Bio
Hi, I'm Karen Ballum, but I'm better know around the web as Sassymonkey. I live in Ottawa, Ontario -- Canada's national capital. (No, I do not li...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Toronto's Trash Strike

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

I haven't been following the Toronto CUPE strike, aka the garbage strike, very closely. Whenever it comes up I usually think that I'm very happy I don't live there at the moment go on to other shinier objects. The strike is now in its fourth week though. Four weeks of garbage piling up in city parks. Four weeks of kids without daycare. Four weeks of the union and the city having "they said/they said" conversations in the media. Four weeks and best I can tell it's not any closer to being over.

The most visible (and smelliest) sign of the strike is the piles of garbage. At Different but good S posted some pictures of the piles of garbage that have been accumulating at make-shift dumping grounds in public parks (as deemed by the city, people are not randomly dumping in parks...much). She raises some health concerns.

Pretty Crazy eh?
And just so you know, maggots are multiplying and rats are reproducing as I type this. What will happen when and if the garbage is removed? Are we inviting a new bout of the plague?

Angry egg reminds us that while the garbage is visible it's not the only thing in the city that is being impacted by the strike.

I feel really bad for the parents who had to make other arrangements for daycare. I feel even worse for the kids (largely lower income) who relied on the pools and community centres for a place to go in the summer. These people have been lost in the fray while everyone else bitches about something they have some control over.

Rositta said that the strike has impacted her household in ways she hadn't imagined, and she's not talking about her family's trash.

No, the bigger impact is on my husbands business. He has now turned down three jobs that require him to remove demolition material and take it to the local dump. This was always included in his service since there are very few homeowners who would want to take their own debris away.

[...]

There has been talk of compensating homeowners for lost services but no one can compensate us for the lost income this strike is causing us.

There appear to be more people speaking out against the strike than in favour or it but We Move To Canada posted on why we should support city workers.

We all aren't lucky enough to belong to a strong union that fights to get us better pay, benefits or working conditions, or to keep what we already have. But the strong unions' efforts help all of us. That's been proven throughout history. Without the higher standards hard-fought for and won by unions, most of us would still be labouring under 19th Century conditions.

But all anyone cares about is the inconvenience to them. And of course, their taxes. "I pay their salaries! They have some nerve! I don't have bankable sick time, why should they?" Yes indeed, why should anyone have what I don't have. If I can't have it, no one should!

She points to a few of the The Impudent Strumpet's posts. One that she didn't point to, but which I found interesting is Juniority

I've heard about this sort of thing happening before when the employer wants to buy out some previously collectively bargained benefit, and I always have a massive, visceral negative reaction. Like beyond the "No fair!" factor of a year not being equal to a year. It really is a disproportionate reaction for something that doesn't affect me personally.

I think I've figured out why I'm reacting this way: they're treating the workers with fewer years of service as though they're less loyal.

MacLean's Magazine recently wrote "Demanding Times", an article on the lack of public sympathy for public sector strikes. People who work in private companies think that the public sector has it better and viceversa.

To say all this has left regular workers feeling bitter puts it mildly. “The whole public sector is going to get tarnished” by the strike in Toronto, says Maurice Mazerolle, a labour studies professor at Ryerson University. “There are outrageous things in some public sector contracts and people are wondering, ‘What is this about? Why do you get this?’ ”

Spoiled Chinese Girl is one of those individuals that "Demanding Times" is talking about. She says that she's not good with labour disputes. If unions are the problem get rid of the unions. If government is the problem shut down (non-essential) services to the government. Or find

  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Lgirl 5 pts

"But the laid off auto and steel workers were also unionized were they not? Private industries but unionized? "

Yes, absolutely. Private industry and unionized. That used to be not such a rare thing. :)

 "My point in the part the you quoted in your comment, which was part of a larger paragraph, is that neither side is doing a good job of selling why there is a strike. "

Yes, I got that. Knowing what I do about unions during a strike, PR cannot be a high priority use of resources. It would be nice, but it's impractical at best, usually impossible.

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

I think that private sector support is the same as the general public, divided. Which is why I linked both those that do and do not support the strike.

Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca/ ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca/ ).

sassymonkey 6 pts moderator

But the laid off auto and steel workers were also unionized were they not? Private industries but unionized?

My point in the part the you quoted in your comment, which was part of a larger paragraph, is that neither side is doing a good job of selling why there is a strike. I think that union has to work harder at this than the government because it's the union members that the public interact with personally on the picket lines. They are the more public face of the strike.

Thanks for the heads up on the typo.

Sassymonkey ( http://sassymonkey.ca/ ) and Sassymonkey Reads ( http://sassymonkeyreads.ca/ ).

Lgirl 5 pts

Hi again. I realized after I posted that you were referring to specific laid-off workers who you know. So obviously I can't say "that's not true". I was referring to private-sector workers in general, many of whom (like myself) support the strike.

Lgirl 5 pts

Thanks for the link!

"I know many people in the private sector that have been laid off in the
last six months during the recession. None of those people are out
there cheering for the striking union. They have pretty much zero
sympathy for people who are fighting about sick days and raises."

This is actually not true. There has been a huge outpouring of support from laid off auto workers and steel workers. They know that good jobs raise employment standards for everybody - and likewise, benefit cuts have negative reprecussions for all of us.

The CUPE strike is not about frivolous extras. The banked sick days were a concession given years ago for deferred wages, and they are in lieu of pension plans. It is something the city agreed to when the union agreed to wage freezes. They got their wage freezes, and now want to take back their side of the bargain.

The raises are strict cost of living, like all the other Toronto public employees have already gotten.

I wouldn't ask you to blindly sympathize with the striker. But it sounds like you need more information. 

Just FYI, my blog-friend ImpStrump is Impudent, not Imprudent. :)