really can’t help themselves.
Intelligent, ‘liberal’ people who once counted on the votes of African-Americans and Latinos would never sink - at least so blatantly and in the public sphere - to the level of filth that has become the Democratic Presidential nomination race.
But it is amazing what people will do when a boot is firmly press against their neck. Right Hillary?
Recently, Bill Clinton, back on the campaign trail for his wife said in response (and I guess in defence to the ugliness of the presidential race) that politics is ugly and that if Obama thought that it was getting to hot water he should get out of the kitchen, believing, I guess that he justifies his race-baiting and not-so thinly veiled pot-shots at Obama’s patriotism. Oh, and Hillary’s flagrant lies (or is that ‘misunderstanding’) about her foreign policy experience which, less we forget, played a huge factor in her campaign.
I believe it was Nobel Prize winner and esteemed African American novelist Toni Morrison who first graced Bill Clinton with the title of America’s first Black President. I would love to find out what she name she would grace him with now.
Not like it has been an entirely bad thing, as there have been a number of challenging debates on the blogosphere and people are becoming more unified and active in exercising their right to participate in the upcoming election. More importantly, they are not going to eat the s#$t that the media and right-wing political pundits have been feeding the public.
One of the more recent and successful activities has been the Afrosphere Action Coalition’s Day of Blogging for Voter Justice. On Tuesday, several bloggers posted entries to raise awareness and contest Hillary Clinton’s utopian assertion that despite she is most likely not going to catch up to Obama in the delegate count, she is going to win the nomination.
This is more about the erosion of the validity of Democratic Party in general and the fear that because of her reluctance to concede that potential voters are going to reject the Party and vote for Republican nominee John McCain for spite which, in relation to the recent CNN polls is a viable threat.
Also on Tuesday, an online petition entitled Concede Now, Hillary! and within its inception two days ago has accumulated over 1,000 signatures and was picked up by AOL News. Here is the description:
To: Senator Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee
Senator Hillary Clinton Must Concede Defeat and Support the Democratic Presidential Ticket
The signatories to this statement urge that Senator Hillary Clinton must concede defeat in her quest for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination and must support the Democratic ticket.
Wherefore:
(1) The Democratic Party base has spoken. The delegate count shows that Senator Hillary Clinton cannot win the nomination on the strength of earned delegates, based on the will of the voters.
(2) Mrs. Clinton’s political attacks upon Senator Barack Obama have increasingly appealed to and sought to increase resentment against others based on the color of their skin.
(3) This divisiveness is regrettable because, via the presidential candidacy of Senator Obama, the vast majority of African-Americans stand united with millions of white Americans and Americans of all colors, genders, ethnicities and religious backgrounds, erasing divisions to implement a program of Democratic change.
(4) It appears that Mrs. Clinton is about to shatter this historic unity.
(5) We therefore call on Mrs. Clinton to face the reality of the earned delegates count, concede defeat, and thereby contribute to healing a wound which is opening and continues to widen.
(6) Mrs. Clinton must wholeheartedly support the winner of the nomination, who has earned the most delegates, and devote herself honestly and enthusiastically to defeating Republican electoral hopes in 2008, not attacking Democratic politicians and Democratic constituencies.
(7) Should the Democratic Party leadership nullify the people's votes by giving Mrs. Clinton the nomination, despite the popular will as represented by earned delegates, we would then call upon African-American voters and all Democratic Party constituencies and supporters to withhold their support from a Hillary Clinton candidacy in November.
We have survived eight years under President Bush and, if compelled to do so, we will survive four years under a President McCain. However, we cannot and will NOT survive the nullification of our most hard-won right - our votes.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
For more information and for some bloggers who have been actively following this and other events; please check out
Yobachi Boshwell
Frances Holland:
Sojourners Space
You can also send a letter to the Democratic National Committee.Mailing Address:
Democratic National Committee
430 S. Capitol St. SE
Washington, DC 20003
And / Or call the DNC’s main phone number at 202-863-8000.
Comments
Here is my question ...
... why should any candidate be asked to concede? Isn't that the whole reason we have the electoral process and all its rules to begin with? Obama can't get the delegate count he needs without superdelegates either.
In light of the current HBO series, I wonder what John Adams would recommend? Given the diviseness of his day in the presidential elections after that of George Washington, I'm guessing he'd say, let it play out.
PunditMom, http://punditmom1.blogspot.com
Contributing Editor, Politics & News
She lost my vote.
When the first whiffs of this race started filtering around the country, I was elated to have the choice between a woman candidate and a Black canidate. It seemed like a smorgasbord in which no choice could possibly be a bad one.
But I vote for integrity and character, not gelitalia or skin color, and this race has shaped up in my head as a landslide for Obama. Hillary has shown herself to be a candidate unworthy of my vote; someone who stoops to the lowest common denominator and hammers busy undecided voters (who have but a smidgen of time to devote to politics before going back to figuring out how to pay for heating oil and groceries) with the lastest fabricated talking points of the day.
Watching her slam Obama for his pastor's words again and again shows me a person who wants to win at all costs...even at the expense of the very country she wants to lead. Seeing her intricate little fibs about her Serbian visit shows me a person who is comfortable spinning a story to the American people. We already have a president like that.
What about Obama's sexist remarks?
About how Hillary's "claws come out" and "I understand that Senator Clinton periodically, when she's feeling down, launches attacks as a way of trying to boost her appeal."
At the very least, both candidates have engaged in these types of tactics.
Liz Rizzo
I blog at Everyday Goddess.
Guessing I don't really need to weigh in
here...
As I've been saying this for over a month, but I really do fear for the party if someone doesn't give on something (read Clinton leaves the race) soon.
Politics & News Contributing Editor
Queen of Spain
She still has my vote and
Obama was closer to having mine last November than he is now. If Hillary doesn't win, I get closer and closer to McCain.
~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager
Flamingo House Happenings
I could never vote for McCain
Because he's anti-choice. Still, Obama's supporters have me feeling loathe to vote for him, that's for sure.
I definitely don't get the calls for Hillary to drop out of a neck-and-neck race at all, not one bit. I admire the fight! It should be admirable and exciting, that the two candidates are neck and neck.
Obama and Hillary have both taken shots at each other - I really don't see where she's winning that race at all. Further, if Obama needs her to drop out to win, that's not particularly impressive, nor does it show much spirit. Although, I will note that I believe the Obama campaign itself is not engaging in these calls for her drop out, so that's one point in his favor for me.
Liz Rizzo
I blog at Everyday Goddess.
What Hillary thinks about voting for McCain
"Please think through this decision," Clinton said, laughing "It is not a wise decision for yourself or your country."
:)
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/03/clinton-not-rea.html
Yep, I've seen that
The problem here is that I don't believe voting for Obama is a wise decision for my country.
~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager
Flamingo House Happenings
And I meant to say
Even with all of the above, I wouldn't ask her to concede. I would just hope for it.
What I don't understand...
I guess I'm having difficulty understanding the logic that if Clinton or Obama don't end up as the nominee, a segment of their respective supporters will vote for the opposition. Huh?
Perhaps it's worse to not vote at all, but to cast a vote for someone whose policies are quite different than those of the Democratic Party, why not just vote for a third party candidate then?
If the candidate you're supporting doesn't get the nomination, will you sleep at night knowing you helped tip the race in favor of the opponent? If so, then go for it. I just hope the reason is because you're in favor of McCain's policies and not a vote cast in spite.
However, if you're doing it in spite, then I'd suggest you consider who the real losers will be on November 5 (the day after the General Election).
Disclaimer: I'm a registered independent. Also, I live in Oregon and frankly, am excited that our May 20 primary may mean (assuming Clinton stays in past April 22) something rather than piling on to someone already selected as the nominee.
Dimple and a Smirk.com
Amen alvenable!
I don't think this survey is about us voters. This is horse-race coverage.
If I may cock a jaundiced eyebrow at Gallup's survey, I must share that this is the kind of throwaway, news-making survey that happens in a lull between the state primaries....
Lisa Stone
BlogHer Co-founder
Surfette
Concession?
To me, looking at it from the outside, it looks more like an issue of those running the party, who happen for the most part to be Clinton backers, not wanting to give up without tearing out all the fingernails. The candidates not needing the financial support of the wealthy people who actually have been running it for so long, as Obama's stellar internet fund raising has shown, is disconcerting those who thought they were in control.
Those folks are not going to go out without a fight. The question is how long will they try to hold on to their power?
ALVENABLE: I think it is disingenuous to assume that everyone who is a Democrat should be willing to stomach a candidate they really in many ways abhor by her actions and in some cases by her policy, or to think it not sensible for them to vote for another party should their candidate not win.
It is the loyalty to "the party" I don't understand.
Though I would never consider voting for an anti- choice candidate with a feigned knowledge of real foreign policy I can certainly understand why some Democrats would go that direction.
cooper
Not talking about all Dems
My question is directed to those hypothetical Dems who were polled and said they would specifically vote for McCain rather than rally behind Clinton or Obama if their preferred candidate did not receive the nomination. My question is more in trying to understand the "why" behind that decision.
I understand that you (read: hypothetical Dems who were polled) may not support Clinton or Obama, but to then say they'd cast their vote for McCain...I'd have to think there are third party candidates out there who are more in line with their preferred candidate's policies before casting a vote for McCain.
Dimple and a Smirk.com
3rd party? not necessarily
I am a very conservative democrat, even if I am a pro choice feminist lesbian.
So far, no third party candidates meet my criteria. But, I'm not ruling any out at this point.
~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager
Flamingo House Happenings
Wishful thinking
I used to be a Clinton supporter but am no longer because of her horrendous campaigning tactics. I suppose I was naively hoping she would rise above the "politics as usual" and run a clean, genuine race. So personally, I'd like her to remove herself, but as someone who believes wholeheartedly in the democratic process, I am not sure I - or anyone - has the right to ask her to concede.
I support Obama for many reasons, but mainly because he is willing to put the "realness" of issues like race and foreign policy on the table. And he talks to us like we are intelligent voters. As a St. Louis Post Dispatch columnist wrote, he quotes Faulkner and doesn't feel the need to explain who he is because he trusts we'll "get it". I haven't witnessed this in Hillary's dialogue with the voters, and as much as I would love to have a woman running this country, I think voting for her simply because she is a woman is as sexist as not voting for her because she is a woman.
So, in conclusion, I think asking Clinton to concede is just wishful thinking for now...
Great post, though!
http://notionsofidentity.blogspot.com