Blog
Miss Britt
Bio
Offline, the only people who call meMiss Britt are children raised in the South.My name is Britt Reints and I am afreelance writer...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

What's Wrong With The Pro Life Movement

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Who doesn’t love a post about Abortion?

First, some background information (ie, where the hell this is coming from).

I read a post a while back about a blogger who had an abortion. This was a decision she’d made a long, long time ago and she has since become a wife, mother, etc. etc. etc. She decided to post about it because of a post that she had read. She came out and said “I had an abortion, this was why, and this is how I feel about it”.

She had no sooner hit publish when the shit hit the fan. To say she was attacked would be an understatement. She was beat over the head with the fact that she had “Killed a baby!” and she could no longer be the kind of person that the child she has now could “ever look up to!” She was told repeatedly that she deserved no pity, no compassion, and nothing but scorn. She’d made her bed, and now she’d have to lie in it.

(I’m not linking to the post or the blogger because, quite frankly, if you don’t already read her I have no interest in sending over any more haters.)

Some more background information (ie, what you should know before we go any further):

I do not believe Abortion is a Choice. It’s a baby, a life, and I don’t think any of us has the right to take a life away.

I also don’t believe Abortion should be illegal - and I vote according to that belief.

My stance on the legalization of abortion has less to do with my views on whether or not it is wrong and more to do with the reality of the social climate here in this country. Namely: making abortion illegal would do little more than further abandon a lot of poor, desperate women and children who already feel like they have nowhere to turn to. We are not, at this time, a society that is fit to care for unwanted babies and the women who find themselves pregnant with them.

And the “Pro Life” movement is a perfect example of that.

With a flagship name like “Pro Life”, you would envision a cause that is about hope and love and support. You would think this was a rallying cry for loving thy neighbor and cherishing each and every one of God’s creations. In a world that made sense, the term “pro life” would be synonymous with expressions like “sanctity” and “compassion” and “precious”.

But, no.

While there is a small slice of the Pro Life movement that wisely funnels their time, money and efforts into Adoption Services, counseling for pregnant women and healing for women who have gone through an abortion - the bigger, louder chunk is a nasty, nasty thing.

It is about black and white. Right and wrong. Condemnation and arrogance.

It is about waving signs and twisted, hateful faces screaming at would be “baby killers” as they shuffle into clinics.

It is about atrocious, deadly acts of violence against doctors and nurses who perform a medical service.

And (most appalling) it is about ripping to shreds the women that need understanding and compassion the most.

What astounded me the most about the attacks on this blogger was not the insistence that abortion was wrong. What I found most upsetting was the need to berate her for a decision that cannot, at this point, be unmade. I don’t care what your stance on abortion is, once it’s been done - it’s done. And no one should understand better than a “pro lifer” that what you’re left with is a woman who is probably steeped in her own regrets and pain.

And this is who you should be attacking? This is how you demonstrate the sanctity of life? By withholding forgiveness and compassion from the person that is left living?

It just makes no sense to me. I can understand the picketing more than I can understand the hate that is lobbed at women who admit to having had abortions. At least the picketers can delude themselves into thinking they might be able to prevent something from happening.

But once it’s done… it’s done. At that point, isn’t the best thing you can do… the right thing for us to do… to try to help those women heal?

And maybe, just maybe, turn our attention to what causes a woman to head to that clinic in the first place?

Instead of screaming about how “real” a baby is and at what point a fetus is “viable” and “not viable”, wouldn’t it make more

  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
lisanoel03 5 pts

I know this is an old post but I just foudn you and your posts and have been reading them all. I myself have had an abortion and know soo many others who have as well and know the devastation it causes the women who chose it. I agree that many prolifers are ugly and hateful at a time when women couldn't possibly need love and support more. But I also think people have come to believe that abortion is the 'easy' fix. Because it is legal woman feel pressured to do it. While I'm not really sure of the right answer because I do believe there should be exceptions I would really love to see something changed. Most people I know who've gone through an abortion are changed for life because of it. But the ones who truly wouldn't have been able to properly raise a child end up being the ones who go back many times to use it as a form of birth control. Our system is VERY flawed.

camisa 5 pts

I am pro-choice too, but not because of the when does life begin issue.  To be honest, I also believe that life begins at conception.  However, I'm pro-choice as a matter of medical decisionmaking.  If abortion choices of adults can be second-guessed by the government, what next?  And, for the record, although I am liberal and pro-choice, I do believe in parental notification (absent a showing of incest or abuse).  If I have to be notified of a tonsillectomy, I better be notified about my daughter's abortion. 

Anyhoo...I just wanted to make my views known for the rest of this response addressing the hypocrisy of the pro-lifers (and to illuminate the fact that, although I consider myself liberal, I am more sympathetic to the "pro-life" position than would be expected).  I used to work in child support enforcement.  My department (a state agency) represented both the Department of Welfare and individual clients in establishing and enforcing child support.  Our department's budget was consistently cut because we were involved with the Department of Welfare (and, you know, those "welfare queens" live so high on the hog - for those who might have missed this, I'm being sarcastic).  It never ceased to amaze me that the so-called pro-life, family values folks were the ones who were alway rallying around cutting this budget.  Life doesn't matter to them after birth.  Further, if you are not white and suburban, life doesn't matter either.  In the more than 2 years that I worked for the department, only one...ONE..self-identified Republican pro-lifer worked for our department despite the fact that our state was run by a Republican administration.  And he left within 6 months.  It was the rest of us "elite" (again with the sarcasm), liberal, pro-choice types who tried to make life better for the born children.

nyshopgal08 5 pts

For the first time I have read someone discussing abortion and felt like they were pulling my own unsaid words from my own mouth.

I would like to comment, however, on the last post regarding the clinic in Michigan requiring women having to wait a day before they have an abortion. Though I agree the cost of a hotel stay is inconvienient for those who can hardly afford the procedure in the first place, I think that the policy is there to give women time to step away and think about their decision. Its one that, as mentioned earlier, will be something they will have to live with forever, and I am hoping that the policy is there in good faith only so that women take time to fully consider their options after recieving all of the information.

sdrawkcabanna 5 pts

Forty dollars can take away the choice from one who really needs it. I live in Michigan, where women are already required to wait a day after arriving at the clinic in order to proceed with an abortion. That adds the cost of a hotel stay to an already expensive procedure for the many women who have to travel to recieve an abortion. (pretty much anyone in the top half of the lower peninsula of the state and all of the upper peninsula, if they don't choose to go to wisconsin instead) While making efforts such as this and extra counseling to see that women consider their options is a nice idea on paper, does it really help if all it is doing is adding to the cost of the procedure? Are these women really convinced by this counseling or is it becoming something out of their reach due to cost? Is a women who can't handle the cost of an abortion going to be able to deal with the costs of having a child without going into debt and/or having to acquire a lot of state assistance? I think that if you want to prevent abortions from being necessary, the legislature really needs to be focused on sex education and the availabilty of a variety of birth control methods and information about their use to all men and women. Preventing unwanted pregnancies is key to preventing abortions.

babybeatnik 5 pts

What a WONDERFUL post! I don't understand how so many people have viewed it and not had something to say about it!

How sad that so many people felt it so neccessary to bash this poor woman for a choice she made so long ago. Up until recently, I was extremely pro-choice. Then I got pregnant with my second child, and my doctor did an ultrasound at 10 weeks. I expected to see a little bean-shaped blurb on the screen - but what I saw shocked me. This little baby had arms and hands, legs and feet, and a face. A little Charlie Brown, exaggerated features kind of a face, but it was still a face. I always knew I wouldn't be able to have an abortion myself, but I certainly didn't want to say others couldn't. 

I still don't want to say that they CAN'T. But I would love to see more money being put into pre-abortion counselling and education. I read a report a few months ago stating that if there was just ONE MORE required counselling and/or educational session mandated before having an abortion, not only would it raise the awareness of what exactly is being done, but it also raises the price by about $40. Just that small spike in price alone would, hypothetically, reduce the rate of abortions by 30%. THIRTY PERCENT!

With all the funding these pro-lifers are sure to be receiving, you would think that they would lobby for more helpful and realistic ideas like that than spending all their time and money making women feel even more ashamed than they already do. 

Anyway - this was a brilliant post, dear, and I certainly hope to see more from you.