TV executive beheaded in Buffalo; husband charged -- what's Islam got to do with it?
by Kim Pearson

Aasiya Zubair Hasan, 37, wanted to dispel post-9/11 stereotypes about American Muslims. In 2004, the Pakistani-born architect co-founded the Bridges TV satellite channel with her husband, Muzzamil Hasan, in their home in Orchard Park, NY, a suburb of Buffalo. That dream ended on Feb. 12 when Muzzamil Hazan walked into the town's police station and announced that Aasiya's dead body could be found on the floor of the Bridges TV offices.

Police did indeed find her body, with her severed head nearby. Muzzamil Hasan stands charged with second-degree murder, and fierce debates are raging over whether this is an "honor killing" and an indictment of Islam, or yet another failure in the effort to protect women from a spouse with a long history of violence.

According to news reports, Aasiya Hasan had filed for divorce and an order of protection against her husband on Feb. 6, after he had beaten and terrorized her for years. Rabbi Bradley Hirschfeld, a friend and colleague, reportedly told the New York Times that she told him about Muzzamil's violence, but that he was getting counseling. The Buffalo News reports that she'd called the police multiple times about his violent behavior, and was so afraid that he would take her children, ages 6 and 4, that gave their passports to a friend for safekeeping.  Police say that despite the repeated calls, Aasiya was never able to bring herself to press formal charges against her abuser.

 

Muslim bloggers and organizations have roundly condemned the murder and have been quick to say that there is no justification for it in Islam. Here's Islam on My Side:

The murder of Aasiya Zubair could have happened to anyone, of any
religious and/or ethnic group, and the actions of her murderer,
Muzzammil Hassan, should never be associated with
Islam. Anyone who studies Islam honestly will understand that Mr.
Hassan’s actions clearly violated Islamic teachings, therefore the last
thing that anyone should call this murder is “Islamic.”

Nonetheless, the writer applauds this press release from a group of Muslim organizations and bloggers urging "swift action" against domestic violence:

In
response to the collective concern of the American Muslim community,
imams and religious leaders across America have been asked to speak out
against domestic violence to their congregations. They are asked to
remind congregants of the Prophet Muhammad's abhorrence of harshness,
abuse and violence, and emphasize solutions that strengthen families
and ensure all members are treated with fairness and respect, free of
fear of abuse or violence.

Sunni Path wishes that the call to action had come sooner:

 What is tragic, however, is that it took a crime so heinous for us to
finally pay attention to a problem which has been long festering in our
communities.

Still, to some observers this horrific crime is evidence that "honor killing" -- a murder of someone who has supposedly "shamed" her family -- is practiced by even "moderate" Muslims. Phyllis Chesler is especially insistent on this point, noting the brutality of the murder:

A beheading suggests that the murderer wants to separate his victim’s
mind from her body, he does not want to hear what she has to say, he
wants her mute, beyond what duct tape can do and he wants her
completely severed, disassociated from her ability to flee.

Others note that Muzzamil Hasan wasn't particularly religious, and say that this was the culmination of an escalating pattern of abuse. Kim Gandy, president of the National Organization of Women, noted women are often in the most danger when they try to escape their abusers, and this seems to have been the case here. According to Gandy, focusing on the Hasans' religion distracts from the real issue:

Despite these patterns that are typical of spouse abuse and murder
(only the manner of killing was atypical), most of the conservative
commentary has focused not on male violence toward women (surprise,
surprise), nor on the importance of protecting women who have separated
from a violent relationship (another surprise) but has focused instead
on attacking the Muslim community. Although the crime was quickly
decried by Muslim groups, many talk shows and blogs used the horror of
Muzzammil's act to indict an entire community -- in a way that they
would never have accused the entire Christian religion because a
Methodist man murdered his estranged wife in a horrible way. Three
weeks ago, a Chinese graduate student at Virginia Tech cut off a female
friend's head with a knife. Not a single news outlet referred to his
religion.

Perhaps ironically, one of the first people to refer to the murder as a possible honor killing was NOW's chapter president in New York State, Marcia Pappas, in a press release criticizing the media for failing to make this a national story:

 And why is this horrendous story not all over the news? Is a Muslim
woman's life not worth a five-minute report? This was, apparently, a
terroristic version of "honor killing," a murder rooted in cultural
notions about women's subordination to men. Are we now so respectful of
the Muslim's religion that we soft-peddle atrocities committed in it's
name? Millions of women in this country are maimed and killed by their
husbands or partners. Had this awful murder been perpetrated by a
African American, a Latino, a Jew, or a Catholic, the story would be
flooding the airwaves. What is this deafening silence?

If Google News is any indication, the silence has been broken.  Stories about Aasiya Zubair and the horror she endured are ricocheting around the globe, with particularly heavy regional coverage. 

Amy Siskind hopes that Aasiya Zubair can become a symbol of the urgent need to combat violence against women in all communities, and finds the debate over honor killing a "sick" distraction:

 

 
Aasiya’s murder could serve to elucidate our country’s gravest societal
crisis—violence against women. The problem is, her killing has touched
off a debate among feminists on several fronts, including whether hers
was an honor killing or domestic violence; multicultural relativism;
Islamic violence on our shores; and whether we should even be speaking
out about this particular murder in the first place. Yet in order for
our country to start a much needed national dialogue on violence
against women, the feminists of our country need to unite and work
together on this most important takeaway—that a woman was senselessly
murdered and the laws of our country could not protect her.

A statement on
the Bridges TV website condemns the killing and asks for privacy.
Bridges TV staffers say they will try to keep the company alive in an
effort to realize Aasiya's vision.

Related posts:

Islamacate lists of other Muslim responses 

http://www.islamicate.com/2009/02/aasiya-zubair.html 
 

Muslim Media Watch
http://muslimahmediawatch.org/2009/02/17/a-collection-of-statements-concerning-the-murder-of-aasiya-hassan/ 
 

Facebook Memorial Page: 

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=51076729695 
 

Warped Galaxies: stats on domestic violence in the US and in several Muslim countries:

 http://www.pktaylor.com/pksblog/2009/02/aasiya-and-horrors-of-domestic-violence.html

 Whose Shoes Are These Anyway: Islamic TV CEO Confesses to Beheading Wife

Many, many thanks to BlogHer CEs Gena Haskett, Nordette Adams and Mata H who contributed links to this post. 

Comments

 

Honour killings and Islam

are two different things, though people will associate them quite willingly and liberally.

I know some will disagree, but honour killings IMO are cultural and or perhaps clannish, tied to pockets of patriarchy that are several standard deviations to the right of usual.

All too often religion becomes the excuse, a path of convenience both as a reason to do and a reason to blame. 

 

nelle

/

llhaesa

 

Patriarchal themes of some major religions
can't be ignored

Thank you for including a link to my blog, Kim, and if my contribution assisted you, I am happy.

I wrote a lot more and then realized I had another post of my own. :-)  I think I must carry this stuff somewhere in the back of my mind because when certain cases come up, thoughts spill out from where I'm not sure.

No, we can't point the finger at Islam because Islam is not alone in having teachings that women must submit to men.  It's a touchy subject in many major religions that don't want to appear outdated or get flack from the politically correct police.  And people tend to protect the belief systems that have given them comfort and their lives meaning and so search for ways to nullify some doctrines that rub them the wrong way.  It seems the most common attempt to nullify is to pretend the doctrine only exist on the fringe.

Nordette: BlogHer CE. Blogs @ WSATA & UMBOP. @Twitter

 

I agree in some ways...

but I still believe religions are significantly shaped by culture.

Some areas of the world practise strict Catholicism, but check out attitudes amongst American Catholics... are there many who are against using contraceptives, as one example?

Islam and Christianity are tethered to written works that leave huge differences in opinion amongst people and even scholars over the intended meaning, all likely written by white guys with a definite agenda.

With a base agenda and a base bias, add in centuries of translation and intepretation by others with an agenda and the perspective of their time and their lives, all of which is significantly influenced by the culture they live in.

Eventually we have people claiming certain behaviours are required or sanctioned, and try to pressure others into accepting their view of what is required or sanctioned, often by way of suggesting a heavenly smiting is nigh if they decline the strongly suggested and proffered path. Here comes conformity, we humans at times love it so.

Anyway, what shows in the interpretation of a religion is often a strong reflection of the culture (and personality) of the person so interpreting. Culture in this case can be expansive - societal level, or it could be group level, if one is heavily immersed in one to the exclusion of other things.

Honour killings make me crazy; I will never forget NPR interviewing a few men who carried one out within their family. I listened to that on my commute home a few years back, and that was positively chilling. It ended with sharing how at least one of them was haunted in everything he did by this act.

When you read a book like The Handmaid's Tale, and you subsequently realise there are places in this world where some elements of the book look somewhat tame, that is a truly chilling thought.

Nightmares, really.

 

llhaesa

 

Thanks, Nelle

I think this is a what came first, the chicken or the egg discussion, which only sends people in circles. :-) 

I made the first comment in response to Kim's thorough post but expanded on it at the post to which I linked in the response and in which I said: 

So, I think a combination of culture, which is strongly influenced by the abuse of patriarchal religious doctrine, and the weak minds of some males who confuse feelings of love with feelings of possessiveness contributes to violence against women contribute to violence against women.(WSATA, edited because I left off a phrase)

I don't know if you read the post, but we're essentially saying the same thing except I give weight to faith being the egg. You're talking specifically about formal religion, it seems, while I discuss religion because religions are faith systems, one of which is related to Aasiya's murder. Once a formalized religion is in place in a culture, especially if it's in bed with heads of state, culture and religion exist symbiotically.

However, when I say faith influences culture, I don't mean just formalized religion. I mean faith as in whatever we beleive to be true about the world around us and ourselves, which is why I also mentioned Darwin in my post.  People can have faith absent of formal religion, and it's that faith that forms culture.

Ancient humans didn't have science, but they did have every day experiences that showed them men were physically stronger than women and from women new life comes.  From these observations as well opinions formed after watcing the seasons, how a river flowed, or sunrise and sunset, they developed belief systems that reflected their experiences, many of which expanded on the idea of men being physically stronger than women, for instance, to become the fallacy that men are superior to women.

Faith is biased because we build our beliefs on what we personally experience and who and what we want to have or give power. So, I think cultures, particularly ancient cultures, spring from faith, what we believe about our world, which is not the same as saying culture springs from religion because religion also springs from faith.

However, once a formalized system of beleifs, a religion, is born that exists in symbiosis with a culture, you can't ignore its influence on the decisions people make nor its influence on cultural laws that sometimes condone those decisions no matter how unjust. And, as I said at WSATA, "... whenever you have the belief that one group is inferior or must by mandate submit to another group, you leave the door open to codified justifications for abuse."

Nordette: BlogHer CE. Blogs @ WSATA & UMBOP. @Twitter

 

Excellent discussion...

and hope to add to the exchange.

Again I agree somewhat and disagree somewhat, though as you suggest we aren't all that far apart overall.

Where I would persist in my cultural-heavy view is that culture predates Islam and Christianity. With Islam surfacing in the sixth century, many of these attitudes existed and simply were built in to the religion.

You are right that it becomes a chicken and egg thing because inevitably the two become deeply intertwined where one religion dominates.

I did drop over and read your off site post moments ago...

Where I wander off again is that religion gets shaped by local circumstance, such as the example I used in the previous post, with those in this country who find ways to justify actions like war and hatred of gays via their interpretations of the Bible.

One can find big differences between Catholic areas worldwide, and these differences are cultural, given they embrace the same belief framework.

With sufficient local isolation, a religion will develop in different directions from other areas. Think the Cathars of Southern France, mercilessly slaughtered in the thirteenth century, for wandering off on their own version of Christianity, only to find they were branded as heretics.

I doubt simply changing Islam (if such a thing were possible) would end honour killings - unless one did so in a very forceful way, convincing people Mohammed despised the practise, say through newly uncovered writings - but I do suspect that changing the culture, with time, will change outcome, and probably take religion right along with it.

I live in the liberal north, a striking contrast to the conservative south in some ways. On balance, the regions approach religion differently, but I would caution people not to extrapolate from the differences the people of the North are any less religious or spiritual than the people of the South. Both areas are predominantly Christian, just different approaches as a regional society, in their outlook.

In the end, it is dangerous to allow any given dogma to dominate such that it casts aspersions on others or chastises others for their way of living. It draws people in, not realising that a rant in Church here, or a rant in a Church there that puts others down is an expressway to trouble.

When igorance is strong, religion can be used to intimidate, to achieve societal goals, to force to conform. It becomes a tool, but once the engine starts, everything moves forward, giving the chicken and egg intertwining you mention.

Going after the issue, trying to solve the issue, I fear it is a mistake to call out Islam directly. People will rally to their faith. It would be better to go after specific issues and deal with them one by one by one, on all levels, showing the damage done, the horrors committed. That NPR report, I'll see if I can find it. If people hear the voices of those who committed such an act, it will get their attention.

Thanks again for a wonderful exchange!

 

 

 

llhaesa

 

I agree

which is why I did not go after Islam specifically, said Islam can't be singled out.  I'm not using the word "faith" in quite the same way you are, possibly, most of the time.

Nordette: BlogHer CE. Blogs @ WSATA & UMBOP. @Twitter

 

In certain very conservative

In certain very conservative branches of Islam - and only Islam - honor killings are the de facto way of handling misbehaving women and youth.  (Men can also be victims of honor killings, especially for homosexual behavior.)  Most moderate Moslems have nothing to do with this - but it does happen.  In areas heavily populated with conservative Moslems the police know that domestic violence killings are often motivated by the "honor killing" code.

It happens.  To ignore it is to ignore a very real problem.

MLO / Melissa

 

Yes, but not sure it's only Islam

All my life, I've heard about women (and in two cases, men) being murdered because the perpetrator decided, "If I can't have you, nobody can." 

As a Christian, I had to stop and think when I read this post from the Feminist Law Profs blog while I was researching Aasiyah Hasan's case. It's not specifically about the murder, but about comparisons between Christianity and Islam with regard to the status of women:

Given there are only 300 million people living in America, and
approximately 1 billion estimated in “the Muslim World”, given that
most women killed by their male partners are killed for leaving and
thus angering or shaming him, how can you say the numbers aren’t
equivalent? No we don’t call them honor killings in the states. No we
don’t officially and legally sanction them. But society clearly has
sympathies to the men who kill “their” women. Every time someone asks
“why didn’t she leave”, every time someone suggests that her behavior
helped contribute to his murderousness, every joke cracked about wife
beating, shows the underlying societal callousness to the state of
women. “Honor killings” overseas and the guy who kills his wife and
their children here because she was leaving him have the same effect -
they both are actions meant to control women by saying “behave the way
‘your’ men want you to behave, or die.” People don’t want to see men’s
murdering of women in the US as in any way similar. People want to
pretend it is all private, unconnected matters if it happens in the US.
“Oh he was depressed, distraught, crazy.” People believe something is
wrong with the individuals involved when a man kills a woman here. They
do not want to look at how society encouraged and condoned the killing.
We view white Americans as individuals acting alone, and those “other”
people overseas as a faceless mass acting all together.

 

For me, the bottom line is, how do we protect ourselves and our communities when an order of protection isn't worth the paper it's written on?

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|

 

When Not Religiously Motivated (Islam) It Is
Cultural

Most historians will even tell you that Christianity and Judaism - as well as some of the Eastern religions actually curbed violence against women.  Islam did not.  Read a history of the Middle Ages or learn about the influence of the Buddha on the extremist sects of Hinduism.  Honor Killing is almost exclusive to a rabid band of Moslem extremists in today's world.  (Honor Killings in the mob or yakuza are different in motivation.)

 

MLO / Melissa

 

The real question is How do we make "orders
of protection" real?

Whether or not you think Islam had a role in the viciousness of this crime, one aspect of Aasiya Zubair's case is all too common: she sought help from the police and the courts and she was not protected. How do we address THAT problem? 

 

KimBlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|

 

Without addressing culture,

Without addressing culture, you can't.

It takes the community to enforce such orders.  They need to be willing to call the police.  And the police need to be willing to enforce - and if they are not culturally acclimated to do such, it won't happen.

MLO / Melissa

 

Christianity curbed violence against women?

What historians are saying that?

As an avid student of pre-Christian Europe and the Christian take-over thereof, I can tell you most assuredly that while Christianity did change the status of women in many parts of Europe, it was largly not for the good. And Christianity certainly did not decrease violence against women. Once established, the Church was responsible for a great deal of brutish behavior toward women. Just it's doctrine alone (and there are many famous mysoginists who were responsible for Christian doctrine) can be held accountable for many crimes of volence against women. Read a little bit about the Spanish Inquisition and the witch hunts of the Church and you will see how many of the victims were women. Do a little research on the history of midwifery and the admonition against anything that decreased a woman's pain in child bed.The Church (both Catholic and Protestant) has not exactly been woman friendly in its history.

I can't speak too much to Judiasm but  I have my doubts as to the likelihood of any religion that relagates women to a subordinate role having the effect of lessening violence toward women.

It has been the experience of ages that when one group is seen as "less than" another (in this case, women to men but it works for race, sexual orienation etc) then that group is more vulnerable to violence perpetrated against it.

Really, the peoples who practice Islam are hardly unique in their history of brutality toward women, whether culturally or religiously sanctioned.

 

islam/beheading

This is one the islamic oppologists are having a hard time burying under the rug as domestic violence. There is just too, way tooo, much evidence that this is an islamic killing of the man's property. I'm sure he wouldn't have been embarrassed when his wife devorced him. His honor would be upheld without killing her. My butt; this was an honor killing with each and every piece of evidence exhibited! islam/behading, islam/beheading, islam/beheading. I'm sorry, 'NOT REALLY' you either follow mohammed's sick, barbaric examples or you don't . We should probably be glad it wasn't a nine year old wife who had disrespected his honor as a man and property owner. islam is exactly the cause, ideal and ideology that created this man, his actions and the teachings he followed to commit them. islam/beheading, islam/beheading, islam/beheading!!!

 

Careful now...

A couple of years ago I followed a link off this site, only to run headlong into an Islam bash-fest.

Whenever we dehumanise groups based on collective generalisations, real people within the group grow increasingly at risk.

I doubt any of us here, all of whom think this crime heinous, wish for this to inspire retaliation and more violence. What *is* needed are reasoned voices all the way around, people looking to move toward the light, and away from rhetoric and confrontation.

If we are truly desirous of ending these honour killings here and elsewhere, the approach is not to ratchet up the tension, it is to give those more reasoned more room to be heard. 

llhaesa

 

Where is the evidence to which you allude?

Perhaps you are privy to details of the investigation that have not been made public?

 

 

KimBlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|

 

ritual beheading

May be  unique to peoples who practice Islam but honor killing is decidedly not. Across cultures and time, societies that have severe moral regulation of sexual behavior (including our own supposed Christian society) have used the death penalty for those who break these laws. Whether it is stoning to death by the leaders of the day or beheading by family members of less ritualized killings by enraged husabands, fathers, brothers or what have you, this has been a "traditional" method for controlling (mostly) female sexual behavior and enforcing "ownership" of the female by the male.

While I agree that honor killings as a ritualized behavior are horrifying, they are not even remotely restricted or unique to the Islamic world.

 

Virginia Tech Decapitation

When I wrote about the decpitation of the woman at Virginia Tech, I presented the tendency to erroneously contribute a certain type of behavior to a particular group based on a string of incidents.  When it comes to violence against women, brutality is not exclusive to any one culture or religion. If we get too focused on one group as though it is the sole offender, we weaken our position in the war against misogynistic violence.

Nordette: BlogHer CE. Blogs @ WSATA & UMBOP. @Twitter

 

Well said.

EOM