Bio
www.herbadmother.com www.thebadmomsclub.com
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Recent Comments

When Breastfeeding Is A Terrorist Act

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

When you think of getting stopped at the border or pulled aside by airport security, what sorts of violations do you think of? Drugs? Contraband sausage? Breast pump? Breast milk?

Wait, what? Not those last two? Obviously, you're not Canadian, or haven't brought your lactating boobs to Canada. Because apparently, breast pumps and breast milk are, according to Canadian authorities, suspicious items that you can't just waltz across the border with. God, no. What if you were going to make a lacto-bomb with that stuff? The terrorists would win.

This is what one Canadian mom discovered last month when she went on a business trip without her baby. Because she was still nursing, she pumped while she was away. So far, so straightfoward. But then she made the mistake of trying to fly home with her breastmilk and her pump. The Canadian airport authorities didn't like that. Because, you know, that stuff is potentially dangerous. "Biohazard" is, apparently, the word they used. So they made her subject it to examination and then check it with checked baggage, where, predictably, it kind of exploded all over her underthings and went to waste. All because that shit might be dangerous.

Really? Really? Breastmilk as a potential biohazard; breast pumps as potentially dangerous? Doesn't that sound more Bush-era American than any-era Canadian?

Apparently not.

Canadian rules about travelling with nursing devices and breastmilk are stricter than those in the U.S.. From Babycenter.ca

According to the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority (CATSA), passengers are permitted to bring liquids, like breastmilk on airplanes, but it is limited, even for breastmilk. As of June 2008, you must carry your breastmilk in containers not bigger than 100 ml (3.4 oz) and you can carry as many as will fit in a one litre/quart clear plastic bag. One bag of liquid is allowed per passenger. However, when
you are travelling WITH your baby, breast milk, baby formula, and
anything else needed for your baby are exempt from this rule but you
must declare what liquids you are bringing for your child.

The U.S. rules are different, however. The US Transportation Security Administration allows nursing mothers flying without their babies to bring breast milk in greater quantities than for other liquids as long as you declare for inspection at the security checkpoint. Hopefully, the Canadian rules will changed to something similar in the near future. Until then, it's best to check with CATSA before you go so you understand the rules before you fly with your breast milk. 

Okay, seriously: why is anyone worried about this? Why can't a nursing mother, travelling WITHOUT her baby, bring along her pump and whatever milk she has pumped and carry it onto the plane and just manage it herself? Why is the default assumption biohazard? And why should a breastpump be looked upon with any suspicion whatsoever?

Being without pump or baby is brutal for a nursing mother. BRUTAL. Any travel restrictions that promote this are cruel. And similarly cruel are restrictions that would have nursing moms toss away any breastmilk that they do pump while travelling. If you're a mom who struggles with milk production, whatever ounces of milk one can save are worth their weight in gold. NOT biohazards.

GAH.

It's hard enough to be a nursing mom without having to deal with social phobias concerning boobs and boob-fluids. And really, we're kind of damned if we do - getting asked to cover up if we travel with nursing babies - and damned if we don't - having our breastpumps seized as potential weapons of mass lactative destruction.

Seriously. You'd think that people have issues about boobs or something.

Catherine Connors blogs as Her Bad Mother and as Their Bad Mother, and when she says that she's bad, she's not joking.

 

 

 

 

  • 11
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
MommyTime 5 pts

In the US, many daycares consider breast milk a "biohazard" -- day care workers will only feed it to children while wearing gloves; there are separate rules completely different from those of forumula for its storage, use, return home, etc., as well as for how bottles once containing it will be dealt with.  Basically, they treat it as a potentially-contaminated bodily fluid. Charming.

Frankly, I found this more than a little offensive when I was still pumping and nursing, but it wasn't clear to me that there was much I could do about it.  Most of my friends' daycares had similar policies, and I know that there are in fact some state mandates at work here (same state mandates that protect our children by not allowing blankets of any kind, including swaddles, in the cribs of infants in daycares, etc).

This leads me to a larger question, then, which is: what would be the best way to get such policies changed? Lobby the Canadian version of the TSA? the State legislature?  If we are all here outraged, then how do we make our righteous indignationmake a difference?

MommyTime
http://mommysmartini.blogspot.com

Vita lingus 5 pts

Yes well having traveled extensively it seems to be women's products generally are deemed as dangerous and needing to be controlled and removed!!  In this situation quite extereme and bordering on the ridiculous 

And then there is this to deal with as women

As a consequence of this level of paranoia  it has created a whole new market for producers of hand creams etc.... that must be carried through customs in tiny containers .. not to mention plastic bag manufacturers having a whole new market around  the use of "zip and seal" glad bags at airports .. Does one smell a conspiracy in maintaining an unsustainable world and blaming women  via their use of products,,,Food for thought indeed .. 

vita

AmberS 5 pts

I think that in Canada we don't have the same awareness about pumping. Because we have these long maternity leaves, we sort of assume that we're covered and don't need to worry about it. It's less common for a nursing mom to be away from her baby on business and be expressing milk. That's my take on why we're less progressive, anyway.

But this regulation is completely ridiculous. Breast milk is not a biohazard. Even if it were contaminated, someone would have to ingest it, probably in significant quantities, to fall ill. You could say the same of any beverage. Honestly, what are they protecting us from? The evil mother who wants to feed her baby?

A lot of these travel regulations make me mad. Yes, we want to be safe, but let's keep our heads on. Harrassing people who are just trying to do the best for their babies does not help anyone.

~ Amber

www.strocel.com ( http://www.strocel.com )

mysailorsmistress 5 pts

This is CRAZY.... I traveled after my son was born and I had a stash of milk... Enough for 3 kids for 2 or so days and the airline I flew on was MORE than happy to work with me!!! Yes my son was with me and NEVER once handed him a bottle on the entire flight. I flew from Florida to California... 

I can not imagine! They were even going to let me pack it in DRY ICE!!!!! This is NUTS.... Wrong in so many ways. 

I have always thought Canada to support this more than America would....

Jennifer

www.mysailorsmistress.net ( http://www.mysailorsmistress.net )

Beth Engel 5 pts

This is beyond ridiculous.

BTW, I read a while ago that they were going to gradually relax the liquid security insanity - all it's achieving is harassing law-abiding citizens - but it's not really happening.

--

My mame is Beth Engel. I've been running my own online business, Epic Merchandise, where I sell personalized, engraved gifts ( http://epicmerchandise.com/ ), since 2003.

muddyboots 5 pts

Wow, I wouldn't be able to make a THREE hour flight! 

www.muddybootsblog.blogspot.com ( http://www.muddybootsblog.blogspot.com )

Aurelia 5 pts

Thanks so much for blogging about this Catherine. It really is ridiculous and I can't tell you how stressful it was realizing that everything I had pumped might be lost.

The flight itself was 5 hours, not including the time spent getting on and off the plane, so being unable to pump was very painful. And the drycleaning bill afterward!

I keep hoping that this will change hopefully before I go to BlogHer because I really don't want to have to pack an expensive breastpump in checked baggage and risk losing it on the way down. Flying out of Chicago with frozen milk on the return may work okay since the US rules are better, but if it's on a Canadian airline, who knows?  Crossing my fingers, and my boobs. 

V_Joy_S 5 pts

I'm going to guess that you aren't a breastfeeding mom who has had to travel without her child, am I right?

What some people fail to realise is that sticking the kid on the boob (a descrition that I personally loathe, but is descriptive enough) is but one part of breastfeeding.  When away from the nursing child, a breastfeeding mom needs to express milk.  Often.  When your breasts are full, they need emptying, now!  And many mothers save every. single. ounce. of liquid gold (aka breastmilk) to give to their breastfeeding baby.  And breastmilk only keeps for so long.  Something like two hours unrefrigerated (I have forgotten the exact specifications, but there is a ton of specifics out there), and up to a week, sealed, in the fridge.  And there is not an infinite shelf life of frozen milk, either.  Chest freezers can keep milk for twice as long as the fridge freezer. So to consign it to checked luggage (any amount!), without monitoring, without temperature control, without the ability to request more ice, please! to save my breast milk, to ensure that it stays right beside me so that it will not get lost at a connecting airport, or to explode all over the luggage and stink the place to high heaven as it spoils, is simply not acceptable.

So, back to continuously needing to express milk to keep your milk production up.  It's not a tap you can just turn on or off.  Really.  It's not.  And expressing milk can be more difficult, and painful, than nursing.  So what comes out is considered gold.  Nay, it is more precious than gold.  And if a child is breastfed, that doesn't mean that their breastmilk doesn't come from a bottle, or sippy cup, or glass with a straw.  And all milk that a mom produces when away from her child is, by rights, the child's, and should be able to be delivered to the child in a safe, timely, sanitary fashion.

And, in Canada, breastfeeding is supposed to be protected by law.  This is an example of when it isn't.  And that is the shame of the Canadian government.   This should be challenged and the regulations pertaining to breastmilk and breastpumps changed.  It's breasmilk.   Not a bio-hazard.

TheFeministBreeder 5 pts

This is the MOST backwards legislation I've ever seen.  Anyone who's ever had to be separated from a nursing baby knows that a mother will need to pump 20-30 ounces per day to feed that child and keep her supply up while she's away.  That's potentially TEN bottles, according to their 3 oz limit rule.  That is absolutely ludicrous.  This means that any mother will need to either dump most of her hard-earned milk, or risk losing or destroying it by checking it with her luggage.  There is NO WAY I would put my breastmilk in my suitcase and send it off to God-Knows-Where.  IF that luggage was even so much as delayed, it could ruin the entire stash.  My bags have been lost enough to say No freaking way!  A person would have to be a pumping mother to understand exactly how precious every single little ounce is that we slave away to extract from our breasts.  I've actually cried hysterically when bottles of mine have been ruined.  It's entirely traumatic.  It's like losing a body part or something.

 If they wanted to limit anything, perhaps limit the amount you can bring if you ARE with the baby - at least if you have the baby then you can nurse him/her.  If you AREN'T with the baby, you MUST rely on pumping and carefully storing that milk.

What a stupid, ignorant policy.

The Feminist Breeder
http://thefeministbreeder.typepad.com/

Alyssa S 5 pts

I'd like to start out by mentioning that both of my kids were bottle-fed, and the ridiculousness of what these women are being subjected to raises my hackles! It's not an overreaction by lactivists to want to be sure that the food you're providing for your baby is going to be brought home safely & not either exlpoded all over your luggage (as it was in this case) or perchance lost altogether if your luggage is lost. I never pack my medication in my checked luggage for just those reasons. And as far as the breast pump goes-depending upon the length of the flight & time of last pumping, it may be necessary to pump during the flight, which would be extremely difficult to do if your pump is in your checked luggage. As I said, both of my children have been bottle-fed, so I don't know all of the specifics, but I think there's a way to use your hand to manually express...but that would have to be a long, slow & probably pretty painful process.

The Grown Up Teenager 5 pts

While I have no problem with mothers nursing on planes, I don't see why breastmilk needs to be kept in the cabin if the baby isn't with the mother. Obviously it needs to be at hand if the child is going to need it, but when there is no need for it, why fight to keep it in your carry on?

 Everything kept in carry ons now has to be in clear containers, labelled, a certain size or less, or airlines will make you do one of two things - check it, or toss it. This applies to shampoo and conditioner, body wash, cleansers, and all kinds of other things that are no more or less harmful than breastmilk. Will it make any difference to the child at home whether the milk was kept in the cabin or the baggage compartment? No, not really.

 I'd support the mothers right to keep milk on hand if her child was with her but because she was alone, this entire thing seems to be a moot point. It looks like lactivists overreacting (again) to me.