Bio
As Senior Fellow at the Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism at Brandeis University, I expose how corporations and private interests skew...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

When Parenting Clashes With Medical Treatment: What Would You Do?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 16
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

The 20-something dental hygienist, wearing dark purple scrubs, smiled at my children and me as she motioned for us to follow her to the examining room.

“Okay,” she chirped at my 10-year-old daughter, “Mom will wait outside while we take a quick picture of your teeth.”

I could feel my face stiffen.

“We aren’t going to do X-rays this time,” I said, keeping my voice as casual as possible. “I mentioned that we didn’t want X-rays when I called for an appointment, and I also wrote it in on the consent form.”

The young hygienist furrowed her brow. “Ah, okay,” she said, her eyes darting awkwardly away from my face. “Just wait in here while I, uh, go check on that.”

She came back a few minutes later.

“Dr. Y says that you have to have X-rays,” she said, still unable to look at my face. “She says she can’t treat your children without them.”

This was in May, 2010, just a few weeks after the President’s Cancer Report, “Reducing Environmental Cancer Risk: What We Can Do Now,” was released. On page 7 of the report, in large font, is a section entitled, “Children Are at Special Risk for Cancer Due to Environmental Contaminants and Should be Protected.”

That 240-page report states definitively that cancer among children (and adults) is on the rise in the United States. Out of 50 countries, the United States has the dubious distinction of rating #9 in the number of deaths from cancer. According to the American Cancer Society, an estimated 10,700 children ages 0 –14 will be diagnosed with cancer in 2010, a rise of more than 10 percent from just five years ago. While childhood cancer is considered “rare,” it is the second most common cause of death among children (after accidents). It is predicted that 1,340 American children this year will die from cancer.

The numbers sadly confirm the anecdotal evidence among our friends and family. As I've mentioned previously on this blog, our 14-year-old neighbor Michael is battling leukemia. My daughter’s friend Isaac’s older sister Whitney was 18 when she died of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after fighting it for four years, and more than twelve of our adult friends (including my 62-year-old father-in-law who has throat cancer, my 29-year-old friend Faigy who has five children and Stage IV melanoma, and my daughter’s first grade teacher who died at age 59 from breast cancer) have been afflicted by cancer.

The President’s Cancer Report is very clear that radiation (that is, exposure to X-rays) is a known carcinogen, and that the more you are exposed to radiation, the more likely you are to get cancer. We have all heard that X-rays are harmful. That’s why you and the hygienist leave the room when your child’s teeth are being X-rayed. That’s why your child wears a lead bib to protect the rest of her body from the harmful X-rays. But what I didn’t understand until I started learning more about it, and what most of us don’t think about, is that the harmful effects of X-rays are cumulative. That means that every time you get exposed to X-ray particles, even if the exposure itself is very small, you increase your risk (or your child’s risk) of getting cancer.

According to the report,

… [I]f patients were more aware of radiation exposure due to specific tests and the cancer risk that can accrue with cumulative medical radiation exposure, they might be more likely to raise this issue with their physicians.

It seems like a simple thing to say, “No thank you. I don’t want my daughter’s teeth X-rayed this time,” but I was worried about bucking the system and a little unsure about how the dentist would react. That’s why I called the practice ahead of time and why I also put the request to not do the X-rays in writing. When Dr. Y came to talk to me about it, I explained that I was requesting we forgo using X-rays as a diagnostic tool and only use them if she found something in my daughter’s mouth that was cause for concern.


If you’ve never questioned medical or dental authority before, the idea that the dentist dismissed my family from her practice might surprise you. But if you’ve been gently asking the doctors and dentists and other health care providers who care for your children to intervene as little

  • 16
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
All that makes you... 8 pts

Gosh this is such a hard call.  My kids never complain about teeth hurting and yet the dentist always finds cavities.  I know that I needed three root canals, (we all have super soft teeth) and I am not exaggerating when I say they took 35-40 X-Rays to figure out what was going on.  

 

Here is the tricky part...my husband is a doctor, a radiologist.  I would come home from the dentist  concerned over how many X-rays they took that day and he would be like, seriously...that is such a low dose it's nothing to worry about.

 

I turn down tests regularly if I feel that even if the test will be positive for what they are testing me for.  An example, my dermatologist couldn't figure out a problem I was having with my skin so he wanted to run a hormone level test.  If my hormone levels weren't correct I wouldn't take hormones anyway so what does it matter.

 

I also had a dentist refuse caring for me because while he was in the hall he heard me tell the hygienist that having him make me come back two different times for two different teeth that were next to each other was getting inconvenient and I would rather be numbed once instead of twice as well.  I should have been a dentist fi they are doing well enough to turn away customers because that's what I consider myself, a customer.

omosmom 6 pts

Since OMO is my first, I haven't studied the info about fluoride so this is enlightening. Thanks.

Kathykate 10 pts

I refuse xrays at dentist prescribed increments, but agree to every 5 years or so.... Much eye rolling and huffing, but our office has honored my request. If there were a presenting problem, I'd consent, but 4 kids and 2 cavities later, so far, so good. And we do fluoride every other visit. DItto for my choppers as well. Dental health is genetic in my mom-opinion, and we've got good genes. If not, it would be my responsibility for full dental care, xrays and all.

Docs aren't used to being questioned -- ever. But with the cost and health risks, they need to be.

Kathy (return to work mom)

http://returntoworkmom.blogspot.com/

Nickelnm 5 pts

As the mother of two boys; one of whom has a serious illness and therefore receive many more tests than the normal child I applaud you for standing up for your beliefs an what you believe to be best for your child.

Our society is made up of followers; people who blindly follow whatever a person in authority tells them - be it a doctor, dentist, police, or even big business.

We all have rights and one of those rights is the ability to turn down medical care we deem un-necessary. I have turned down floride treatments at the dentist and have refused to get the floride drops from the pediatrician filled. Our water doesn't have floride in it. The school even offer floride treatments. If I blindly allowed all of these people to give my boys floride how long before they have to much in their body??? To that end, I refuse the majority but they do get one treatment a year.

I think the dentist was WRONG for refusing to see your point of view and to see your child because you stood up for your right. I personally would probably file an official complaint against that dentist's license for unnecessary treatment.

If we don't speak up for ourselves and our children then who will?

lisamann 5 pts

Unless you are a danger to your child, your wishes,as her parent,should suffice (after your doctor informs you of the possibilities. My daughter, because of a different health issue, has many many xrays. So her dentist only xrays her if absolutely necessary. Health care shouldn't be a one-size-fits-all proposition.

JennaHatfield 207 pts

Oh, gosh. I hear you.

Imagine if your mother-in-law was your dental hygienist. It's an on-going battle in my family.

Contributing Editor Jenna Hatfield (@FireMom ( http://twitter.com/FireMom )) blogs at Stop, Drop and Blog ( http://stopdropandblog.com ) and The Chronicles of Munchkin Land ( http://thechroniclesofmunchkinland.com ). She is a freelance writer and newspaper photographer.

MyKidsEatSquid 5 pts

Our insurance company will only pay for annual x-rays, no 6 month scans here. But I had a rough experience with dental problems as a kid--several of my baby teeth didn't come out at the right time so I had to have oral surgery to have some things corrected that could/should have been picked up on an x-ray. So for my kids I'm going to make sure that their progress is monitored carefully, including x-rays, so that hopefully they won't be in their senior year of high school, still in braces.

Purple 5 pts

I'm not saying go and jump into a pond of green gooey radiation, I'm simply stating that it is literally everywhere, even in the oceans and in the ground we walk on, in the air we breathe, etc., and that one little x-ray is hardly going to make your child sprout tentacles. While I don't really see the point of taking x-rays of a little baby mouth (it's obviously just so they can get more money from the insurance companies) I also don't think it's wise to go on an x-ray banning spree.

My friend is an x-ray technician and she had to learn pretty much everything about radiation. The people who should worry about getting cancer from a mere x-ray should be the people giving them; she stated that the bib you wear is pretty much pointless because the radiation you get is so little.

Idk, I just think there's always going to be something out there that people fear because someone starts shouting how horrible it is. I honestly do not feel that radiation is the top of my concerns. Keeping my kid from getting obese is something I'm more worried about, since food these days are hardly good for you. But that's another subject.

sstiavetti 5 pts

Yeah, I'm going to have to disagree with this statement. You acknowledge that there's a ton of radiation around, and yet you want to expose your child to more? That's logical how?

There's also a risk to thyroid health with head and neck-area radiation. See this article from the American Thyroid Association:

http://www.thyroid.org/patients/patient_brochures/childhood.html

Sure, dental radiation may be negligible, but a child's thyroid if more sensitive than an adults, and radiation exposure does indeed build up over time.

----------------------
Food blog: http://www.wasabimon.com ( http://www.wasabimon.com/ )

Cookbook reviews: http://www.thegoodtastereview.com

Twitter:

KrisBordessa 5 pts

It's crazy to me that dentists insist on Xrays every six months. It's purely about billing, I think, not about the health of teeth. I've recently found a holistic dentist who is *amazing. He xrays only on occasion or when he sees a problem. He does not use fluoride *at all* in his practice. That alone is pretty telling.

Jennifer, we canned our microwave 10+ years ago. People can't figure out how we survive.

And to the person who mentioned radiation as a cure for cancer, yes. It is a cure for cancer. It can also cause cancers to recur.

There are always different angles to consider and as parents we have the responsibility to make the best choice possible for our kids. We can do that only if we're informed. This might be of interest: http://www.chemicalbodyburden.org/

Jennifer Margulis 5 pts

After reading about the dangers of microwaves, we gave ours away six years ago. We have never missed it. We also stopped using no-stick pans and we no longer have any plastic utensils. When you learn something is toxic, you change your behavior. If everyone did this, there would be far fewer toxins in the environment and the government and private industry would start paying attention to what is destroying our children's health. So, yes! Of course! You should throw away your microwave. The best part about doing that is your food will taste so much better.

Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D.
Contributing Editor, Mothering magazine ( http://mothering.com/jennifermargulis/ )
Author of Why Babies Do That: Baffling Baby Behavior Explained ( http://www.amazon.com/Why-Babies-Do-That-Explained/dp/1595432434/ref=pd_rhf_p_3/105-9128239-6172436 )

Jennifer Margulis 5 pts

There is a huge debate about adding fluoride to drinking water and a growing number of doctors and scientists are beginning to think it is not a good idea. What people don't know is that fluoride has not been proven safe. It's been linked to bone cancer and a host of other health problems.

Fluoride is poisonous in high doses, and is used to kill rats.

Scientific American, Prevention Magazine, and dozens have others have written about the dangers of fluoride:

Excerpts from "Second Thoughts About Fluoride" (or you can buy the full article in Scientific American): http://www.fluoridealert.org/sc.am.jan.2008.html

Prevention magazine: http://www.fluoridealert.org/media/2006f.html

An M.D.'s take on the dangers of fluoride:
http://healthjournalclub.blogspot.com/2010/08/more-on-flouride.html

For more information, there's the book THE FLUORIDE DECEPTION by Christopher Bryson

I don't want my children to ingest a toxic chemical for the sake of strong, healthy teeth. I prefer to practice good oral hygiene and to limit the amount of sugar they eat, and make sure they eat a healthy diet that can help them have healthy bones and teeth.

Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D.
Contributing Editor, Mothering magazine ( http://mothering.com/jennifermargulis/ )
Author of Why Babi ( http://www.amazon.com/Why-Babies-Do-That-Explained/dp/1595432434/ref=pd_rhf_p_3/105-9128239-6172436 )

Erin McNeill 5 pts

I am really surprised the doctor refused you as clients. I have often turned down x-rays for my kids. I think once a year is more than enough, and they want to do them every 6 months, and since they have few troubles with their teeth or health, the benefits don't seem to outweigh the risks. I've turned down other diagnostic tests for myself and them, as well, when I didn't think the risks were worthwhile. But I've never had a doctor refuse to see me or them because of it. That's really shocking. I wonder if it has something to do with insurance reimbursement formulas, medical malpractice suits or the need to pay off the x-ray machine. As Knock it Off says, I am responsible for my kids health, not the doctor.

omosmom 6 pts

My daughter is a bit young to worry about the dentist x-raying her teeth yet and I 'get' your reasoning for not wanting the superfluous x-rays. However, I went back and read your blog on not allowing fluoride at the dentist and I'm curious as to why you didn't want the treatment.

I ask because I know first-hand the good effects of fluoride. I was born in 1971 and growing up in CA my first few years, the water did not contain fluoride. I moved to PA in 1976 and it did. If you compare my siblings' (both older) teeth to mine, mine are much healthier and I am convinced it is due to the fluoridation in the water as we all had the same brushing habits as kids.

Certainly, my story is not clinical proof, but again, I'm curious as to your reluctance. Thanks!

KnockItOff 5 pts

I have heard a number of health professionals state they s/he is "responsible" for some aspect of my or my children's health. I disagree with this statement.

The dentist is responsible for my children's teeth like my mechanic is responsible for my car. The mechanic helps me take care of my car but ultimately I am responsible for my car. The same is true for my children and their health. The doctors, nurses, dentists and other health care professionals I seek treatment from help me address some specific aspect of my children's health, but I am ultimate responsible. This means that in the end the decisions are mine to make based on the advise from the health care professional.

If we as parents surrender our responsibility to health care professionals, we become victims of their care rather than consumers.

Purple 5 pts

I'm all for wanting to make sure my child is healthy, but I think refusing x-rays isn't a way to go about it. We are surrounded by radiation all our lives. I'm sure you have a microwave, and if you use it the same amount that the average microwave user does, then your child has been exposed to more radiation that way then by one x-ray. People say that microwaves don't produce that much radiation, but that's not true, they produce enough that if you use it enough over time you could indeed get cancer.

That's just one of the many things. Hell, I'd rather get an x-ray, atleast you get a lead bib where as you don't get anything when you're cooking food or riding an airplane.

Besides, what would you do if your kid DID get cancer? You do realize the most common and effective cancer treatment is radiation, right? Would you refuse that as well?

Again I'm ALL for looking out for our kids, I have one as well, but I'm not going to refuse x-rays, if I do that I might as well throw out my microwave, my smoke detectors, my old glass antiuqes (lots of antiuqeus before the 1970s is radio active), and my food (most food contains some levels of radiation).

http://www.chem.duke.edu/~jds/cruise_chem/nuclear/exposure.html a good read.