Surprises result from Dobson's evangelical attack on Obama
by Mata H

This has been an interesting news week for discussions of politics and religion.

First we have James Dobson, evangelical leader, criticizing Barack Obama's view of scripture because he is not a literalist. Dobson is the host of the popular conservative, evangelical radio program "Focus on the Family". His scathing denunciations of liberals are legendary.

But this time, as my aunt used to say -- "the one finger that pointed out was on a hand with four pointed back at the sender." Translation: backfire.

First,within a day, a site launched called James Dobson Doesn't Speak For Me. And who launched it? Rev. Kirbyjon Caldwell. Does that name ring a bell? It should. Rev Caldwell introduced President Bush at the 2000 Republican convention, and officiated at the wedding recently of Jenna Bush.

The site includes a side by side comparison of Dobson's critiques and what Obama actually said. For Example:

Dobson: “What [Obama is] trying to say here is unless everybody agrees, we have no right to fight for what we believe” (Focus on the Family Broadcast, 6/24).

Obama: "Indeed, the majority of great reformers in American history were not only motivated by faith, but repeatedly used religious language to argue for their cause. So to say that men and women should not inject their "personal morality" into public policy debates is a practical absurdity. Our law is by definition a codification of morality, much of it grounded in the Judeo-Christian tradition" (A Call to Renewal).

Further in the news of electioneering and religion, the Obama campaign has recently hired a new religious Affairs advisor, Shaun CaseyWesley Theological Seminary

in Washington , D.C.

As we just learned from the Pew Study released this week, younger evangelicals are more tolerant and more liberal than their older counterparts, although still more conservative than the national averages.

This month, Obama has also announced an upcoming project called "The Joshua Generation Project", an effort to reach out to that group of younger evangelicals and younger Catholics around issues held in common - environmental concerns, poverty, HIV/AIDS, Darfur, climate change, healthcare and the war. (Of course that is if they get to keep the name -- because they are being sued over it. CBNNews says "..."Generation Joshua," a division of the Home School Legal Defense Association, has been established since 2003 and is pursuing legal action against the Obama campaign.")

The past, when candidates would just cringe, pose outside a church or get vague when assaulted by the religious right, seems to be over. We are seeing a new kind of candidate, and a weakening in the once united voice of the evangelical right.

RELATED BLOGS:

Self-described Muslim-by-choice Aaminah Hernandez voices her negative reaction to Dobson, even though she may not vote in the upcoming election.

Vanessa Unplugged points out that over 10,000 supportive signitures have been put on to the Rev Caldwell's site.

Zoe, a former fan of Dobson laments her past choices and is saddened by the religious right's response.

Esri Rose, a conservative who has yet to decide for whom to vote, in the post Why I am Not A Right Wing Nut Job" speaks of the Dobson email lashing out at Obama and walks readers through her reaction. This is a fascinating account from someone who is as yet undecided about the vote.

Mata H, CE for Religion and Spirituality also blogs about this and that on her blog, Time's Fool

Comments

 

This Post is a Lie

Amanda

Shame on you!  I listened to the speech by Obama and then listened to the ENTIRE broadcast on Focus on the Family... and you got the facts WRONG!

I am not all about Dobson but I certainly dislike Obama.  He promotes the murding of babies.  GODS children.  He supports gay marriage.  A blantant sin.

And You seem to be supporting him.

This was a gross and sad read.  I am so turned off to see that you are on blogher all the time. 

I would love to be represented by MY belief...that Jesus is my Saviour, died on the cross for ALL our sins, and lives in Heaven as a part of the Holy Trinity.

What do you stand for?  Because if its not for Him, its against Him.  And you know what that means.

Amanda

 

Differing views

Amanda, I am a Trinitarian, and faithful Christian. If our opinions differ, it does not mean that the post is a lie. I also listened to both the speech and the broadcast. There are a number of conservative bloggers, several of whom I have referenced on the above article, who feel that Dobson was not accurate in his condemnations.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool

 

You are Still Wrong

Amanda

You cannot be a Tritarian AND a 'faithful' Christian.  The meaning of Christian is follows the teaching of Christ. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Trinitarian_Universalism

 Your belief system is based on a mans (when I say man I mean human) interpetation of the Bible.  What you stand for is some mans version of religion.

You did get your facts wrong.

http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007770.cfm

as stated very clearly here.

I dont have an opinion on the matter.. I have a Biblical Truth that I stand by.

God bless-

Amanda

 

 

Hello Amanda

I think we could post a lot of comments about our differences, but I am not sure that heat would create a lot of light. I believe that it is true that two faithful Christians can look at the same piece of scripture and hear it differently. That is the nature of being human.

We all rely on someone's scriptural interpretation in addition to our own faith experience in addition to prayer to discern God's will. Our hearts and intellects and all that we are seek to understand what God wills. I do not believe that any single religious person has a corner on that discernment.

Dobson and Obama disagree. I hope it gets a lot of people thinking more about their faith and the role it has in their lives.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool

 

What a surprise to see

What a surprise to see Caldwell's name!  He is starting a technology-based charter school in Texas for teenagers that focuses in dropout recovery and helping struggling students recover lost credits.  I have been suspicious ever since finding out a pastor founded the school, especially because, at least tentatively, the school will be housed in a religious center (this might change closer to the opening date).  Since charter schools are all public schools, I am always wary of religious leaders having a major role in them.  Can we ensure that church and state will be kept separate?  I am going to be keeping an extra-watchful eye on this school's developments now that I know the extent of Caldwell's religious background.

This is What a Feminist Blogs Like

 

Dobson

I have always respected James Dobson and his staunch support for the family and God's role in restoring health family relationships. I also appreciate his voice in politics. I think he may come across as too religious or overbearing, but remember he is of a different generation and he remembers better times when such radical liberalism was not tolerated.

I am glad for his voice in these matters. I'm sure he not 100% right all of the time, but give him a break. He's a great man of God and his ministry is a wonderful blessing to this nation. We are so quick to judge our own. We must be more careful than that. Jesus said the world will know us by our love for one another. Yet we jump on the bandwagon of criticism way too fast. Let us not be so fast to add insult to injury and distort the character of a great man like Dobson. No one is perfect. Let us not be so hard on him.   

 

Answer bearer

Some of the wonderful things about living in America are religious freedom and freedom of speech. I don't think "better times" were when "liberalism was not tolerated". I think America is great because of the tolerance for both liberlism an conservatism.

Actually Obama does not embody radical liberalism in Christianity. While he may look that way to someone who is very conservative, he is actually pretty mainstream.

"Radical liberals" -- interesting choice of words as I think about it. My guess is that Jesus and St Paul and John the Baptist were called the Aramaic equivalent of that in their days on earth. It all depends on to what you compare the person.

~~ Contributing Editor, Mata H. also blogs right along at Time's Fool

 

religious war

opinions & thoughts cant be tolerated because religion, or moreso "in the name of religion"

when a faith builds up walls where you can't see, feel or understand another person, another human....then it's not faith....it's insanity