Bio
AV Flox is a Peruvian transplant living in Los Angeles. She is the editrix-in-command of Sex and the 405, a site that shows you what your newspaper w...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Northwestern University, Sex Toys and the Female Orgasm

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 17
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

When I was 15, I went to my first and last sex education class. By this point, I had already developed an interest in sex and as a result, had spent countless hours in the library doing what I do best: researching. From anatomy and physiology texts to historical classics like the Kama Sutra and Ars Amatoria, I’d devoured everything that was available and I wasn’t impressed with the dumbing down of material, giggling and general discomfort that permeated the class. Mind you, I went to a very progressive and rather fearless school and most of us, by that age, were able to hold our own in political and philosophical debates. But sex? For the first time, our instructors were closed off, hoping to God we wouldn’t ask any questions.

When she got home that evening, my mother wouldn’t leave me alone. She’d signed the permission slip for me to attend the class and she was sufficiently excited about for all students and instructors combined. She’d attended an all-girls Catholic school where the pages of the anatomy and physiology texts relating to sex were stapled together. The most eye-opening thing relating to sex that she’d experienced in school was a comment made by a transfer student, the daughter of a French (of course!) diplomat, who, during religion class, had informed a nun discussing the virtue of virginity that the notion of gauging women by their sexual inexperience was sexist and backward and she couldn’t wait to extinguish hers.

My mother told me that several years later, at a high school reunion, she’d encountered old friends and, recalling this incident and how times had changed with regard to people’s perception of sex, many had confessed that they were not sure whether they’d ever had an orgasm.

“If we’d had a sexual education class, I don’t think so many of them would be wondering if they’d ever orgasmed,” she said. “How could you be uncertain of an orgasm? That’s just cruel and unnecessary ignorance.”

I gently broke it to her that my sex ed class was not about orgasm, but rather, focused on safety.

“Safety?” she asked.

“You know, unwanted pregnancy and all the diseases.”

“That’s important,” she agreed. “But how long does it take to cover all that?”

“The whole semester,” I responded. “A baby takes nine whole months to form, you know.”

“A baby?” she was aghast. “Can’t you learn about that in biology? And aren’t diseases better suited for health and wellness class?”

I shrugged.

“Americans aren’t allowed to talk about sin and shame anymore,” she mused. “But that’s OK: instead of putting the fear of God into the hearts of young adults, they can put the fear of illness, death and obligation there instead. It’s not much different. In the end, no one orgasms.”

I’ll never forget that conversation. That’s why, when I write about sex, I try to write as much about the pleasures and fun as I do about the problems and politics. And, as much as possible, I try to employ personal narrative. Those marketers are onto something when they talk about word-of-mouth marketing. People listen to their friends and to people they see as having authority. The numbers and dates never matter in these discussions -- but anecdotes live forever. Experience is king.

Experience is hard to come by -- even while everyone is touting the power of sex in selling products, sexual content itself, no matter how well written, is impossible to monetize. Erotica is largely disregarded when it comes to the assessment of literature and those who do allow their imaginations to venture there are held up to such ridicule as to make it advisable to abstain unless the plot absolutely demands it, and even then, with only the utmost care.

We’re left with the internet, which hosts a glorious variety of stories, but as Audacia Ray has pointed out in Naked On The Internet, “sex blogs occupy a very definite Internet ghetto”—one that Google will not easily help you find.

Northwestern University

So naturally, when I read about the controversy surrounding Northwestern University’s Human Sexuality class, I’m utterly dismayed. Here is a professor, John Michael Bailey, who is offering, at last, some semblance of a full sexual education to students who are interested. The class focuses on the science and diversity of sex and offers events for students to explore sexual issues with panels and presenters who have experienced the things being discussed. The events occur after class; they are optional

  • 17
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
TW 26 pts

That's what troubled me as well.

Retro-Food.com

abgirl 5 pts

I've never had an orgasm through penetration either and I'm skeptical that any woman can as it just doesn't stimulate the right places for long enough. There's not many, that's for sure.

I also used to only be able to orgasm with a vibrator, but now I can reach orgasm other ways. I found that it took some "training". I used my fingers and just tried really, really hard on focusing on the feelings it gave me, which was pretty much nothing at first but gradually it started to work. I found I could get in the right mindset to allow myself to feel pleasure, and then it took less stimulation for orgasm to happen and cunnilingus worked too.

I also find that if I use my vibrator, especially on a high setting, and my boyfriend tries cunnilingus within a day or so after, I feel pretty much nothing. If I put the vibrator away for a few days, and eschew masturbating altogether for a couple of days, then cunnilingus feels heavenly and I can have a great orgasm. The clitoral nerves seem to "build up a tolerance" and the more I use my vibrator, the less I'm able to have an orgasm other ways. A woman can easily become dependent on it.

Anyway, I'm just saying, maybe there's hope for you yet to be able to enjoy oral sex/manual stimulation. Of course, if you're OK with only using vibrators I'm not judging you. In my relationship we incorporate them a lot (in fact my boyfriend bought me my first vibrator). It's a funny thing about the female orgasm; it takes concentration and effort on the part of the woman. We can't just sit back and let it happen to us like men seem to be able to.

Dawn 8 pts

my "power tool". As in maybe 4 times in my sexually active history.

Some women just need a different level of stimulation...I'm not sure what there is to "get" about that.

Had I known that I need a very high level of stimulation that is not provided by a tongue or penis I may not have had to wait for so many years for my own orgasms.

Dawn Rouse

Writer, Thinker, Nap-Taker and almost Doctor of Education

I am Doing the Best I can ( http://www.balefulregards.com )

True Wife Confessions ( http://www.truewifeconfession.com )

abgirl 5 pts

Is it the scandal of the century? No. Is the professor a terrible person? No (or at least I don't know). But is he a groundbreaking hero achieving progress for the sex-positive movement? Not really, and the experts in the movement are backing me up on that. Sex-positive doesn't mean "sex everywhere, all the time." It wasn't really necessary and was inappropriate in a place of learning. It wasn't some great sin, either, just inappropriate.

By the way, I'm not necessarily saying this particular incident was exploitative, but just because the woman was comfortable and willing does not make it non-exploitative. It might not necessarily exploit her, but perhaps it exploits female sexuality itself, or exploits women.

It's the same issue I take with porn that is degrading (which is not necessarily all porn). Yes, porn stars are often powerful women who are well-paid, professional, and at least claim to feel respected. They're willing participants. That's all fine and dandy, but I don't really care about the porn stars themselves and how they might feel about what they're doing. I care about the effect of porn on women in general--the pressures it can put on women to look a certain way, to engage in certain sex acts, to set aside their own sexual needs in order to serve men, to be sexual objects for men. I also feel a lot of porn lies to men about the types of things women actually enjoy, and actually contributes to sexual ignorance/negativity.

Leepconsult 5 pts

abgirl

Agree with every word you're saying. Especially the last thoughts about porn. I actually occasionally enjoy porn, BUT -- a lot of the times I will look over at my husband and say "don't ever do that!" So much of the time what is being done to the woman or what she is doing is so far from what would actually feel good and cause the woman to feel pleasure and orgasm, that I wonder "what's wrong with these people? Haven't they actually ever had real sex?" These protrayals totally miseducate men as to what women actualy enjoy. In additoon, a woman who may be inexperienced may think that is the way she SHOULD be feeling and acting like, and think there is something wrong with her when, in fact, she doesn't "experience" what the porn star/actress is portraying. This is a loss of a great opportunity to educate while we're having fun and getting all smily anf googly inside :-)

MenopauseChat 8 pts

I understand the importance of talking openly about sex and that an open dialog can lead to healthier relationships, safe sex and a better understanding of the female anatomy. However, I didn't understand why it takes a power tool to accomplish this. If that's what it takes for a woman to have an orgasm, then I don't get it.

http://menopausechitchat.com/blog

livingwithumami 5 pts

Human Sexuality was one of my favorite classes at UCSB & the class was great. It was also one of the most difficult classes I've ever taken, rating up there with Statistics. I learned about different cultures, perspectives, & about myself as a woman who has a voice.

If anything, this class at NW got people talking & isn't that the point?

I'm not sure how I would have felt, had I been in that actual class, but I think the point was made. I also had the same thought as "theoutcast" about having a man demonstrate.

I admire the idea but not sure about the actual act of the demonstration. Does it have to be live? Can't they just watch a film like my class did?

Dawn 8 pts

in class...

After many years of figuring out what I liked in sex, what I didn't like and finally having it proven to me that I could have orgasms ( after too many years of thinking I just couldn't)

I pledged that my daughter gets a vibe for her 16th birthday. Why?

Because I never want her to think that she can't have an orgasm, I want her to know HOW she can get one for herself and then lead her partners to the way that SHE can be pleased, sexually.

I NEVER want to think that my daughter had to go through some of the years of self doubt that I did - and own her sexuality from the onset.

And, BTW, I know that Sybian machines are for rent in Boston..I assume that is the device that was alluded to in the article.

Dawn Rouse

Writer, Thinker, Nap-Taker and almost Doctor of Education

I am Doing the Best I can ( http://www.balefulregards.com )

True Wife Confessions ( http://www.truewifeconfession.com )

Melissa Ford 40 pts

It's that quote that has bothered me for the last 48 hours. Because I think it reveals the true nature of the professor -- that he finds teaching this titillating rather than illuminating. And when that occurs, I think that events like these are more akin to rape than they are about sex (and not to misunderstand -- I am not equating showing a class a woman having an orgasm as akin to rape. I am saying that if this were the SAT and this were the analogy section, I would say that this type of teaching is to real education as rape is to sex).

I have been in a similar situation -- this isn't the first time this has happened -- though in my case, it was a mandatory class and not optional. It was also pre-Internet, so while it made all the newspapers in the state, it wasn't discussed by the world at large. And I think that also makes a big difference here.

There is a power dynamic in place here. There is someone with the grade book and someone who needs a grade. This is not a meeting of two equals exchanging information. And once you introduce that dynamic into the mix, you can no longer say that it was optional! It was the student's choice! What's the big deal!

So I am bothered enormously by this despite agreeing that we need to talk more about female orgasms, that there needs to be more education, and that the university can be an excellent place to disseminate information and encourage discussion.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her novel about blogging is Life from Scratch ( http://www.life-from-scratch.com/ ).

theoutcast 7 pts

Avlox,

By the way, I was impressed with article just not the class itself. Just wanted to clarify.

Heather blogs about Motherhood & Other Offensive Situations at http://www.ultimateoutcasts.com.

CrissiD 7 pts

This is a refreshing take on such a controversial subject. You bring up some great points about how the pleasurable parts of sex just aren't taught, how focus on sex has become focus on the negatives. But there really is a lot of good to sex! And I hope I am portraying that to my own daughter in our sex talks. 

But still, I wonder how much more these students learned from this than they could have watching a porn or attending a sex club. It doesn't seem like a live sex act belongs in front of a class. I don't doubt that these students will remember this lesson forever. But I can't help feel like it was done to fulfill this woman's fantasy over actually demonstrating sex enjoyment. 

Catch up with my blog on parenting over at Wine Country Mom ( http://winecountrymom.blogs.santarosamom.com/ ), or an uncensored look on life at Unabashed Passion Fruit ( http://unabashedpassionfruit.com/ ).

Kinky Kelley 5 pts

awesome writing!! This was a great read!! TY
www.kelleyskinkytoyz.com ( http://www.kelleyskinkytoyz.com )

avflox 14 pts

I think there is a difference between a woman demonstrating female ejaculation, which is a controversial topic, something that many do not believe is possible or natural and a man ejaculating, which is something we all understand as possible and natural.

The fact that we don't yet agree on whether women can ejaculate or even if a g-spot exists is exactly the reason why this sort of presentation and discussion is essential.

I don't think it's exploitative if the woman performing the demonstration is comfortable doing so. If it's uncomfortable to watch, those present were free to leave.

I like that you mention Emmanuelle, by the way. The original book that engendered the skin series was one that revolutionized my way of thinking about relationships, specifically the possibility of different configurations.

avflox 14 pts

The class has 600 students and some 120 stayed. That's not a lot, but it's enough that it wouldn't be easy to take note of who exactly was present unless attendance was taken.

Obviously a student could ensure the professor notes their commitment and interest by participating in the after-class Q&As in the same way he or she can do so by sitting in a certain place and being very attentive and participatory in the class itself.

I think these after-class sessions vary sufficiently that they enable students to find something that suits them should they feel they need to get past that grade-line.

NatalieJ 5 pts

My mother told me when she was growing up, she wasn't allowed to talk about menstrual periods, even among her sisters! She didn't think that women could enjoy sex until she had been married for 10 years and had 4 kids!

I had a sex ed class in grade school, 1 hours worth. The boys and girls were separate. We saw slides of drawings of body parts. I remember wondering "but how does the sperm get from the guy to the girl"?

So things are progressing.

I think someone once said "A new idea goes through 4 phases.
It's laughed at.
It's scorned.
It's vilified.
It's accepted as truth.

Natalie   www.thoughtful-self-improvement.com ( http://www.thoughtful-self-improvement.com )

theoutcast 7 pts

This class begs controversy and criticism. I wonder if the teacher is going to have a male ejaculate for the class next time? Sounds exploitive, mechanical and uncomfortable to me.

Some of the best sexually educational material I ever came across was the 1980 film 'Emmanuel in Bangkok' on Cinemax at a tender young age. (Thank you Cinemax!) It is a bad movie but is erotic. I learned alot more from that movie than I would today in this class.

And what is the point of studying if a woman can ejaculate? Who cares? Is this going to be the next big achievement for women?

I'm not impressed.

Heather blogs about Motherhood & Other Offensive Situations at http://www.ultimateoutcasts.com.

TW 26 pts

While not "on the test," every student knows that backing out of an optional activity held by a professor can lead to ramifications if they are "on the grade line" between grades. Suzy stayed for the presentation. Sally said see ya. They both have the same grade--that nebulous participation point will go to Suzy.

I also objected to the "pre-University had backlash and PR on it" quote from the professor: "Sticks and stones may break your bones, but watching naked people on stage doing pleasurable things will never hurt you," he said to loud applause at the end of his speech.

Retro-Food.com