Bio
Paula Gregorowicz, owner of The Paula G. Company, helps you discover and successfully create the work you are meant to do in the world. Through the p...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

What Happened to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and What it Means to You

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 6
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

This week has been buzzing with news of the government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It is a big deal as the NY Times called it a "In Rescue to Stabilize Lending, U.S. Takes Over Mortgage Finance Titans". It is an extraordinary move for the federal government to essentially bail out two gigantic mortgage lenders with public funds. If you've heard the names Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac but aren't sure about who they are, what they do, and why all this matters, let's start with the basics. The Irish Times Newspaper has a great article "Fannie Mae Freddie Mac:Anatomy of a Crisis" that succinctly answers some of the fundamentals - What are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and What do They Do?

What are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? They are called government-sponsored enterprises because they initially were formed by the federal government. Fannie Mae is a common name for Federal National Mortgage Association. in Washington, DC. Freddie Mac is a common name for Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. in McLean, Virginia.
What do Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac do? Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy mortgages from savings and loans, banks and other lenders to generate more cash for those lenders to make more home loans. Together they hold or guarantee $5.4 trillion of mortgages, about half of the US's outstanding home loans.

So what happened? Well as home prices fell, foreclosures went up, and lenders ran into trouble, so did Fannie and Freddie. Loans they backed went bad, capital became harder to come by and it was harder for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to sell their loan packages. Thus, like any desperate, compromising soul, they lowered their standards and backed riskier mortgages and all this came back to bite them. Whether you are Sally-Homeowner or a big financial institution, you can't hide from sound financial principles and the truth of the matter. "So What Did Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac Do To Mortgage Rates?" That is what Quizzle asks:

Like many Americans having trouble selling their homes, ol’ Fannie and Freddie have been having trouble selling their packages of loans. The investors who typically buy from them have become much pickier about what they’ll buy - with good reason - they were worried about increased risk as mortgage defaults rose and home prices fell. Since the two companies own or insure about $5 trillion in mortgages (nearly half of the nation’s total), the world has been watching them very carefully. Especially the American government. In the opinion of the government leaders, Fannie & Freddie were headed toward failure. Since they’re so big, their failure would have dramatic (likely worldwide) consequences. So Uncle Sam worked the weekend and officially stepped in. So why are mortgage rates falling now? Think of it like this: Fannie and Freddie are kind of like big insurance companies. Before this announcement, investors worried that Fannie or Freddie might not be around to pay if mortgages they bought went sour. Worried investors = high mortgage rates for consumers. Now that Uncle Sam has stepped in, mortgage bond holders feel much safer. Happy investors = lower mortgage rates for consumers.

Wisebread has a superb post outlining the the winners and losers

in this bailout. As you might expect, guess who one of the biggest losers are?
American taxpayers - This bailout is not free. Noone knows the final damage this bailout will do to the Treasury, but most believe that the losses will be in the hundreds of billions. Considering that Fannie and Freddie holds approximately $5 trillion in home loans and currently more than 9% of loans are in the process of defaulting, then simple math tells us that these two companies could potentially lose $450 billion. Additionally, taxpayers will have to pay for the upkeep and operations of these companies so the costs will keep on increasing for years to come.

Some of the winners I never really thought of were interesting, particularly:

Banks that invested in Fannie and Freddie's debt - Fannie and Freddie sold trillions of dollars in mortgaged backed securities to central banks all around the world. For example, China's People's Bank owns more than $300 billion in Fannie and Freddie's mortgage backed securities. If both of these companies defaulted on all of these securites the Chinese national bank may have gone bankrupt

So in some respects the government is busy bailing out everyone at the expense of the taxpayers who DO

  • 6
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Archie 5 pts

Please walk me through this. Paulago said in the article that "As home prices fell, foreclosures went up."

I'm missing something. How do falling prices prompt foreclosures?

Thank you.

Candelaria Silva 5 pts

in the home safe or mattress is wise in these crazy days.

blog.candelariasilva.com

Good and plenty!

paulag01 5 pts

Thanks for all the great comments. I have to agree with you Candelaria - time tested sage advice is great. While I wouldn't advocate storing my money under the mattress like my grandmother, new slick financing isn't the ticket either.

 Kim - thanks for the kind words!  It does feel like deja vu and makes me wonder - do we (the collective we) ever really learn from our mistakes?  History does seem to repeat itself.

 Mary - thanks for the article link. Appreciate the clarification.  You demonstrate how complex the situation is and how so easily it is to get confused!

Warmly

_Paula

Paula Gregorowicz
The Paula G Company

www.thepaulagcompany.com
www.coaching4lesbians.com

maryrwise 5 pts

This Salon.com ( http://www.salon.com/tech/htww/2008/09/08/fannie_a... ) article explains the situation better than most.

And just a slight clarification, Paula -- Fannie and Freddie are not mortgage lenders. A better description is that the companies are mortgage buyers. You explain it correctly later, but it could confuse folks.

The Blog: Red Nose ( http://bozoette.typepad.com ) The Book: Girl Clown ( http://www.lulu.com/content/45470 )

Candelaria Silva 5 pts

Thanks for this.  The old fashioned, slow and steady, save, prepare and then buy a house was replaced by all sorts of new and it turns out untrue ways of dealing.  It reminds me of the debacle of new math that was quickly run-out when it turned out not to be reliable and that neither teachers or students got it.  Back to the old math.  Some ways of being, especially in the financial world, that have a solid history should be followed and promoted.

What is most bothersome is that there are so many lies, so much spin, so much greed that it is hard to know who to believe.

The rich got richer and the poor got...

The other lesson is that we are all so connected that this crisis and bail-out affects all of us.  Clearly, my grandmother's common sense approach to life would have served me better than the so-called wisdom of the experts in the industry.  Nobody was looking out for the consumer with the same vociferousness of the industry.

blog.candelariasilva.com

Good and plenty!

Kim Pearson 5 pts

First Bear Stearns, now Fannie and Freddie. Didn't we learn anything from the S&L crisis about using the danger of allowing tax-payer backed securities to be invested with such abandon? 

 I'm also concerned about the impact of this crisis on affordable housing, ( http://www.fool.com/investing/dividends-income/200... )

which is going to be an even more pressing problem as we ride out this housing bust.

Thanks for this amazing post, Paula, and for the introduction to Muckety, which I had not seen before. 

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://blogher.org/blog/kim-pearson )|Professor Kim ( http://professorkim.blogspot.com/ )|