Should we abolish adolescence?
by Leslie Madsen Brooks

Should we skip right over those pesky adolescent years? Apparently Newt Gingrich has been advocating this move for years, and the former U.S. House representative reiterated it last week. Says Gingrich in Business Week,

It's time to declare the end of adolescence. As a social institution, it's been a failure. The proof is all around us: 19% of eighth graders, 36% of tenth graders, and 47% of twelfth graders say they have used illegal drugs, according to a study by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the University of Michigan. One of every four girls has a sexually transmitted disease, suggests a recent study for the Centers for Disease Control. A methamphetamine epidemic among the young is destroying lives, families, and communities. And American students are learning at a frighteningly slower rate than Chinese and Indian students.

The solution is dramatic and unavoidable: We have to end adolescence as a social experiment. We tried it. It failed. It's time to move on. Returning to an earlier, more successful model of children rapidly assuming the roles and responsibilities of adults would yield enormous benefit to society.

Prior to the 19th century, it's fair to say that adolescence did not exist. Instead, there was virtually universal acceptance that puberty marked the transition from childhood to young adulthood. Whether with the Bar Mitzvah and Bat Mitzvah ceremony of the Jewish faith or confirmation in the Catholic Church or any hundreds of rites of passage in societies around the planet, it was understood you were either a child or a young adult.

Boys to men

Many, many male bloggers seemed to appreciate Gingrich's suggestion to abolish adolescence. And I can understand why: Gingrich talks largely of the success of men many in the U.S. consider to be heroes.

As proof of the benefits of a system when "early adulthood, early responsibility, and early achievement were the norm before the institution of adolescence emerged as a system for delaying adulthood and trapping young people into wasting years of their lives," Gingrich reaches back to the late 18th and early 19th centuries, citing Ben Franklin's apprenticeship in a print shop at age 13 (note: Franklin ran away from his apprentice responsibilities, becoming a fugitive at age 17, and he was apprenticed to his brother, not to his uncle, as Gingrich claims in a video), Daniel Boone's yearlong trek in the wilderness at age 15, and John Quincy Adams's employment at age 14 as interpreter to the American ambassador to Russia.

I'm skeptical. After all, here we have someone championing the conative domain by citing examples of young white men who succeeded in a country established by and for white men. And oh? All this happened more than 200 years ago.

Adolescence happens in bodies

Gingrich's arguments hinge largely on the intellectual development of adolescents. He proposes we provide financial incentives for students to study, as well as provide scholarships to students who finish high school a year or two early.

Gingrich ignores the fact that adolescence is very much an embodied experience. This willful ignorance of embodiment is exactly what Donna Haraway has called "the god trick" and "the view from nowhere." It is the privilege, accorded typically to educated white men, of being able to speak without people questioning one's motivation for speaking, as if one is speaking the universal truth instead of speaking from an embodied perspective.

Let's talk for a moment about embodiment. Remember puberty? Gingrich would probably consider my own adolescence a successful one: I enrolled in an "accelerated" curriculum for gifted students, developing my mind while pretty much ignoring the changes in my body because they made me deeply uncomfortable. Psychologically, I'm still paying for not taking the time to be an adolescent, to grapple head-on with my pubescence and new sexuality, instead of a junior intellectual.

Adolescence is tough on all genders, but from my observation and experience it's particularly tough on girls because their bodies are the ones that change most dramatically. They not only need to get used to their own new bodies, but also must put up with the frequently unwanted attention that comes their way as a result of their developing curves.

If anything, I needed more, not less, time as an adolescent. It's an important period of physical and psychological transition, and it shouldn't be rushed. Does that mean we have the adolescent years figured out and our current educational system meets all adolescents' needs? Far from it. But it is ridiculous to suggest that American students in general should rush through school and seek early employment in order to get them to, in Gingrich's terms, engage with "real life" and "earn real money." Note to Gingrich: Puberty and school are "real life"--young people are experiencing real changes and they are surrounded by real teachers and staff holding down real (and really tough) jobs.

What do women think of Gingrich's idea?

I don't know. I'd love to find out.

With the exception of Nancy LeTourneau, who briefly comments on abolishing adolescence and possibly a blogger of whose gender I am not sure, I have yet to find a female blogger who has commented on Gingrich's idea. (If I missed your post, my apologies; please leave your link in the comments if you have written about the issue.)

So. . .what are your thoughts? I know there are plenty of bloggers out there--including Jenn of Mommy Needs Coffee, Kelly from Mocha Momma, jo(e) of writing as jo(e), and Grace of State of Grace--who have parented adolescents, and chances are good you've been an adolescent yourself.

What say you, bloghers?

Leslie Madsen-Brooks develops learning experiences for K-12, university, and museum clients. She blogs at The Clutter Museum, Museum Blogging, and The Multicultural Toybox.

Comments

 

first adolescence in your 30's

my 'teen' adolescence was never properly completed, or 'worked through', in terms of psychosocial stages of development. several friends have agreed we all just finished working through some of those key milestones in our 30's. i think for the more introverted and delayed collection of us, who were not smoking in the bathrooms and engaging in other recreational activities our parents would have frowned upon, had to play catch up. so abolishing the teenage one, is really putting off the inevitable. Disa Fedorowicz

 

A Happy Medium

While I don't necessarily think that pushing a 13 year old into the work force is in any way a good idea, I do feel that as a nation we're allowing our children to spend years idle and not accountable. We're obviously doing something wrong - the problems that our children face are pandemic.

We've been having this sort of conversation in my house for a few months now.  I have a 13 year old son and a 10 year old daughter.  The son feels that he's entitled to be treated like an adult and the lesson that I'm trying to teach is that you don't just magically reach an age where your privileges are equal to an adult without proving that you're responsible enough to handle them.   We have given the children responsibilities that allow them to earn their privileges.  They have the right to healthy food, an education, a warm place to sleep and clothes on their back.  Everything else must be earned.  Harsh?  Maybe... but once they're on their own, those basic rights that they have with me are not guaranteed in a cold, harsh world.  No one knows what tomorrow brings and I know I want them to be able to survive in the event that something happens to their father and me. 

I feel that we're not doing anyone a service by allowing our children to barely scrape by in school, having little or no accountability in the home, eking by for 4 or 5 years and then throwing the doors open wide at 18 and expecting them to "get it". 

My adolescence was atrocious. I was forced to grow up way before I was ready with no guidance at all.  A mother who didn't want me and so just changed the locks at whim and a court system that kept putting me back in her house. There should have been another option. I couldn't wait to be "of age" so that I could make my own decisions and be responsible for myself.  Unfortunately when I did reach that age, I had no foundation to make those decisions and let's just say I'm lucky that I've turned out as well as I have.

It's an experiment in our house and I can only make decisions and
implement ideas based on my experience and the love I have for my children.  I hope that I'm doing it well,
but I guess we won't know until they actually do venture out into the
world.

Christine
It's My World.  Welcome To It.
Blog: http://www.colormepink.com
Homeschool Blog: http://web.mac.com/colormepink/
Jewelry Blog: http://www.starbrightjewels.com/blog

 

I agree with the commenter

I agree with the commenter above.

 

 

I have great respect for my peer group on many levels.

 I
will say I find this thinking people over 21 are still youth is
ridiculous.  I often wonder why people my age are still blogging and
talking about their "best hangover" long into their twenties as if 5
years after college they have nothing else to live for or feel no
responsibility toward anything.

 I'm not sure if it come from so
many parents of kids controlling them excessively during high school.
It seemed to me some parents I knew became almost excessively involved
with their child's life to the point it becomes their own and they
actualy foster that "your still young " attitude because they don't
want to lose that. 

 

I saw a lot of parents who
virtually lived for their kids soccer and lacrosse games. Other parents
I called  "the usual suspects" would constantly ask me if my parents
were coming to my soccer games and look at me with that "poor girl
look" when I'd say no not today . As if it was some unwritten law of
the parent gods that a parent must be at every function their child
takes part in until they are gradauted high school.

 
I
think the nature of kids not having to work, having so many luxuries,
time on  their hands, and parents willing to buy into wanting to make
it so much easier for their children than it was for them is part of
it.

My parents thought the way they were brought up was fine,
and did not damage so I was lucky in that they didn't bother following
the mantra of the day they followed the mantra they grew up under.

 Allow responsibbilty and independece and expect it earlier, fun is nice, but too much fun and idle time leads nowhere.

 

cooper

 

Adulthood is unpopular

I have a close friend who frequently complains that no one in our society grows up until their thirties, if ever. The more conservative side of me agrees with him.

People strive to stay as young as possible for as long as possible. We put off marriage, parenting, sometimes even college. We often dress like children, even at work. And of course, there's the profound sense of entitlement that comes from not having had to work hard from a younger age.

Any employer will tell you that the entry-level employee who has worked since high-school comes in far better prepared to contribute than the one who never had a job.

Adolescence is supposed to be a transition to adulthood, and although physically, it will always be with us; societally, we can make far better use of the time our young people have with adults as guides into the next stage.

-Lisse

@ Home in the World

 

Female says, "Here Ye!"

Female opinion? I completely agree with the principle... teenagers need to take on more responsibility, but I don't think you can necessarily expect them to forego the ups and downs of adolescence. It is very biological, and this is coming from someone who rode an emotional roller coaster for many years. Yet it didn't stop my parents from expecting me to keep up with life. It was not an excuse to bail out of school or a job. Life goes on. When life began to stabilize again, I started where I had left off with the emotional and physical scars to remind me why my journey was different.

Society has created a social standard for teens and surrounded them with the pressure to achieve and maintain it. Why do we not have a standard of responsibility? Why do our parents and grandparent hold their pride in their accomplishments while teenagers now are more proud of their new [free] car? 

We are lacking a sense of appreciation for the lifestyles we maintain and there is no one to blame but parents who support it. Parents are quick to bail their kids out because 'they can' but then will expect at some point for them to take on this chore themselves. Yet if these 'kids' never hit bottom on their own, how will they know how to pick up the pieces?

When did the concept of parenting trade in life lessons for new iPods and laptops?

 

 

Don't ban it, just save me from it!

Back when I was teaching middle school English this might have sounded like a good idea. Or even last Sunday, when I bought jeans for my 12 year old granddaughter and the size slims which had previously almost slid off her hips were now clinging tightly. She's getting hips! Save me.

Virginia DeBolt
BlogHer Technology Contributing Editor
Web Teacher
First 50 Words

 

It wasn't just young men...

Though I do not agree with Newt Gingrich's politics, he is a very respected and learned historian.  Most people do not realize that young women would be apprenticed to other households to learn the ins and outs of running a house in the same strata as their likely mates.  Remember, the major difference between then and now is that it was assumed a wife would be running the internals of a business just as much as her husband - thus, she would be apprenticed to the "management" side which included managing the male apprentices.

 I for one think it would be good to end the ridiculous and non-biological extension of adolescence.  Young men, especially, are making bad choices that are affecting not only their futures but the women in their lives futures as well.

MLO / Melissa