- Share This Post
- submit
- 4
-
Sparkle (0)
This past Tuesday the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution apologizing for America’s part in slavery and segregation. “Acknowledging the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow” the resolution was a symbol of America’s apology to African-Americans for the wrongs committed against them and their ancestors. The resolution also acknowledged that while the apology was sincere, it serves as a “confession of the wrongs committed can speed racial healing and reconciliation and help Americans confront the ghosts of their past.”
Umm, yeah.
Well something is better that nothing, right? Here’s how the presidential candidates have weighed in on a governement apology. From The Daily Voice:
On the presidential campaign, Senator John McCain said last October that he would support a federal apology for slavery, although some critics note that he failed to support the bill when it was discussed in February of this year. For his part, Senator Barack Obama has said he has little interest in an official government apology for slavery or reparations for descendants of slaves, according to the Associated Press. Asked if he would support reparations for Native Americans, Senator Obama said last week that "the more important thing for the U.S. government to do is not just offer words, but offer deeds." Although he reportedly noted that by "every socio-economic indicator Native Americans are doing worse" than other Americans, he said he was "more concerned about delivering a better life," according to a report on BlackAmericaWeb.com. Obama added. "The best reparations we can provide are good schools in the inner city and jobs for people that are unemployed," Obama told an audience at the Unity convention in Chicago.Earlier this year, the U.S. Senate passed a resolution apologizing to Native Americans, and in 1988, Congress passed and President Reagan signed a law apologizing to Japanese-Americans who were held in detention camps during World War II. The 60,000 detainees who were alive at the time each received $20,000 from the government, according to CNN.
As with everything, there are differing views on the legitimacy of the apology, the timing and the most burning questions: What about reparations? From Beautiful, Also, Are The Souls of my Black Sisters:
And why give an apology. . . .and no reparations?
Why give an apology to the Japanese Americans interned in concentration camps during WWII, and $20 million in reparations, but offer no reparations to black Americans whose ancestors suffered the cruelty of American slavery? Why refuse to offer reparations to black Americans whose grandparents, uncles, aunts, mothers and fathers (many of whom are still alive) who suffered through the venomous humiliation of segregation?
Why give $56 million in reparations to the Seminole Tribe, but no reparations to black Americans?
Melissa Harris -Lacewell, a professor at Princeton University ad co-author at The Kitchen Table is giving the apology the side-eye (Sorry, I love that sayingJ)
Let's just say I am not taking the apology very graciously.
Apology is critical to a process of reconciliation. No healing can begin without acknowledging the depth of the wrong that has been done. Here is my problem with















