This Fall CBS is ready to make television history with the new series Kid Nation, wherein 40 children ages eight to fifteen are plunked down in an abandoned New Mexico town for forty days with "no adults" (in reality there's a skeleton camera crew, of course, but the kids are ostensibly on their own). The reality show is expected to draw huge ratings; it's already generating controversy.
As a parent, I'll confess to wondering if this was a joke, when I first read about it. It isn't, of course -- according to the CBS website you can catch the premiere on September 19th. Not only that, but the network is so sure of the series' anticipated success, they're already casting a second season.
My knee-jerk reaction was such disgust that I couldn't find a single thing about this premise that wasn't completely odoriferous, so I applaud Karoli at odd time signatures for managing to find the redeeming values despite the obvious objections:
There are so many things wrong with this that I barely know where to start, so I guess I’ll start with what’s right about it. I think it’s good that the kids had to wrestle with the idea of forming a government and deal with the natural leadership struggles that arise as part of that process. I’m sure they learned much about the art of leadership and the art of following. I think it’s good that they had an opportunity to learn how to deal with the realities of daily life without the usual comforts. The preview below shows brief vignettes of the environment they were dealing with…hauling water, bringing it up from the well, cooking, cleaning, dividing responsibility…all of that is good. Some have objected to the series on the basis that they missed a month of school. That’s the least of my objections, because I’m sure the life and practical lessons they learned were worth the entire year, much less a month.
I am all the more impressed by this ability to note the positives given that Karoli's disdain for the show touches on issues of child labor and then extends beyond the producers and parents involved:
It would be unfair to bash the parents of these kids without bashing the inevitable hordes of viewers who are likely to make this show a hit, young and old alike. After all, if the show had no viewers there would be no motivation to exploit children in the name of entertainment, however willing they may be. But there will be viewers, and those viewers are open to taking large doses of reality TV, even clamoring for it. The RealityWanted.com website has 12 pages of listings for contestants and casting calls for reality television. It’s a big, huge profitable business. If this show is a success, I predict spinoffs and clones, all grinding those big bucks back to the production companies and networks clamoring for more.
While I agree that the viewers are culpable as well -- at least in terms of tackling this from the perspective of our cultural obsession with all things reality TV -- I still believe the first line of blame goes to the parents. They are, after all, the ones responsible for the well-being of their own children.
Lisa Renee at Liberal Common Sense doesn't put too fine a point on it:
What kind of money hungry attention starving ditzy parent would allow their child to live under those kinds of conditions and what hare brained people at CBS actually thought up this one?
These are not exactly almost adults - the children are aged 8 to 15. This should be considered child abuse and I plan to contact every single advertiser for this junk that it's not appropriate to use kids in this way. No, I won't be watching, seeing the preview was more than enough for me to see that even in the reality tv world which is at times of questionable taste, this one takes the cake.
I do wonder how CBS came up with the allowed age span. Needless to say, I have very different feelings about allowing a 15-year-old to spend a month+ on her own than I do about allowing an 8-year-old to do the same.
And just in case this all doesn't disturb you enough, Angry Working Mom is predicting even greater repercussions than might immediately occur to you at first blush:
Kids without supervision? Okay, obvious Lord of the Flies comparisons aside, I just know this nonsense is going to be blamed on working mothers. We will be dragged into this somehow, just wait. Or maybe we’ll just drag ourselves in by stating that this is not what we had in mind when we asked for affordable childcare.
Sheesh. As I contemplate parents willing to let go of their young children for 40 days just for their shot at the "big time" and maybe a little bit of money, suddenly pageant moms seem almost tame by comparison. Now that is scary.
Contributing Editor Mir also blogs about issues parental and otherwise at Woulda Coulda Shoulda and Cornered Office, as well as sharing the joys of mindful retail therapy at Want Not.
Comments
I have wondered about the
I have wondered about the some of the same things that you mention in this post, such as leaving an 8-year-old on his/her own with a lot of older kids.
Do we know how "real" this reality show was? Obviously cameramen are always present and I am assuming they had directors, caterers etc. Were there any safeguards for these kids? Anyone to break up fights? treat injuries? monitor their health?
Wheat Among Tares
Perhaps too real
One parent has already lodged a complaint with the state of New Mexico (where it was filmed) because:
"Several children required medical attention after drinking bleach that had been left in an unmarked soda bottle, according to both the parent and CBS. One 11-year-old girl burned her face with splattered grease while cooking."
Oooh - so much fun, can't wait to watch!
BlogHer CE
Kleenex® Let It Out™ Blog
Beyond Help
thanks, Maria!
Great link, Maria. Thanks for sharing it.
What I wonder is what sort of hundred-page waiver the parents had to sign in the first place, and then whether that release actually protects the producers from culpability in matters like this when -- surprise! -- kids get hurt.
--
Mir from WCS
(BlogHer Mommy & Family contributing editor)
Personal: Woulda Coulda Shoulda
Having it all with less: Want Not
Lord of the Flies
Mir, I smelled trouble the first time I saw the advertisement for the series a couple of months back or so. Like Angry Mind, I connected the show to Lord of the Flies in my mind, and we all know how pleasantly that worked out. Reality TV is mainly senasationalism at the expense of some people's lives. But how could CBS do Kid Nation without the kids' parents agreement. Maybe it's like some other reality show where the so-called real people are really aspiring actors with parents pushing them from behind.
CBS is running out of creative ideas. Is this Survivor for kids?
Great post. Great links.
"Love is liquid. Brew and be drunkards!" ~~Nordette. And here's a link to the blog.
"Survivor for kids"
Nordette,
It appears that CBS is quick to point out that it's NOT Survivor-like, because no one is voted off. Kids can choose to leave, but cannot be forced to go.
And they seem to be hanging their hats on this as the mark that the show is kid-friendly and not inappropriate. Because voting off would be bad, but unattended minors is fine. Ha!
--
Mir from WCS
(BlogHer Mommy & Family contributing editor)
Personal: Woulda Coulda Shoulda
Having it all with less: Want Not
Bleach in a soda bottle?
Were someone TRYING to kill these kids? I can't imagine any reason for putting bleach in a soda bottle in reach of a bunch of kids other than an attempted poisoning.
----
Jen
http://yawwblog.blogspot.com
http://angryfatgirlz.blogspot.com
http://toledolefty.blogspot.com
parental ire indeed
At the risk of stating the obvious:
* If you don't want your kid watching it, say no. It's called "being a parent."
* Who the heck are these parents who presumably had to sign a bunch of paperwork to allow their 8-15 year olds to participate in this? Are they insane or did they really think that it was a good idea to put their kid in an environment where the most mature person on site for 40 days is not an adult? This is not anything like having a babysitter for the evening. This is not even anything like parents who leave their 10-15 year olds home alone for the day while they go to work (I have seen this, I assume it's a money issue). Why has child protective services not stomped this thing and arrested every adult involved for child endangerment?
* I am working under the assumption that either the cameras are mounted somewhere so that control and editing are remote, or that the camera operators have specifically been told not to interfere. Hey after all, it's not exciting television if the kids all behave themselves. If anything, I would not be shocked if the camera operators actually deliberately stir up trouble just to create drama. (What was bleach doing on site at all? Not like the kids need bright white linens, eh?)
Hmmm
I have to say that while the bleach episode seems incredibly and tragically irresponsible, I am not ready to condemn the whole show and premise with such a heavy hand.
People send their children to camp for a month...where they are tended by 14 and 15 year olds with a few adults over the age of 21. There were adults on site...probably hoards of them.
As for the grease fire injury (and actually the bleach as well), it could have happened at home just as easily and is far more likely I am betting. Every 4 seconds a disabling injury happens in U.S. homes. That is just the ones considered disabling. Children get injured constantly on trampolines and playing sports-probably a much higher percentage than had any kind of injury during this filming. But, you wouldn't have such scathing views of parents who sign their children up for soccer, would you? Or the neighbor who is irresponsible enough to have a trampoline in her yard?
~TW
Retro-Food
I'm sure the disclaimers were long and very,
very legal...
According to the sources I read, there were very few adults on site and those who were had instructions to take a hands-off approach to the kids. There was a medic and a psychologist on site, but none of the usual watchdogs making sure the kids didn't work longer hours than chlid labor laws permit. I hadn't read about the bleach incident at the time I wrote my blog post. That's awful. They're lucky someone wasn't killed with it!
I cannot imagine a set of circumstances that would be so compelling that I would turn my kid over to a production crew (even WITH hordes of adults) for a month. Just hearing the stories on the backstage of AGT was enough to send me into orbit, and I sent my kid with a trusted adult to that...never again. I had reservations then and I know better now.
karoli (odd time signatures)
TW must have gone to a very
TW must have gone to a very different summer camp than I did.
All the counselors at my camp were at least college aged. In addition, there were instructors and leaders who were all adults. Every day we had 6-10 hours of planned, supervised activities, excluding mealtimes and head-checks. My kid just went to a day camp at the YMCA. Not only were all the counselors all at least 16 (they might have all been at least 18 but some look young), there were plenty of adults directly involved with the camp and even more down the hall working for the YMCA itself.
Sure, kids get injured playing sports on a regular basis, however organized sports have a grown-up coach whose job includes teaching kids to play in a manner than reduces the risk of injury. Sure, kids get injured at home, but home also has parents who theoretically say things like "Don't do X, you might get hurt" and who is there to pick up the fire extinguisher if there is a grease fire. Sure, idiot neighbors have idiot things on their property, but not only should parents say "no you are not going to go over to the Smith's place", Mr. and/or Mrs. Smith should be supervising people on their own property.
Not all accidents can be prevented through supervision, of course. Nor does adult supervision prevent all problems among children. However, even the best kid has moments of bad judgment, and over the course of 40 days even the smartest and wisest kid is going to do something ill advised. And that's assuming there's not someone deliberately making trouble.
Not here
I wasn't speaking of my camp experiences, I didn't go to camp. My children have and I have spent quite a bit of time researching camps for them.
Camp Counselors here are routinely under 18. They usually are around 16.
I am not sure what you think the difference is between the grown up coach and supervising neighbors is and the adults that were present at all times during the production, ready to step in. CBS said paramedics, a pediatrician, an animal safety expert, a child psychologist and a "roster of producers" were onsite, too.
~TW
Retro-Food
Wonder What It Will Be Like??
I am curious to see this program. When I first saw the advertisements, I was horrified. But then I stopped to think about it for a while. I worked at a summer camp when I was 17 and took care of TONS of kiddos all by myself--age 2 up to high school. And then I started thinking about what an interesting social experiement this is. I'm sure we can learn a LOT from watching these children interact and learn about living all on their own. That being said, most reality shows are scripted, and I'm sure there were adults all over the place watching everything. Would I send my own child (that I don't have)? Hmmm... I'm thinking no. But I must admit, I can't wait to see the show.
Stating the Obvious Stuff
A television program is a business venture. The purpose of a television show is to help generate profit for the company and advertisers. So what we have here is a group of parents willing to lend their kids physical and emotional safety to a TV show. Huh?
CBS is not a charity. It is a multi-billion dollar business. We stand on our high moral ground and declare that child labor is immoral and illegal. Why is this ok? Why do we need this at this time?
Are we so starved for entertainment and sensationalism that we now need children to perform as "reality players?" And let's not forget it is not reality because what you will see will be edited and parts suggested or implied will be inserted.
How is this different from child laborers? Oh, they don't get paid? There is no prize? It is the summertime and the kids would be goofing off anyway, right? It is an "adventure" of a lifetime that the parent couldn't deny the kid.
Eight years old people with no adult supervision? Being a latch key kid is not the same as this because parents eventually come home! These kids are not only not home but there is no parent in proximately.
Children have "guardians" to look after them because we as a society said that children don't have the capacity to make financial, ethical or moral decisions.
This is bad judgment from the network, the producers and the parents. Adult people can sign off on making fools of themselves. This is going to stay with the kids for a heck of a long time, especially if something embarrassing happens to one of them.
Gena - Out On The Stoop
I CANNOT WAIT!!!
I CANNOT wait for this show to start!!!! My son (15yo) sent in his application and video for Kid Nation 2 in July and has already been contacted by the assistant casting director!! From the 4 minutes of video I have seen the "work" these children did was nothing more than what is done on a working farm every day. We laughed hysterically when one young participant said, "I'm a princess I don't do dishes!" UNBELIEVEABLE!!!!! No wonder our society's work ethic is going down the drain. People baby their children, give them whatever they want, do everything for them and then release them into society totally unprepared for the "real world" - NOW THAT'S CHILD ABUSE!!!!
My son is praying he is chosen so he can show the nation that there are kids who know what it takes to live on their own and be role model and helper for those who struggle.
A follow up
I happened to notice this NYT item on the show. Apparently the state of New Mexico is investigating them for possible violation of state child labor laws and some sort of zoning problem related to running an unlicensed group home for children. Somehow I doubt that turning away the state investigator was a good idea.
And another follow up:
"These kids were in good hands and under good care with procedures and safety structures that arguably rival or surpass any school or camp in the country," the CBS statement read.
Also, a producer called parents every three days to offer updates on the children
~TW
Retro-Food
What?!? Kid Nation is awesome!
People, people, don't listen to the garbage rumors. There has been a ton of publication of this "Several children required medical attention after drinking bleach that had been left in an unmarked soda bottle, according to both the parent
and CBS. One 11-year-old girl burned her face with splattered grease
while cooking." but if you'd just bother to follow up on it, you'd find the kids immediately spat out the bleach, and that the girl who was burned not only was doing it for reasons she really wasn't supposed to be doing, but she said, and I quote, "It's no big deal. It happens all the time." Besides, that could happen at any point someone is cooking greasy potatoes. She could have just as easily been burned at home. Overall, the show has less danger then many kids on working farms face, and even if a kid is hurt, the medical care is not only immediate, but X100 better then what parents could do. They also had psychiatrists in case they were needed, and the kids have said "There were more adults there then kids running around all day." Not to mention all but one kid has said given the option, they'd do it again. Some kids were even DEPRESSED upon returning home because their adventure was over. I am 14, and given the option, I'd go to that place in a heart beat. There was also the worry of "An 8-year-old" being there with no supervision. Don't you, then, find it odd the yellow district, made almost entirely of kids under 12, beat the older kids consistently throughout the show? Anyways, all I'm asking is for people to THINK before they go spreading complete rumors like that.