Bio
Carol is a well-traveled consultant, businesswoman and speaker who has collected countless pearls of travel wisdom over many years. Sh hrai...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Full-Body Scanners and "Friendly" Pat-Downs: How to Negotiate Airport Security

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 12
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

The holiday travel season is upon us. Between booking travel, buying gifts and organizing the family, who’s got time to even think about the latest airport security procedures? But if you’ve been hearing the word "pat-down" in the news -- yes, it means what you think it means.

The recent statement by the Transportation Security Administration reads, "TSA is in the process of implementing new pat-down procedures at checkpoints nationwide as one of our many layers of security to keep the traveling public safe. Pat-downs are one important tool to help TSA detect hidden and dangerous items such as explosives. Passengers should continue to expect an unpredictable mix of security layers that include explosives trace detection, advanced imaging technology, canine teams, among others."

DALLAS, TEXAS - DECEMBER 27:   A TSA officer screens airline passengers in Terminal C at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport December 27, 2009 in Dallas, Texas.  Pre-flight screenings were stepped up after Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, 23, of Nigeria was accused of trying to blow up a Northwest Airlines flight on Christmas Day.   (Photo by Tom Pennington/Getty Images)

Before you cancel your plane tickets and swear off flying forever after reading this statement, here’s the quick rundown on what to expect, your choices and ways to make the airport security process as stress-free as possible.

  • TSA may have an Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) unit (aka the "full-body scanner") in your airport, though there is rarely one at every security lane.
  • If you do go through a security line with an AIT unit, you have your choice of going through this scanner or asking for a pat-down instead.
  • If you go through a pat-down, it may be friendlier than just a quick feel of your arms and legs. This method of screening must be as thorough as what the AIT scanner would do.
  • You can ask for a private pat-down to be done by a same-gender TSA agent.

Personally, the only thing I find unpleasant about this scanner is raising my arms above my head after I’ve removed my jacket -- I'm not fond of showing off my arm jiggle to fellow travelers lined up behind me. Luckily, the next folks in line are too busy emptying pockets and untying shoes to be looking at my arm jiggle. (I recently wrote My New Wardrobe Rules for Full Body Scanners after going through my first AIT experience.)

If you’re worried about what TSA sees behind their screen -- no offense, but it’s a picture not worth posting on any adult website. Instead, the screens display E.T.-looking body shapes with genital blobs, not the specifics of any one body. Check out TSA’s Advanced Imaging page to see what they see. Believe me, if I caught a peek of my body on one of these machines and saw a voluptuous, sexy image, heck ... I’d be going through the scanner again and again to see it for myself!

For as stress-free a security passage as possible:

  • Give yourself ample time to get through the security lines. It’s impossible to gauge the length of the line you’ll be going through or the speed of your fellow travelers, so be conservative and allow extra time. Hopefully you’ll have time to enjoy a coffee once you get near your gate.
  • Remove your coat, jacket or big sweater, scarf and hat.
  • Empty all pockets.
  • If your favorite necklace is big and clunky, put it in your purse or carry-on and put it on after you go through security. Also remove big buckle belts.
  • Avoid bulky clothing -– big, flowing skirts or multiple layers, for example. This just invites a pat down.
  • Wear easy-to-remove shoes. If you’re wearing boots for the winter weather, start removing them before it’s your turn to go through the security lane.
  • Use the arm-raising AIT machine. It’s faster than a pat-down, less intrusive, and there’s no need to be separated from your family or your belongings while you’re in a private pat-down area. (I stress more about where my purse and laptop are than how I’m being examined.)
  • And be very grateful you’re not the one who has to look at the ET body blobs marching through the scanners all day!

I fly each and every week. On Monday mornings, I line up behind countless tourists in the Orlando airport. They

  • 12
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
randamace 5 pts

I just wrote an article on Blogher about the sexual molestation/rape aspect of this as well. You are being violated and with thousands of TSA agents employed around the nation, your odds of running into a sexually perverse officer are MUCH higher than a terrorist attack. *Profiling (within reason) the passenger for "RED FLAGS" would be a better option. The machine/feel up would serve better purpose for someone who ACTUALLY AROUSES suspicion. Not a family with a hotel booked for 6 nights in Orlando. I cancelled my trip. HECK NO, you are not molesting my child.

Gena Haskett 6 pts

And I do have choices but when did the balance come between public safety and personal injury?

The crickets are still chirping on my multiple questions about what are the radiation levels?

How are the machines maintenance and calibrated?

Who trains the TSA staff on the correct use?

Who controls access to the images?

What do you do with people who cannot go through the scanners AND have medical, faith based, moral or prior abuse issues that will not allow them to be touched?

Are the going to establish a pre-screen program for these folks?

I do get it. It is a hard balance between air safety and personal authority. Yes, lean toward air safety. I want an informed 3rd option other than be Scanned or stay home.

Seriously, BlogHer11 might be on rails for many of us.

Gena Haskett is a BlogHer Contributing Editor. My Blogs: Out On The Stoop ( http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com ) and Create Video Notebook ( http://createvideonotebook.blogspot.com )

everydayjill 5 pts

I agree there are other ways to travel, but the argument that these machines make us safer seems unfounded. Lifting my breast to check underneath it for a bomb doesn't make us safer. Hastily ordering machines full of unanswered questions, unreliable technology and possible widespread dangers doesn't make us safer. Feeling underneath my boyfriend's testicles and backwards does not make our country safer.
Low-tech things make us safer. Doors on cockpits with locks. Bomb-sniffing dogs. Current real time communication between all gov't agencies. Testing for bomb and gun residue on luggage. These are time-tested and effective things that make air travel safer.
To say that one can use a bus or a car if they don't like the invasive body searches or the questionable backscatter machines is misleading. If these are allowed in airports, why not bus stations? Why not train stations? Why not government buildings? Slippery slope...
Giving away rights is a dangerous path. Once we freely give away rights, we don't easily get them back.

onblank 5 pts

I'll be the first to admit that airport security is a pain in the ass. But the reality is that there are other ways to travel. You can take a car, a bus, a train, a boat, or charter a private plane. Whenever there are air disasters involving weapons or bombs smuggled on-board, we bitch about how security should have been tighter. When we go for a while without such disasters, we start to bitch about our right to privacy.

We do have a right to privacy. And I have a right to fly commercially without getting blown into a million pieces. If you're so concerned about the scanners or the pat down, go ahead and call upon your right to get there some other way.

Great tips from Carol; there's nothing you'll encounter going through security that a little planning ahead can't fix.

Solidarity.

--Kristina

www.OnBlank.com ( http://www.OnBlank.com )

KnockItOff 5 pts

Not the blog post, but the TSA.

We are American citizens. We have rights guaranteed by our constitution. One of these rights is "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

The full body scanners pose a health risk due to radiation.

The images from the full body scanners can be (and have been) saved. You can get them through a Freedom of Information Act request (http://gizmodo.com/5690749/). A policy clearly does not prevent employees from keeping images that are supposed to be deleted. And, if these images are stored, even for a very short time, they can be recovered even if they are deleted.

So, my choices are 1) public nudity through a machine involving taking an image of me without clothing and outside of my control. Might show up on the internet. Yeah! Or 2) public groping by a stranger.

We should all be outraged by this. Our rights are being violated. Our choices are to not fly or to accept public degrading and humiliation (and potential health risks no one wants to talk about).

And how does this make us safer? Well, it makes Mr. Chertoff much safer in his retirement since he is being paid to lobby for these machines by the company that makes them. Given the size of the order for the machines themselves, I would say the company will be pretty safe in its profits too. The American public - I am not convinced that this is anything more than security theater (actions to make it look like they are doing things to make us safe without those actions having any measurable impact on actual safety).

I suggest we all write our congressmen and senators and tell them that these security procedures are unacceptable. We want our 4th Amendment rights to be guaranteed, not violated. We want to travel without being violated as part of the process.

AllieAnalogue 5 pts

Ditto the other commentors here.
It's not just another little security check that you need to allow extra time for. It's a cancer risk and an invasion of bodily integrity - my doctor doesn't get that intimate with me during a full physical.
I may have a chance to travel to Nigeria next year, my first overseas trip, but I will not go if I'm going to be assumed guilty until felt up by someone with impunity.

Carol, thank you for the tips, but if you're only concerned about your underarm jiggle, I think you need to think about this a little more critically.

Allie

My blog: www.AnalogueChic.com  ( http://www.AnalogueChic.com  )

Gena Haskett 6 pts

It is almost as if the TSA is trying to discourage folks from flying. Why can't there be a statement about the radiation levels?

Is it the same as an x-ray? An MRI?
Who is monitoring or calibrating the machines so that they can't be set to higher than tolerable levels.

And the pat downs. A friend told me that they can be cavity invasive.

I (don't) love my choices, either get zapped by excess radiation or being touched by a snarly pissed off TSA agent.

This is the kind of stuff that makes Grayhound look good.

Gena Haskett is a BlogHer Contributing Editor. My Blogs: Out On The Stoop ( http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com ) and Create Video Notebook ( http://createvideonotebook.blogspot.com )

emilycsims 5 pts

I'm concerned about the safety of the machines for the sake of airport and airline employees who have to go through them everyday--could frequent exposure to x-ray be harmful?

To see a funny take on the situation, read @TSAgov's tweets. It's a guy mocking the whole situation, and his tweets are cracking me up :)

I blog about books, life and writing at Check, please! ( http://www.emilycsims.com/ )

Never book travel without a coupon code ( http://travelated.com/travel-deals )!

everydayjill 5 pts

I am concerned about the safety of the machines. The more I read about lack of large studies and good studies being done about their safety convinces me that I don't want my children going through them for reasons other than just modesty. Pilots' unions are urging pilots to avoid them for safety reasons. Scientists are coming out saying that they WILL cause cancer, although gov't websites say this is untrue.
As for the new 'friendly' pat-downs, I have seen news reports where women are having their breast lifted and cupped, men are having their testicles and penis lifted and probed under.
This seems invasive to me on many levels. I shall take the old-fashioned machines, no matter how long the line, and if I am searched with the new 'friendly' patdown/feelup, I shall file a formal complaint.
I hope everyone travelling studies both their options and their rights in regards to this issue.

everydayjill 5 pts

I am concerned about the safety of the machines. The more I read about lack of large studies and good studies being done about their safety convinces me that I don't want my children going through them for reasons other than just modesty. Pilots' unions are urging pilots to avoid them for safety reasons. Scientists are coming out saying that they WILL cause cancer, although gov't websites say this is untrue.
As for the new 'friendly' pat-downs, I have seen news reports where women are having their breast lifted and cupped, men are having their testicles and penis lifted and probed under.
This seems invasive to me on many levels. I shall take the old-fashioned machines, no matter how long the line, and if I am searched with the new 'friendly' patdown/feelup, I shall file a formal complaint.
I hope everyone travelling studies both their options and their rights in regards to this issue.

Chgkim 5 pts

Hi Carol, as a woman who had a hip replaced at a fairly young age, I too travel, not weekly as you do, but I do get stopped at security each time I fly.
There is a big difference between todays pat down and the pat down of 2 weeks ago and it is, in a word, the "wand". Previous pat downs used a mix of wand metal detector and pat down. In retrospect this was great you learn not to wear underwire bras, no "gromets" in your slacks,etc. With all pat down, all the time, it is def NOT just a "bit friendlier". Sure I can have a "private" pat down, but it doesn't change the fact that their hands are feeling me all over, including between my legs and, yesterday, having me lift my shirt to feel in my wasteband.
I am not the sort of person that lets anything having to do with travel ruffle my feathers, but I really do find this more stressful.

Tropic of Mom 5 pts

Actually, the scanners may reveal more. There was a situation at my local airport where the TSA workers were testing out the scanners. A supervisor apparently joked to a worker about the small size of his package after he went through the scanner. Then the co-workers joined in and teased the man for weeks. Finally, the man couldn't take it anymore and roughed up the supervisor and was arrested. That news story was the first that I had heard about the body scanners and how revealing they are.

Holly

Tropic of Mom

http://www.tropicofmom.com