Bio
Scattered Mom is a 40 something, west coast living, cookie baking, road tripping, key misplacing, perpetually lost blogger who can sniff out a Starbu...
 
 
 
 

Jamie Oliver and Taking A Stand for Healthy Lunches

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 19
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

 “So Josh, what’s going on?”

 His jade green eyes stared back as his voice faltered.

 “I dunno, I didn’t do anything..”

 The smile played on my lips for a second before I spoke.

 “Josh, you can’t sing “Who Let the Dogs Out” in the middle of a math lesson. Let’s go over the math here where it’s quiet.”

 “I don’t want toooo!” His whine was nails on a chalkboard, grating on my patience.  He pushed his chair back and began kicking the table leg harder, now.

 “Wait a sec.  Did you have breakfast?” His blonde head shook silently. 

 “What have you got for lunch?”

 His shoulders shrugged slightly as he shook his head again.

 “No lunch.”

 Then came a question I never ask, but this time the words were out before I could catch myself.

 “So what did you have for dinner last night?’

Silence.  His eyes, now sad and vacant, searched mine as the horrible truth washed over me. This child who had seemed so defiant, angry, and out of control moments before in the classroom was not a behavior problem.  The problem was that he hadn’t eaten anything substantial for close to 24 hours.  Instead, he had survived on the offerings of his well meaning friends; a pop, some fries and gravy, a bag of popcorn, and candy.

Two Schoolgirls Sitting at a Table in a Canteen Eating Their Lunch

Later on  that evening Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution was on TV. Now -- you may say that Jamie Oliver is a bit crazy; who does this guy think he is, coming over to America and telling people how to eat?  Why does he care? Why should anyone listen to him, anyway?  Does it really matter that 31 million children participate in the USDA’s school lunch program and 11 million in the breakfast program? Or that many of those kids are consuming up to half of their daily calories at school?

You bet it does, especially when child obesity rates have tripled in the last thirty years.  Between schools offering less time for PE, marketing for junk food aimed at children, government subsidies for corn farmers, struggling school districts with little money to train their staff, and processed food costing far less than anything healthy, it's obvious that we have a problem. It doesn't take someone like Jamie Oliver to point this out, but perhaps it takes the glaring spotlight of Food Revolution to highlight just how serious the problem actually is.  Unfortunately, it appears that Los Angeles Unified School District in particular doesn't want all eyes to be on them.

Set to be the new school district that Food Revolution whips into shape, the Los Angeles Unified School District is the second largest in the country and serves 69 million lunches every day.  However, this district declined to be part of the Food Revolution, citing that their "direct work with nutrition experts, health advocates, the community, schools and students is the most effective strategy for continued success and improvement..." (Melissa Infusino).  Which sounds all well and good -- California is, after all, number 41 on this list of states ranked by weight, until you look at the LAUSD's website

As I perused through the menus and offerings, I began to wonder.  Coffee cake for breakfast? Chicken nuggets? Sausage rolls? Corn dogs and fish nuggets?  What the hell is a peanut butter and jelly pocket? Are they kidding?  What nutritional expert would approve of that?  As I dug further, I also noticed that while one can find the calories, carbs, and fat content on all the items served, the amounts of sugar, salt, and ingredient lists are missing.  Without a list of the actual ingredients, the calories are meaningless.  Think of it this way:  

  • Banana and 8 oz of 1% milk:  approx 200 calories
  • Breakfast pastry: approx 200 calories (along with things like tricalcium phosphate, high fructose corn syrup, and red dye #40)

 As anyone who reads Mrs. Q at Fed Up With Lunch knows, school lunches that look good on paper rarely make the grade when one digs around to see what is really in the food. If the food is so nutritionally sound that they

  • 19
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
scatteredmom 5 pts

If you live in the LA area, go to Jamie's kitchen and show your support. He needs parents like you guys to demand that Food Revolution come to Los Angeles United School District.

Show your support by checking out his kitchen at 1038 Westwood Blvd. Los Angeles, CA, 90024

scatteredmom 5 pts

I work in a small, rural school that has hot lunch once a week provided by the parents. It's not easy; those ladies work their butts off to provide a home made lunch.

But I can tell you, I haven't seen anything it's equal anywhere else. Delicious. Fresh. Completely from scratch. It CAN be done but I think it's not until parents revolt that things will change. At the moment, in too many places it seems as though dollars and politics speak louder.

The "double lunches" are frightening. Why not serve snacks like fruit and veggies throughout the day? Or a protein snack that they can take with them? (hummus and crackers is good) Double the fries? Oh my.

april yedinak 5 pts

I agree about the picky eaters. A truly hungry child will not be picky. If a kid turns his nose up at the healthier options then he is not hungry (likely because he is filling up on processed junk at home). I know that people say if you are poor then you have to go with processed foods because they are cheaper. I say that is a load of crap. I feed myself and 5 kids on a budget of $500 dollars a month. Yes, That breaks down to less than $3 per day per person for food. How do I manage? Coupons, sales, stocking up, cooking from scratch- there is no way that a box of fat and sodium laced rice or pasta mix is cheaper than buying a bag of the plain, unprocessed rice or pasta. Beans, greens, apples and bananas are cheap, filling and nutrient dense. What I can't afford is chips, candy, kool-aid and frozen meals. If we get any junk food or extras it is a treat and it was free with coupons and such.

JStark 5 pts

http://agrarianista.blogspot.com

As a parent, long-term unemployed, and a former high school teacher, I've got so much to say that it's really difficult to start.

First, then: I'm tired of the picky eater concern. If they choose not to eat, then that is their choice. It's just like a kid threatening to hold their breath. There may be some kicking and screaming, but who is the adult here?

Second, there is absolutely no reason for unhealthy food to be served in schools. Chocolate milk isn't cheaper than regular milk, potato chips aren't cheaper than salads. The price argument doesn't make sense.

I'll stop there - I'm steaming mad right now.

kyooty 5 pts

I'm so very glad someone asked the right questions for Josh. So many don't

JeanettesHealthyLiving 5 pts

In the past year, our schools have transitioned to healthier lunch offerings. They no longer deep fry anything, and have learned to make all the food from fresh fruits and vegetables. I just spent some time with the woman who cooks at my son's elementary school. She makes her own beans (no canned beans), and stock for soups. When I was in the kitchen, she was steaming ground turkey for tacos. Change takes time, and a good cook in the kitchen who can adapt.

Toast - Mairi 5 pts

So glad to here that good work is still happening. You just can't but help be in awe of his drive and determination to have everyone eat good food. I am in NZ & Jamie's Food Revolution is just airing about what he did in Huntingdon,,,it makes compelling, and yes, at times disturbing viewing but so good to see some results and here that revolution continues on,,,these things take time and the ground swell is building everywhere.

everydayjill 5 pts

Our school district offers atrocious lunches.

Root beer flavored milk.

Salted Pretzel with cheese dip (main course)

Cheesy dip nachos

Sausage pizza is probably the most nutritious thing they serve.

Which explains why my son has NEVER eaten a school lunch in three years.

What passes federal guidelines as healthy would be funny if not for the wide-ranging consequences.

Robyn
http://everydayjillwentupthehill.blogspot.com/

scatteredmom 5 pts

everydayjill Root beer flavored milk? Oh my. That is just downright GROSS.

grannysu 5 pts

That's what I wonder. Those who choose the menu are adults. Are they choosing foods they like themselves?

Jamie Oliver caused a revolution when he came to Huntington, WV all right, and it's not over. The city is still working on ways to improve, although some reports say the changes didn't stick for the school system. But a $50,000 grant is keeping the community food kitchen going; classes on healthy eating are offered along with other activities. Other communities in the state are looking at ways to change school menus to include more nutrition and local produce.

I've been to some schools that offer two lunch lines--the usual, and the salad bar. I've also been to some that offer the usual and...the pizza bar! That's downright scary.

Granny Sue Stories from the Mountains and Beyond www.grannysu.blogspot.com ( http://www.grannysu.blogspot.com ) susannaholstein@yahoo.com

beachgirlroxy 5 pts

I've heard from people in the food service industry that they feed kids things with enough calories and what not because of kids like the one in this story. Because the lunch they get at school may be their only meal each day.

That doesn't mean that every kid in a public school, nor every kid who qualifies for free or reduced lunch does not eat at home. It is an assumption and really depends on the area.

I do not agree with it at all. If they think a kid doesn't eat at home maybe they should offer a 2nd lunch, or a meal before going home for these kids.
Or let them raise their own kids.

Visit my blog:  Just Roxy ( http://blog.justroxy.com )

scatteredmom 5 pts

beachgirlroxy I agree. I don't think stuffing them full of calories to play catch up is a good idea. Stuffing them full of healthy food is far better, in my opinion. How about a snack after school?

lisanoel03 5 pts

As a family who's kids are on the lunch AND breakfast program I have mixed emotions about them changing things. Clearly I want my boys eating good foods for the 5 days a week we are getting the help from the school. And honestly we cant' afford to eat as well as we should the rest of the time because as you stated, processed crap is way cheaper than whole, fresh stuff. But I have two fears if someone demanded our district change things, ONE, the increased cost would result in fewer kids qualifying for it and TWO if they included foods that my picky eater doesn't like, then he wouldn't be eating anything all day.

scatteredmom 5 pts

lisanoel03 I can understand your concerns. And sometimes, kids will refuse healthy offerings, but as I have found working with kids, eventually they get hungry enough to it and try it only to find out that they like it after all.

MealMixer 5 pts

I worked in an elementary school last year and saw plenty of kids who weren't being fed at home. What killed me was that the school provided breakfast was filled with sugar (juice, sugary pastry and/or cereal). Once that sugar hit the bloodstream the kids were jittery, then they crashed until their equally atrocious lunch.

And to make matters worse? Now you aren't supposed to send food to school - so even the parents who care and want to send in cheese and fruit are discouraged because of allergies and hygiene issues.

Also? Flavored milk MUST GO. The adults in charge are not making good choices.

Marianne at Mealmixer ( http://www.mealmixer.com )

JennaHatfield 21 pts

Jamie Oliver needs to hit rural Ohio school districts. It's absurd. One local district has "super lunches." Yes, that's two times the amount of everything a regular lunch has (two milks, two rolls, two servings of nuggets, two servings of fries, you get the point). The argument being that some kids don't get enough at home. That would be fine if they were serving real food. Sigh.

And no elementary school -- ever -- needs to offer "extras" in the form of sugary snacks, ice cream and the like. MIND BOGGLING.

Contributing Editor Jenna Hatfield (@FireMom ( http://twitter.com/FireMom )) blogs at Stop, Drop and Blog ( http://stopdropandblog.com ) and The Chronicles of Munchkin Land ( http://thechroniclesofmunchkinland.com ). She is a freelance writer and newspaper photographer.

scatteredmom 5 pts

JennaHatfield@firemom Those super lunches are crazy! I've never heard of that!

theoutcast 5 pts

Moms have been beating this drum for years. But as usual, it takes a male messenger to make a change or start a movement (it seems).

To your point:

"Don't we owe it to our children to make sure that they at least have life spans equal to ours, despite big business, politics, and the like?"

There is so much we can and should do but Moms have to elevate their position if we are really going to make any substantial changes in all of those parts of our society...or we are going to need alot more Jamie Oliver's.

Good reading :)

Heather blogs about Motherhood & Other Offensive Situations at http://www.ultimateoutcasts.com.

scatteredmom 5 pts

theoutcast I'm not sure if the fact that he is male makes a difference. I think more that he is willing to get out there and DO it.