For almost 20 years, Lilly Ledbetter worked as a supervisor at a Goodyear Tire plant in Gadsden, AL. She was the only female supervisor in what Gail Collins (my favorite columnist) described as a "not exactly-female friendly environment." The Mighty Quinn pointed out on BlogHer that Ms. Ledbetter's salary began at the same level of her male co-workers when she was hired, but over the next two decades, she "received smaller raises and a substantial disparity grew. For years, she was paid between 15% and 40% less than her male counterparts on the management team..." Thanks to secrecy about salaries at the plant, Ledbetter did not realize that she was paid substantially less than her male counterparts - including ones with significantly less seniority than she had - until someone anonymously provided her with a list of salaries around the time she was retiring. As Ledbetter explained to Collins, "I was just emotionally let down when I saw the difference." Clearly, Goodyear Tire discriminated against Lilly Ledbetter because she was a woman.
According to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it is illegal to pay people based on their gender. Ms. Ledbetter offered to settle for the difference between her salary and the lowest-paid man's, but Goodyear refused. So Ledbetter did what any intelligent, wronged woman would do: she sued the pants off them. A jury awarded her $223,776 in back pay and more than $3 million in punitive damages. This was letter scaled down to only $300,000 due to caps on damages, but it still vindicated Ledbetter and made up for the fact that, as Ledbetter and Joan Blades explain at The Huffington post, "The discrimination continues today, because my pension and Social Security are based on my pay." Hurray! Justice is belatedly served. Right? Of course not. This is the US under the Bush administration.
Goodyear Tire, being good corporate citizens who want to do the right thing (ha ha ha), appeals the decision. The 11th Circuit Court, loaded with Bush appointees made during Congressional recesses after Democrats attempted to block his nominees, said that Ms. Ledbetter did file her claim in a time appropriate manner. See, ladies (and other people who are secretly discriminated against), we are supposed to use our infamous "woman's intuition" to know when a company is paying us less although everyone's salary is a secret (and as Mighty Quinn pointed out, "it's illegal to ask in many states" what co-workers' earn) so that we can lawfully file our complaints within 180 days after the pay is set. So, if like Lilly Ledbetter, you don't find out that you have been screwed for 19 years, it's your own damn fault for being so complacent, and you get bupkes (a Yiddish phrase ranging from "nothing, nada, zilch" to horse turds).
Fortunately, we have the Supreme Court to correct the deficiencies of lower courts. In normal modern times, this would be true. But these are not normal modern times, and of course, the Supreme Court is also loaded with people who have no interest in justice or equality these days. Thus, Ms. Ledbetter was chided in a 5-4 decision for not consulting psychics, breaking into the payroll department, or doing whatever else she could do to determine that she was paid unequally for her work. Bush appointee Sam Alito hated that companies that discriminate against people might be faced with "the burden of defending claims arising from employment decisions that are long past. (In other words, "the longer you discriminate, the less you should be held accountable for your actions, so do whatever you can to not get caught in the first six months!)
Where does this leave poor Ms. Ledbetter? Why, of course, with a legal bill (Goodyear Tire thoughtfully passed $3,165 in their court fees on to her to teach her a lesson - can you imagine a woman wanting equal pay for equal work?) and Congress. The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which would rectify the idea that people who do not possess ESP have a right to sue within 180 days after learning that they have been discriminated against (as opposed to intuiting) passed the House, but Senate Republicans banded with psychics and stood their ground. To ensure that people have a fair chance at legal compensation, 60 votes were needed. The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act when down in flames four votes short. (Hilzoy at Obsidian Wings has a link to the roll call votes if you'd like to thank your representative or politely inquire as to why they hate paying women fairly, depending on his/her vote. And don't forget that McCain missed the vote, but cheerfully told people during a speech that he would have opposed it, since women need "education and training" to pull them out of poverty, not actual paychecks.)
If you are thinking many things that involve four letter words and want to take more constructive action, there are a few options. First, in November, take some advice from The Savvy Sista and remember that no matter which Democrat is on the ballet, "A John McCain presidency will be nothing but a Bush III." You can also sign a petition and send McCain your resume at Moms Rising. (Totally brilliant!!!) I would also suggest that anyone who supports equal pay for equal work join Jackie and boycott Goodyear. This is truly putting our money where our mouths are: if Goodyear doesn't want to use their earnings to support the earnings of women, then they will get no money from other women.
One thing that the folks in power understand is money. If we don't make people pay for not paying, then there's no reason that companies or politicians will treat women fairly when it comes to compensation.
Suzanne also blogs about life at Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants, about yogurt and pudding at Live Active Cultures, and about positive social change agents at Just Cause. She hereby publicly pledges to not buy Goodyear products for her PT Cruiser, and to not vote for John MCCain in November.
Comments
Secret Salaries Not A Good Thing
Many corporations have codes of conduct that prohibit employees discussing salary. No wonder. When salary disparities are discovered, employee morale is rattled. My belief is that if a company is not willing to defend the salary ranges of employees then there is something inherently unethical about the salary ranges.
However, if an employee is discovered sharing this very private information, it could be grounds for dismissal. As Joseph Heller would say. That's a Catch -22.
elana
Blogher Contributing Editor,Business&CareersFunnyBusiness
What an outrage...
but along with it, Ruth Bader Ginsburg emerged as my new hero. :)
An article referred to elsewhere today...
How Dumb Are We?
nelle
Great article
Thanks for that link, Nelle. Lithwick did a really nice job.
Jill
Writes Like She Talks
NYT today on...breaking taboo of not
discussing salaries
I can't imagine anything more vindicating of supporting the Ledbetter legislation than this article from today's New York Times which very clearly establishes just how impossible it has been for time in memorium to know what others are making.
I only wish that the NYT had included a statement about that in the article, otherwise it's just more fluff, imo.
Thanks for writing about this, Suzanne.
Jill at Writes Like She Talks
What a lost opportunity, indeed
Especially in light of what Elana wrote about the serious consequences employees face if caught sharing salary information with co-workers, and the fact that Gail Collins wrote her excellent op-ed piece yesterday in the same freakin' publication, it is not just a shame that the article didn't mention anything about Ledbetter, it's offensive. Bah!
And Nelle2Nelle, I could not agree with you more. I hope RBG stays around a long time to keep shaking things up for us little people.
Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS)& Other Rants
Help us boycott
This case outraged me, and I've long thought the quickest way to effect change is to rally consumers to boycott. I started a boycott campaign over at thepoint.com to start boycotting Goodyear Tire Co and make an example of them. We need 10,000+ supporters by Mother's Day to start the boycott. We need to spread the word though!! We need lots of bloggers to post about it if we're going to get the momentum and press under it.
Goodyear may have kept the discrimination secret from Ledbetter, but now that WE know, we don't have to keep it a secret. Nor should we let Goodyear quietly slink off. The more we blog about the issue and the boycott campaign, not only do we raise more awareness, but we make it really tough for Goodyear to hide from it. The last thing a company wants is to have a bunch of negative articles show up in the search engine rankings when someone googles their company name or products.
So let's shout it out!!
You can also find info at my blog Velvet Verbosity