Bio
Erin Kotecki Vest is BlogHer, Inc.’s Social Media Strategist helping BlogHer make the most impact in the quickly-evolving new media landscape. Erin al...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

So Rielle Hunter, Dora, and Barney Walk Into a Photo Shoot

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Recently, I was asked on CNN what lessons politicians like John Edwards could learn from sex scandals. My answer was simple: "Keep your pants on."

Apparently, Rielle Hunter should have been given the same advice during a recent photo shoot with Mark Seliger for GQ. Call me crazy, but if you become famous due to a sex scandal with a presidential candidate ... you might not want to take pantless photos for a bombshell interview, posed with your love-child's toys. Even we mommybloggers know enough about brands to call that a boneheaded move.

Image: Mark Seligman, GQ

As if sexy photos from someone seen as a homewrecker weren't enough, the Dora and Barney stuffed toys leaning against her threw in that extra edge of creepy.

Hunter, the mother of Edward's child, has reportedly told Barbara Walters she now regrets the photos,

"She was in tears when she called," said Walters, "and said that when she saw the pictures in GQ she screamed for two hours. She said she found the photographs repulsive."

So Walters says she asked if that was the case why did she pose for them?" She said she trusted Mark Seliger, whom she said is a brilliant photographer and quote, 'I went with the flow,'" recounted Walters.

If you haven't seen the GQ photo spread and interview of John Edward's baby mama, go take a peek.

I'm not buying that Hunter really regrets these photos. At some point she had to take her pants off, and at some point she had to let Barney fall on her leg a bit and act sexy. Sex and the 405 isn't buying it either,

Oh, my. We're all about the MILF here at Sex and the 405 but posing half-dressed among your kid's toys is just a little too ... ew. That's Barney half on your lap, you know? To make matters worse, according to Barbara Walters, Hunter called her hysterically to let her know how disgusted she was about the GQ photos Mark Seliger took of her for the men's magazine -- like she was somehow not a part of the shoot or had any say in the matter. We'll say to her now what we said to "Johnny" then: you did it, now own it!

Shannon of RightPundits is also skeptical.

Rielle Hunter allowed herself to be interviewed and photographed by GQ magazine; just exactly what John Edwards, the man she supposedly loves, didn't need. Never mind that in the photos which you can see here, she pimped out their two year old child and allowed semi-racy pictures of herself to be taken. And surprise, surprise; she's shocked that GQ would have the audacity to run photos of her wearing nothing but a white button up shirt. Are we really to believe that this woman is that naïve?

Bipartisanship at its finest -- the Right and I agree that the Hunter photos are in poor taste and ill advised! Next time, just follow my advice: Keep your pants on ... and maybe stay away from the children's toys.

Contributing Editor Erin Kotecki Vest also blogs at Queen of Spain blog

Politics & News Contributing Editor Erin Kotecki Vest

  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
TreniaP 5 pts

I think what Rielle is doing is horrifying, that's a given but what I find to be interesting is while society and media is busy making angels and demons out of Elizabeth Edwards and Rielle, John Edwards is nowhere to be found. He's sort of like this abstract object that people are talking about but he's nowhere in sight. What really pisses me off is Elzabeth is dying and she's forced to deal with all of this foolishness and that lying, cheating John Edwards is probably just going to move on with his life and a new family. Pathetic.

www.fatgirlweightlossmap.com ( http://www.fatgirlweightlossmap.com )

www.fatgirlweightloss.com ( http://www.fatgirlweightloss.com )

Bridging the gap between weight loss & body acceptance

Erin Kotecki Vest 5 pts

she's the only one who hasn't cashed in on this whole thing...

Politics & News Contributing Editor Erin Kotecki Vest ( http://queenofspainblog.com/ )

Houseonahill 5 pts

I am ALWAYS the last person to  judge or make any hasty comments, but  I heard about these on a radio program and immediately became ill.

Now having seen just the one photo you posted I could really throw up.

Honestly, she may be in need of a dime or two, but that is sick and I am completely offended - and think her behavior is really vulgar and despicable.

I'm Houseonahillorg ~
Healthier Happier You! ( http://www.Houseonahillorg.blogspot.com )
Welcome To Wellness ( http://www.HealthierHappierHouseonahill.org )
( http://www.HealthierHappierYouReviews.blogspot.co&... )

Erin Kotecki Vest 5 pts

Politics & News Contributing Editor Erin Kotecki Vest ( http://queenofspainblog.com/ )

Megan Smith 5 pts

Jim Henson must be rolling over in his grave to have his loveable and faithful Kermit the frog in the same photo with this shameless hussy.  For her to somehow imply by this risque photo that Kermit would ever cheat on Miss Piggy with her is the height of hypocrisy. 

Barney, I don't know about.  I've never heard his name linked with anyone other than the odd passing single, stuffed starlet.  But Kermit is in a committed relationship and for this woman to take advantage of his good nature is horrifying.

Shame on you Ms. Hunter!

Megan

TV/Online Video Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/megan-smith )

Megan's Minute ( http://www.megansminute.com/ )

Meg's Rad Reviews ( http://www.megsradreviews.com )

camisa 5 pts

...and not in a good way.

Your post here says it all regarding the pictures (IMO).

Up until this GQ debacle, I thought that Ms. Hunter decided to take the "high road."  She didn't speak to the media one way or another - she seemed to be weathering the storm for the sake of her child and I applauded her for it.  I thought she was the only person involved in the fallout from this relationship who acted well.  AND THEN THIS.  Unbelievable.

suebob 7 pts

I'm always amazed and put off by people - especially women - who claim to be victimized by photography. That anti-gay Miss USA woman who didn't know she was being photographed topless and now Rielle Hunter. Why do they think they can claim that they have no idea how photography works? My nephew was taking great photos at age 4, and yet somehow these women have never gotten a clue that when someone points a camera at you and you sit there without your pants or shirt on, a photo may result?? Amazing. No sympathy.