Bio
Publishes Mamalogues® and is a talk radio host. Blogher contributing political editor; also contributes to Mamapop, Imperfect Parent, Momversation, an...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

Thousands Gather Across the Country for the Tax Day Tea Party Protest

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Tomorrow I will join thousands of Americans in protesting continued fiscal irresponsibility by our government. The desire for fiscal responsibility is neither conservative or liberal, Republican or Democrat; it is what it is and to view it otherwise is to make it a partisan issue. It's not a partisan issue, it's an American issue.

There is a lot of misinformation out there about why we are taking to the streets; as one of the national sponsors and as an organizer who's been involved since its inception, I wanted to address some of that.

I am not a billionaire, nor am I funded by billionaires. Were this accusation true I would be wearing a rhinestone-encrusted beltbuckle with the words THA BOSS plated across the center. Clearly this charge is false because a) I do not have said belt buckle b) we paid for our permits by scraping change out of the couch cushions and with donations made by everyday citizens.

I am not a GOP hack. I'm not going to bash the GOP; I realize that they are our biggest champions of conservative principles in Washington. However, take this as caring criticism when I say that their recent jump onto our coattails was not exactly welcome. The Tea Party protest is a movement started by nets/grassroots activists. By the people and for the people. It makes no sense to involve the GOP because it was on their watch that the Wall Street bailout passed. I only like irony in the comedic sense.

Myself and my fellow organizers are not members of groups like Freedom Works or Newt Gingrich's American Solutions Project. These groups (except perhaps for a protest in Florida organized by Freedom Works, I believe) tacked themselves on to the movement after it had momentum. Gingrich may be a mastermind strategist, but if he thinks he's opaque enough to hide his posturing for a possible 2012 bid he's missed his mark.

I fully realize that me saying this or even attempting to be honest about any political party will cost me valuable points and prizes from those who accept only salacious butt-kissing and those people can, quite bluntly, bite me. I refuse to be manipulated. Period. /digression

These protests are also not "hate Obama" rallies. Please. If you truly believe that we would not be in the streets if this were President McCain making these decisions and not President Obama, then I have a bridge to sell you. Seriously. You will never find another deal on a bridge like this.

We are not "extremists." Just yesterday evening a network affiliate mischaracterized me and my co-organizer by analogizing us to the worst kind of kooky extremists and didn't bother to contact us to ask us anything about a story he was doing. On us. This isn't the first hit job I've taken by shoddy journalists and it won't be the last, but it does aggravate me that someone would attempt to suppress turnout by likening those who show up to protest fiscal waste to extremists or neo-Nazis. It's irresponsible and intellectually dishonest.

Since when did political dissent become unpatriotic? (The Anchoress has a brilliant piece on this, by the way.)

So why exactly are we protesting? We're protesting the tripling of the deficit and the forthcoming taxes to offset that. Kiss that $13 dollars-a-week "cut" goodbye - especially when programs like cap-and-trade go into effect and the price of energy skyrockets and gobbles up your little bit of pocket money. We're protesting the massive increase in government's size; the incessant federal meddling in the private sector. Mostly we're protesting fiscal irresponsibility and all that which it brings, as detailed.

That's why we're protesting. We're not expecting to enact change overnight, but we want Democrats to know that we do not like the current course; we want Republicans to know that we will hold their feet to the fire if they don't block increased spending; we want all legislators to know that they have until 2010 to get it together. As for the every citizen, we hope that they realize that it is NOT unpatriotic to ask that government spend responsibly, that it's NOT hateful to criticize the president (I can guarantee you that you won't see the sort of offensive effigies and signs at these protests that we've seen at some anti-Bush rallies ). We want them to realize that our government is overreaching and exceeding its purpose.

As the Constitutional Convention drew to a close in 1787, a Mrs. Powel approached Benjamin Franklin as

  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
KeegsMom 5 pts

Yeah, the "Obama as Hitler" signs were charming, too.  The guy said, "Obama's a fascist!" but could not explain what he meant by it.

He probably should have looked up the word in the dictionary before getting out there with his little sign. It's clear people using the word "fascism" don't know what it means.

KeegsMom

KIDSFLIX

http://kidsflix.blogspot.com

my vote counts 5 pts

I was at the tea party at the plaza and you rocked the plaza Dana!

Made me proud to be an American and gave me some hope, thanks- I am a new fan of yours

Prior bailouts and spending  pale in compairson to what our new administration is pushing through in rocord speeds. Eveen if you factor in the war. So I think compairing past with present is a funny concept.

NOT all the signs speak for me.  I would say these are NOT hate rallies - linking to the negitive is just what some are looking for. Thats okay I'll be at the rallies fighting for my childrens future. Most people know why they are there.

I was there! I didn't just look at what the left wing media want me to see. I suggest others do the same!

evilslutopia 5 pts

I agree with everyone above me pointing out that there were no tea party protests while the Bush administration was spending and spending and spending.  So the whole 'we would totally be out here if a Republican was president right now!' argument rings a little hollow to me.  As does 'since when is dissent unpatriotic?', considering that the thousands and thousands of people who came out to protest the Iraq war were characterized as unpatriotic by many on the right.

Also, I've got to comment on these statements:

"These protests are also not "hate Obama" rallies. Please."

"I can guarantee you that you won't see the sort of offensive effigies and signs at these protests that we've seen at some anti-Bush rallies."

Really? Seriously? In the photos from the tea parties that I've looked at so far, I've already seen the following slogans (and yes, I can link to the pictures for anyone who thinks I'm making any of these up):

"Come On, Let's Tea Bag the D-Bag"

"Chairman Maobama"

Signs with slogans like "Stimulus Slave" and "No More Tax Slavery" and "Obamanomics: Chains You Can Believe In" and "Obama's Plan: White Slavery" (Not offensive at all!)

"Stand idly by while some Kenyan tries to destroy America? I don't think so! Homey don't play dat!"

"The American Taxpayers are the Jews for Obama's Ovens"

"Speak For Yourself Obama - We Are A Christian Nation"

"Wake Up America! Your Muslim President Bowed to His Muslim King!" 

There was also the 'emperor has no clothes' themed naked Obama effigy, and the sign with Obama as Urkel saying "did I do that?"  Your claim to the moral high ground on this one is pretty ridiculous. 

~Jezebel 

The Evil Slut Clique ( http://evilslutopia.blogspot.com )

EvilSlutopia ( http://evilslutopia.blogspot.com )

Liz Rizzo 5 pts

Hi Dana,

Besides invoking an historic spontaneous protest that had to do with taxation without representation, unlike what we have now and I believe actually related to tea, it's simply mind-boggling to hear the term "teabagging" bandied about in terms of this protest. I've been snickering all day, and yeah, I've got Sex & the City up on my blog today and my Facebook.

Honestly, no matter what my feelings on taxation, this particular protest has me either offended for my early American ancestors or laughing, so I pick laughing.

And I realize this is an over-simplication, but I can't get my mind around why these levels of spending are good when spent on a war in Iraq and bad when spent on (bailouts aside) America? I mean, it just makes it all seem insincere.

I'm angry about the bailouts, too, but this protest just couldn't include me, no way no how.

I keep my teabagging in the home. (Sorry, I just can't resist. It's just so incredibly funny.)

Liz Rizzo ( http://blogher.org/blog/liz-rizzo )

I blog at Everyday Goddess ( http://everydaygoddess.typepad.com/ ).

cindydianne 5 pts

So it has been bad in the past. 

So it is getting worse. 

So there is a grass roots effort to change it. 

WHY on Earth would you people take away from the importance of the effort because it didn't start (or more likely come to the forefront) when you think it ought to have.  Isn't something better than nothing?

aftercancer 5 pts

Out of control spending? Seriously?  Why were you people not marching in the streets when the Bush administration was filling the pockets of their friends with no bid contracts? Having rallies when millions and millions of dollars in Iraq simply disappeared?  When Paulson decided which of his colleagues would be supported and which would be set to crumble?  When cash was thrown around with no guidelines, no rules and squandered on stadium naming rights and spa retreats?

This group would have far more credibility if it had spoken to any of these issues. Instead there are signs at these rallies calling for the hanging of the speaker of the house.  Sorry, you lose any authority when that is the statement that is expressed. 

Kate

I blog at http://www.aftercancernowwhat.blogspot.com 

KeegsMom 5 pts

If it's about out of control spending, why weren't you/others spurred to action when Bush was spending like a drunken sailor? (Can't believe he didn't even include the cost of two wars in his budgets!)

 Bush was merely spending, Obama is investing. Already I've seen stimulus money saving some jobs here in my state, preseving jobs from arts organizations to fishermen.

And you ask, when did it become unpatriotic to dissent?

 Why, under Bush of course!  Which is why most spineless Democrats in Congress went along with the Iraq war.

KeegsMom

KIDSFLIX

http://kidsflix.blogspot.com

See Jane Do 5 pts

 Dana,

 I think it's important for women to stand up for what we believe it rather than think someone else will fix the problem.  However, I'm confused why fellow Americans weren't throwing tea party protests during the last 8 years while Bush was in office.  It was the poor decisions of the Bush administration that put our country into a severe economic depression and deficit...much of which is due to spending outrageous amounts on the Iraq War rather than our own country.

I agree that our tax money must be spent responsibly.  We must invest in America.  We need to help everyday Americans rather than bail out wall street.  For some reason this tax tea party rubs me the wrong way.  And I can't help to think where the protesters were over the last 8 years as our country sunk farther and farther.  The republicans want to halt spending (they seemed to be fine pooring millions of tax payer dollars towards the war though) but this will not slolve the problem.  We must invest in the programs and the people of our country that will turn this mess around.  The mess George Bush left us.

Elisa Parker

Co-founder, Producer and Host of See Jane Do

Norma156 5 pts

Yes. Yes. And, yes.

Here in Texas, Rick Perry is sponsoring legislation affirming the 10th amendment. OK, I know it's a media stunt. I know he'll be up against Kay Bailey Hutchinson. Yeah, I know it. But I'm so glad he did.

Thanks for a wonderful column. I've off to meet some friends for our tea party. BTW, a couple of columns below yours is one providing the left point of view. Apparently, the left sees these protests as laugh out loud funny.