Bio
I write Stirrup Queens when I'm not reading other people's blogs, cooking, or chasing after my twins. I'm the author of two books: Life from Scratch,...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Three Ways Egg or Embryo Freezing Are Changing the Fertility World

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 8
  • Sparkle (
    )
     
A FERTILITY TREATMENT CENTER HELPS PEOPLE CONCEIVE A CHILD FOR WHOM CONVENTIONAL MEANS ARE NO LONGER FEASIBLE. AFTER OVULATION A SAMPLE IS TAKEN FROM THE MOTHER AND SEARCHED FOR VIABLE EGGS. SPERM IS THEN TAKEN FROM THE FATHER AND INJECTED INTO THE EGG WITH THE AID OF A MICROSCOPE. AS EMBRYOS DEVELOP THEY ARE EITHER IMPLANTED INTO THE MOTHER OR CRYOGENICALLY FROZEN FOR THE FUTURE. FERTILITY LAB EMBRYO COLD FREEZER CRYOGENIC PRESERVE

Putting eggs, embryos, or ovarian tissue on ice has been a hot topic for the last few weeks. Numerous articles have popped up, discussing these options and holding them out as a solution for those who are not quite ready to build their family, or who need to protect their family building options due to fertility-damaging medical treatments. The articles run the gamut from "career women" to a two-year-old in New York about to experience chemotherapy.

British Women Considering Freezing Their Eggs Rather Than Using Them Now

Time reports that a study of 200 women found that, "half of those pursuing degrees in sports or education would consider freezing their eggs to give them the option to delay starting a family, while more than 8 out of 10 women pursuing a medical degree said that they would do so." A second study in Belgium found that half of the 15 women interviewed would freeze their eggs in order to take the pressure off of finding a partner in time to utilize the woman's fertility.

I'm not really shocked at the results. Certainly, as IVF has become commonplace, attitudes surrounding IVF have relaxed and many see the idea of egg freezing as a great leap forward in allowing women the same gamete safeguards given to men, especially when it comes to preserving fertility prior to undergoing medical treatments that would impair fertility. Men have been able to freeze and thaw their sperm for years, but it has only been in recent years that scientists have been successful in freezing eggs.

Which opens many more doors than simply freezing embryos.

Prior to recent years, scientists had great success with freezing embryos -- in other words, eggs that had already been fertilized. But this didn't provide a wide-range of options for women who weren't in a partnership. Those wanting to preserve their fertility -- either due to career, relationship status, or medical treatments -- needed to either pair their eggs with donor sperm or use the sperm of someone they may be in a relationship with at the moment. Egg freezing releases women from only being able to utilize their gametes with a donor, and provides the same options afforded to men.

The study was additionally discussed by Fox News, which points out that at this point, there is more discussion than action:

Gorthi said none of the medical students in the study had frozen eggs, that the youngest woman to freeze eggs in her clinic was 28, and that it was most commonly requested by women in their late 30s, whose fertility had already started to decline.

Reuters reports that over half the fertility clinics in the United States are offering egg-freezing options, though many do so with restrictions:

The researchers found that a third restrict the option to cancer patients or as an alternative to freezing leftover embryos for women attempting in vitro fertilization. And while two-thirds of those clinics that offer it will do so electively, no more than a third will provide it to women over 40 years old.

A fairly detailed article in the Daily Mail also explores the study, pointing out many of the fallacies the general public holds about the reach of IVF.

Creating Embryos for Later Use

The Washington Post had a perky article about a couple who has created and frozen embryos because, after eight years of marriage (and in their early thirties), they still aren't ready financially to become parents. They state that their reason for delaying parenthood was that, "It was very important to us, though, that we first be financially stable enough to support them and give them plenty of parenting time."

Which is all well and good, but it begs the question how much money this couple believes they need to have in order to be ready to parent.

  • 8
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
nsc8 5 pts

Yes, I'm considering doing this in the next year. I just turned 36 and do not have immediate prospects of starting a family in a traditional way. I'd love to attempt to preserve my fertility for a bit longer to see if I meet someone I'd like to have children with. I'd either donate my eggs to infertile couples or to science. If the eggs were good and survived the thaw.

maybebabymomma 5 pts

Please take a look at my blog about egg freezing: freezerdreams.blogspot.com

I know many women are interested in this, so I'm trying to get a conversation started.

Thank you!

Melissa Ford 42 pts

Absolutely--though it worries me if people believe that freezing embryos or eggs comes with any guarantee. It only presents a possibility--a very expensive one--and it's one thing if you have no other choice, but it's quite another to put off something you want that has an expiration date for something that doesn't.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

40andoverblog.com 5 pts

I tell all the young women who are asking my advice because I am a "professional" that, if you want children, you can't put off having them indefinitely. If you are going to wait until 35 to have kids you have to freeze SOMETHING!!

One of my college friends thinks that this is my mission in life, since she and I answered emails and took conference calls while our biological clocks sounded the alarms. I am lucky to have adopted a child and she has a stepdaughter to whom she is close, so we have both luckily experienced parenting (the toughest job in the world).

Young people think you can "have it all" -- assuming that is a goal worth having -- at once. You can probably have it sequentially. But once you go down the road, "having it all" takes on different, or maybe only nuanced, meanings. A career will be there, fertility has a shelf life.

Melissa Ford 42 pts

That is wonderful that you got to be their surrogate! Thank you for sharing that story.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

pmacphee 5 pts

I think there are definitely viable reasons for freezing eggs and embryos, but I don't believe financial consideration makes any sense in light of the cost of the retrieval procedures in the first place. Retrieving eggs and freezing embryos, though, is a hopeful opportunity to preserve the fertility future of girls and women undergoing cancer treatment. My cousin's wife was lucky to have an oncologist who suggested egg retrieval and embryo freezing before her cervical cancer treatment began. Though the treatment rendered her uterus inhospitable and she could not carry a pregnancy, they were still able to have a family when I offered to carry the baby for them as a surrogate mom. I can personally attest to the amazing, life-changing effect that opportunity provided to my cousin and his wife. My hope is that all women and men are provided with this option so that when they recover from the devastation of cancer they can still be hopeful about creating a family.

Melissa Ford 42 pts

I think that's what worries me the most about that article. Chemotherapy--definitely. Protecting your fertility because you are not prepared to be a single parent by choice--definitely. Waiting to become more financially stable? Well...no. IVF is prohibitively expensive and if this couple has the funds to create, freeze, store, and thaw embryos, they have the money to have a child. I wish she had focused on a different reason.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).

JennaHatfield 83 pts

The creating-embryos-for-future-IVF-in-order-to-wait-to-be-financially-stable situation kind of boggles my mind. Especially as I was once under the impression that the "stuff" of parenting was what made a good parent, but, of course, I have since learned otherwise. More over, finances can change so quickly. This economy is proof. People who thought they were on the up and up are suddenly struggling. There is no perfect time to have a child. The moment you make the decision and move forward on the path, your car will break down, the washer will die and your husband's prescription won't be covered by insurance.

If I was not yet a mother and was facing something like chemotherapy, I would consider freezing. Otherwise, not really.

Jenna Hatfield (@FireMom ( http://twitter.com/FireMom )), from Stop, Drop and Blog ( http://stopdropandblog.com ) and The Chronicles of Munchkin Land ( http://thechroniclesofmunchkinland.com ), is a freelance writer and newspaper photographer.