Bio
Laina Dawes is a contributing editor for Blogher and is also a music journalist whose writings can be found at Exclaim! Canada and...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Southern Publisher To Remove N-Word from Huckleberry Finn: Who Benefits?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Earlier this month, Publishers Weekly announced that the next print edition of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn will be without the words "nigger" and "Injun" (“slave” will replace the "N-word"). From the PW website:

Unsurprisingly, there are already those who are yelling “Censorship!” as well as others with thesauruses yelling “Bowdlerization!” and “Comstockery!” Their position is understandable: Twain’s book has been one of the most often misunderstood novels of all time, continuously being accused of perpetuating the prejudiced attitudes it is criticizing, and it’s a little disheartening to see a cave-in to those who would ban a book simply because it requires context. (Emphasis mine).

Huck Finn book

So, is this good news or bad news? Emotionally -- for me, anyway -- this is good news. But it's also very bad news, in the sense that a great opportunity to make a dent in eradicating racism has been lost.

The blogosphere has been atwitter over this news, and, surprisingly, a number of Black bloggers have also said that while on paper the nasty word will be erased, its meaning and its legacy will never be erased from our minds.

I was in fourth or fifth grade when we read Huckleberry Finn in class. As I was the only Black person in the class (and there were only three Black kids in the entire school), that experience was already bad enough -- without having to hear the word "nigger" repeatedly said by my teacher, who read the book aloud.

I was confused: Wasn’t that a bad word, a word that was repeatedly said to me by schoolyard bullies and the occasional person who yelled it at me and my older sister from the confines of a passing car? I do not remember the beauty of the story, the lessons that we could learn from the book. I only remember my hurt when the teacher said that word, looking at me as she said it. I can only remember my fellow classmates snickering as she did.

The adult me never wants another Black child to ever feel the pain I felt when reading that book.

In preparation for this post, I read the introduction to the 1996 Oxford edition of Huckleberry Finn by Toni Morrison, and she was able to articulate the powerful nuances in the book -- nuances that as a kid, I certainty didn’t pick up on:

In the early Eighties I read Huckleberry Finn again, provoked, I believe, by demands to remove the novel from the libraries and required reading lists of public schools. …..Embarrassing as it had been to hear the dread word spoken, and therefore sanctioned, in class, my experience of Jim’s epithet had little to do with my initial nervousness the book had caused. Reading "nigger" hundreds of times embarrassed, bored, annoyed -- but did not faze me. ….Although its language -- sardonic, photographic, persuasively aural -- and the structural use of the river as control and chaos seem to me quite the major feats of Huckleberry Finn, much of the novel’s genius lies in its quiescence, the silences that pervade it and give it a porous quality that is by turns brooding and soothing.

Reading Morrison’s introduction made me want to pick up the book again after about 30 years. It stresses Huckleberry Finn's importance, not only in the world of great literature, but perhaps in how we can look to the past in order to understand our present. As with Morrison, after repeated use, the word "nigger" has lost its power over me; I no longer feel small and unequal when someone directs it toward me. It is the accompanying actions, designed to make me feel small and unequal, that are more problematic.

Many rational people -- including those who wanted the book pulled from schools' shelves -- know that in the good old days, things were much different. In the time when the book took place, African American slaves were not seen as having the same human qualities as whites. “Nigger” was, in some strange way, not even seen as a derogatory word -- it rolled just as easily off the tongue of Jim as it did of Huck. Unfortunately, it was a way of life -- besides, Black slaves had more pressing concerns than being called the “N-word," like slavery, rape, beatings, lynchings and other disturbing ways of being murdered. Not to mention not having any dignity nor humanity. By removing "nigger," we're removing one way Twain denotes

  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
klucas8048 5 pts

This is such a hot topic for debate. I am not convinced this particular word should be censored from an existing piece of literature. I think the word in this case, is used for a reason: to invoke feelings within the reader.

A lot of the music my daughter listens to is littered with the "n" word and I'm sorry but it does offend me! We just had a conversation about this topic the other day. Her response was that she does not say it or sing along with it... but why is it ok for "black people to say the word and not for white people?" That is a question that I do not know how to answer other than to say "it is not ok for ANYone to use it, it is degrading to our fellow man."

Does anyone have any advice on how to answer such a quesion when your 14 year old daugther is asking? Please let me know if you do because honestly, it remains a mystery to me why so many people will not let the word go un-used.

ModaMama 5 pts

For some reason, I read Huck Finn as part of advanced Freshman English. My instructor was a former professor of literature from a notable university and had a doctorate in psych. Nobody could have been a better guide through this difficult work.

Looking back at my copy of Twain now, much of the language is obscure to the point that it has become like reading Shakespeare or Beowulf. It's beyond framing with context but actually dissecting speech. This would be true for children who aren't familiar with any sort of Southern language nuance in particular. Seriously, think of kids in Berkley or Bolder or Teaneck and imagine them trying to sound out every line to make sense of the words. Also, middle school tends to be a particularly mean age for many. I don't know that I'd rush this one.

But I absolutely agree with you, this isn't a general population elementary school read anymore.

www.SaraInAkko.blogspot.com ( http://www.SaraInAkko.blogspot.com )

Life in the Middle East, with craft and spice

Nordette Adams 6 pts

But I also think given what we're seeing as far as the nation's test scores go, the average elementary school student is neither mature enough nor do today's students read well enough to grasp the nuance of what Twain was doing with his language.

Elementary school teachers have enough on their plates.

I do, however, think that eight graders could take this book on with a good teacher guiding the discussion. The book should be integrated into a social studies unit that's tied to language studies through which students would learn history and a bit about literature as well.

Nordette Adams ( http://www.bookotopia.com ) is a BlogHer CE ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... ) & you can find her other stuff through Her 411 ( http://her411.com ).

suebob 7 pts

I hope that Huck Finn isn't taught in elementary school. Just because it is a book that features a child lead character doesn't mean it is a book for young children. It would better be taught in high school, where students have more perspective and life experience and analytic skills.

Jane Byers Goodwin 5 pts

Who benefits? The publisher. Everyone else loses.

"Don't be content with being average. Average is as close to the bottom as it is to the top."

Jane blogs as "Mamacita" at Scheiss Weekly, ( http://janegoodwin.net/ )hitting the fan like nobody can.

Quad_C 5 pts

Exactly. A major point is context. The time in which the term was used, the political, racial, stances etc on such terms at the time the piece was written ...

What a great post. I'm going to share it on Facebook so that more people can see it. And Twitter.

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

On one hand, it's one publisher, one edition with a fairly small first print run (only 7500 copies according to the PW story). It doesn't mean that all publishers are going to due it as well or that all schools will buy this particular edition. In the big scheme of things that's not all that many copies and I don't think it's going to take over. If it was a larger publisher, such as Penguin, I might feel more strongly.

On the other hand, I hate the idea that it's rewriting history. It feels to me that it's just sweeping the actual history under the rug and saying, "Nothing to see here." Pretending it didn't happen doesn't make it go away and I feel like we lose a chance to have a discussion.

But then the problem is the classrooms where that discussion doesn't happen and then you get situations like Laina experience with the snickering in the classroom by the other students and that's wrong too.

I feel like we need to strive for better conversations, not rewritten novels.

Contributing Editor Karen Ballum also blogs at Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca ).

msladydeborah 5 pts

Ms Lady Deborah

I am not supportive of the revised version of Twain's work. It is reflective of the time and it is a story that does have a point.

Altering the work doesn't change the reality of the nation's attitudes towards Black or Native People.

I don't like the idea at all. There are lessons to be learned from reading a work in its original format. We should not be afraid to look at how this nation really was during Twain's time.

I find it interesting that in a socity where justification for using the word nigger, nigga and niggaz has been established, that this particular work would be deemed offensive. The word is either offensive period or it's not. It would seem that we are a nation divided on this issue.

This is another attempt to wash over the reality of America's story. If I was a teaching this particular course, this book would either be read in its original form or not at all.

ModaMama 5 pts

Perhaps my not being black makes my criticism of this move towards censorship less vital than your post and Nordette's but I feel just as passionately that both assessments are correct.

Whitewashing history doesn't take away the hurt and doesn't maintain the triumph of a people.

Although Twain had originally intended these stories of Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn to be for children (he himself states this in the preface of his manuscripts), I think the appropriate place for reading and discussion of his works might be jr high or high school where greater context can be given. If anything Twain was a master-linguist, he wasn't careless in his prose and meant emphasize this terrible fact that "these people" weren't seen by others as people. But, Twain's nomenclature and milieu is (hopefully) outside the experience of any 4th grader today.

I can't imagine the hurt and embarrassment caused to you as a young child hearing this and can only think of my own anger and resentment when Eli Wiesel's "Night" was read to my Jr. High class. The unwanted attention made me different and subhuman and couldn't be a triumph of human survival but a terrible episode in my school memories because it singled me out as a Jew.

I want to modify the first part of my comment so as not to be misunderstood; this is not simply a black or white issue and all thinking peoples should be concerned that the culture of being PC robs us and our children of the ability to grow from our past.

Thank you for giving light to this topic.

www.SaraInAkko.blogspot.com ( http://www.SaraInAkko.blogspot.com )

Life in the Middle East, with craft and spice

mashadutoit 5 pts

"In my opinion, the significance of this decision means that people will never really have to discuss the real disparities that exist between names and actions. Teachers are off the hook -- especially those who, when reading the book to their students, could dismiss "nigger" as a "bad word" without contextualizing the belief system behind it. "

Exactly.

Leading a classroom discussion on such a touchy subject is tough. It requires a great deal of skill, honesty, and empathy, and is a big challenge for any teacher. But how valuable such a discussion can be, and what a lost opportunity if it cannot happen.

Nordette Adams 6 pts

I hope people are paying attention and will think about these topics and put this issue into a greater context.

This notion of removing words that people don't like from literature or possibly even minimizing history information that makes people feel guilty, ashamed, or uncomfortable (there's evidence some schools systems want to do this) is very disturbing to me. Years ago I wrote a poem called "Time Travel at Newark International Airport ( http://bigsole.blogspot.com/2010/03/time-travel-at... )" that addressed the pain of discovering that my ancestors were slaves and then a kind of healing. Will we remove slavery from the textbooks because some people don't want to face that horrible part of American history?

One conversation that I enjoyed on this subject was Michaela Angela Davis with linguist John McWhorter on CNN's Parker/Spitzer. McWhorter called changing the book an insult to black people ( http://bigsole.blogspot.com/2011/01/john-mcwhorter... ), and Davis made a great point that sanitizing our history removes the struggle and therefore removes the triumph.

Nordette Adams ( http://www.bookotopia.com ) is a BlogHer CE ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... ) & you can find her other stuff through Her 411 ( http://her411.com ).