Bio
Learn more about me or just visit my personal blog or come bargain hunt with me. Writing? Check. Parenting? Check. Shopping for shoes? Check. Yep,...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Walmart to Launch Anti-Aging Makeup Line... for Tweens

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 17
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Oh, Walmart. Every time I think I've finally heard it all from you, you just find another way to make me shake my head and say, "This isn't right. This can't be real. What is wrong with this country?"

The latest, in case you haven't already heard, is that later this month, Walmart is launching the 'geoGirl' line of cosmetics, aimed at 8- to 12-year-olds. Now, I'm not wild about make-up for that age group, anyway, but here's where Walmart is willing to go that extra mile to make sure I end up completely ashamed to be American: The geoGirl line includes products noted for their anti-aging properties!

What's Walmart's role here?
The retailing giant will be carrying the geoGirl line, which it says "was developed in partnership with our customers to give parents a healthier, age-appropriate option for their tween girls who ask about wearing makeup."

Where does the "anti-aging" part come in?
The line's creators claim it's formulated for fresh young skin, with ingredients like willow bark to exfoliate and chamomile to calm, as well as anti-oxidants, which reportedly prevent aging.

There's so many things here that make me want to weep, I barely know where to begin. First, I have a 12-year-old daughter -- the upper end of geoGirl's target demographic -- and in our house we consider a little lip gloss to be the extent of age-appropriate makeup at this age. I'm an old fuddy duddy, I know, but even overlooking the fact that her middle school is overrun by girls who believe "more is more," particularly when it comes to eyeliner (yikes), I've yet to see a kid roaming the halls there where I've thought to myself, "Hmmm. She could be really pretty, if not for all the fine lines and wrinkles, y'know?"

Basically, you show me an 8- or 12-year-old who needs anti-aging makeup, and I'll show you this fantastic bridge I have for sale, cheap.

Non-Toxic Kids is calling for a boycott, not just because of the message being sent, but because of the product ingredients themselves:

Geo-Girl is supposedly an eco-friendly line of cosmetics, but I would like to see the ingredient list and ratings by the Environmental Working Group to be sure ... I'm disappointed, although not surprised, by this move by Walmart. They stand to make millions of dollars selling products to this vulnerable age group, who will learn that our society values their looks above all.

Over at No More Dirty Looks, Alexandra is hardly a fan, but poses this counterpoint, wondering if at least geoGirl's ingredients will be less harmful than the comparable "adult" products:

But then, here’s the thing: When I was a kid, I loved nothing more than putting on a full face of makeup, spraying my self-cut bangs into an 80s tease, gluing on some Lee Press-On Nails, and pretending to be a grown-up. I cringe to think of the chemicals, but that sort of adult imitation is kind of par for the course, no?

Triple Pundit's Andrea Newell points out that this supposedly "eco-friendly" product line is an oxymoron even just from an environmental standpoint:

Encouraging repeat sales of an essentially unnecessary product for this age range, eco-friendly packaging or not, is still environmentally unfriendly. All those used up tubes and jars have to go somewhere. During this past holiday season much ado was made about not buying in excess and not buying unneeded products. Although Geo Girl will sell in the $3.99 to $5.99 range, cosmetics for tweens could be seen as an extraneous line item in the household budget.

Furthermore, Newell makes what I think is the most salient argument against this concept as a whole:

Promoting “beauty care” to tweens says that 8- to 12-year-old girls are not attractive without looking sexy. Tampa dermatologist Dr. Seth Forman has spoken out against the line claiming that it not only focuses on superficial looks at a crucial age, but the skin care products themselves could harm young skin. Psychiatrist Dr. Henry Paul cautions that the use of makeup can sometimes be addictive, resulting in girls who are addicted to being “beautiful” and don’t see themselves as anything else which can lead to an erosion of self-esteem in the long run.

If you have kids, do you (or will you) let your tweens wear makeup? Do you think this is all harmless fun and people like me who are horrified are just overreacting?

  • 17
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
kario 7 pts

I have a nearly-twelve-year-old daughter who is not allowed to wear makeup and hates me for it. But someday I hope she will grow up to value herself for who she is, not have an eating disorder, not be addicted to plastic surgery, and thank me for pointing out to her just how appearance-crazed our culture is. This is absolutely evidence of a market economy gone crazy: "let's invent problems we can solve with new products." Yuck.

Kario

http://www.the-writing-life.blogspot.com

Publicly Mika 5 pts

Speechless... and not in a good way.

cynthia bailey md 5 pts

Anti aging makeup for preteens is silly, but good self care isn't. Teaching our girls to take good care of their skin is actually an important aspect of our mentoring to them. It involves using appropriate products for their skin type and teaching them good sun protection (http://www.drbaileyskincare.com/blog/category/sun-... This should ideally start as soon as they learn to bathe and dress themselves. Healthy eating and regular physical activity belong with those important self care lessons too. In a perfect world we older girls and women would be teaching and setting good examples. Good self care is important, but anxiety about beauty or glamor, and wanting to rush through childhood is sad.

BeWellMama 5 pts

For cryin' out lot! seriously? My goodness. When my daughter becomes old enough to wear cosmetics, perhaps some time in Middle School, (at least, not to sneak applications behind my back), I will buy her less toxic cosmetics from Arbonne or Melaleuca's Sei Bella line, which I use. Yes, it will be more $, but I feel as though if I don't use mass-produced cosmetics made with cheap ingredients, then she can't either. Another reason for me to boycot Walmart.

http://bernadettemarkey.blogspot.com/

godsygirl 5 pts

And we don't socialize girls to think their appearance correlates with their sense of self worth, right?

"It's only what's on the inside that matters, Dear." Oh, bite me, you crazy world. Maddening. Really bugs me.

I need a nap.

Check me out at GodsyGirl.Com
( http://www.godsygirl.com ) or read my Mommy  Articles here! ( http://www.examiner.com/x-15864-Kansas-City-Mother... )

Rita Arens 7 pts

No, no, no, no, no. NO. No.

Rita Arens authors Surrender Dorothy ( http://bit.ly/Qp0sS ) and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak ( http://tinyurl.com/9pg62e ). She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

mrslundy 5 pts

My DD is still a baby, but this disgusts me. So many women are shackled to make-up and "cant leave the house" without it. Do we really need to begin the cycle this early? Furthermore, do we need to tell a tween that they are already getting old? This is so sad.

Ill just add this to one more reason I really hate Wal-Mart.

smartybee 5 pts

I think it's ridiculous that they're marketing makeup to kids who haven't even hit the double-digits yet. My mom didn't let me wear makeup (aside from nail polish) until I was halfway through high school, and when my mom let my sister wear makeup at fourteen, I was horrified - I thought even that was too young. I never really got into wearing makeup, probably because my mother insisted I wait to do it, and I definitely do not see the point in makeup for kids. Girls that age are supposed to be kids, not miniature adults!

onblank 5 pts

I just read something about the lawsuit against McDonald's that said it is actually illegal to market directly to children because children lack the ability to understand that they are being marketed to.

The media telling an 8-year old that she needs this product to look beautiful and stop the signs of aging early seems no different to me.

(The article was pretty interesting as far as where the law stands on the issue, by the way: http://www.appetiteforprofit.com/2011/01/27/why-th... ( http://www.appetiteforprofit.com/2011/01/27/why-th... ))

Solidarity.

--Kristina

www.OnBlank.com ( http://www.OnBlank.com )

ModaMama 5 pts

What a truly bizarre marketing blunder...it just seems totally non sequitur to that suggest girls trying to look older are concerned about counter-acting aging.

If I remember correctly, as a tween I was concerned about the teenage blemishes I didn't yet have. Has acne magically disappeared and is somehow no longer a ripe tool for tween exploitation?

Are the hormones in our meat and dairy products working so much overtime on young girls they've skipped awkward skin/puberty issues all together and are now fighting back the crows feet?

PS Mir, makeup makes me nervous as an adult so lipgloss seems about reasonable, I shudder to think of the day my sweet child will turn into a demanding tween who wants to go down to "the Mart" to pick up her obliphica stretch-mark repair cream.

www.SaraInAkko.blogspot.com ( http://www.SaraInAkko.blogspot.com )

Life in the Middle East, with craft and spice

Galaxy Girl 5 pts

It is so sad that we are already instilling into young girls the obsession to stay young forever and avoid any signs of aging. A 12 year old does not need anti-aging anything! Even if that wasn't the main focus it does concern me that they've created a line of makeup for tweens this young. And the age of what they consider to be a tween just keeps getting younger! I don't think i would have known what to do with a mascara wand if you'd handed it to me at age 12.

livingwithumami 5 pts

This is exactly what I don't want young girls to be exposed to. Why can't more companies take after Dove & do compaigns that promote being "you" & unique with the character that makes us beautiful. UGH!

p.s. I'm slightly biased . . . I used to be in Food Retail for a great company & I also wrote my Masters thesis about/against Wal-Mart 5 years ago on their Economic impact. They are a disgrace & even when they try to do good; i.e. fresh/healthy alternatives it takes about a million years. I don't get it.

Okay. I'll get off my soap box now.

Shannon
www.livingwithumami.com ( http://www.livingwithumami.com )

LucindaA 5 pts

My 9 year old has make-up...as a toy. To use only at home. For fun just like I did as a kid. She used it for about a month and now it just sits there.

The idea that they are targeting a line of make-up to my daughter is beyond absurd. And ridiculous. And infuriating. And scary....so so scary.

My daughter told me the other day that she worried that she wouldn't always be skinny. Ugh. So we talked. Again. And we'll talk more about it but I am tired of this uphill battle.

Polish Mama on the Prairie 5 pts

You are freakin (because I can't use the word I want to) KIDDING me!

Bad enough I can't buy tshirts for my daughters promoting great self esteem and sports and goals like little boys can have (Fire Fighter, Park Ranger, Soccer Champ, Basketball Star, Future President of the USA, etc.), their only tshirts with words are crap (Diva, Mommy's Shopping Partner, Shopaholic, Brat, Cute Girls Rule, etc.). Which I consider Walmart to be the worst store at this.

Bad enough that my 5 year old for a while was convinced she was fat (still might secretly be) when she is a beautiful slim creature who the doctor says wishes the rest of the kids coming in were her size. All because she was given a (bought in Walmart) coloring book one year for Christmas from a well meaning In-law. The problem with it? It was a book about fairies. If by fairies, you mean oversexualized caricatures of women with wings worrying about birthday parties and shopping.

Bad enough they shove Hannah Montana and other garbage down kids' throats.

Bad enough girls this age are being shown on Yo Gabba Gabba and all other shows that girls are only good for looking cute and nothing else (and the loose sex that comes with it when they get older).

Bad enough I can't even really count on innocent sounding musicians like Taylor Swift to be pure and sweet for my kids to look up to.

Why can't little girls just be little girls? Little boys get to be little boys and they get to grow up being comfortable to do whatever they want in life and make more money at the same job. And they get to view girls (because when we grow up, we don't get to be addressed as women, even we grown women are guilty of it! Or else we address ourselve or other "girls" as b---es, with pride, not sure what in the world that is about) as nothing more than sex objects.

In my house, we do not shop at Walmart. Because of repeated moves like this by that company. When will we as a nation realize that store has caused us nothing but economic, social, and environmental damage? Or should I just lighten up and go with it and raise two sluts while handing over my husband's paycheck for inferior products made in sweatshops?

Btw, JennaHatfield's comment is right on. I agree 100%.

And Emmysboosandrawrs, I agree with you. I had a friend who was 13 who's parents let her dress up and makeup and hang out with whoever and she dissappeared one day and was never found. I don't want my kids to end up like that. And I agree, that whole "tween" thing is just crazy. Until you are 13, you are not a teenager, you are a young child. Then, when you are a teenager, you are an older child.

Emmysboosandrawrs 5 pts

Little girls today are growing up in a world of princesses and other very feminine, sometimes even sexualized baby dolls, movies, etc. So I get that girls are wanting to look grown up younger and younger. But when we live in a world where girls are hitting puberty SO young, and because of that are already looking older than they are...it just seems so dangerous to me to allow make up. It's stupid and even potentially dangerous to let your 12 year old look 16. It's not natural or okay. Even the term 'tween' shows how much we are forcing girls to grow up so young. 8 year olds should just be kids...Not 'almost teens'. 8 year olds are FIVE years away from being a teen...and 5 years AGO they were three. 5 years is forever away when you're 8. The whole thing is just sad to me.

Morgan Shanahan 6 pts

I...don't even know what to say. I just...I can't even...

::dead::

JennaHatfield 9 pts

So they can roll out anti-aging makeup for kids who don't need it, but it's going to take five years to reduce cost on good foods? Oh. Okay.

*headdesk*

Contributing Editor Jenna Hatfield (@FireMom ( http://twitter.com/FireMom )) blogs at Stop, Drop and Blog ( http://stopdropandblog.com ) and The Chronicles of Munchkin Land ( http://thechroniclesofmunchkinland.com ). She is a freelance writer and photographer.