Bio
I am a 44 year old single mother of two beautiful children; Brian 20, and Nicole 17. Being a mom is the thing I am most proud of; I could sit and ta...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Universal Health Care: The Health and Wellness of Our Entire Country Is At Stake. What are you going to do about it?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

I'm a little frustrated about not hearing more concrete answers from the presidential candidates on the health-care crisis in America. Let me clarify that; I am hearing a lot about how bad the "crisis" is, what I'm not hearing is how we are going to "fix" it. Why is that?

Statistics from the NCHC...

Forty-seven million Americans, or 16% of our population is uninsured.

Over 8 out of every 10 uninsured person is from a working family. (70% of those are from families where one or more are working a full-time job, and 11% from families working part-time jobs). These are NOT lazy people who just want a "free ride", these are hard working American families.

John Edwards explains this well in a speech he made yesterday in New Hampshire...

For more than 20 years, Democrats have talked about universal health care. And for more than 20 years, we've gotten nowhere, because lobbyists for the big insurance companies, drug companies and HMOs spent millions to block real reform. Instead, they've grudgingly allowed incremental measures that do nothing but tinker around the edges -- or worse, they've hijacked reform to improve their own bottom line. So today, more Americans go without health care than ever before. Instead of prescription drug reform that brought down the cost of drugs, the lobbyists for the big drug companies got us a prescription drug bill that boosts drug company profits but doesn't cut patient costs.

And then he continues his speech, with his plan...

I have a bold plan to finally guarantee true universal health care for every single American and cut health care costs for everyone. My plan will require everyone -- business, government and individuals -- to contribute something to reach universal coverage. And I am honest about the cost: $90 to $120 billion a year, and I'll pay for it by repealing the Bush tax cuts for families above $200,000. If we end the game in Washington, we can finally have a health care system that treats the health of all our people with equal worth.

Personally, I give John Edwards a lot of credit for being honest, and not trying to "sugarcoat" the reality of this situation. I give him credit for telling the "truth", a word many politicians have become greatly unfamiliar with.

I wonder though...Is the real problem whether or not politicians can "tell" the truth, or whether or not the American people can "handle" the truth? I don't mean that in a negative way, what I mean is...Will we be able to "handle" it all the way to the voting booth? Words are a wonderful thing, but action is what is needed here. And how many people still don't even vote in this country?

Here are some interesting statistics about women voters, from an article titled "Why Millions of Women Don't Vote"...

In the last presidential election, 8 million women registered but did not vote; another 36 million potential female voters were not registered at all, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Unmarried women are the fastest growing major demographic group and represent the largest potential group of new voters, according to "The State of Unmarried America," an annual report released on June 29 by Washington-based Women's Voices Women Vote.

But many of their votes aren't there to be counted. Of the 49.5 million single, separated, divorced or widowed women in the United States, 18 million are unregistered and 5 million are registered but don't vote.

If women could just harness their collective voting power, they could be the majority in our government, they could be the third party of this country.

I know, I know, I'm a BlogHer Health & Wellness contributing editor...Why am I going all "political" on you? Just indulge me for a moment. It's because, the Health and Wellness of our entire country is at stake here, and no amount of political wrangling (even truthful, honest wrangling) is going to change that. So, who CAN change that? The answer is simple...YOU CAN. Get to know the candidates, and vote for the one YOU think will be best for our country. (For the record...I'm in no way promoting John Edwards, I simply used his speech as an example for this post).

"Politics is boring, frustrating, and gives me high blood pressure", you say? I know, me too. But even if we ignore it, it won't go away. So, if you can't beat-em, join-em.

  • 9
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
DanaFiles 5 pts

I'm so late to this discussion. Too many things going on it seems!

I have to say, I'm open to the concept of universal health care. There are some very personal and moral questions I have to ask, of course, but for the good of the people, we need coverage for all.

SouthernLadywithabrain 5 pts

Last week the U.S. Census Bureau informed us that 47 million PEOPLE (NOT Americans) are without insurance. Their data also shows that of those 47 Million, they are made up of:
45% are not U.S. Citizens - do you as taxpayers really want to insure the 22 Million illegals in the country? When they can already go to a hospital & get free healthcare & can already qualify for medicare benefits?
29.5% of those uninsured are between 18 - 24 yrs of age (how many of us didn't buy health insurance when we were young?)
27% are between 25-34 yrs of age.
8.5% or 4 Million have incomes over $75,000 yr. How many of you are making that amount now? If you are, chances you are working for an employer who provides health care, or your husband is getting healthcare through his job, or you are actually paying for it yourself either through an employer plan or other.
Let's not be fooled on how these numbers will be used in the Presidential election to push a "National Healthcare Agenda". The problem with the media is that rarely do you get all the facts. Please ladies & gentlemen - get all the information before you vote. Do you really think that hiring more federal employees to administer that program, tell us what they will allow & what they don't, handle the paperwork, etc., would pay off? Trust me, it will be much cheaper & more efficient for all of us to "just" be responsible for ourselves & get our own insurance. There is no way having taxes collected to fund another large government agency, who will then pay for our Doctor visits and decide what they will allow us to get done medically could be more efficient or effective than each of us taking responsibility for ourselves. The only one that would make out on that deal would be those people who get those high paying government jobs with the federal healthcare plan.

nellewrites 6 pts

And hope you have enjoyed your weekend as well...

Good point on how we pay, it also is very much a part of the health care discussion. I'm with you that taxation should be progressively structured.

nelle ( http://www.nelle2nelle.org/ )

Catherine Morgan 5 pts

I agree Nelle, thanks for your comment.

When it comes to who should pay? I think it should be spread out not equally, but more in a way that the industries making the most profit off of the American people pay a larger part. What I mean is; a small employer should not have to pay the same % into this program as lets say...the Insurance Industry. But if the employer is MERCK they would pay a higher % into the program than lets say...a supermarket chain.

It can't end up like our current income tax system...Where big corporations and the very wealthy pay a smaller % of their total incomes/profits (because of loop holes and tax incentives) than lower and middle class families do.

Does that make sense?

Anyway, that's just my humble opinion. I realize the whole thing is much more complicated than I really understand...But the problem still needs to be more than just "addressed" - it needs to be "solved".

Thanks again Nelle, hope you're having a great weekend.

Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan
also at Women 4 Hope ( http://women4hope.wordpress.com/ ) and Informed Voters ( http://informedvoters.wordpress.com/ )

nellewrites 6 pts

The current state of health care discussion is arguing over the shape of the table, and who will sit at this table.

Health care involves so many interested parties, and that's what makes it so exceedingly tough to solve. These interests are frequently oppositional, favouring one means loss for another.

When I talk on health care, the first element mentioned is always the uninsured; it is amazing how many blow this off and delve into fear of health care devolving into some perceived (and fictional) model of ineptitude, denial and inadequacy - rooted in what we've been scared into believing exists in the UK and Canada. (Funny that my future SRS surgeon, one of the reputed two best in the world, does his work in Montreal.)

As another analogy, think middle eastern geopolitics. How to get people to even *want* to set at the table? And who will be there representing the uninsured?

Will the pharmaceuticals play? Hospitals? Medical professionals? Insurers? Government (for which side?) And employers?

With so many players, is the only way an up and down public vote mandating change? Would we ever be given this chance? How?

The second key element of change should be looking to remove the current tethering of the system to our employers; it unfairly saddles them with costs that can leave them uncompetitive.

Can we all agree on these things being key, before we even begin the discussion?

nelle ( http://www.nelle2nelle.org/ )

Catherine Morgan 5 pts

Hi Virginia. I think voting is the most important thing we can do to facilitate change in this country. I'm hoping we see a huge increase in women voters for the 2008 election.

Thanks for your comment.

Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan
also at Women 4 Hope ( http://women4hope.wordpress.com/ ) and Informed Voters ( http://informedvoters.wordpress.com/ )

Virginia DeBolt 5 pts

I remember being struck by a phrase in a book of Gloria Steinem's years ago to the effect that "everything is political." It dawned on me that this meant more than gender issues, more than feminist issues. It meant everything about human rights, fair pay, insurance coverage, access to health care, word choices, access to jobs, school board elections, congressional districting, the price of gasoline, the fuel efficiency of cars, and poisonous pet food additives from China. You're getting the idea: everything is political. I've been paying attention to politics ever since, and I vote in every election that comes along no matter how insignificant it seems.

http://www.webteacher.ws/
http://first50.wordpress.com/

Catherine Morgan 5 pts

Hi Amanda. That sounds like a good idea to me.

Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan
also at Women 4 Hope ( http://women4hope.wordpress.com/ ) and Informed Voters ( http://informedvoters.wordpress.com/ )

Amanda 5 pts

Don't know how many people I will reach, but yeah, I will be a loudmouth about it.

As for voting, I'll probably go with whatever candidate takes the time to at least talk about cancer funding and policy reform.

Amanda Shaffer, Blogher Health and Wellness Contributing Editor ( http://www.blogher.com )

The Cat Lady. ( http://the-cat-lady.com )