What does ACORN stand for?
by Jane Becker

ACORN is suddenly in the news a lot.

Two weeks ago the New York Times revealed that Pelosi and Frank had tried to build a clause into the bailout bill that would hand over the first 20% of every dollar invested in the bailed out institutions to ACORN. Not to taxpayers, but to ACORN.

On Monday, AP reported that officials in Nevada raided the offices of ACORN after claims of voter registration fraud (including registrations in the name of Tony Romo, the Cowboys quarterback). Fraud on the part of "voters" registered by ACORN has already been found in Missouri, Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Today it was revealed, by Investors Business Daily, that Obama's campaign paid ACORN $800,000 to register new voters--a payment that his campiagn finance records did not make public. Obama also worked for the voter registration arm of ACORN in 1992.

So, who is ACORN and what do they really stand for?

Jane Becker

http://thedamedomain.blogspot.com

Posted In

Comments

 

The ACORN I know

The ACORN I know from Baltimore is a home ownership org.  They have trained people in the facts of home ownership and have helped many people I know personally get homes.  What is often overlooked in the booming housing market is the fact that rents goes shyward too.  For many who are renting saving for a home becomes increasingly harder as you have to save for this house while renting and sometimes the rent is higher than the mortgage would be.  ACORN went into churches and schools to do home ownership outreach.  They trained people to help them understand the process and to get them up to speed on what it means to own a home.  The ACORN I know has helped a lot of people buy homes and not get taken advantage of.  I know of at least one couple who was going to buy a home using an ARM and ended up with a FHA after talking to an ACORN rep.  ACORN advocates affordable homes and helps homeowners thnk about their budgets and all of the other things that can come up.  They tell you upfront that ARMs, ballons, interest only are not smart loan choices and give you the reasons. 

Do I doubt the account of voter fruad no.  When you hire teenagers and send them walking house to house things happen.  I know because I did voter registrtion in '88. The true mistake in this is paying by the number you register, when you do that some college kid or even a deperate adult is going to go to the phone book or the library.  Here is the thing.  These fruadulant people are not going to show up on election day.  This is much to ado about nothing.  How many people are really going to show up with fake IDs to vote? Because in every state I have lived in you have to have an ID to go with your card or you can't vote.  55% of the adult population is not even registered to vote.  You think there is going to be some concerted effort to vote fraudulantly?  There may be one or two isolated incidents but a huge effort?  In order for that to happen you have to get a fake ID and remember all the names and addresses that you filled out on the form and then pick different times as a precint rep is surely likely to remeber you about the 3rd time.  That's either conspiracy theory or  gulibility.   

Michelle

I blog at http://www.mommycan.blogspot.com/

 

The ACORN Tree

The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)

This link below has many, many articles about ACORN.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6968

Obama & ACORN - Grants

The Chicago ACORN Received Grants Of $45,000 (2000), $30,000 (2001), $45,000 (2001), $30,000 (2002), And $40,000 (2002) From The Woods Fund. (Donors Forum Website, ifs.donorsforum.org, Accessed 6/10/08)

NOTE: From 1993 To 2002, Barack Obama Served On The Board Of Directors For The Woods Fund. (Tim Novak and Fran Spielman, “Obama Helped Ex-Boss Get $1 Mil. From Charity,” Chicago Sun-Times, 11/29/07)

Obama & ACORN - ACORN Endorsement

ACORN’s Political Action Committee Endorsed Obama. “[A]CORN's political action committee endorsed Barack Obama for President. … The endorsement reflects a belief that Obama – who worked as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago – understands that change must come from the ground-up, as part of a working coalition, rather than from position papers.” (Katrina Vanden Heuvel, Op-Ed, “ACORN: Obama Gets It,” The Nation, 2/23/08)

Obama & ACORN - Community Organizing

Obama Formerly Represented ACORN, Taught Classes For Future Leaders Of ACORN, And They Endorsed His 2008 Presidential Campaign:

Obama Directed Project Vote And Later Taught Classes For “Future Leaders Identified By ACORN And The Centers For New Horizons.” “He [Obama] says he is drawn to politics, despite its superficialities, as a means to advance his real passion and calling: community organization. … In 1992 Obama took time off to direct Project Vote, the most successful grass-roots voter-registration campaign in recent city history. Credited with helping elect Carol Moseley-Braun to the U.S. Senate, the registration drive, aimed primarily at African-Americans, added an estimated 125,000 voters to the voter rolls--even more than were registered during Harold Washington's mayoral campaigns. ‘It's a power thing,’ said the brochures and radio commercials. … Obama continues his organizing work largely through classes for future leaders identified by ACORN and the Centers for New Horizons on the south side.” (Hank De Zutter, Op-Ed, “What Makes Obama Run?” Chicago Reader, 12/8/95)

Obama & ACORN - Legal Work

Obama Was Part Of Team Of Lawyers Who Represented ACORN In A Suit Against The State Of Illinois. “Obama was part of a team of attorneys who represented the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) in a lawsuit against the state of Illinois in 1995 for failing to implement a federal law designed to make it easier for the poor and others to register as voters.” (Mike Robinson, “Obama Got Start In Civil Rights Practice,” The Associated Press, 2/20/07)

Obama & ACORN - Campaign Money

Obama’s Campaign Paid Over $800,000 To ACORN Subsidiary, CSI, For Get-Out-The-Vote Efforts, But “Mistakenly Misrepresented” Their Work To The FEC:

Obama’s Campaign “Paid More Than $800,000” To ACORN For Get-Out-The Vote Efforts; The Campaign Originally “Misrepresented” The Group’s Work To The FEC.  “U.S. Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign paid more than $800,000 to an offshoot of the liberal Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now for services the Democrat's campaign says it mistakenly misrepresented in federal reports.  An Obama spokesman said Federal Election Commission reports would be amended to show Citizens Services Inc. -- a subsidiary of ACORN -- worked in ‘get-out-the-vote’ projects, instead of activities such as polling, advance work and staging major events as stated in FEC finance reports filed during the primary.” (David M. Brown, “Obama To Amend Report On $800,000 In Spending,” Pittsburgh Tribune Review, 8/22/08)

http://www.gop.com/ObamaAcornTree/

 

The question remains

The question still reamins how will this affect the out come of the election?  From where I sit if they aren't making batches of IDs to go with the voter registration cards then how are these dead and fake people going to vote?  The crime is filing false documents.  But there is no way this will lead to fake votes.  This is all smoke and mirrors

Voter supression which is a fun Republican activity is a crime. 

Michelle

I blog at http://www.mommycan.blogspot.com/

 

The Question Remains...Valid

Obama's association with ACORN is still very much a valid question.  He paid them $800,000 to get out the vote (while hiding the expense).  They are now accused of massive voter registration fraud in more than ten states--including key battleground states.

ACORN also took in hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Fannie Mae foundation while Raines was CEO.  Fannie Mae also contributed heavily to Obama and Raines is now an Obama advisor.

Fannie Mae was a major contributor to the sub-prime mortgage meltdown.  ACORN, in Chicago, engaged in intimidation tactics with banks to get them to issue sub-prime mortgages.  Obama is from Chicago.

The web gets more and more tangled around Obama, ACORN, Fannie Mae, voter fraud and the financial mess on Wall Street.

These are serious issues.

 

 

Same question

In what way will this affect the outcome of the election?  Were there hundreds of fake Ids to go with those fake registrations?

>Michelle

I blog at http://www.mommycan.blogspot.com/

 

From where I sit ...

A picture ID isn't needed in every state in the U.S.  Voter ID Laws  Therefore, the notion that a fake ID would be needed to commit voter fraud in these states is a false claim.

  • 23 states and the District of Columbia currently have the minimum HAVA ID requirements - first-time voters who register by mail and do not provide ID verification with their registration must show ID before voting. Photo and non-photo ID accepted in these states. (CA, DC, ID, IL, IA, ME, MD, MA, MN, MS, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NY, NC, OK, OR, RI, UT, VT, WV, WI, WY)
  • 18 states require ID for all voters. Photo and non-photo ID accepted in these states. (AL, AK, AZ, AR, CO, CT, DE, KY, MO, MT, NM, ND, OH, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA)
  • 3 states require all voters show photo ID. Voters without the proper ID will be offered provisional ballots. (FL, GA, IN)
  • 4 states request all voters show photo ID. Voters without the proper ID can sign affidavits and cast regular (non-provisional) ballots. (HI, LA, MI, SD)
  • 2 states require ID of all first-time voters. Photo and non-photo ID accepted in these states. (KS, PA)
  • Notes: In Florida, if the voter does not have the required ID they are required to vote a provisional ballot. The canvassing board determines the validity of the ballot. In Georgia, the state law requiring photo ID at the polls is still the subject of litigation. If the voter does not have the required ID they must vote a provisional ballot. The provisional ballot will only be counted if the registrars are able to verify ID of the elector within the time period for verifying provisional ballots. In Indiana, if the voter is unable or unwilling to present photo ID on Election Day, they may cast a provisional ballot. They have until noon 10 days after the election to follow up with the county election board and either provide photo ID or affirm one of the law's exemptions applies. In Michigan, state law reqiring photo ID at the polls is the subject of litigation.

 

Former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker, co-chairmen of the National Commission on Federal Election Reform, discuss their newly released recommendations for federal election reform.  READ MORE HERE

Among the commission's 87 recommendations are: calls for standardized photo ID's for all voters; state, not local control over voter registration lists; verifiable paper trails for electronic voting machines; uniform statewide standards for counting provisional ballots; and moving towards the nonpartisan administration of elections.

 

ACORN's response

Here's their defense of their voter registration procedures. One key excerpt:

Fact: ACORN flags incomplete, problem, or suspicious cards when we turn
them in, but these warnings are often ignored by election officials.
Often these same officials then come back weeks or months later and
accuse us of deliberately turning in phony cards.

 

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|

 

Answer to the question

It will impact the election because Obama's campaign paid ACORN to "get the vote out" and ACORN was subsequently charged with fraudulent registration. Voter fraud is a federal offense and the question has to be asked, how deeply is Obama's campaign involved in this fraud?

The answer to that can have a serious impact on the campaign.

Jane Becker, http://thedamedomain.blogspot.com

 

 

 

Still asking

Still asking the same question.  Will Mickey mouse and others vote?  Voter registration fraud happens when you pay people to register X number of people to vote.  The real issue is overwhelmed regisration officials, but there is no chance any of these people dead, alive or fictional can vote. 

Jane, I have to tell you that even I was concerned about this but my 13 year old child thought it was hillarous.  He said mommy image showing up saying your name is Mickey mouse and then pulling out your ID?  It hit me that I was so caught up in the news story that I did not get that dead people, people registered 50 times will not be able to vote.  My concern was for the organization I described above.  The one that does needed and real work in communities. But the FACT still remains these people just cannot vote unless there are IDs to go along with the apps. 

Michelle

I blog at http://www.mommycan.blogspot.com/

 

I answered your question.

Check my post above.

 

ID or no ID

Ladies, whether or not those "Mickey Mouse" voters show up at the polls with or without ID, there is a presidential candidate who is deeply associated with an organization accused of  voter registration fraud, and that's a very big issue, esp. since his campiagn paid them to get those "voters" registered. 

That's the fact.

Or would it only be a fact if it were a Republican candidate who was involved? Speaking as a Democrat, I remember all the allegations of voter fraud against the Republicans in Ohio in 2004. It was wrong there, and it's wrong here.

 

 

John McCain

Here is a pic of John McCain at an ACORN rally:

 

If interested read the other side of the story here:   http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/13/acorn-mccain-and-gop-used_n_134284.html

They can't be that bad.  Like I said smoke and mirrors.  We have got to start thinking BEFORE we jump on a bandwagon.  THis is an organization that has done much good in communities all accross the country.  Republicans have used it when it benefited them now they are throwing it under the bus to go on the attack.  The only problem is tearing apart ACORN's reputation will have lasting and very negative affects on the people it serves.

Michelle

I blog at http://www.mommycan.blogspot.com/

 

ROFL - you're joking right?

 I found this from the ACORN web site -

ACORN is a non-profit, non-partisan social justice organization with national headquarters in New York, New Orleans and Washington, D.C.

I found this from an Ohio blog -

Ohio ACORN Hiring Canvassers To Help Obama
Submitted by Jeff on Thu, 02/21/2008 - 12:22pm.

An announcement from Ohio ACORN political director Mari Engelhardt:

GOTV for Obama! Ohio ACORN is doing a Get Out The Vote project with the OBAMA Campaign. Ohio ACORN is hiring canvassers to go door to door encouraging voters to vote for Barack Obama.

ACORN is hiring in Cleveland (216)431-3905, Columbus (614)425-9491, Cincinnati (513)221-1737, for Dayton (call Cincinnati), and for Toledo call Cleveland. Or email polnatoh@acorn.org and your inquiry will be routed to the appropriate person in each of these cities. Intake and training will be held daily at local ACORN offices. Canvass begins on Wednesday Feb. 27th and will work through election day. Please, only persons wishing to work all or most of these days (Saturday and Sunday included) should inquire.

Please do not contact the Obama campaign directly regarding this post as they are not the organization doing the hiring and it will only distract their staff and volunteers from the other important work they are doing on behalf of Senator Obama.

READ THE FACTS HERE

__________________________________

So I just called the Cincinnati ACORN office at 1-513-221-1737 ...

A woman answers and I told her that I was interested in their help wanted ad and I wanted to get voters registered for Senator McCain. I was put on hold...another woman comes on a few minutes later. A woman by the name of Amy Titleman, a director, says "voter registration is over"... I said "oh yes, the ad did state you were looking for help to go door to door to get out the vote and I want to apply to do this for Senator McCain". She says "well, we have endorsed Obama so we don't need people to get out the vote for Senator McCain"...I said "oh, so you ARE one sided and yes of course he has given you so much money of course you are backing him. I just wanted to veryify if the rumors about Obama and ACORN were true and I think I have just done that". I told her I would pass this info along to the press. She hung up on me.

FACTS about ACORN:

  • ACORN is a radical left-wing group that takes in 40% of it's revenues from American taxpayers. 
  • ACORN has it's finger prints all over the sub-prime mortgage fiasco.
  • ACORN is a corrupt organization hiding behind the poor.
  • ACORN's political action committee has endorsed Obama's presidential candidacy.

Want more facts - 

"James Terry, Chief Public Advocate for The Consumer Rights League testified in June 2008 at a joint House Administration and House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on "Federal, State and Local Efforts to Prepare for the General 2008 Election," where he highlighted "corruption at every level of ACORN including embezzlement, cover-ups, misuse of taxpayer funds and voter fraud." 

 

Huh????

As I understand it, the Obama campaign paid 800K for a get out the vote campaign among those likely to vote for Obama. Why would ACORN entertain taking on someone who wants to get out the vote for McCain? If McCain ponied up the cash, I bet ACORN would do that for them too. My guess though is that the McCain camp did not want the type of people involved in ACORN to be getting out McCain's vote :)

 

Nice Red Herring Southerngirl.

Good try. :-)

 

Voter Fraud vs. Election Fraud

I agree about Smoke & Mirrors - ACORN attests that they have been diligent in complying with state registration laws including the need to submit all signed registration forms regardless of their suspicions. They have complied with the investigations including turning over information to help fraud be prosecuted. You are correct, this will not result in Election Fraud that can inflate the number of voters for one candidate. I personally feel election fraud is the much more onerous crime and in the form of voter suppression it is more often attributed to Repubs. As for holding the Obama campaign responsible for the misdeeds of some individuals employed by a contractor (or subcontractor) we may as well make the goverment responsible for the misdeeds of Blackwater in Iraq because they employed  them. This should be such a non-issue.

 

Asking Another Question

How many verified cases of election fraud have stemmed from  voter registration fraud? There must be stats for this among law enforcement. I would guess that of the many hundreds of election fraud cases that are prosecuted, 99% result from other tactics ranging from ballot manipulation, voter suppression, sabotage, etc.

 

It's Very Much An Issue

If a presidential candidate has worked with and for, given money to and promised a role in his administration to a publicly funded group that is accused of fraud.  Esp. when that group and the candidate each took a lot of money from a company that was a major player in the sub-prime mortgage meltdown.

Whether the candidate in question is a Democratic or Republican,  this is a VERY serious issue which raises significant questions about the character of the candidate involved.

 

 

Facts please

 when that group and the candidate each took a lot of money from a company that was a major player in the sub-prime mortgage meltdown.

Do you have facts to back up that statement?  Here is an exerpt from an article I read the other day:

But, apparently, that's because you and I, dear readers, don't understand the intense psychological pull poor people have on rich folks, a pull that can, apparently, make the world's hardest, meanest, and most ruthless CEOs - highly educated men and women who've spent years honing the fine arts of profit-making -- part with good money on a whim and hand it over to a bunch of irresponsible, check-bouncing lay-abouts. Fox News's Neil Cavuto went so far as to explicitly link banks' lending to minority customers - a move they only reluctantly agreed to after decades of redlining minority neighborhoods and effectively removing most African-Americans from the home-ownership society -- with the current financial collapse. Thursday night, on Larry King, a conservative spokeswoman accused the community organizing group ACORN of "pressuring" banks to give mortgage loans to people with no jobs. Obama is supported by ACORN. QED: the whole bloody mess is Obama's fault.

Let's forget for a minute about the attempt to blame the collapsing global financial edifice on a man who in one breath the Republicans accuse of having no government experience and in the next try to position as being single-handedly responsible for the creation of trillions of dollars in dubious loans. Let's look at the deeper notion that manipulative poor people are responsible for all of our current pocket-ache.

Kind of eye opening if you are willing to do more than just bash.  If you want to Bash Obama, which seems to be your intent, do it.  But do not try to take down good organizations in order to do that.  That bath water seem a little heavy?

Michelle

I blog at http://www.mommycan.blogspot.com/

 

Bashing or Questioning

Why is it that every time someone asks about an Obama related fact, it's a "bash" or "negative"?

ACORN may do some good but it's coming to light that they have also done a LOT of bad.  Obama did work for them and promise them a role and give them money.  These are facts--as are his friendship with Ayers, his long term association with Wright and his middle name.  So why, when these facts are mentioned, are they misconstrued as bashing?  Is it also bashing him to say that he wants to raise taxes? Is it bashing him to say that he promised to take public financing for his campaign and then decided against it?

Facts are facts, whether or not you like them.  And the fact is, Obama's relationship with ACORN and ACORN's activities are questionable and a valid question in this campaign.

 

Feel free to question Obama, but...

You can ask whatever questions you like about Obama. My only question is whether you are open to listening to the answers, and to responding to others' questions.

Here's what I wonder:

1. What has Obama's middle name got to do with anything?

2.Are you similarly concerned about prominent Republicans who also worked with William Ayers?

3.Does it matter to you that an independent analysis of the Obama tax plan contradicts your claim?

4. Today I listened an episode of the Diane Rehm show in which allegations of voter suppression and voter registration fraud were discussed. One of the guests was the deputy director of the Franklin County Board of Elections in Ohio, a place where there had been allegations of voter suppression during the 2004 election. He said that out of about 26,000 new voter registrations in that county this year, about 20 cards turned out not to be valid. He guessed that half of them came from ACORN. He also said they hold weekly meetings with ACORN representatives to ensure the validity of the registration cards. His remarks are consistent with ACORN's claim that it flags problematic registration cards and alerts election officials. Do you have evidence to the contrary?

5. You will doubtless disagree with me, but I love to know your thoughts on what I wrote about Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright in 2007. 

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|

 

The middle name thing slays me..and scares
me..

Have heard he is related to Saddam to Bin Laden is a terrorist by blood etc etc....

So everyone named Hussein or Obama is a bad person......his name is politically bad luck..but I think the fall out would have been worse for him had he changed his name to something more...white.

 They would have bashed him for that too.

It is a real test of just how 'advanced' America is to see how 'comfortable' they are with voting for a black man with a strange name.

Look at the fuss about Arnie as Gov?  He was too german for them. 

 

Look for me at http://crunchycarpets.com or check out the ladies at www.wetcoastwomen.com

 

Ethical Issues

Do you see any ethical issues about a non-for-profit organization supported by taxpayers endorsing one candiate over another one?

 

 

Obama's Middle Name...

Has nothing to do with anything. But why are people who use it called racist? Why doesn't he come out and say, yes this is my middle name, what of it? Why has he allowed people to be called racist for using it--thereby impugning Arabs everywhere?  It's his god-given name as they used to say.  Why doesn't he defend it and thus eliminate the Arab argument?

Voting for a man just because he is half black is no indication of "America's advancement".  Voting for a man or woman, regardless or ethnicity or religion, is. 

As to Obama's tax plan, I watched his dialogue in Ohio with a plumber.  He's definitely raising taxes and he said so.

 

Jane Becker

 

If I'm not mistaken he *has* come out and
said that.

It is his name. Ok. So what? But I'll show you why those that use it are considered racist:

 

Because it's only used by those that want to stir up feelings of fear and animosity amongst the public. What IS John McCain's last name? Do you know, or will you have to think about it? Or Google it? What's Joe Biden's? Sarah Palin's? What's the W. in George W. Bush stand for? 

 

Yeah. Exactly. 

 

- Maria

http://immoralmatriarch.com

 

Evidence, please

I've never known Obama to deny his middle name.Why does he have to defend it? It's his name.

I have seen him refute lies about him being Muslim -- here and here, for example. I wrote about the need for cultural competence when covering Obama back at the beginning of this campaign. I specifically referred to his name, although not his middle name. 

Perhaps there is a cultural issue here. It's very common to find African Americans born between the 1960s and the 1980s with Arabic names, and most of them aren't Muslim. I almost named my own daughter Khadijah, even though I am a born-again, Bible-believing, water-baptised, not-ashamed-of-the-gospel believer in the risen Christ. It was a very common thing to do as a sign that we were no longer ashamed of our African ancestry. 

All of the statements that I have heard Obama make about taxes say that he would only raise taxes on people making more than $250,000 year. If you have evidence to the contrary, you should present it.

Peace.

 

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor|Professor Kim|

 

Returning to the discussion

Returning to the discussion on ACORN, I'm disappointed to see the same tired, old argument brought up again and again about ACORN. This is an organization that works for worker's rights, in support of Unions, equal opportunity for education, and yes, get out the vote campaigns.

Every Presidential election, some Republican in my state in Missouri comes out whining about ACORN and fradulent voter registrations. And every four years a couple of ACORN workers get busted, turned in by ACORN, and convicted of using the phone book to make it easier to fill in cards. 

Every four years, ACORN registers several thousand Missourians -- 53,000 this year. And ever year, about 100-200 of these registrations are found to be duplicates or frauds, almost invariably flagged that way by ACORN directly. As far as I know there has not been one fraudulent vote cast because of ACORNS work. 

Not one.

Every four years, I think of the same thing: why is it that the Republicans do not want people to be registered to vote. After all, I would think that both parties would want everyone to vote. Then I look at the voting identification campaigns and so on here and realize that the Republicans are trying to keep out the poor, and the black. Since the party can't win fairly, it will take whatever win it can get, even to denying entire groups the right to vote.

If you all want to talk about the true crime here, trying to prevent legitimate voters from voting is the worst possible crime associated with each election.

My own take on this issue: http://realtech.burningbird.net/not-technology/politics/support-acorn

 

 

Two things

First, the thing about ACORN getting 20% of anything related to the bailout is just an out-and-out lie. The money was supposed to go to the National Housing Trust Fund, which supports affordable housing. This money is only available to non-profit housing developers, of which ACORN is not one. ANd it is only available as part of a competitive grant process, not as an Congressional earmark.

Of course, ACORN itself does NOT seek nor accept federal grants anyway, so the point is moot.

 Second, you can find out the real deal from the horse's mouth here: http://acorn.org/index.php?id=17851 

 

Facts About ACORN

ACORN takes money from the US taxpayers.

ACORN has engaged in voter fraud.  A federal judge in Ohio has issued a ruling that the state must now set up a system to verify new voters because of the ACORN registrations.

Obama gave more than $800k to ACORN to engage in voter "registration".

Obama has promised a role in his admin to ACORN.

ACORN took money from Fannie Mae under F. Raines, and Obama took money from Fannie Mae under F. Raines, who now works for Obama.

These are facts. 

 

 

 

 

The only facts

The only facts in the above statement is that Obama's campagin gave 800k to ACORN for voter registration efforts.  The rest is subjection meant to bring about doubt.  If you have sources please provide them.

Acorn has Co-written legislation that has been put into law by at least 2 repbulican Governors.  But Jane Again I say lets stand back and take a good look at what we are doing to this org by demonizing it.  Yes I stand by my contention that you want o bash Obama.  I am bashing McCain he is not my guy.  I do not want him to win the election just as you don't want Obama to win, but lets make sure we don't throw innocents in the fray.  That's all I am saying with this ACORN thing. 

By the way Franklin Rains has said he is not an Obama advisor.  I guess he is lying in your mind. 

Michelle

I blog at http://www.mommycan.blogspot.com/

 

Fact Bashing

Here's a link to the Fannie Mae Foundation page listing ACORN grants: http://www.fanniemaefoundation.org/grants/grants_awarded.html?grantee=acorn&state=all&submitted=1

Here's a link to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics' list of Fannie Mae contributions to Senators:  http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-fannie-mae-and-freddie.html

Here's a link to one of the many stories about Obama's $800k contribution to ACORN: http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/10/ds_nuts_acorns_legal_troubles.php

Here's a link to one of many stories about ACORN's voter fraud:  http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/2008/view.bg?articleid=1125581&srvc=rss

And here's a link to a video wherein Obama promises an active role in his admin to ACORN: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vJcVgJhNaU (two minutes in).

Bashing or fact checking?

 

Jane, ACORN has never been

Jane, ACORN has never been involved with voter fraud. Voter registration fraud practiced by some ACORN employees is not equivalent to voter fraud. Unless you believe Mickey Mouse will show up to vote?

What does Fannie Mae have to do with this discussion? Can you please focus on the topic? You're the one that started it.

 That video has said that Obama would involve all community organizations in shaping his presidency. Of course. Or would you prefer that only corporations shape the administration? Religious nuts? Right wing Alaskan secessionists?

I can't believe you think we're so stupid as to believe your extrapolation of Obama's address to all community organizers to be specifically about ACORN. Thank you for your vote for our intelligence. But I hope Obama does also include ACORN. ACORN is an organization representing the common man and woman, no matter how much you all fear it because of how much power it gives to the poor and the minority,IE the people the Republicans disdain.

Obama paid $800,000 to Citizen Services, Inc in order to augment it's own "Get out the vote" campaign. Whether Citizen Services, Inc is actually directly financially affliated with ACORN is uncertain, because you can't find anything on the web -- search results are contaminated with blogger opinions, and the ACORN site is down. But the money was used for canvassing, not voter registration. I'm assuming it's permissable for Obama to canvas voters, isn't it? Or is it only allowed for Republicans?

But you're into facts and against ACORN -- do you denounce the fact that McCain has also worked with ACORN in the past? That he was keynote speaker at an event in Florida, 2006 that was co-sponsodered by ACORN? 

To be honest, I think many of the fraudulent registration cards associated with ACORN were filled out by Republican operatives, trying to discredit ACORN. In many states, registration cards have to be turned in regardless of how invalid they may seem. What a better way to discredit the voter registration movement--a movement you should applaud, if you believe in what this country stands for-- than to have people fill out registration forms with names like Mickey Mouse and then when the cards have to be turned into election boards, denounce ACORN for its "blatant attempts at voter registration fraud". Seriously, I think all registration cards filled in with obvious falsifications such as these are deliberate plants. But that's just my opinion. 

However, since opinion weighs the same as facts here abouts, then that's my "fact". 

 

Saying so does not make it

Saying so does not make it so, Jane. Or are your facts Palinized facts? Repeat it often enough, ignore the parts you don't like, and maybe some gullible fool will actually believe you?

Cite specifics where Obama has specifically said ACORN will have a role in his administration?

Cite where ACORN has, directly, been charged and convicted with voter fraud? Cite where any worker in ACORN has been charged and convicted of voter fraud? 

Cite where Obama gave ACORN money for voter registration?

And did you also neglect to remember to cite the fact that McCain also took campaign money from Fannie/Freddie? And what the hell does that have to do with voting fraud, or ACORN?

And since you're using this post to bring out everything about this campaign, how about that Keating, eh? While I'm at it, now what did that report say about Palin's abuse of office? Wow, too bad McCain believes in deregulation, because it sure us hurt us this year, didn't it? And isn't that something, McCain's going to gut Medicare in order to pay for those tax cedits for the oil companies, before they go and rip up ANWR and the fishing grounds along the Atlantic coast. Who needs fish, anyway?

I could go on, but I think I'll just stick with the topic of your post.I am furious that you tar and feather an organization whose only goal is the betterment of the common man and woman, in order to discredit the voter registrations to prevent people who _might_ vote for Obama from voting. To disenfranchise the poor and the minority.

Why don't you all just return to your roots: go get a bunch of guys to grab people doing voter registration, take them out into the woods, and beat them to death. 

And those are the facts.

 

 

Now that's bashing

My roots, Shelley P, are deep in the Democratic party where I have spent the last 30 years working on democratic presidential, statewide and local campaigns.  Those are the facts.

 

Jane Becker

 

That's not bashing -- that's

That's not bashing -- that's a reminder of the problems we've had with voter registration drives in the past, and how today's attempts to discredit all such efforts are only a continuation of the same.

How every time a state race is close, Republicans bring up issues of voter fraud ahead of time, in order to obfuscate and confuse. To send bully boys to polls in order to intimidate voters, which McCain wanted to get Obama to go along with, and Obama wisely declined. 

I'm still waiting for you to point out one instance of convicted voter fraud in the last ten years.

You say you're associated with the Democratic party. Great for you. That has nothing to do with the topic of this post, does it? 

 

I checked and did find a few

I checked and did find a few instances of voter fraud. The New York Times did a broader overview:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html

Bottom line, most of the "fraud" was confusion, such as felons not being aware that they can't vote. Personally, once a felon has paid their debt to society, I think they should be allowed to vote, but that's beside the point.

The vote buying schemes seem to be related to small, local races. 

As for the fraudulent votes there doesn't seem to be any ties between ACORNs effort and the fraudulent votes. 

Certainly there's been no grand conspiracy to steal the elections because of voter fraud. However, "stealing the election" because of not allowing legitimate voters the right to vote is just as much a danger -- or do we forget Florida 8 years ago?

 

 

Voter Suppression 101

I've been watching this post build on ACORN and voter fraud charges and smears against Barack Obama build, and have been reluctant to comment for a variety of reasons. However, in support of the information from ShellyP, I submit the following links that show this issue is an old story tied to Republican attempts to disenfranchise voters and to smear ACORN's work with fighting for the working poor and the poor who can't find work.

The Republican War on Voting by Art Levine

Threats to Jail Black Voters

The Fraudulent Voter Squad story at Slate Magazine

The Truth About Voter Fraud from The Brennan Center for Justice

An Interview with David Iglesias, one of the attorneys fired by the DOJ b/c he would not follow its politicized agenda, in particular, to prosecute ACORN

More on US Attorney Firings, for anyone who needs history

Missouri Attorney A Focus in Firings, The Boston Globe

Phony Fraud Charges, NYT editorial

Republicans and Voter Caging

The GOP's ACORN Voter Fraud Canard (from BradBlog. He leans left but his facts are correct)

ACORN has been working on its quality control

I included this last link because what's really going on with the accusations against ACORN is that the Republican party is going after the weakest link, a group that hires temporary workers in impoverished areas to help people fill out their voter registration cards and encourages low-income citizens to speak up and vote. It's inevitable that errors will be made in a large-scale voter registration drive, and it's a McCain spin doctor's joy to twist these errors into bogus charges of voter fraud.

As others have said in this thread, it's unlikely Mickey Mouse is going to show up to vote even if a voter registration worker, in an attempt to get paid for work he/she didn't do, turns in Mickey's card.

Regarding Amy Titleman at ACORN having to answer an ambush phone call, she misspoke. ACORN did not endorse Obama. The ACORN political action committee endorsed him. But she was correct to tell the caller that voter registration was over. BTW, ACORN can't register voters. It may only help voters to register by approaching them and asking them to fill out the voter registration form. Board of Election offices register voters.

Get Out the Vote or GOTV is not voter registration, and it really doesn't matter whether ACORN's PAC supports Obama or not. All ACORN workers can do is try to get people to go to the polls and exercise their right to vote. It can educate voters on issues important to ACORN. They can't go in the booth with able-bodied citizens and vote with them. Neither does ACORN have the power to commit election fraud, which by the way is not the same as voter fraud. (Election fraud is the crime of attempting to swing an election and generally is committed from the back end, not the front end of helping people to register to vote.) Also, an organization cannot commit voter fraud, which is one of the reasons ACORN has not been convicted of voter fraud ever, that and because no ACORN member or staff person has ever instructed anyone to fill out a false voter registration form.

Actually genuine voter fraud is an individual impersonating an actual voter and attempting to vote in that person's name. Republicans have written and enacted legislation to redefine voter fraud as a crime including the filling out a voter registration form with false information, the result of which has been to prosecute little old ladies who help their friends fill out voter registration forms and in this case, to go after temporary workers for large-scale voter registration drives in an effort to smear the organization that employs them.

To transform questionable voter registration forms into live people voting by impersonating others would take an effort far beyond the capacity of any community organization. (For one, the organization would have to set up thousands of physical addresses to receive the Board of Election voter registration cards that resulted from the forms. These groups don't have those kinds of resources.)

In low-income communities, which are ACORN service areas, getting people to impersonate voters ain't gonna happen. It's an uphill battle to get people to fill out their registration forms at all and to show up and vote legitimately in their own names much less anyone else's. The people who want to vote in their own names in such communities are far more likely to have trouble getting to the polls than anything else, but if these legitimate voters make it to the polls, Republicans have challenges for that too.

Also, ACORN and other community organizations lack the power of mind control to motivate people to vote under an alias. I'm shocked by the seemingly educated people who believe this form of mass mobilization would be possible.

Perhaps Republicans believe mass mind control during elections is possible because they believe in the power of people like Rush Limbaugh and his "Operation Chaos." Or maybe it's simply Republicans getting dirty because they recognize that disenfranchised minorities and people in low-to-moderate -income communities won't vote Republican anyway.

When voters from low-income and minority communities become engaged and realize their votes count, they will vote, and when most vote the one vote to which each is entitled, is it any wonder they don't vote for Republicans? What has the Republican party consistently done to show that it's concerned about people in poverty? Not much intentionally. That's why Republicans want to shut down low-income communities that wake up and vote. They know those votes are unlikely to favor Republican candidates, and emails from their operatives back up my thinking on this.

The questionable voter registration cards from ACORN are just that, cards filled out questionably by a few temporary workers who wanted to con their employer, ACORN, and be paid for registering voters when they actually didn't get out on the streets and help to register anyone. ACORN fires these employees when they identify them through quality control, and it cooperates with prosecutors who want to prosecute the workers.

When all is said and done, when you look at the numbers of
people ACORN has helped to register, a laudable effort, you'll find that the error rate for problematic cards is consistent with other large voter registration operations, some of which are run by government agencies. You will also find that Republicans call almost anything voter fraud, even bad handwriting. Republicans are scared that ACORN's success at getting more people from low-and-moderate-income communities to register to vote will result in these citizens exercising their right to vote. Smearing Obama is more icing on the cake.

On a final note, I watched the video to which Jane linked that she believes shows Obama saying ACORN will play a "major" role in his administration. He did not say that. He said that community organizations will have a voice in determining his policies. More than one community organization was present. There's nothing new about his saying that. Obama believes the working poor and the poor who have trouble working as well as the organizations that help them have been left out these last eight years. He's right.

I think Obama should be commended for having seen the need for poor, underrepresented Americans to have equal opportunity and an equal voice in this nation and having the heart to do something about it. He did that early in his career and not specifically with ACORN. Republicans openly laughed at him for being a community organizer, which tells you what they think about working to help hard working families and also what they really think of fighting for voting rights.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I admit that I used to work for ACORN, and it is also in the spirit of full disclosure that I tell you that ACORN, while doing an admirable job working to organize low-income people to stand up for their rights, is ill equipped to swing any election and that any questionable voter registration cards are more evidence of a need to tighten up on quality control than anything sinister. The accusation that ACORN has the power to commit massive election fraud is the best joke here. The group is good at moving people not paper, which is why that organization has had to work hard to develop quality control procedures for voter registration efforts. Community activism is at ACORN's heart not administration skills. And that's the truth I could not have shouted while in its employ.

Post Script: Republican Governor of Florida, Charlie Crist, said today that voter fraud accusations in his state are most likely exaggerated.

Nordette is a Contributing Editor with BlogHer.com whose personal blog is hosted on another site at this link.

 

Nordette

Wow thanks for this response.  I have worked with ACORN reps before and am relly upset as to how the organization has been demonized in the press.  I attended a few of their homeownership workshops.  One couple in the room was already talking to a broker who was going to get them an ARM and the ACORN rep told them it was not a good idea and explained in detail why.  They went to another broker and got an FHA and a cheaper house after being consueled on budgets and unexpected expenses.  They were really grateful.  I went with an older church memeber who wanted to buy becuse at 54 she ended up with 3 of her grandchildren and was looking at maybe having to take in 2 more.  She did end up buying and getting a 15 instead of 30 year mortgage for $100 more than her rent and is still happily paying her mortgage.  She was soo very grateful for the experience.  After seeing firsthand the resources they offer I know that this is a very important organization one the ground where it matters.

Michelle

I blog at http://www.mommycan.blogspot.com/