Bio
For now, I can only marvel that I am still here. I am fairly grumpy, willfully sardonic but have occasional outbreaks of perkiness - though I underst...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

The Ugly Omelet: Hard-Cracked Realities of the Egg Industry

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 28
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Yesterday, a disturbing video landed in my inbox from Mercy for Animals (MFA), an animal-rights organization. Shot with a hidden camera by an undercover worker at Hy-Line Hatchery in Spencer, Iowa, (the largest hatchery for egg-laying breed chicks in the US), the footage shows thousands of tiny baby chicks - all males - being ground up alive. Sadly, this is standard industry practice and considered humane by several regulatory agencies.

 

Male chicks are targeted because they don't lay eggs and don't grow big enough to produce meat so ... off they go. At the Hy-Line Hatchery, 150,000 male chicks are ground up every day - 130 million a year. This daily butchering is just business-as-usual to get those cheap eggs to market. Exhibit A:

Average price of a dozen eggs in 2009 - $2.89.
Average price of a dozen organic eggs in 2009 - $4.89.



"Since the undercover video by Mercy For Animals, a vegan advocacy and animal rights organization, was made public, many have expressed shock that male chicks, considered non-profitable to the egg industry, are killed shortly after hatching. The practice, however, is not news within the agricultural industry where 'instantaneous euthanasia' is carried out daily. Rural experts contend that most Americans are too far removed from family farming, much less the agricultural industry, to know and/or understand why certain practices which appear cruel are continued."

--Lynda Waddington, Iowa Independent


The video also shows a debeaking machine where surviving female chicks are inserted, dangling by their beaks, into a laser cutter where burns are inflicted to make the beak fall off in a week. Now that the video has made the rounds, feathers are flying.

While I knew intellectually that this type of thing went on, seeing it on film is a whole other matter. I couldn't get over how the workers roughly handled the baby chicks like they were apples or potatoes. There is a specific position called a "sexer" that separates the boys from the girls - flipping the boys (I assume) by their heads into a giant metal chute. I'm sorry, but if you can't empathize with a newborn baby - a baby anything - then I have to assume a bit of your soul has died somewhere along the way. The video did not make me proud of my species, to put it lightly.

But it does no good to demonize the workers, who are merely doing a job to provide for their own families. Nor does it help to crucify the egg producers who are in the business of providing what the market (me, you and that guy over there) demand: Cheap eggs. This is the ugly side of corporate agriculture and .... actually, I have yet to find a pretty side.



Since the video's release, an independent audit commissioned by the corporate owners of the Spencer hatchery has concluded that some of the practices depicted by an undercover video are, in fact, not standard operating procedure and are in violation of the company’s animal welfare policy. The (nameless) auditor's concluding statement:


"In conclusion, I am impressed with the commitment to animal care by Hy-Line and its employees here in Iowa. The equipment, practices and handling of chicks at the Hy-Line hatchery in Spencer, Iowa are consistent with customary industry husbandry practices and exceed animal welfare standards in a number of areas.

However, these independent audits confirm that some of the practices at our Spencer, Iowa facility depicted in the undercover video did not reflect the standard operating procedures of our company and are in direct violation of our animal welfare policy. One scene in the video depicted a bypass of the instantaneous euthanasia process and was a direct and clear violation of both the authorized animal handling procedures and our welfare policies."


Yeesh.

So, while the industry deals with being naked and exposed, what can consumers do on our end? As Americans, we all know that money talks. What are our options here?

#1- Go Vegan: While I get lots of help from my own garden, the amazing SusanV, Trader Joe's Vegan Trail Mix cookies and Cafe Gratitude - I can't see myself taking this road until I fully conquer the vegetarian thing. If you are looking for info, check out GoVeg - a fantastic resource. I'm always surprised how many yummy options there are.

  • 28
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Heather Clisby 5 pts

Cathal,

Honestly, I think any solution has to be an improvement on the macerator. And yes, it does come with some pretty interesting philosophical quandaries but they are worth confronting. The main one being: Where is the line when it comes to mankind messing around with Nature?

My thought is that there may have been a line but we paved over it long ago. Mankind is a part of Nature, no matter how much we like to ignore it.

Ah, I'm getting ahead of myself - certainly a worthy blog post for another day.

Thank you so much for introducing this concept. Have you shared it with any of your science brethren? More importantly, with the Dept. of Agriculture? Who knows? Maybe even someone is on the case. If this idea ever goes anywhere, I would appreciate you letting me know. I have found this video and the jarring awareness that followed affecting my everyday food choices far more than I ever expected.

Okay, I'm off to the store to buy some Quorn. Crazy! Thanks for that too. I'd never heard of it.

Good luck with the chickens.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

onetruecathal 5 pts

It may be a controversial suggestion, and I'd like to preface it by adding that I'm a strict vegetarian who plans to have his own chickens soon to help prevent this sort of thing!

It wouldn't be too technically challenging to create a Genetically Modified breed of chicken in which the male eggs appear different to a quick visual examination; a host of species have been made flourescent, and making it male-egg specific is certainly achievable.

This overcomes the main barrier to embryo sexing: getting companies to try something that requires new techniques or expertise. If male eggs were red, nothing new or specialised is needed.

Of course, many would contend that anything made with genetic technologies is an innate abomination; I think something that helps to end a facet of animal cruelty certainly compares well against the current and accepted practise in this case!

To those who just can't do without Chicken meat, by the way, I'll add that "Quorn" brand meat substitutes are among the few vegetarian alternatives that actually are fairly indistinguishable from the real thing. Although they do contain egg.

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Beth,

I'm glad you got the ball rolling on this - it really open my eyes and inspired me to dig a little. If the sexing of embryos can really happen, imagine the savings in cost and suffering! I would love to see a solution that all could benefit from

Although, I'm still going to get chickens of my own someday.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Beth Terry 5 pts

Thanks so much for posting this story!  I just want to emphasize that the debate about whether or not male chicks should be killed, whether they should be wasted in the macerator or fed to birds of prey, would be moot if the industry practiced sexing of embryos in the first place.  Embryos could be destroyed painlessly and money and energy that would have gone into incubating, hatching, and sorting male chicks saved.  It is a big waste to grow millions of baby chicks only to kill them immediately after hatching. 

Adele Douglass from Humane Farm Animal Care, the organization that certifies humane egg farms, told me that the research is promising, we just need to put pressure on the USDA to fund it and promote it.  Hence, the points in my letter quoted in your Item #3.

Thanks for all the additional research you did.  I'm glad this issue is being discussed.

Beth Terry@fakeplasticfish
www.fakeplasticfish.com ( http://www.fakeplasticfish.com/ )
( https://twitter.com/fakeplasticfish )
FaceBook ( http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=649272144 )

Maria Niles 5 pts

Though I disagree on the anthropomorphizing. We all know that animals are killed. And I don't believe that chicks are more terrified of grinders than they are of hawks. It's because chicks are cute and being ground up in a grinder seems more awful to us as humans that we project our human feelings onto the animals and react in a way that we don't when it's chickens getting their heads cut off.

Not you because you have a point of view that tells you that killing animals is killing animals but many others do vary in their reaction which often is a result of putting human emotions and expectations on the animals.

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

Elisa Camahort 5 pts

But it quickly becomes satisfying, not sacrificing. When you do what is the right thing for *you*, it changes everything! And, in this case, that includes your palate :) 

Elisa Camahort Page
BlogHer
elisa@blogher.com

My BlogHer profile ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... ) truly shows you everything I do online...Check it out!!

Maria Niles 5 pts

I really appreciate your response. And one key point you made for me is that a key difference between the practice of placing male chicks in a grinder and donating them to a bird of prey center is the role one plays in the food chain and circle of life and the other doesn't.

I certainly agree with your other thoughts and I appreciate you trying to help me sort through my question of why a common reaction to the video seems to be "grinding up cute babies is wrong" but electrocuting them, gassing them or cutting their throats as adults is acceptable.

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Thanks for your pertinent question, Maria. I have a thousand thoughts about this but will try to boil it down for the both of us.

For me, it comes down to pure waste and the concept of a "senseless killing." Is a soldier dying in Afghanistan a better killing than a person getting mugged in an alleyway for $40? We could debate this for hours. In the end, dead is dead, no matter what justifications we attach to it.

When these chicks are ground up alive, it is sad and tragic, for sure. But it also commits a crime of a higher order - not giving back. Any quick study in nature will illustrate the food chain where there is no sympathy for the cute or the fuzzy. This one eats that one, which eats that one, which eats that one, which eats grass. (The vegetarians always get screwed in this scenario.) Everybody has to eat something and we didn't set the rules - it was like this when we got here.

The other night I was watching the superb BBC series, "Planet Earth", and watched a fox grab a mouthful of newborn goslings. It was not easy to watch, for sure, until you see the fox bring the birds back to her babies, who badly needed food. And so on. We are part of this chain and except for the occasional shark victim or mountain lion/jogger incident, humans remain at the top.

We raise these birds for food. Period. That we find a specific portion of them inconvenient in our efficient and profitable system is their sheer bad luck and our shame. They are born and slaughtered within hours and contribute nothing to the very food chain that we all depend on for life. In short, they die in vain.

When I was in Africa, traveling through town after town, I finally had to ask where the cemetaries were. I discovered that many tribes do not believe in 'wasting' perfectly good 'meat' when there are animals to be fed. Gross? Totally. Still, it makes sense when you think of 'giving back' to the system that fed that our bodies all along. I believe several Native American tribes believe this as well.

To quote Eryn above: "But a bird of prey refuge here was buying the male chicks for pennies
on the dollar as food for their birds. It's still not pretty, but the
wounded hawks and owls have to eat, too, and at least the male chicks
were entering the cycle in a more natural way."

I guess what I am trying to say is, these male chicks are going to die anyway (aren't we all?) but at least their deaths would contribute to the regeneration of another species rather than becoming trash. Watching those chicks get thrown into that macerator, I couldn't help but think of all those folks in Africa who would thrive from just a few of those little guys. Perhaps Heifer International could take a few ...?

So much for boiing it down.

Thanks for the book tip! I'll add to my never-ending list.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Elisa Camahort 5 pts

And I don't think any predator out in the wild is killing 130MM per year of anything.

Nope, nothing "natural" about factory farming.

Actually, I have never heard this idea before of giving male chicks to wildlife centers. Seems like quite a stretch...sincerely doubt there are *enough* birds in such centers to need all those chicks. Odd.

Elisa Camahort Page
BlogHer
elisa@blogher.com

My BlogHer profile ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... ) truly shows you everything I do online...Check it out!!

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Elisa,

Ack! You cut to the heart of the challenge! That's so like a leader.

It comes down to sacrifice, doesn't it? I've become so comfy in my modern life that OF COURSE I would like an omelet with cheese, please.

Y'know, last month I was in Aspen and came across a fur store - they are everywhere in this part of the world. My reaction to it was visceral - I kinda freaked out. Sure, the coats are pretty but I could never imagine myself in a million years wearing one. It seemed so barbaric to me and yet, I probably ran off and had a chicken sandwich. What's the difference? Such a hypocrite.

Soon, I may have to challenge myself - via this wee little blog space - to fully once-and-for-all commit to vegetarianism and tap into the support of ya'll. I'm nominating you head cheerleader, Elisa.

Thanks!

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Maria Niles 5 pts

This is an excellent and thoughtful post as always, Heather. And I appreciate the personal perspective you've added about your journey.

This is something I've long wondered and I'd be curious if you've come across any answers in your research or have any thoughts to share. An article I read about the video mentioned that a "humane" alternative some hatcheries take is to donate the unwanted chicks to a center for rehabilitating raptors as food for the birds of prey. In the wild big meat-eating birds eat smaller, sometimes baby birds, alive. Bears pluck salmon from the water with their razor sharp claws and then bite the fish's head off while they are still alive. Getting eaten alive is a fact of life for many animals. So how is finding a different way of killing chicks more acceptable when grinding them up is equivalent to their potential fate in nature?

Is it just that as humans we can think of some "better" way of killing chicks (that we have no right to kill them in the first place is a different argument than specifically being appalled by this particular practice)? Because it seems to me that of all the many excellent arguments against horrific factory animal farming and meat production practices (like debeaking and confinement as you mention), it is only through anthropomorphizing (especially of "cute" animals) by city dwellers that this is among the more persuasive.

Also here is a review of a book that might be useful for your future chicken raising adventures. ( http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/10/garden/10books.h... )

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

Maria Niles 5 pts

However, I wasn't referring to citing a central nervous system as anthropomorphizing. As a vegan you disdain equally the killing of all animals regardless of their cuteness. Others however are content with killing animals until it is something cute and baby-like like chicks rather than chickens. That's what I mean by anthropomorphizing.

And, absolutely, raptor rehab isn't in need of all the discarded chicks. As I mentioned there are many, many arguments for why factory farming is horrific.

What I'm trying to understand is why another method of killing the chicks, say electrocution, is considered more "humane" when being chewed up alive is what could happen in nature. It seems to me that is the raising of excess animals for food production and the mass discarding and killing of the males that is unnatural and inhumane rather than the method of killing. I understand that is the position of animal rights advocates but it is interesting that it is the symptomatic issues of method of death and the type of animal being killed that gets attention of the broader public rather that the underlying foundational concerns.

BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/maria-niles )
PopConsumer ( http://consumerpop.typepad.com/popconsumer )
Beyond Help ( http://mariax.vox.com/ )

Elisa Camahort 5 pts

Interesting questions. I just think that the vast majority of us are very disconnected from our food and how it gets to our table. Anytime  a spotlight is shone it is shocking. Video makes an impact mere words never can.

I think of the recent example of the video of downed cows being prodded and forklifted...they weren't calves, they were full-grown cows, and they weren't even being killed at that time.  But we can understand the pain and terror such animals feel when we see it in action. We may not be close to a cow, but most of us are close enough to other animals to know that things like pain and terror are objectively experienced by animals, without it meaning we are anthropomorphizing them.

Like always: The Internet and technology like online video have an amplification effect on the word of mouth.

Elisa Camahort Page
BlogHer
elisa@blogher.com

My BlogHer profile ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... ) truly shows you everything I do online...Check it out!!

Elisa Camahort 5 pts

Having finally successfully become a vegan three years ago after 17 years as a vegetarian and several failed attempts to go vegan in the past: I know you can do it!

It's easier than it ever was before. Even regular grocery stores carry more vegan foods, including convenience foods. Plus, almost all restaurants at least know what I'm talking about now, even if they don't always have good solutions :)

I finally realized that the egg and dairy industries cause as much suffering and death (if not more) than the actual meat industry, and if my goal really was not to personally participate in that, then I wasn't fulfilling my goal.

I also realized that the only reason *not* to be a vegan was purely, "but I *like* ______" (cheese, omelets, sour cream, whatever) and that that was a pretty frivolous reason. Would I wear a fur for that reason? Would I eat a puppy, or a baby for that matter, for that reason? Um. No.

All to say: If you believe in it...you can do it. I know you can! (And it really is true that if you don't eat anything for a while, be it meat, cheese, sugar, etc. you do stop craving it!)

Thanks again for the post.

Elisa Camahort Page
BlogHer
elisa@blogher.com

My BlogHer profile ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... ) truly shows you everything I do online...Check it out!!

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Your success with veganism is an inspiration to me, Nina. I'm not kidding. The more V's I talk to, the easier I can picture myself doing it too.

Feel free to pass along this info - hard though it may be - to anyone who might be open to it.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

yellowlemon 5 pts

That was disturbing.. hard to believe how some people have the heart to do this.. it's simple disgusting.. I have been a vegan for nearly a year now and I am loving it. My health has improved and so has my entire outlook towards life. 

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Gotcha. If you lived nearby, I'd make you some soup! Or at least homemade ice cream.

Here's hoping your situation turns around provides more filling meals very soon. I'll add you to my list of 'universe requests' that I make nightly.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Eryn,

THANK YOU for your well-informed response here. I think you underestimate your writing skills - I must've yelled aloud "YES!" at least three times while reading it and your linked post.

I am so envious of your chickens. Recently, I put together a 'dream board' - cutting out photos from magazines of things I want in my future. The first image I glued on was a bunch of chickens!

Also, I'm so glad you showed the comparitive yolk photo in your awesome post ( http://www.homeschooledyear.com/?p=1370 ). Years ago, my beau took me to a B&B on a permaculture farm. They stocked our little kitchen with their own eggs & produce. I'll never forget how big and gorgeous those fresh eggs were ... and the yolks! I'd never seen them so rich and orange. We ended up staying an extra day just to eat more eggs.

And to reiterate the nutritional benefits that you mentioned, pasture-raised eggs compared to commercially-raised eggs:

• 1/3 less cholesterol

• 1/4 less saturated fat

• 2/3 more vitamin A

• 2 times more omega-3 fatty acids

• 3 times more vitamin E

• 7 times more beta carotene

When I get finally get my chickens, expect some random questions from me ...

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Zoe,

I'm curious - why does your economic situation make you want to eat meat again? It is because Whoppers are so dang cheap?

Anyway, I applaud your efforts in the veggie stance. I have to recommit myself to the effort every day, every meal - not unlike someone in rehab. It's the only way.

And yes, it is not only the cruelty that gives me nightmares here, it the sheer waste. But as one farmer put it, "If you can find me a market for thousands of male chicks, I'm happy to hand them over." Maybe that's the solution we should be working on.

Thanks for reading!

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

You just made my day, Jennifer.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

zoedoom 5 pts

Because of some very unlucky life circumstances, I am extremely poor and have to rely on food banks and soup kitchens. While organizations like Food Not Bombs provide vegetarian dinners to the needy, most organizations have limited animal-friendly options. My local food bank provides meat and eggs, and if you don't eat that stuff you'll end up living on rice, oatmeal, and canned beans (like I do, most of the time). If I ever want to see a filling meal again, I'll have to eat meat! That is until I get a job or my unemployment claim kicks in (six weeks without income and counting --but that's a whole other story). If it weren't for that I'd be perfectly content to not eat meat ever again. Tofurkey is great and I love veggie meatball sandwiches. I find meat gross and it makes me squeamish. I can eat turkey if I'm starving and someone makes it for me, but even that takes a lot of effort.

Modern Poverty ( http://modernpoverty.wordpress.com )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

Julia,

Writing and posting this was one of the better uses of my time ... in a long time. It's alarming how much we can learn if we just do the tiniest bit of research. I applaud the MFA for doing the dirty work so the rest of us can be informed about our decisions at the supermarket, or better yet, Farmer's Market.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

UnplannedCooking 5 pts

Thanks for posting this story.  I had no idea that this practice was taking place, and I will definitely make a note of where I buy my eggs from.

http://www.unplannedcooking.com

Leighbra 5 pts

Backyard chicken coops are sweeping the nation! You don't have to have a full-fledged farm to keep a couple chickens; a family of 4 will likely need only 2 hens to supply enough eggs to have eggs several times a week, plus extras for baking.

We love our chickens, bought as a straight-run from local 4H kids (a straight run means they're not sexed, you get what you get). We have 11 at the moment, because we are rural and have a bit of land, but many many people are keeping chickens in their backyards. Laws vary, but some cities allow residents to keep up to 3 chickens, often with some sort of rule further limiting roosters.

At a rate of 2 eggs per chicken every 3 days, we have more than enough eggs to keep us from buying eggs. Chickens are living composters, eating our kitchen scraps, and bugs in our lawn. In the winter, we feed them grain to keep em fat and happy. (Without a light system like they use in the egg factories, hens will not lay in the winter. They use that time to rest up for spring.)

Awhile back I wrote a little thing comparing commercially raised eggs to farm raised ( http://www.homeschooledyear.com/?p=1370 ). It's not scientific at all, and not nearly as elegant as some people can write, but I could now add "no male chickens were ground up in the making of my farm eggs" to the list of benefits.

A local hatchery also culled their male chicks. But a bird of prey refuge here was buying the male chicks for pennies on the dollar as food for their birds. It's still not pretty, but the wounded hawks and owls have to eat, too, and at least the male chicks were entering the cycle in a more natural way.

Keeping chickens was the first real step in what we call "food awareness" for us. Everything we eat has a cost, and we need to know that cost. The more you look at the big business of meat production in this country, the more you realize that we have NO idea what's really going on with our food. Thanks for the article.

zoedoom 5 pts

I've been a vegetarian for 14 years (though my current financial situation has made me want to eat meat again). Although I was a vegan briefly (for about 11 months), I never thought of living without eggs long-term. I knew there were problems with the dairy industry, but I didn't realize that the practices towards baby chicks were so inhumane. Obviously not everyone is going to go vegan, and I don't even know if I will, but I think that as consumers, we need to put pressure on legislators to put an end to these unnecessary atrocities. There are (more) humane ways of treating these animals, even if they end up just being used for meat. It would be illegal to grind up kittens alive, so why is sort of behavior okay?

Modern Poverty ( http://modernpoverty.wordpress.com )

juliakalish 5 pts

Thank you for taking the time to get the word out about the senseless torture and slaughter of these animals. We have a right and a moral responsibility to learn how our food gets to the table and to use that knowledge to make informed food choices.

Farm animals are not protected by the same law that protects cats and dogs from animal cruelty. What we as human beings to do them is unbelievably horrendous and should be stopped immediately.

Julia Kalish, CN, eRYT-500

www.doubledogyoga.com ( http://www.doubledogyoga.com )

www.eatrundoyoga.com ( http://www.eatrundoyoga.com )

Heather Clisby 5 pts

I think we all have a lot to learn about our food. Ultimately, this will be good for us ... and the chickens.

~ClizBiz

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Animal Concerns, Proprietor, ClizBiz ( http://www.clizbiz.blogspot.com/ )

Candelaria Silva 5 pts

I've been buying organic, cage free, free range eggs thinking that meant humane practices.  I will do the investigation that you suggest and write the Secretary of Agriculture.

Just because one eats poulry and eggs doesn't mean that we want animals to be killed inhumanely.  Thanks for sharing.

http://blog.candelarisilva.com ( http://blog.candelarisilva.com/ )

Good and plenty!