Several reviewers have expressed uncertainty about the ending of The Kid. I’m really interested in how others understood the ending. Here's my take:
Abdul has a break down at the end. He finally figures out the truth about his father and it drives him over the edge. His reaction is to turn to the kind of behavior he has in the past to cope with stress. He abuses a young child—the nephew (?) of one of the women in the dance troupe that has become his support network. (I may have some of the details wrong. I can’t bear to reread the book to check the accuracy of my recollections.) Overcome by despair, Abdul slashes his wrists and winds up in a psychiatric institution.A few reviewers have noted the lack of positive characters in the book. There was one, I think—-Dr. See. He recognizes Abdul’s intelligence and potential and realizes he is in danger of being locked up in the mental hospital indefinitely. Dr. See’s report will determine Abdul’s future. He is about to leave the institution for a new job and decides he doesn’t want to leave the decision re Abdul to his replacement. He decides to take a chance and release Abdul immediately. The novel ends abruptly. We have no idea what will happen to Abdul upon his release.
Karen Bojar blogs about retirement life, feminist activism, grassroots politics and gardening at http://www.the-next-stage.com/



Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Google
Yahoo


I don't think it's the acceptance of his parentage that did it. I think it's that he got caught acting out something he had been previously able to pretend he had not done. Does that make sense?
When faced with the truth about himself - not specifically where he came from, but his own actions, he could not handle it.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like