What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Does Breastfeeding Cause Divorce?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 111
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Mother breast feeding son

Admittedly, most talk of the health care bill and the state of medical care in our country causes my eyes to glaze over. (Apologies to my many friends who are talented, valuable doctors.) But this spring, new research was released with quite a splash, catching my attention.

The recent study said that the lives of 900 babies could be saved, along with billions of dollars in lost employee wages, if 90% of American women breastfed their babies exclusively for the first six months. I am not sure which part of that goal stuns me more – the 90%, the six months or the “exclusively.”

When you really think through those demands, it is no wonder that only 12% of American mothers currently comply with that goal. And they’re hoping for a 600% improvement – even for the government, those are some pretty high expectations.

Sure, I’m all for solving the deficit and saving lives, but aren't there far more insidious foes out there than suboptimal breastfeeding rates? For example, smoking during pregnancy is said to cause more than 1,000 deaths annually. And yet, more than 12% of women report smoking during the last three months of pregnancy. I’ll go out on a limb of deductive reasoning here and say that 12% is not the same 12% that breastfeed exclusively.

I lend full support to the efforts of the study, The Burden of Suboptimal Breastfeeding in the United States: breastfeeding-friendly legislation, more support for nursing mothers in the workplace, and more breastfeeding help for new mothers in our hospitals.

However, a goal of 90% of American mothers to breastfeed exclusively for six months is an effort I cannot rally behind, and nor frankly, as a woman and citizen, do I think it is a very healthy goal. Sure, doctors and researchers have been able to put numbers and dollars on losses due to the nation’s breastfeeding rates. But what they haven’t looked at is what these “suboptimal” rates have prevented or gained for American women, children and families. Where are the statistics on how many marriages have been saved by limiting breastfeeding? Or simply what postpartum independence has meant for women’s mental health, and their confidence and trust in their relevance outside the domestic sphere?

When baby comes home from the hospital, there are those few first magical days of shared responsibility with your lab partner. And then, inevitably, someone’s got to take charge. With breastfeeding, there is no question who is in charge: the authority, the source, the expert, the ultimate backstop. And for many, so begins the road of resentment. A road on which it is very difficult to make a U-turn.

For many women and couples, having a baby is an epochal event, after which a tenuous level of shared responsibility and psychological equality can be recovered. Half a year of exclusive breastfeeding would make such reparations nearly impossible.

I suffer this bizarrely narcissistic relationship to many of the challenges of parenting and find myself frequently thinking, "If it’s this hard for me, imagine what it’s like for..." Breastfeeding was no exception.

For me, nursing was fine. Which is a far cry from saying it was easy. I can still recall the nights with my firstborn when we’d play our own little game of "who can cry longer, baby or mother?" And of course, it’s strategic cousin, "who can cry louder?" (That one was more fun during daylight hours while Slim was away.)

I nursed each of my children for respectable terms – 3 months, 5 months and an almost embarrassing 10 months. I stayed at home. I worked. I used a pump (and there is nothing stylish about the Pump-In-Style). I nursed in the Nordstrom’s "Mother’s Lounge" and pumped in the dressing room at The Gap. I breastfed in the front seat of the car on I-95, though never while driving. I even breastfed on a bathroom floor in Dallas while wearing a bridesmaid’s dress. It was novel, it was never elegant, and it always struck me as more science fiction than biblical.

I do not resent breastfeeding, my children, or my nearly perfect husband. I do resent the expectation that after carrying a baby for nine months, American women should surrender control for six more months.

Because it’s not just the physical and time commitments that breastfeeding requires (which at 6 to 18 hours a day is, no doubt, significant). Being a nursing mother overrides

  • 111
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
waschell 5 pts

an embarrassing 10 months you breastfed? You should be PROUD to have done it for only that long. I was a LaLeche and attachment parenting mom. I worked full time and pumped and/or breastfed for 2 years. I think part of my amazing relationship with my child is that I let things happen naturally and didn't force weaning, potting training, etc. I took cues from him and encouraged letting go when he was ready and the adjustment went smoothly without any trauma on anyone's part. I continue to respect his needs in development, in addition to my own needs, not just mine exclusively.

dontmesswithmama 7 pts

I do see a point in the unbalance between a mom and a dad, especially with the first child. But I feel like that's part of taking on the role of a mother. I accept to carry the baby in utero for 9 months, and I commit to breastfeeding for another 12 months. But I also made sure my husband was fully on board to help with as much as possible to minimize my work in caring for the baby. He fed in the middle of the night - heck in the beginning when I was trying to establish my milk he stayed up with me and fixed my breastfeeding pillow while I was figuring out how BFing worked.

Now that we have our 3rd baby, he's doing a lot more than I am with our 2 oldest kids. While I'm BFing on the couch and reading news on my iPhone, he's making dinner for the kids, doing homework, cleaning up, you name it.

I actually like the idea of women trying to commit to 6 months of BFing. I think if they make it as a goal then they're less likely to give up. Of course some women can't BF, but a lot of women just choose not to when they're able.

Just my two cents.

stilettosnmud 10 pts

I nursed all of my kids varying degrees of time. I found the most important aspect of being a healthy, happy, full time nursing mom was the amount of support I had as well as the amount activity I engaged in outside the home. Every mom, whether she breastfeeds or not can become depressed and over burdened if she does not have the proper love and support every mom needs and deserves. I didn't share the view I was giving so much up in order to feed my child. I loved that my body was providing the very best for my little one. I can tell you now that my oldest is 19 and in college...I don't regret one thing I let go of to nurse her or be her mom. It really wasn't a sacrifice.

I didn't feel I gave up anything psychologically while nursing five children. I engaged with my children, talking cooing, reading to them, and singing. Bonding hormones were released, I dropped pregnancy weight due to the nursing, I actually sat down for five minutes instead of rushing around. If this is an individual issue for a woman, then it is something she and her partner should discuss in making this decision.

Being a stay at home nursing mom equates to an unequal distribution of wellfare for the children. I stay at home and I work hard at. My husband works outside the home and would love nothing more than us switching roles. Sad fact is he can make a whole lot more than I can. HE would have supported me if I had chosen to work outside the home, but we are of the mindset it is best to have at least one parent home during the formative years, even if it means sacrificing having a little more $.

We are a blended family, both coming to this marriage with children. Then we had one together. When our daughter was born he took 2 weeks off to be here with us. I tease him to this day that the second she was born I hardly got to hold her except to nurse her.

My spouse did the majority of the diaper changing, rocking and holding the first couple of weeks, despite the fact I was nursing exclusively. If he is home, he is a hands on dad and when he isn't home and is out earning a living for our family...I view that as parenting too as he is making sure the children have what they need. I think the issue here is the assumption that men/partners are not stepping up to the plate and parenting as well as what the definition for parenting is. Nursing exclusively doesn't prevent this.

If a woman chooses to nurse exclusively because it is the healthiest thing for her child, she needs to make sure she has the proper support system in place including a partner who parents or friends and family who can come over to giver her a break. Those women who choose not to nurse exclusively because it not over healthiest or even feasible should not beat themselves up about it. No one else walks in any woman's shoes.

Not Like a Cat 6 pts

Wow. You really nail so much about motherhood. I'm not sure I agree that a lot of that stuff is due to breastfeeding--rather, I hate to blame breastfeeding. I breastfed my firstborn for 2 years and am still going strong with my younger child, now 16 months old. But I do agree that it makes the mother the default parent, the go-to person, the expert, the backstop. Because the baby needs us to feed it, the husband gets to step back and say, "Oh, he needs YOU," no matter WHAT the situation!

Let me be clear: my husband is a great guy, wonderful husband, and devoted father. But the breastfeeding thing put us on really unequal footing. It didn't help that I was laid off from my job when the first baby was 7 months old and I never did regain my professional/career/equal footing. I've become a reluctant housewife, causing our equality to slip even further.

My husband and I, though in our late 30s, were really unprepared for how demanding a newborn could be, and he (husband) was so lucky he could toss the baby to me as MY responsibility, since I have the breasts. Our second son, for medical reasons, was mostly bottle-fed after 3 months, which gave us MUCH more equality in terms of parenting.

But still. I'm now a stay-at-home mom, not entirely by choice, still breastfeeding. No one ever tells you how much motherhood--despite its great joys and beauty and all that and yes I love my children--takes from you, physically, mentally, emotionally, professionally, personally.

I still think babies should be exclusively breastfed, if possible, for the first year, but this country REALLY needs to change its policies about family leave and such!!

Life Flipping with Grace 9 pts

I found this post to be quite well written. But I disagree that breastfeeding, or spending the appropriate amount of time prioritizing one's infants needs, equates to unhappiness. I also disagree with the implication that domestic responsibilities are somehow degrading or unsophisticated or low-status in nature. You seem to have some negative associations with the concept of full-time motherhood.

- Sarah

abitbackward 10 pts

Hmm. I'm really not a fan of this post. Asserting that this public policy leads to unequal division of labor (doesn't having a baby necessarily require SOME changes to division of labor on ALL sides?) or that breastfeeding a baby exclusively (for the relatively short period of 6 months) could lead to divorce?! Maybe if you had major problems before the baby's arrival to begin with . . . I understand that there are more demands on a woman when she is the one exclusively providing the food, but personally I have to disagree you.

In my own experience, breastfeeding helps me feel calmer and more able to deal with the demands of life. It gives me a chance to relax and just be with my baby. It helps my marriage because it is a united endeavor for my husband and I! My husband is supportive, and picks up the slack when I'm busy with the baby, and often brings the baby to me at night so I can nurse him without really waking. It is also much cheaper so our financial burden is lessened. I actively eat healthier when I'm breastfeeding, so I feel better and have more energy. Nursing helped me lose my baby weight fast too. So, although my body is not the same I feel sexy - which helps in the intimate realm of my marriage.

Ultimately, I'd say just the opposite. Breastfeeding IS healthier and cheaper. If the data show that doing it longer would save babies' lives, I really don't see why we shouldn't all jump on the bandwagon to support such a proposal. . .

Here's one of my posts on why I love nursing: http://howdyhepworths.blogspot.com/2011/04/happy-c...

mira 5 pts

the writer's aspect is from a very selfish, self-centered perspective....one must be married to a not so normal person to come to think breastfeeding can cause a divorce...even regardless of that, it's very selfish not to give your baby what's best for them...especially in the US where insurance costs are sky-high, at least a reporter for The Wall Street Journal should know this, i suggest you go back to basics

MamaMount 5 pts

Very. Very. Well-said. Thank you.

MamaMount 5 pts

While I completely agree with you, even my loser deadbeat [ex]husband was not only supportive of my exclusive breastfeeding for more than 6 months, but encouraged it and picked up some of the slack to make up for my additional duties. The blog makes me wonder what about the baby? Even if we don't breastfeed, the blog seems to imply that once delivery is done, the kids should simply disappear. After all, no matter breast- or bottle-fed, a child still has to eat, doesn't it? At least that was my experience. People who don't believe children are worth some time (ironically, breastfeeding is usually less time-consuming than bottle-feeding) shouldn't have children as they obviously don't know what having children entails.

Anne Andretta 6 pts

You need professional help.

You say "If it’s this hard for me, imagine what it’s like for..." , what exactly makes you think that things should be any easier for you? You don't have any information that's worth reading and you apparently didn't have any support.

"I even breastfed on a bathroom floor in Dallas while wearing a bridesmaid’s dress." - congratulations for the huge sacrifices you have endured. Guess what- motherhood IS demanding, and for people who don't like it, there's a very simple solution - do yourself and others a favour and don't have kids. Concentrate on your career, if this is what you do best.

What kind of shallow relationship could be ruined by breastfeeding? I can't possibly imagine myself married to someone who would think that's an issue. If the problem is that husbands can't share the responsability of breastfeeding with their wives, I wonder how women can stand being pregnant for 9 months - and all the limitations they have to face? The morning sickness, the extra pounds, the stretch marks??? Isn't it unfair that their partners can't carry the unborn child every once in a while? That their bodies are not changing, that they can have drinks whenever they want to? And women keep doing it - well, you did it 3 times!!! Do you hate yourself? How come you're still married?

I'll go back now to my sad life of taking care of a breastfeeding baby and a toddler, which was breastfed for(not embarassing at all)two years. I would feed her anywhere, anytime, and that included filthy restrooms and yadda yadda yadda. Surprisingly, I don't feel sorry for myself, I'm just glad I could do this for her. It's just part of living. And being a mother.

CandaceApril 7 pts

First, I don't really see "claws" here. I think that is a bit of a misogynist way of looking at some very reasonable challenges to a post filled with false logic.

The "gasps" are not here--perhaps you got that reaction at that point in your life and for that I am truly sorry. Most of the breastfeeding activists I know are more interested in action to support breastfeeding mothers and/or encourage increased rates of breastfeeding in society in general...not to disparage any individual mother for her choices or needs.

Please stop using the term "breastfeeding Nazis"...it is offensive makes it very difficult to take any point you make seriously--especially a point about remaining reasonable in discussion.

mgould951 6 pts

The blogger obviously has her own issues with breast feeding that taints her opinion on this matter. Did she say she was embarrassed to be nursing at 10 mos? When the APA recommends doing so for the first year and WHO recommends two years? The goal is to get all mothers, who can, nursing.

Just the fact that she says she nursed on a bathroom floor makes me wonder as to her extreme need for privacy even at the sanitary risk of her infant...maybe the issues with nursing are hers...not the world's.

Nursing has been a successful, joyful part of my marriage and four children who nursed far beyond their first year. I have bipolar and nursing has never caused mental distress, rather it can be calming to nourish a child. I am so sad the blogger does not have that bond with her children.

julierachelliz 6 pts

Wow. I actually tried to read that, but can I just say WTF? Where are all these women coming from that write these articles and why are we putting this out there as some sort of "normal" thinking? I would also guess that this woman has never actually lost a child, or her tone about infant death would not be so cavalier. I can't imagine having a...(tharr be more) Peer into the depths spouse that was willing to get a divorce simply over the fact that I breastfed, nor can I imagine having someone that I resented so much for not taking their "share of feeding duties" that I wanted to divorce them. Breastfeeding has always been such a special time in my parenting. It was the time I could always wrest my baby back from family and friends and steal some quiet time with them. It is also one of the most rewarding experiences, even when I do sometimes find myself getting a little irritated when my daughter wants to nurse all day long. That being said, I have been either pregnant or nursing or both for 8 years now. The only break came after my son died, and I would have given anything to have been nursing him. I honestly find articles like this to be petulant and pathetic. This goes beyond expressing a dissatisfaction with your own experiences onto making bitter, sarcastic generalizations to affect an already affected group of mothers. There is so much marketing done to push formula, and then articles like this come along and make breastfeeding seem like some marriage-destroying, self-esteem-wrecking, breast-destroying abomination. GAH! Ok rant over, as I bang my head against the wall.

staphl 7 pts

First of all, "duh" is nothing I've ever heard one of my fellow Germans say. Isn't that an American expression Homer Simpson is using?

What I really wanted to say is this: Breastfeeding is the one thing that keeps me sane juggling my life as family breadwinner, doctor, mommy of a 2,5yr old little boy and wife of a man from a Southern European background who has never seen his father take part in the tiniest bit of housework and needs a lot of encouragement to learn new habits in this area ;-)

Breastfeeding saves me from temper tantrums, calms the pain of minor sores and puts my son to sleep effortlessly.
It gives me a break after work lying down with my son, reconnecting and maybe relaxing while reading a few pages in a novel before starting the second half of my day.
Breastfeeding adds a form of independence to my life as mother - wherever I go, I have some kind of nourishment with me and I never have to worry about delays in public transport or power cuts.
Breastfeeding gives my son the time his immune system needs to develop completely and it saves me from the sleepless nights and lost workdays that moms of infection-ridden formula-fed babies have to suffer.

In my opinion, any woman that could breastfeed and chooses not to is as crazy as a healthy person using a wheelchair instead of legs.

HipppieMama 5 pts

You said, "I do resent the expectation that after carrying a baby for nine months, American women should surrender control for six more months." Exactly! After we've nurtured them for nine whole months and then birthed them, we ought to be done with them. How absurd that anyone would expect us to do more.

IndependentPharmacist 5 pts

I'm not sure what the author's point is? Is she trying to say that breastfeeding makes women unhappy, therefore it will lead to divorce, because the husband will be more unhappy than the wife? I think that is what she is saying, but am not positive. Of course, that is ridiculous. One of the meany reasons I breastfed was because it is so much easier than formula feeding. Her experience was vastly different than mine. I didn't watch "everything I ate or drank"--I just ate and drank normally. Perhaps she is one of those people who is unaware that unlike with pregnancy, alcohol and shellfish are safe to consume while breastfeeding (at least in most cases.) As for treating depression, very, VERY few drugs are totally contraindicated while breastfeeding. With very few exceptions (cancer), any medical condition can safely be treated while breastfeeding. And what was her point about some crying game between the baby and mama? That sounds like something that would happen while a parent is trying to find a bottle of formula during the night. Of course, I co-slept, which may be something she never thought of. But my babies didn't cry at night, they would start to root, and I would groggily roll over so they could nurse, then go right back to sleep. I worked full-time too. Pumping at work wasn't fun, and I only got to pump once each 8 hour shift, but it worked out. It certainly beat having my sleep disrupted by having to get up and go to the fridge to find or make formula. If anything, her article points out how media and society are not being supportive of breastfeeding, by perptrating myths.

mama108 7 pts

Just wanted to let you know you are not the only one who doesn't get the lovey-dovey hormone rush. I don't either and felt very alone in that for a while. I have since realized there are many, many women who don't.

mama108 7 pts

FearlessFormulaFeeder, I wanted to acknowledge what you are saying about how pregnancy and breastfeeding were for you. It is absolutely important for these stories to be shared so individuals can be supported. With that said, I would like to gently suggest one more piece to what you are saying...if public policy (and often, therefore, opinion as well) were more favorable to breastfeeding you would have been given much more support as you went through your experiences. There are some amazing pioneers out there who are working hard to help women deal with things like eating disorders, past abuse, etc...helping them have emotionally healthy pregnancies and nursing relationships. But if you don't know to look for those people, you would never even know they are there. If breastfeeding were more normal, rather than novel, then health care providers would either become better educated or they wouldn't hesitate to send a mother on to a professional. As it stands right now, many (some would even say most) health care providers give very bad, damaging advice regarding breastfeeding and do not even think to admit that they do no continuing education in the field of lactation. (and to be clear, I'm not saying this is true of all health care providers) I do agree that it is important for women to share their stories, but at the same time, public policy does not mean it is the law and a woman is forced to do it. It would mean that for the women who do want to do it that support that wasn't there before would hopefully start to appear. I could go on and on about what it would mean...but I'd be going way off track. What I mostly wanted to say is that I am seeing more of these articles that basically say women are being tied down and the mood is always "this is the real reality" and there is even an undercurrent of "and if you don't admit it you are simply in denial". Sharing stories is wonderful and healing, passing a story off as reality for the masses (ad I feel this article did) is dangerous. Thank you to this commenter for sharing your story. I wish you could have been better supported.

mama108 7 pts

I can't possibly add anything more to Mir Kamin's comment but do want to state clearly that I agree with it. My experience is also nothing like the experience laid out in the article. And know many, many others who would also agree that is not their reality either. My strong, secure husband had no problems shifting to find the best way to support the family and we worked together to make necessary shifts.

CandaceApril 7 pts

This has NOTHING to do with anyone being forced to breastfeed. The only thing I could think of that would "force" a woman to breastfeed would be to make formula prescription only and I'm fairly certain that is not even on the table for debate by the US government.

Remember that formula has a giant marketing budget. I am sorry that the nurse at your hospital made it difficult for you to get a bottle of formula. However, statistically, that is not what is happening. Rather, formula is pushed on moms at every sign of trouble.

The government is simply acknowledging that as part of an initiative to save lives and lots of taxpayer money, it makes sense to encourage breastfeeding...which will mean the scales will be slightly less ridiculously tipped towards formula feeding in the US. Encouraging something is completely different from forcing something.

You made a choice not to breastfeed and you should not be criticized for that choice. This also has NOTHING to do with the individual mother and her decisions.

This has to do with a broad statistical look at society. It is a fact that more breastfeeding would save lives and money (I never trust these exact numbers...but it would undoubtedly save some). Therefore, it makes sense to try to balance out the skewed view the formula companies present and to support mothers who are trying to breastfeed.

This article was just silly. I won't comment on the post itself other than to say that others have already torn enough holes in it a mile wide.

dittdott 5 pts

Seriously? I hardly think that you can link breastfeeding to divorce. I think that a divorce basted on that would have happened anyway. I breastfed exclusively for 7 months before introducing homemade babyfood, and then I continued breastfeeding along with the homemade babyfood until 14 months... with TWINS. I never used formula. I loved breastfeeding. In the beginning it was hard and I cried a lot, but by the end I was crying because I had to wean my girls. My husband never resented me for breastfeeding his girls. Doing what I could to make sure they were healthy and happy.

Amanda Dittlinger
Mom to Isabelle and Madeline 12/20/07
blog: txtwins.blogspot.com
food blog: theFrickinChicken.blogspot.com

dittdott 5 pts

Seriously? I hardly think that you can link breastfeeding to divorce. I think that a divorce basted on that would have happened anyway. I breastfed exclusively for 7 months before introducing homemade babyfood, and then I continued breastfeeding along with the homemade babyfood until 14 months... with TWINS. I never used formula. I loved breastfeeding. In the beginning it was hard and I cried a lot, but by the end I was crying because I had to wean my girls. My husband never resented me for breastfeeding his girls. Doing what I could to make sure they were healthy and happy.

Amanda Dittlinger
Mom to Isabelle and Madeline 12/20/07
blog: txtwins.blogspot.com
food blog: theFrickinChicken.blogspot.com

my_two_cents 5 pts

Maybe this comment is more of the spirit the author meant. Feeding children is about priorities starting with breastfeeding.

If parents are armed with knowledge about breastfeeding, know how to get help with any problems, and understand exactly what formula can or cannot do for their baby (e.g. it does keeps babies alive and growing, but lacks hundreds of nutrients and other compounds that foster a child's health and brain development), then choosing formula is a perfectly viable option.

It's the standard of formula feeding (and it is standard after a couple months after birth) that is disheartening and keeps all of the "breastfeeding nazis" trying to change a culture so that breastfeeding is the norm and formula feeding is the exception.

sasha2010 5 pts

Mir, I entirely agree with everything you stated, and love the way you worded this response.

twportugal 5 pts

I breatfed my son for a year and I have to admit that I was not one of those people who thought it was great and lovely. I hated it in the beginning (so painful) and was in a complete other universe from exhaustion for about 2 months. I resented my friends who never breastfed and said their babies slept through the night from 5 weeks on (don't we all resent those friends!) I went back to work full time, pumped, and never really loved doing it. But, I never felt like it was my duty or that I should be expected to give up myself because I had a child. I, too, think it is ridiculous to think it's a woman's job or duty. However, I still did it. I felt the benefits outweighed the bad parts. I liked the fact that I was losing weight rapidly, my breast cancer risk went down (see, I did a lot of it for myself!) and it was, of course, good for my son. After the first couple of months it became pretty easy but I still wanted my sleep. After I weaned him at a year (I was pregnant again so I REALLY wanted to wean him) I felt really good about the path I had taken. It was tough, but I felt it was worth it. However, I think it is fine to choose not to, especially if it is putting a woman in a really bad state emotionally and mentally (and especially if they need to take medication for PPD).
Anyway, I think in your responses you're ignoring one of the main things you talk about... linking breastfeeding to divorce. That's just absurd. I didn't love breastfeeding and I cried a lot and hated it on many days, but it never led me to want to divorce my husband. What's he got to do with it? In my first couple of weeks, I resented every person on earth who wasn't breastfeeding, but why would I want to divorce my husband? He did everything else! If you were trying to prove that women should have a choice and not put their emotional health at risk, etc. then you should've left the divorce thing out and been a little clearer that you just have women's mental/emotional state in mind. I totally agree that breastfeeding is rough and can be really be difficult, but divorce? That's taking it a little to far. Thanks for listening!

getagrip 5 pts

Does anyone else notice the omission of any discussion about the rights of the child to it's mother's milk? We all demand "our rights"---no smoking please while I breathe fresh air; I'll say what I want, thank you very much--the Constitution guarantees that freedom, etc.

The infant has no voice. So let's get on with our "right" to a full night's sleep, a fulfilling career, whatever else you think of to throw into the mix while you feed the baby formula prepared by a company who has the baby's best interests at heart. Yeah, right.

mollybaker 5 pts

Molly Baker writes at http://www.playgroupwithsylviaplath.com and is a freelance reporter for The Wall Street Journal and The Philadelphia Inquirer

Again, pleased that so many women and men feel so passionate about the subject, but I'm still just as confident on my side of the issue.

For all of those leaving comments who think that I live in a parallel universe where my husband would be resentful of my breastfeeding, um no. It was me who resented that a man's life can, for the most part, return to its previously scheduled flexibility after the arrival of a baby, while a woman's cannot, particularly if she breastfeeds. And even after being happily married for 17 years, I can still recall those early blue days of babies and parenthood.

A thanks to the many who pointed out that I should have expected my life to change after a baby -- that's a big help. But as for the notion that I should accept my life is over, it's not about me anymore, and my favorite, if you don't want to breastfeed don't have children, I find those to be ridiculous sentiments that ask women to sell themselves short. Parenting is about making choices that are in the best interest of the entire family -- and these priorities and choices shift as need be. It should never be static, and it should never be "over" for anyone in the relationship.

My breastfeeding days are long passed (and lest you think that I callously believe this is because my children are 24 months, no, they are 13, 11 and 9 years old -- and the healthiest one was breastfed for the shortest time). And, like many readers pointed out -- there are no medals or trophies, or hardly even any acknowledgment for the commitment of breastfeeding. In fact, once the early years have passed, it hardly seems to be an issue anymore. But what remains an issue is how a woman defines herself and what she has to give as a parent and individual. For me, I know that I am a happier and better parent and individual when I can share myself with my children emotionally and intellectually rather than physically.

And lo, my kids actually think I'm doing a decent job of it. Go figure.

kathydettwyler 5 pts

Please. If you don't want to devote a significant portion of your time, energy, money, and attention to your child for the next 18 years, then DON'T HAVE A BABY. No one says, anymore, that a woman has to have a baby to be a success or to be a real woman. But if you are going to have a baby, we (society) expect you to take care of it, including the whole "using a car seat every time you travel by auto, not leaving the baby in a hot car with the windows rolled up, hold their hands while crossing the street, don't drink while you're pregnant, and all that other tiresome nonsense" that comes along with being a responsible parent. And just to set the record straight, the World Health Organization recommends six months of exclusive breastfeeding, followed by continued breastfeeding along with solid foods for a MINIMUM of TWO YEARS. Did you read that closely -- a MINIMUM of TWO YEARS. It is indeed embarassing that you only nursed your daughter for 10 months, but not for the reason you think. Real men support breastfeeding. So do real women, whether they have kids or not.

SAHMama 5 pts

Maybe if you aren't ready for the constant 24-hour responsibility of having a child you shouldn't be having one. Breastfeeding doesn't create that - parenthood does. Is it stressful sometimes knowing that you're the sole source of nourishment for your child? Of course. But it's also empowering. Not to mention, it's how children were meant to be fed. Before formula was around it was the only way children were fed, yet somehow women survived & marriages survived.
I sincerely believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion & lifestyle, but this type of article is just dangerous. It's difficult enough for new breastfeeding mothers to find support & when you print irresponsible, outlandish claims like this it could potentially scare off mothers who are considering breastfeeding.
I breastfeed my children until they choose to wean & I will always be proud of that because I know I gave them the very best start in life. I will not nurse in bathrooms or closets & nurse in public proudly. I hope that my openness about breastfeeding will give confidence to other mothers.

dkent83 5 pts

i agree with mir- this article's claims are outlandish and vaguely supported. it assumes all women hate breastfeeding and have loser deadbeat husbands.

MotherUnexpected 5 pts

I breastfeed a nine month old.
I work outside of the home as a network technician... FULL TIME.
I still pump at work.
I have an associates degree.
I don't feel "tied-down".
I'm still married to my high school sweetheart (whom I've been with for 9 years).
Having a daughter changed my whole life, and I let it change.... willingly.

The thing is, I'm not special. A lot of women are a lot like me and don't think twice about it. You think breastfeeding goals make women feel bad or guilty about their decisions, lets face the cold hard facts ladies. Human milk for human babies is PROVEN to reduce health risks! And this article just sounds condescending to those of us that choose to breastfeed, if you don't want to, then so be it more power to ya, but it can be done if a woman wants to try. And they should have the information to make those decisions including the hard info (like breastfeeding can reduce health risks to mother and babies while formula can't) that may seem biased (but fact is not biased --- only in its presentation can it be biased)

mendicant 5 pts

Between all the whine whine whining and the 'I need to be free' all I can get from this is that in the last 150 years, apparently the American mother (and family) have become less mentally and physically able to raise a child.

Is it such a bad thing to give up 6 months worth of luxury in order to give your child a better chance at the next 60?

Not that I'm against a mother's right to choose, but to hear the argument that basically boils down to "I carried it for 9 months and that's all the work I'll do" is just selfish. I guess now that I think about it, isn't taking the easy way out "The American Way"? Maybe you should've waited 3 days and posted it on Independence Day as a sign of you declaring your independence from the burden of your children.

Kerri Rae 5 pts

First of all, like most people leaving comments, I disagree. In fact, I think most of your opinions are based on the fact that you couldn't figure out how to make it work, and I'm sorry you had such difficulties. As one of the few moms who really did exclusively breastfeed for six months and continued a strong nursing relationship beyond that, I too had many troubles and great difficulties, with my first born our first 3 months were riddled with thrush, infections, lactation consultants and long, hard nights and sleepy, tear filled days. Many days I wanted to give up but it was my husband who gave us the strength to carry on. In fact I have said many times that those were the hardest days of our lives, but we were united and it brought us closer together and strengthened our bond (I am talking my husband and I, not baby and I). Perhaps you should look into the affect of narcissism and/or the effect of post-partum depression / psychosis on failed marriages. I'm sure the All-American way of doing things the quick and easy way has nothing to do with it.

redwritinghood 12 pts

I nursed my son until he was two and a half, and my daughter until she was 18 months... at no point did I find either lengths "embarassing", nor did my husband feel resentment. I didn't "give up" anything psychologically... in fact I gained a significant amount. I was able to slow down and realize what was important and what wasn't.

Equality doesn't mean "both spouses do the same thing" it means they are both treated the same in terms of respect... just because my husband couldn't breastfeed and I could, does not mean we are unequal in any way, so it doesn't upset any apple carts in this household.

But I do think that it's a bigger issue for American women who have less support from their government and their full-time work situations.

What you all need in the US is mandatory maternity leave times so that this goal is somewhat achievable.

Heather

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
www.heather-cook.com
www.thewritingmother.blogspot.com
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

justanotherdayinparadise 7 pts

I think it's ridiculous that the claws come out so much over this topic. Seemingly normal women get all crazy-eyed and fanatical depending which side of the fence they're on with this issue. I've been on both sides. I've breastfed and [gasp] used formula. Now, I'm adding my two cents.

I wanted to breast feed my daughter, and I did for the 6 weeks I stayed home with her. And it went PERFECT. . .until I returned to work. My employer and boss were all for breastfeeding. I pumped away. . .for a few weeks. But here's what no one told me. (And this doesn't apply to everyone.) I could not perform MY job adequately when I had to go pump every few hours. My job is to work 1 on 1 with patients, and I'm on a pretty strict schedule. (I'm the only person who does my job at my company.) It was not fair to my employer nor to my patients to expect them to wait so that my child could have frozen breast milk. Eventually, the pumping got less, and well, you know the rest. . .The guilt overwhelmed me (and still does sometimes). Then, I decided to get over it. I survived on formula. In fact, more than a generation of us survived on formula. . .Is breastfeeding better for the baby? Yep. Is it the only way to go? Nope. The breastfeeding nazis are right. You DO have to have priorities; however, sometimes a woman is allowed to have a priority other than what someone else deems as superior. My priority was to provide a loving home and adequate nutrition for my child(ren) while completing the career that I chose. . .and I would do it again.

MJ at CheepChix 5 pts

I just wanted to chime in with my personal experience. Breastfeeding has brought my husband and me closer together. I breastfed my 1st child for 18 months, I was only able to do so exclusively for the first three due to the demands of a single childless boss, but my daughter benefited from the breast milk she did get. I am now into the 6th month with my 2nd child and she has been 95% exclusive. My husband knows that the girls need this and because of that knowledge he was supportive of my recent work schedule change that puts him in charge of evening activities and bedtime.

MJ is a contributing author at www.cheepchix.com ( http://www.cheepchix.com ) updated every Monday

a_m 6 pts

Now that there is yet another commentary on "how I breastfed, but it wasn't fun and I felt awkward about nursing a 10 month old so...tee hee...I'm not WIERD or anything", let's get down to brass tacks.

I am disappointed, but not surprised, that we live in the most forward-thinking, woman supporting and woman-supported society in history and somehow, breast-feeding a child can somehow bring us to our knees. 10 months of nursing is no more embarrassing than the unused celebrity bimbo cleavage that is draped across every news stand selling to WOMEN as well as men. And if nursing your infant causes stress on your relationship, you should thank God you noticed a problem then and not 10 years in the future. You should also wonder how you'd failed to notice so far. If not nursing, for whatever reason, causes you emotional trauma you're going to need to grow up: your child is going to need an adult mother. And adults need to learn not to base their decisions/well-being on other people's opinions. We can think of a long list of things that are uncomfortable, unpleasant, frustrating, and (legitimately) embarrassing that women contend with daily, by choice, because they like how it ultimately makes them look or feel. It just happens that nursing a baby ultimately is about your baby and not you. But, for that matter, so is giving the baby formula. So be the ADULT and make the best decision for you. Then, find something better to do with your emotional energy.

Pencil Writer 5 pts

Apparently motherhood is a side job for some. If so, breastfeeding, could then be construed to be a menial chore. For some mothers, breastfeeding just doesn't work.

For some mothers working for a living isn't optional. But, my opinion is that our society, in whatever part of this globe one exists, is only going to continue as long as mothers bring children into the world with loving care and devotion. A healthy society, in my opinion, will only exist as long as parents view parenthood as an essential part of society, our most important investment. In the ever increasing "liberal" view of life and family, motherhood--probably the most noble work a woman can ever enlist in--is denigrated. Hugely.

When a mother decides that her sphere of important work outside of her family is more important that the effort to lovingly rear her children and teach them values of moral behavior, I believe society as a whole suffers. Miz Baker is entitled to her opinion. I'm impressed that she breastfed all her children; sorry that she felt it was not that important in some way.

I have four children. Breastfed them all a minimum of 9 months. Wouldn't trade that for all the world. Parenthood is the most challenging endeavor in life. I pray more parents will work very hard to provide for their offspring by earning a living but not at the expense of raising their children in a way that they might feel valued and of greater importance in their families than earning that living. It's a difficult balancing act sometimes.

But parents who think of themselves and what they need miss the boat. Selfishness is not a firm foundation for raising emotionally healthy children. Raising emotionally healthy productive children is a huge investment of time, money, emotion, and education . . . where does the list end?

Motherhood can be the most fulfilling job a woman can have. Is it a struggle? Supremely so. Aren't the greatest victories the ones that follow the most heroic efforts?

multimom30 5 pts

Seriously? If a man is offended by his wife nursing his child to the point that it causes them to divorce, than he is a selfish baby himself. My husband loved to watch me nurse, and breastfeeding doesn't mean no sex. The first few months of any new baby are hard on the parents- nursing or not. It's the lack of sleep that does us in, not the breastfeeding. And how is ten months embarrassing? It wasn't until the fifties when they came out with formula and purposely made women feel as if they were hurting their babies by nursing instead of using the "new and improved formula" that nursing became an issue with people. We now know that breastfeeding is so much better than formula. The body knows when the baby needs extra nutrients, helps keep the baby healthy, helps mom battle ppd- not make it worse. Why do people think that having a baby is a nine month commitment? Something is very wrong here.

my_two_cents 5 pts

I love this post if just because Molly is pinpointing exactly the attitude/reasoning of why women do not continue to breastfeed their children(12% keep breastfeeding if I use the stats cited.) I could argue that it's the attitude towards breastfeeding in this article, the attitude that breastfeeding is something to be endured and given up when it gets "embarrassing" or 'surprising" because there is a "fine" substitute, that leads to low rates of breastfeeding, not low government support of breastfeeding.

If we as humans would simply view breastfeeding as the normal way to feed our babies, I truly believe that the only people not breastfeeding would be those with legitimate medical reasons (probably up to 10% of mothers could not breastfeed no matter what).

Right now, giving a baby a bottle of water mixed with pulverized and dried cow's milk fortified with man made vitamins, minerals, and highly processed sugar and fats stored in a can is NORMAL, and, as this article points out, considered a "fine" option.

Instead, as woman do make up around half the workforce and most women in our society do have children, it makes economic sense for an employer to work around the needs of a breastfeeding employee. But these lactating mothers, in general don't ask (i.e. demand) these considerations. Split shift work, taking infant baby to work, nanny-care on/near worksites, working from home, alternative schedules . . . most of these things are completely possible for women and employers. (And yes, there will be exceptions, but I've seen everyone from the fast food worker and migrant worker to the white collar employee make this work) but not something most women are willing to negotiate for as it's a more difficult route to balancing the need to mother and work.

Admittedly, it's much easier to go back to work at the baby's three months, place the baby in daycare, pump for a while, and then not worry about breastfeeding.

So until we can change the general societal attitude that breastfeeding is kind of a quirk that only the while granola-hippie liberal educated upper class stay at home mom can indulge in, all the government mandates in the world won't matter.

And to change society? I don't really know, but we could start with each mother examining her own feelings about being a mammal, making babyfood from her own breasts, sexuality of breasts, and the definite risks and inferiority of formula (it does keep babies alive and growing, as does white wonder bread and skippy peanut butter with doritos for lunch keeps our elementary school children alive.) But each woman should also know her value as an employee and start making changes in workplace culture.

GrandmaL 5 pts

All I can say in response to this article is how sad it makes me that people feel this way. I know that some do, as I had friends who felt their personal boundaries invaded by pregnancy and therefore it makes sense that breast feeding would fall into the same category.

For me pregnancy was euphoric, breastfeeding was difficult but worth it and the bond between mother and child started out that way and grew. With a lot of work and a lot of difficulty. No one said parenting was easy and we are torn between so many life goals these days that it's hard to see the forest for the trees. The unfortunate part is that you don't know how the experience is going to go until you do it. No one thought I would have kids - I was the career girl. What happened was an epiphany. I fell in love from the first moment I felt a movement and I am still in love with all my kids going on 36 years later.

As far as I aware the research supports what Mother Nature designed but I also agree with the very practical point of view that says beyond the minimum only as long as Mom and Babe want to continue.

Although I have had to work most of my adult life I would have preferred always to be at home with the kids. Boredom is not an issue. The world is full of things to do and I have always felt that I could do more good in the world by turning out several well-adjusted and productive indiviuals than by making some small impact in a job in a business or company or social agency.

suburbsanity 5 pts

I've never read such a short-sighted, offensive, opinionated piece. Surely this author can put her judgements aside long enough to quit labeling her fellow mothers who choose, or even have a goal, of breastfeeding their children for longer than her "embarrassing" time limit. And give some of us credit for being able to meet our children's needs, our husband's needs, and our needs at the same time. Actually, to do so and see our relationship thrive. My husband was in awe of me while I breastfed our children. He was thrilled to provide support for that relationship and realized it was the best thing for our entire family.
I would love to one day look at the byline for a well-balanced article and see that the author was a freelance writer. Instead, I usually find the same drivel I have sadly read above.

cilantroqueen 5 pts

I am so disheartened. There is no better gift to give your baby than to breastfeed. It's sad that you feel "resentment" that you should continue giving your baby the best care after it's born. Breastfeeding is such a short time in your life and the benefits clearly out way your "inconvenience". I breastfed my first daughter for two years and am now breastfeeding my second daughter who is 10 months...and lady, that is not embarrassing. My "perfect" husband supports, admires, and recognizes the minute, sacrifice I am making.
Sounds like you need to spend less time researching statistics, and more time researching yourself.

renatria 5 pts

No major life decision should be made solely on the basis of what makes you, or your partner happy. No one would suggest that women should give up their educations or careers because the added stress leads to an increased divorice rate. Breastfeeding has an end, and if a marriage can't survive breastfeeding, the feeding of the baby wasn't the only problem.

The idea that if something is making us unhappy we should stop it is probably the most dangerous idea in our society. I'm a senior in college. Should I drop out rather than take the statistics class that I'm dreading? Should I quit my job during a stressful week? Should I leave my husband when we argue over who's turn it is to do dishes?

Besides, having a child was a choice that was made, and that choice is going to change everything. That's not going to end when nursing does- and being a mom (or a dad) should also override everything else. What are you going to do, choose not to take your child to checkups because it conflicts with your schedule?

Every set of parents has the right to decide whether to breastfeed or to use formula, however, like every other decision, there should be more involved in the decision than happiness.

Besides, not breastfeeding isn't going to stop the nighttime screaming wakings. Not breastfeeding isn't going to mean you fit back into those cute prepregnancy dresses.

beep 5 pts

I guess I don't have to write the essay that was welling up inside of me. I agree with much of what has already been said in the responses here.

I wasn't embarrassed to breastfeed mine for a bit over a year (at which point she was fine with stopping). My husband supported me absolutely. The first few weeks after her birth were tough, physically. After that, the hardest things overall (about breastfeeding!) were:

1) Worrying about disapproval from other people if I fed her when I went out. (As nuts as that worry sounds, looking back...)

and 2) Pumping in unpleasant conditions and under time pressure when I went back to work.

What would have been really empowering in my situation would have been more practical support for the technical act of providing food for my infant.

Bringing down the practical barriers to combining breastfeeding with other activities, so that any woman who would like to breastfeed can, would be an incredibly civilized and organized thing for a society to achieve.

If a woman resents breastfeeding, then I think the damage that resentment does may offset greatly the benefits of nursing.

harmony08 5 pts

The 90% comes from the study, but the study is not setting breastfeeding goals for the US. The study used the 90% number as a benchmark to calculate savings in terms of lives and costs. It's "If 90% did then.... " The goals for the US in terms of breastfeeding are set Healthy People 2020 and their goal is to increase breastfeeding rates. Increase, that is all. Even in this study, the conclusion says that our current breastfeeding rates are too low, not that we have to get to 90%, but we can do better.

It seems to me you are viewing this as an oppressive point of view. It's not. They study does nothing to take away a woman's choice and in fact it supports choice. It gives women important information in order for them to make their choice, and informed choice. Let's not pull the wool over our own eyes like we can't handle the truth. How does it go, women are not as good at math and science as men, so hmmmm, maybe when it comes to breastfeeding we better just dumb it down, poo-poo the research, and claim breastfeeding is just too darn oppressive since men can't do it too. Hooey! Men don't do pregnancy either, is trying to increase the number of women who carry to term oppressive as well? Why do we accept the science that shows preterm birth is dangerous, but we act like breastfeeding is a ridiculous expectation?

What I think you are missing is that many women are not in a position to choose breastfeeding. They may not have a choice to stay home, their workplace may not support them pumping, or they may have other barriers like lack of information and knowledge on how to do it. Research like this informs the public and the government that breastfeeding is valuable, and women who WANT to do it deserve to be supported in their efforts. It doesn't force unwilling women into a breastfeeding relationship, it helps allow that as one choice for women who want it.

Your statistics accurately state that only a small number of women exclusively breastfeed 6 months, but closer to 43% breastfeed for 6 months in some amount. Some of those women may be nursing or pumping throughout the day but adding some rice cereal or applesauce before the 6 month mark. It's important to note that introducing baby foods at 5.5 months results in those women/babies not being counted in the "exclusive" number. So even though 12% exclusively breastfeed for 6 months, a lot more could be very close to that goal, we don't know.

I encourage you to look at breastfeeding and depression again, some studies show that breastfeeding reduces rates of depression. I would like to see scientific support for the fact that breastfeeding would increase depression. There are meds for depression one can take while breastfeeding, so breastfeeding alone does not mean a woman experiencing PPD has to go without. And really, your suggestion that breastfeeding can drive up divorce rates is absolutely unfounded. Are you trying to scare women out of breastfeeding? It puzzles me why you would say some of the things you are saying unless you really do not want women to breastfeed, and since they aren't your breasts, why do you care if more women do a healthy thing for themselves and their babies?

It is true that doctors stress that formula is a "fine option" but do those same doctors inform women of the risks? Don't women deserve to know that by breastfeeding they reduce their own risk of breast and ovarian cancers? That they might miss fewer days of work due to a sick baby? That there is a lower risk of SIDS and all sorts of illness and disease? It seems to me we can agree formula is fine but we don't need to dumb it down for women, we can handle the truth and make our own decisions without some doctor trying to make the decision "easier" for us by sheltering us from the known and scientifically supported risks. And we certainly don't need bloggers trying to debunk scientific realities with unsupported, unscientific speculation about depression and divorce rates.

Harmony

bfmom 6 pts

Sorry, I just finished watching Michael Moore's Capitalism: A Love Story so this is where my perspective is coming from, but I can't help but observe that your reasoning is a product of the capitalist-way of thinking that is destroying your nation and the health of its citizens, including the babies. In Canada, we also live in a capitalist country but much less so. Thankfully we get a year's maternity leave and most jobs provide top up so we can stay home and have no problem exclusively breastfeeding for 6 months or even a year. And when we don't the culprit is generally for social reasons, like the opinion you share that breastfeeding past a certain age is embarrassing or wrong or gross or whatever. So I blame capitalism but also old fashioned ways of thinking which I am thankful I don't subscribe to, and wish you and the rest of this developed world didn't either.

harmony08 5 pts

Here is a link to the study if anyone wants to read it. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/...

It's a very good study and is based on poorer health outcomes for children who are not breastfed (extensive science exists to support this) including a much lower risk of SIDS for breastfed infants even when SES, race, smoking, and other factors are controlled for.

However the study does NOT do what this author claims - it does not set a goal for breastfeeding. The study conclusions merely point out that more babies would live and due to health issues that parents, employers, healthcare industry and the government would save money if more women breastfed and breastfed longer.

This article misses the boat because although she says she doesn't resent breastfeeding and she breastfed three children successively longer with each baby, she makes breastfeeding out to be an oppressive, family destroying activity that will decrease the mental health of women and send them out of the workforce right back to being barefoot in the kitchen. To that I say: Nuh-Uh.

The fact women have the power to do something healthy for their babies (if able and willing) does not in any way oppress those same women. We all have the choice to breastfeed or not, and decide for ourselves how long we want to do it. This study is information only, so we can make informed decisions about our choices for ourselves and our babies. The only oppression going on is from a woman who apparently liked breastfeeding, who chose to breastfeed three children, suggesting to other women that they will destroy their lives and their families if THEY choose it.

Harmony

Conversation from Twitter

laurendlloyd
laurendlloyd

Chatonsworld i nursed 100%for the first yr, then 2 feedings per day til 16 mos. hubs was supportive and child thrived. No regrets!

jcherold
jcherold

Chatonsworld Go for it! It's all good.