Talking Race with Kelly Wickham of "Mocha Momma"

Hello, ladies. It's Rita's sis here. I had a lot of thoughts about this, but I realized my comment was going to run waaaay too long for this forum. I wrote my response on my own blog if you care to see.

Rita and Kelly, I enjoyed this conversation very much. It got my brain cranking this morning!

www.talesfromclarkstreet.blogspot.com ( http://www.talesfromclarkstreet.blogspot.com )

I recently went to a feedback seminar at work.  Someone said, "I want to learn how to take feedback without getting pissed off."  I think you've nailed an important point -- it's important to listen to what was said instead of immediately figuring out your defense.  It's hard to take the feedback without getting pissed off, whether it's about blowing a deadline or race.  

I think that's the valuable part of my conversation with Kelly. There wasn't a whole lot said that I edited out except the name of the black blogger.  I respect the blogger I approached, I don't know why she backed out, but that was her choice and she in no way asked to become the Black Blogger Representative of the World.  It's not fair to introduce anything personal about her into this discussion except to say, hey, she was black, and she was writing about race. I think those two points are relevant to the discussion.

You could, however, just as easily say, why only one?  Why only three Jewish people?  Why only one mother of an adopted child of another race?  Why, why, why?  And you, as a reader, as a consumer (I hope) of this collection, have every right to that opinion.  You have every right to ask why.  In some ways, the answer doesn't matter.  

Liz has been very close to the project, so she knows a lot about the struggle to get the anthology put together.  I think her points ARE relevant.  She asks equally valid questions.  As we all ask our own questions, I think we're getting to the core of the discussion Kelly and I started.  The whole discussion of race transcends any discussion of one mommyblogging anthology, but this discussion is important and should and will influence any future anthologies I personally put together.  Whether or not this particular one was "right" or "wrong" is not as important as this discussion playing out now. I feel like this discussion is VERY important. 

Surrender, Dorothy ( http://surrenderdorothy.typepad.com )- When I was your age, we just let them ride in the back window.

Rita Arens is a contributing editor for BlogHer -- Mommy & Family.

Thank you Yvette for saying what I was thinking, but couldn't quite figure out how to say.

Megan
BlogHer Contributing Editor, TV/YouTube ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/msmith )
Megan's Minute ( http://www.megansminute.com/ )
Video Runway ( http://www.womenonwomenblog.com/megan/ )

I have to repeat that I am not familiar with the anthology. I was responding to a pattern I saw in the conversation--the topic of which just happened to be about this anthology. And that pattern rang familiar to me as a frustration when trying to have honest conversations with White men and women.

That pattern is most simply this: At the invitation by a non-minority person or organization to please share your thoughts and feelings about X, a POC decides to open up and says, "Well, I felt bias/marginalization/lack of understanding/lack of representation when _________." Instead of the response being to explore that perception and look for solutions, it is for the non-minority person/organization to take a defensive pose: "Well, ________ was not biased/there was representation..."

Clearly, in the case of the conversation between these two women, there was more that was not apparent in the edited version, and their prior relationship and openness to moving forward means that they will continue the ongoing process of dialog.

Responding to your question: I wonder why you think diversity should work "both ways." Are White women/mommybloggers really so under-represented that they should be included in work by folks who really are under-represented? Again, I do not know enough about this specific topic, nor of the Mommyblogosphere in general to say. 

I find it interesting that the some of the conversation about one POC's feelings of marginalization continues to focus on the perceived feelings, good intentions, character, etc of the non-POC. This is a familiar dynamic for many POC: the idea that there is no space for honest discussions of our feelings and experiences if it makes Whites feel ill at ease or uncomfortable about themselves.

As I said in another comment, these conversations cannot move forward unless folks are willing to work through their discomfort and defensiveness. 

Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast ( http://blog.lib.umn.edu/perry032/impossible/ )

Kelly and Rita (and commenters), this is a fascinating discussion - thank you both for this interview. I've learned a lot, and I love the frank discussion surrounding it.

Yvette, I have to ask: if the anthology was being put together by a black mommy blogger, would you feel that, to maintain diversity, she should backfill if her white writer backed out? (assuming, of course, that she chose mostly black contributors in the first place)

Does diversity work both ways?

Speaking from my (white) perspective, I think that as long as the subject matter attracted me, and the stories resonated with me, I'd enjoy the book no matter what color the writer.

I do realize about myself, though, that if the book would be presented/marketed as a "black mommy blogger anthology" instead of as a "mommy blogger anthology" I'd be more likely to skip it. I'm not proud to say it, but I'm glad that this post has made me think about the diversity of what I read, and realize that it's fairly narrow. 

Indeed the clarification is apt. I do feel like there is a cumulative effect of lots of people posting about feeling left out of the book. Not always in such thoughtful words as Kelly has done here.

However I do think in Yvette saying:

I want to point out that the strategy of not actively seeking out
diversity is part of what contributes to that kind of marginalization

to me, indicates that this is Rita's "strategy." It clearly was not which was my main point. Perhaps you didn't intend that comment to be about the book specifically. Apologies if I misinterpreted.

And certainly Yvette I in no way said that diversity was not a valid - and in fact the core - issue in the discussion. (Forgive my choice of the word "real" - I overuse it hopelessly.) I'm simply asking another question in return about what constitutes diversity.

Is there no diversity if there is no African-American voice? Is there no diversity if there is no Muslim voice? Is there no diversity if there is no lesbian voice? I think those are questions worth considering, as well as why including Asian, Latina, and various biracial bloggers somehow isn't enough. What is enough? Is there ever enough?

I suppose diversity is in the eyes of the individual who is feeling marginalized and that makes it very difficult to pinpoint.

Mom-101 ( http://mom-101.blogspot.com )

Thank you, Yvette to adding to this excellent conversation (huge thanks to Rita and Kelly for starting it) by asking questions and raising issues that might cause some discomfort but are important. Until we discuss rather than ignore the hard stuff we will never make progress.

And, far be it from me to put words into Liz's (Mom 101) mouth but I suspect the "beating" she is referring to is not the conversation here but rather to some of the incredibly nasty, jealous and hurtful comments Rita has received at her own blog and have been posted by other bloggers elsewhere.

ConsumerPop Marketing ( http://www.consumerpop.com )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer ) (Politics, Current Events & Links)
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ ) (Music, TV & Pop Culture)

I'm feeling a little defensive, as goes in these conversations.

And I would say, that's OK! LOL Seriously, if folks are not prepared to feel a little (or a lot) of discomfort in the course of having dificult conversations, then better not to embark on them in the first place.

It is clear from the remainder of your response that you do not let discomfort get in the way of further attempts to understand, and that too is a good thing.

As for the "backfill" issue, I am not sure I know enough about the history of the project to respond. I guess I would say that my opinion (repeat: my) is that in general "colorblind" methods of just about anything are not proactive enough to achieve true diversity.  Certainly, not all POC feel that way--just like with any other topic. Which is why it is important to get a diversity of voices and not expect any one person to be the voice of folks who are _____.

Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast ( http://blog.lib.umn.edu/perry032/impossible/ )

Mom101, I am glad you found the anthology represented a wide variety of voices.

At the same time I feel it is unfortunate that you call the issue of diversity in the work not part of the "real discussion."  Of course that is your option, but I wonder why you feel you can so easily dismiss a concern that was raised.

I also find interesting your statement: I don't think it's fair to say that Rita wants "credit for what little diversity is managed." If you re-read my comment I think you;ll find that this is not what I said at all.

Finally, it is too bad that a discussion designed (I thought) to be a safe place for this kind of dialog is seen as a WOC delivering a "beating" to Rita.

Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast ( http://blog.lib.umn.edu/perry032/impossible/ )

It's a can of worms, Rita.

You've got this great discussion with Kelly and other women of color and from there it could lead to discussions with lesbian mommy bloggers and from there it could lead to discussions with mommy bloggers who are not middle to upper middle class.

Can of worms, I tell ya. But a really important can of worms and I appreciate the honesty and openness of all involved in this discussion.

~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager

Flamingo House Happenings ( http://www.flamingohouse.net/ )

Hi Rita,

Please don't feel horrible. I would hate to think my answer to your question made you feel that way.

And again, I greatly respect your willingness to listen and to try and understand. We need a lot more people like you who are willing to do that.

Megan
BlogHer Contributing Editor, TV/YouTube ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/msmith )
Megan's Minute ( http://www.megansminute.com/ )
Video Runway ( http://www.womenonwomenblog.com/megan/ )

I'm going to attempt to address diversity in the anthology which is a volatile topic and I'm guessing most people are staying away from it for that reason.

I don't think it's fair to say that Rita wants "credit for what little diversity is managed." In fact I think that's entirely unfair.

It seems to me that she's pointing out hey, this is not a book with only one perspective represented. There's a wide variety of voices here, from bloggers with children of different ages, in different parts of the country, in different life stages.

Is every single group represented? Of course not. There are no single moms who conceived their children with donor sperm. There are no lesbian moms. There are no devout Jews or practicing Muslims. An African-American blogger and a Latina blogger each dropped out by choice at the last minute and are no longer in the compliation.

Does this mean those groups were "marginalized?"

I think Rita did an excellent job at reaching out to a variety of bloggers, while still trying to maintain a popular enough roster that she could sell the book. In which case perhaps the real discussion should go back to some of Kelly's earlier (and very valid) queries about why bloggers of color don't achieve the numbers with mainstream readers that they might.

Maybe I have no credence here as someone included in the book. But I'm frustrated for Rita who's taking too much of a beating. Even here, where the discussion is civil.

Meanwhile so glad that Rita and Kelly are offering up the topic for discussion. It needs to happen.  

So, as Kelly puts it, I'm getting "schooled."  :) I'm so glad we are having this conversation.  In my attempt not to offend, I think I offended.  I feel horrible. But at least there's been some valuable learning here, at least for me. 

Thank goodness I have black friends to help me out.  Seriously.  I count you guys as friends for coming to me without attack and giving me valuable coaching as an editor.  

Surrender, Dorothy ( http://surrenderdorothy.typepad.com )- When I was your age, we just let them ride in the back window.

Rita Arens is a contributing editor for BlogHer -- Mommy & Family.

Hi Rita,

I think that's a great question, and bravo to you for being courageous enough to ask it. It's a kind of damned if you do, damned if you don't position that we as black people need to try to understand.

In this circumstance, my answer would be yes.

When the black mommy blogger was unavailable for your book I think it would have been a good idea to try and find another good black mommy blogger.

I would have then approached her and said "I'm doing a mommy blogger anthology and I'd like to include a black mommy blogger's perspective in the book, would you be interested?"

Since you had some multi-racial writers in your book, she wouldn't have been the one token black writer, but even if she had been, I would still say yes.

Hypothetically, if a mommy blogger anthology were being put together today, if there were ten writers who were going to be included, I would like to see at least three who were WOC.

Is that including the writers because they are black? Yes. But as long as they are also excellent writers, have interesting stories to tell, and they were approached in the way I described, I wouldn't have a problem with that and I don't think they would either.

Even if their stories aren't from a black perspective, but simply from a mommy perspective, it's important to be included.

That's very different from a black person being hired for a position and then having it thrown in their face later on, either implicitly or explicitly "the only reason you were hired was because you're black." And then diminishing their accomplishments and prospects on that job because of that.

Megan
BlogHer Contributing Editor, TV/YouTube ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/msmith )
Megan's Minute ( http://www.megansminute.com/ )
Video Runway ( http://www.womenonwomenblog.com/megan/ )

I wanted to respond to this part of the comment from Yvette:

At one point in the conversation, Kelly shares her perception of a
lack of diversity in a recent anthology, expresses some dismay about
that, and asks some questions. I do not totally know what to make of
the response, but the pattern of Rita's statements that followed
revealed, for me, one of the frustrations about having these
conversations.

I should point out that the pattern of my statements was the edited version. Kelly and I talked specifically about the black blogger I approached, whom we both knew, but I didn't want to reveal her identity. I'm feeling a little defensive, as goes in these conversations. I sought out this particular black blogger because of her post on adopting a child whose skin is darker than yours. I sought her out because she was writing in particular about race and I had wanted that represented in my book. I lost contact with her before I got her contributor agreement, and at that point, we were going to publishers. There was a timing issue involved.

The first part of the response was to counter that yes, there *was*
diversity in the anthology, as evidenced by 8 of the contributors being
"not 100% caucasian" or having biracial children. That does not seem to
me to acknowledge the initial concern about a specific person's
perceived sense of margialization and lack of representation.

You're right about that. I was surprised that Kelly herself felt marginalized by my collection. Shocked and dismayed. I didn't sleep well that night. We talked about it a lot, and I wonder if I didn't go about this a little bit wrong. I was afraid of having anyone feel like they were a token, so I approached people without a specific eye to race. I wanted writing about race, but I wasn't specifically seeking out any particular race to do that writing. I'm thinking now, after talking to Kelly and reading your response, that I should have. That's one of the reasons I wanted to publish my conversation with Kelly. She influenced me in an important way, and I hope I go on to write and edit more books and use this new learning to be better with each successive effort.

Also I want to point out that the strategy of not actively seeking
out diversity is part of what contributes to that kind of
marginalization and lack or representation of voices. While some may
feel great about what diversity was lucked upon, clearly others still
feel something is lacking.

I struggle with this comment, because Kelly made a point in our conversation about not liking being chosen as a teacher in her early career because she was black. Help me understand how it is different to seek out a black writer for the purpose of having diversity. This is a sincere question, and not one meant to provoke ire. This was something I really struggled with. I didn't want ANYONE to feel like they were chosen to be in my book because of their skin color. They were all sought out because of their writing. When I lost my black writer, I didn't backfill her. I also lost three other writers, not black. I didn't backfill them, either.

Should I have backfilled to have a black writer in the book? Specifically sought out a black writer because another black writer dropped out? When I didn't backfill the white writers?

I'm serious. I thought the answer was "no," because I didn't want anyone to feel like they were the token black writer. Maybe I was wrong?

Surrender, Dorothy ( http://surrenderdorothy.typepad.com )- When I was your age, we just let them ride in the back window.

Rita Arens is a contributing editor for BlogHer -- Mommy & Family.

I think it is always important for people to have conversations across what ever divides they feel.

The artist Damali Ayo has created a satirical website that has biting truth in it, rent-a-negro.com.

On it there is pricing for things like "Help, I Need a black Opinion," and Touch Hair,"  "Touch Skin."

 There are things on it that made me laugh out loud because I had experienced them in the encounters I've had with white women who attemped to get to know me awkwardly or sometimes impolitely.  Some women are very comfortable asking questions and expect to get answers.  For a slow-to-warm-up person like me, it often feels as if they are probing Martians.  It's better to get to know people organically over time. 

I've connected with some of the White, Chinese, Japanese, Indian and other women who are not Black American that I have via our love for books or for cooking.

I've often told people that they might want to get a friend who agrees to be a cultural ambassador so that they can ask questions safely.  I don't get the need to drill others but it's something I've seen done over and over and it often misfires and for many Black women, it shuts down communication.

 Really, there is so much that women have in common (ie., our biology, roles in the world, relationships) that it shouldn't be that hard to talk and build communication and knowledge through authentic experiences.

That's all. :)

Well okay - not completely all. ;)

This:

It's so exhausting and belittling to be the Answer Gal for people. I
much prefer my friends to accept my experiences as a part of who I am
and not as a pocket answer to All Things Black.

My thinking is that so many of the people who DO ask me those
questions don't immerse themselves in a culture of diversity and then
keep asking us, "So why do you do this?" and "Why do you do that?" as
if their limited understanding requires me to explain ad naseum when
they never really get it nor will they ever.

I wrote in the Dana/Israel post about how I'd just experience getting to that same point in regard to sexism and misogyny with a bunch of male bloggers. And while I had kind of started to get that I needed to do a lot of work on my own re: how to be anti-racist, that experience of men just not getting it and still badgering me to make them get it really drove it home - how you must feel.

Smirking a bit - I'm still a big question-asker, always have been. But - the exhaustion thing? I really appreciate it and hopefully it will help me learn more on my own and then also learn from conversations like this, when you become generous with yourself and viewpoints.

Both of you. :)

So, just thanks.

Jill
Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com )

I also neglected to say in my comment above that I appreciate the conversation the two of you had and I thank you for sharing it with the rest of us.

I do have one thing to point out--and I hope (a) not to put words in Kelly's mouth but only to relay my own perceptions and (b) that it is taken in the same spirit of open discussion.

At one point in the conversation, Kelly shares her perception of a lack of diversity in a recent anthology, expresses some dismay about that, and asks some questions. I do not totally know what to make of the response, but the pattern of Rita's statements that followed revealed, for me, one of the frustrations about having these conversations.

The first part of the response was to counter that yes, there *was* diversity in the anthology, as evidenced by 8 of the contributors being "not 100% caucasian" or having biracial children. That does not seem to me to acknowledge the initial concern about a specific person's perceived sense of margialization and lack of representation.

Also I want to point out that the strategy of not actively seeking out diversity is part of what contributes to that kind of marginalization and lack or representation of voices. While some may feel great about what diversity was lucked upon, clearly others still feel something is lacking.

I find this often as a WOC in discussions with non-POC about "diversity" issues. Often other folks want credit for what little diversity is managed, while I continue to try to point out how this is not enough. This is particularly frustrating when my opinion about diversity is being explicitly sought out in the first place.

Possibly I am not conveying this well but that is enough for now!

Thanks again, and to every one else too for the comments here.

Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast ( http://blog.lib.umn.edu/perry032/impossible/ )

Hi Julie,

You're right about more racially open casting.  It has gotten better.  For example, due to unusual timing, when the pilot of the show "Lost" was being written, many of the characters were adjusted to adapt to the actors who were being seen by casting for the show. 

"ER's" another example of a show with a multi-racial cast and of course, the star of "Ugly Betty" and the characters in her family are Latino.

There just needs to be a lot more of that kind of casting and those kinds of well written minority characters. 

Megan
BlogHer Contributing Editor, TV/YouTube ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/msmith )
Megan's Minute ( http://www.megansminute.com/ )
Video Runway ( http://www.womenonwomenblog.com/megan/ )

Thank you, Yvette! While it makes sense to lump those things together when doing a study, I highly doubt that the conversations I've had regarding that ever do the same thing. At least in my own naive mind that is so.

Link Text ( http://www.mochamomma.com )

That’s a term that perplexes me: socioeconomic. Where did it come from and what is the evolution of that word?

I can only give an explanation from my disciplinary experience, but perhaps it will be useful. The "socio" in socioeconomic status is meant to convey thet someone's economic standing is more than just money, but also involves other aspects of social standing such as educational level/quality, and occupation. So, for example, in my research I might take an index of SES that includes yearly family income, accumulated wealth, home ownership, parents' occupation.

To my knowledge the term was never meant to apply only to one group or another, but is a way to more accurately encompass more aspects of the resources individuals and families do (and do not) have access to.

Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast ( http://blog.lib.umn.edu/perry032/impossible/ )

it seems some of these things were cleared up!

Koan is right to question my comment at face value, but she's also correct in realizing that my meaning didn't end there. It's so exhausting and belittling to be the Answer Gal for people. I much prefer my friends to accept my experiences as a part of who I am and not as a pocket answer to All Things Black.

My thinking is that so many of the people who DO ask me those questions don't immerse themselves in a culture of diversity and then keep asking us, "So why do you do this?" and "Why do you do that?" as if their limited understanding requires me to explain ad naseum when they never really get it nor will they ever.

Now is the time when I tell you all that I am suffering from the flu and have a wicked headache, so if I'm not making any sense...

Still, I love having the discussion and sure, I'm open to questions, but I'm far more open to compassion as a bridge rather than explaining things away so that we don't feel the need to delve further into finding out WHO people are.

Link Text ( http://www.mochamomma.com )

However, I think her intent was to say don't base your expectations for people of color, black people, brown people, white people, any people, by what you see in the media. Know real people, and then you will have a closer view of the truth. At least that's how I interpreted it. 

That's how I interpreted it, too! I was concerned that Kelly's comment might be read, by some, as "get some Black friends, and they'll do all of your learning for you". I am sure that's not what she meant.
also interpreted her comment as an invitation to talk to her about race, and I jumped on it.
And I, for one, am glad that you did! :) Even by offering that outreach moment, though, I think it behoves us - any of us - who makes use of that opportunity to understand that it may not always be convenient, or appropriate, for the person answering the questions. And that it may not be an invitation without limitation of time. Again, that statement may be affected by my own experience - I used to try to help with a spot of Gender 101, whenever the opportunity presented itself - but that time is past. Because I used to field such questions in the past, doesn't mean I'm happy to do so, now. It's draining, in many ways, to be that person. Kelly's fantastic efforts, right now, don't automatically become a lifelong commitment to be that outreacher. If she - or anybody else - decides to be such a lifelong outreacher, I applaud them. But I don't assume it of them. And I don't think anybody else should, either.

First, Bravo to Kelly and Rita...great conversation. I can't wait to see more.

(You can also come hang with the diversity that is MOMocrats anytime you like. )

Megan, okay see that's what I thought about TV.

How can we get someone in power to legitimately feel it's important?

Cosby Show was great show, period. So I totally agree it needs to be quality. 

Chandra Wilson is a really interesting person, based on interviews, and has some good points about woman, women's shapes and images, and being black. I am pretty sure she is one person who said she always chooses parts because they are good roles, and could easily be any race and that way she knows she is putting forward a good face.

Out of curiosity, I wonder why characters---which are more personality based---can't be more racially open. 

KWIM? 

Julie
Using My Words ( http://theartfulflower.blogspot.com/ )

I totally get where you're coming from, Koan, and that's actually something I asked myself when I saw Kelly's comment.  However, I think her intent was to say don't base your expectations for people of color, black people, brown people, white people, any people, by what you see in the media.  Know real people, and then you will have a closer view of the truth. At least that's how I interpreted it.  I also interpreted her comment as an invitation to talk to her about race, and I jumped on it.  She was gracious and inviting, even though she knows how to be direct, and she was.  I was glad she was direct, even though she hit close to home for me, because I think that's how we stop dancing around the important points and really begin to discuss them.

Yes, none of us can speak for our entire race, our entire gender, our entire country, all mothers, all single people, all fathers, or all media professionals.  However, we can tell our own stories, and every little bit helps.

I really liked Kelly's suggestion of reading books written by black people, about black people, for black people, as a white person.  I've recently received a ton of books about Nigeria, about areas more urban than mine, about China and Japan, and I've been reading them to my daughter and really enjoying the newness of them.  They are about people who have a different experience than I do, and that makes them really interesting to me.  I get bored with my own experience. I think her suggestion that I read Ebony and listen to world music is a great one.  So yes, Koan, I agree it's not fair to make your black friends represent all black people, but since Kelly volunteered to talk frankly, I thought I'd take her up on it. :)

Surrender, Dorothy ( http://surrenderdorothy.typepad.com )- When I was your age, we just let them ride in the back window.

Kelly, Rita - I think this is an awesome post, bringing a crucial subject to the fore.

However... I guess I feel uncomfortable about one aspect of Kelly's opening comment. Just because someone has - or acquires - Black friends, does that mean they have the right to use those friends to educate them?

Please understand where I'm coming from - I hate racism more than just about anything on this planet. I'm all for smashing it. But I'm not sure that using my Black friends as my educators would be respectful to them. I still had to - have to - do my work. I don't expect it to be handed to me on a plate by them.

I have something of a parallel experience (although I don't for one moment claim that it is the same experience, just that it influences my thinking on this question) - there are certain characteristics of me that mean I'm the only person, with those characteristics, that some of my friends know. Does that mean that they have an automatic right to use me to school them on the finer points of those characteristics? Of the experience of living with those characteristics? Like hell it does! :)

My Black friends - my non-white friends - my friends who are people of colour - enrich my life. Because they're my friends, and are in my life. Because they're amazing, wonderful people. But they're not my unpaid, unasked educators. Unless they choose to be. And then I listen and learn, for sure. But that's their insight to give, if they choose - it's not mine to ask for.

I congratulate you both on starting a conversation that is relevant and very important.

What Babz said is absolutely correct. The conversation has to be between people who are willing to put themselves in the other person's shoes and be prepared to understand, even if they don't necessarily agree.

I'm a single black woman and what I absolutely hate is being "pegged" by someone that I'm a certain way or that I believe a certain thing before I ever open my mouth.  And I'll tell you right here and now that goes for white women and black women.

Because I'm a media person I'll try to speak to the TV aspect of the conversation.

The media is all about money and who knows who. As far as network television there is no black person in charge who can pretty much greenlight anything they want except Oprah Winfrey. And in primetime, even she has some limitations.

There is one black Mom that I can think of on primetime and that's Miranda Bailey of "Grey's Anatomy." I don't think it's a coincidence that "Grey's Anatomy" is produced by a black woman, Shonda Rhimes. ( http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0722274/ ) She's the only black woman in primetime with such a high profile position much less a hit show.

If some executive had the guts to put on a drama revolving around a black family and it was a hit, you better believe, every other network would be putting on a drama revolving around a black or minority family. That's how TV works. They're copycats, but no one wants to put on anything that fails.

If it's a black show and it fails, it's perceived to be because it was a black show, not because it was a crappy black show. That means it's another ten years before a black show is even attempted.

What's my point? I guess it's that there's no grand conspiracy in TV, they just put on what's safe and what they know. That's no excuse by any means---there's no one who represents me as a single black woman either, where's my "Mary Tyler Moore Show?"---but if I had the answer, I'd put it out there and make myself a mint.

The hiring of more black executives, writers, producers and directors in Hollywood is a beginning, but someone in power needs to legitimately feel that's important and act on it.

Megan
BlogHer Contributing Editor, TV/YouTube ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/msmith )
Megan's Minute ( http://www.megansminute.com/ )
Video Runway ( http://www.womenonwomenblog.com/megan/ )

I think you both came to this discussion with open hearts.  Knowing full well this is a tense topic and ripe for real mis-understanding(s).  But you both handled it with a great deal of tolerance and I don't mean the lip-service type of tolerance. But with a real sense of hearing and listening and paying attention.

It is difficult to convey what it means to be a Black Woman in America.  To be both invisible and held up as troubled, troubling and in-trouble. It is a duality that few know.

This ought to be an-going dialogue here, even at the expense of personal comfort.  I, like Sojourner Truth asks the same question: Ain't I a Woman!"

This forum that is Blogher is primed and ready to lead this discussion with a clear head, willing spirit and open heart. Take it on!

Love, Babz