Bio
AV Flox is a Peruvian transplant living in Los Angeles. She is the editrix-in-command of Sex and the 405, a site that shows you what your newspaper w...
 
 
 
 

Successful Women Don't Get Naked

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

"Playboy looking for the hottest women in Social Media. Because women haven't mastered anything until Playboy photographs them doing it naked."

That's what the tweet said. It was the first time I'd heard about Playboy's Miss Social contest but even without context, I immediately felt myself become defensive at the opinion leveled against it.

Why shouldn't a woman be allowed to be a successful professional and also enjoy and share her body? Why are the ideas of accomplishment so fundamentally irreconcilable with the female form? Why is undressing or showing any degree of sexuality grounds for disqualification as a serious professional?

One of the most fascinating business people I know is Cyan Banister, the co-founder of Zivity. The first time I met her was at a tech conference, where she discussed her investment strategy in terms of the seven deadly sins. Later on, she would allow me to run pictures of her first ever naked photoshoot on my blog. Venture Beat picked up the story, describing the spread as not that startling among sex tape leaks and political sex scandal landscape in which we live.

It seemed to me at the time that we were finally making some progress, moving into a world where we could take pride in our bodies and share our likeness without sacrificing our career goals.

Clearly, I'm an idealist.

May 15, 2010 - Hollywood, California, U.S. - Playboy Playmate katie vernola (miss June).2010 makes an appearance in front of the Pearl at the Palms Theatre inside the palms resort & amp, Las Vegas , Nevada 05-15-2010. 2010.K64838EG. © Red Carpet Pictures

Today, Playboy announced its first Miss Social, Krystal Harlow, a 19 year-old student from North Carolina. Unlike the tweet seemed to imply, the contest wasn't among the web's well-known power users, but open to any women using social media.

Participants get through the rounds by mobilizing their contacts to cast a vote via text, each of which costs 99 cents. I've seen users campaign for votes on social media my fair share of times – it's not easy. And to mobilize them to pay money? It's no small thing.

More compelling than how the women involved engaged their respective audiences was Playboy's role in the contest. As an established publication facing the treacherous state of the magazine industry, Playboy has been doing its best to stay relevant, most recently by launching a safe-for-work site named The Smoking Jacket.

"Playboy is looking to harness the power of social media," said Paul Lee, Playboy's Managing Director of Digital Ventures, when I e-mailed him inquiring about the contest. "At its core, Miss Social is about telling the Cinderella story and giving a girl the opportunity to become famous through her own efforts and hard work. The business model is closest to that of American Idol if it were purely digital – we leverage the Playboy brand to allow the girls use their social networks, entrepreneurial efforts, and engaging personalities to get votes (which people paid $.99/vote) to win the competition."

A sound business strategy for Playboy considering over 2,000 women entered this first Miss Social.

"On average, each of the participants drove more than 1,000 impressions and increased their own social networks by more than 300% (as defined by Facebook friends), and generated a significant number of votes," Lee said, though he didn't specify the total votes put in by participants.

Asked how else the brand is planning to stay relevant on the web, Lee referred to the presence of its main web property, Playboy.com, which averages 5.5 million views and remarked they will be launching a series of initiatives to "highlight our lifestyle and brand strength in the digital arena."

No word what these ventures are yet, but by the looks of things, Playboy is moving in a direction that could possibly define what it means to manage profitability as old media transitions to new. I'll be keeping an eye on that.

In the meantime, congratulations are in order to Krystal Harlow. She's shown her chops as far as mobilizing her following, and naked or not, that's no small feat.

AV Flox is the editor of Sex and the 405 -- what your newspaper would look like if it had a sex section.

  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
victorias_view 19 pts moderator

I didn't win! It's always the young bunnies! Kidding! All joking aside...It would be nice if woman could strive to be recognized more than an sexual image. But I guess baring it all is the cost of fame these days...

Nobody wants to be Ethel 5 pts

I know that whatever any woman wants to do with their career, bodies, etc is freedom of choice. But the rest of the world may see it as an opportunity to take advantage of that woman. Once you put yourself out there, the world thinks they can have a piece of you - without boundaries. Our society has no boundaries. Whatever happened to boundaries?

The mantra is be true to yourself.

And HH is a DOM.

Patty

nancymartira 5 pts

Interesting post; I'm honored and surprised to find my tweet here. I absolutely don't believe that women should be ashamed of their bodies in any form, however we all know that the primary consumers of Playboy are men whose first thought upon gazing at these photos probably isn't, 'wow, how awfully empowering for that bright young woman!'

If you want to take off your top and show your #bewbs for Anissa, I am so into that. If you want to ask your Facebook "friends" to spend $0.99 to vote for your photo so that you can win a trip to the Playboy Mansion and a photo shoot, well, that feels less like challenging societal norms about gender and sexuality and more like some link bait chain letter.

I don't know much about Krystal because it seems the entity of her entry I found online is limited to: "Hi! I'm Krystal Harlow and I live in Raleigh, N.C. I am a fashion merchandising student & aspiring model. Three words to describe me would be driven, bubbly, and compassionate. XoXo" However, I wish Krystal the best of luck. I just wish we could encourage more young women to consider a future in technology and social media without resorting to posing in a bikini.

PS Would have been a nice surprise if Playboy donated all of the $0.99 entrance fees to nonprofits benefiting sex workers.

Judy Schwartz Haley 6 pts

you know, I've actually considered posing nude for

the scar project (nsfw) ( http://www.facebook.com/?ref=logo#!/album.php?aid=169950&id=255064983743 )

which is a group of strong young breast cancer survivors revealing their mastectomy scars and reconstructed breasts. But the tone is different - it's not objectifying the women or reducing them to sex objects.

There is a difference. I would never consider posing for Playboy

CoffeeJitters.net ( http://coffeejitters.net/blog )

Liz Henry 5 pts

I could seriously answer this post all day long, and I'm glad you wrote it! I agree with you a million percent that women's bodies and images of our bodies should not be a weapon against us. But under patriarchy, pornification and commodification of our bodies and their images takes place even when we try to control that commodification and the social meaning of our nakedness or our sexuality. We can try to construct alternate systems which hold different meanings and different systems of power. But they are still to some degree encapsulated and engulfed by the dominant systems.

So while I'm all for sex worker warrior activism and radical claiming of the meaning of our images and taking control of what we do with our bodies, that control is in part an illusion. It isn't breaking patriarchy, certainly not breaking patriarchal capitalism, more often providing a weapon against us than a source of empowerment. Now, while I say that, I don't care about being naked, because, really, fuck it. NOT posing sexy, or naked, or having sex with someone, or doing it, doesn't actually make much difference. And I see it on the same spectrum as other performativity of gender like wearing make up, not wearing makeup, or having purple hair. I don't mean to be post-modern nihilist about it. Just pragmatic. I also won't let my own decision to play inside that sex-positivity framework be determined by political strategic concerns, which is to say, it would be difficult to persuade me that I should or should not take off my clothes in some situation because it would damage other women. One more thought to add to the general complexity. I would rather perform radical acts like Annie Sprinkle showing an audience of 1000 women her cervix one by one in an auditorium, than get paid thousands of dollars for a naked photo shoot for a magazine that men masturbate to, not because I am against men masturbating but because there is a power relationship that I don't want to support if I can help it. Men will still buy Annie Sprinkle videos meant for women's empowerment and fetishize them, because everything about us including our feminist rage gets fetishized, and because Sprinkle needs to make a living, but at least it is *more likely* that some of the layers of meaning will come through to an audience that gets something more from it than "I can buy anything I want and other 'human' beings perform for my whim".

Anyway, by all means show the world that you are a radical smart kickass person and writer whether your clothes are on or off or whatever you do with your body. Solidarity.

-----------------
Liz Henry
Composite: Tech & Poetics ( http://bookmaniac.com/ )
Badgermama ( http://badgermama.com )