Bio
I'm a pedagogy specialist, which means I help university instructors improve their teaching. As the contributing editor for Research, Academia, and E...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Which to Fund: Science Labs or Racial Equity?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 6
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

A committee at Berkeley High School in Northern California has proposed eliminating science lab classes—and the teachers who teach them—in favor of funding activities and resources for underperforming students and closing the racial gap in performance at the school.

Writing at the Berkeley High Jacket student newspaper, Chloe Holden explains:

Under the new plan, finalized and approved two weeks ago, the Berkeley Schools Excellence Project (BSEP) grants currently being used to fund science labs, along with those used in the arts programs, will be redirected to fund a new system of “equity grants.” These grants will be intended to support the Action Plan’s larger objective of student equity at BHS. While it is possible that parts of the lab program may be submitted by the science department funding under the new equity grants, potential of this taking place is currently unclear.

According to the East Bay Express,

The proposal to put the science-lab cuts on the table was approved recently by Berkeley High's School Governance Council, a body of teachers, parents, and students who oversee a plan to change the structure of the high school to address Berkeley's dismal racial achievement gap, where white students are doing far better than the state average while black and Latino students are doing worse.

In the same article, a parent is quoted as saying that the lab classes have been presented to the School Governance Council as enrolling mostly white students.  The article also cites Mardi Sincular-Mertens, a 24-year veteran of BHS science teaching, as saying that cuts will impact her black and Latino students as well; for example, she has 12 African-American male students in her Advanced Placement classes, and black students constitute 17.5 percent of her four environmental science classes.  Latinos constitute 13.9 percent of those classes.

That 17.5 percent isn't a representative percentage of the black students at the high school; Razib Khan offers a pie chart illustrating the school's demographics; it indicates the school is 29.1 percent African American, 36.7 percent white, and 12.6 percent Hispanic/Latino.  As Khan points out, the city of Berkeley is 9.3 percent black, 57.4 percent non-Hispanic white, and 10.7 percent Hispanic.  Compare the two sets of numbers, and it suggests parents are sending their white students to private schools in larger numbers than are parents of black or Latino students.  Cutting the science labs may contribute further to this trend, he writes.

This action will reinforce this tendency; the type of engaged parents which a public school benefits from won't consider sending their child to one which has to slash science laboratories to focus on remedial education. So Berkeley High School is simply accelerating its long death spiral.

More generally, the bizarre racialist logic used to justify the slashing of the science curriculum, that science implicitly benefits whites, is objectionable (at least to me, and likely to readers of this weblog). Our civilization is grounded fundamentally in science. Additionally, Berkeley High School is just a few blocks from UC Berkeley, where there are plenty of non-whites who do science. 42% of the undergraduates at UC Berkeley are Asian, as opposed to 31% who are white.

Science teachers at Berkeley have written an open letter to the school community; they are, of course, protesting the cuts.  From the letter:

This proposal flies in the face of the BSEP mandate and the 2020 Vision. The science labs during 0 and 7th periods provide weekly enrichment and satisfy [University of California] and [California State University] requirements that college prep science classes offer 20% of instructional time for hands-on lab activities. In addition, the extra lab periods provide additional time to support struggling students. The science program meets the goals articulated by both BSEP and the 2020 Vision providing enrichment, support for all students and UC requirements.

The extra time BSEP funding supports allows BHS to maintain an outstanding AP science program. Many of our students take and succeed in three AP level sciences courses as first year courses. Our students’ performance on the AP exams well exceeds the national average. These courses would have to become 2nd year offerings if the labs were eliminated. Approximately 600 students per year enroll in our AP programs. All of our students take Advanced Biology, most take chemistry, physics, or environmental science or anatomy and the extra time provides the support students need to develop a deep understanding of these topics.

Where Asian-American high school students fit into all of this isn't clear from material available online, but I will point out that Berkeley

  • 6
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Gena Haskett 6 pts

If you do not have a functional science lab in your school you do not get to practice what you have learned.  If there are no computers, money for science supplies or the availability of qualified science instructors then you are not lazy. You don't have the tools and resources needed.

I attended those kind of schools before I got lucky and transferred out to a better one for me. I and my classmates with may be two exceptions were not lazy. We didn't have jack in the school except old textbooks and 1950's science slide shows.

Now having said that it is stupid to take from one group of students so that both groups are deprived of resources. Science is essential, it is a required subject for 21st century learning. 

Instead of seeing lack I see a opportunity to network with UC Berkeley and tap into undergrad and grad school science tutors. Or find community members who are science savvy to offer ideas on how to solve this problem. 

One of my thoughts is funding for public schools has to move off of the property values tax base.  Provide funding the same as a weapon or a tank. Because it is clear that only those families who are taxed at a higher property value rate get consistently a quality school system.

Families who live in impoverished areas get the luck of the draw and it is a sucker game from the beginning. Or find another income path that is population based and equitable.

The current system is not. Has not been and never will be until there is equitable funding for all.

Gena Haskett is a BlogHer CE. Blogs: Out On The Stoop ( http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com ) and Create Video Notebook ( http://createvideonotebook.blogspot.com )

Jane Byers Goodwin 5 pts

Will the stupidity never end?  This school is punishing the bright and hardworking students of all backgrounds and spoonfeeding the lazy students in an effort to create an artificial "equality."  Advancement in any area can only be achieved by actual effort by individual students!  Non-achievement is a choice, a personal choice made by an individual.  I've had fantastic, hardworking students of all backgrounds, and I do not believe for one moment that either excellent or nonexistent work ethics are forced upon anyone by circumstance, birth, background or anything other than personal choice.  Yes, some people have to do it all by themselves, because they have no home mentors or help, but some people still do it.  They CHOSE to do it.  As did others who chose not to do it.

Depriving the hardworkers the opportunity to INCREASE their knowledge with experience in a lab is a stupid decision made by stupid people who don't think hard work and pushing oneself has anything to do with it. 

Yes, I've used the word "stupid" in this post.  There are times when it fits the bill perfectly.

Bah. 

I reference Harrison Bergeron all the time, too.  We're getting closer and closer to it, and there will always be people who believe equality is best achieved by handicapping the brilliant that the others might not be overshadowed.  Feh.

This issue infuriates me.  I must stop writing now lest my fingers catch fire.

NOTE:  I am NOT referring to SPED here. 

"Don't be content with being average. Average is as close to the bottom as it is to the top."

Rita Arens 7 pts

I reference that story all the time and can never remember who wrote it. Leslie, you just scratched a MAJOR itch for me. Thank you!

Rita Arens writes at Surrender Dorothy ( http://surrenderdorothy.typepad.com ) and BlogHer and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak ( http://tinyurl.com/9pg62e ). She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

Leslie Madsen Brooks 5 pts

Rita,

You're right--this does have tones of Vonnegut's "Harrison Bergeron"!

Leslie

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Research and Academia ( http://www.blogher.com/topic/research-academia-edu... )
My blogs: The Clutter Museum ( http://cluttermuseum.blogspot.com ), Museum Blogging ( http://www.museumblogging.com/ ), and The Multicultural Toybox ( http://www.multiculturaltoybox.com )

Rita Arens 7 pts

I've been searching for the link, but I can't remember who wrote it. It was set in the future, and  they put weights on all the ballerinas and made smart people wear helmets that screeched loud noises every few seconds so they couldn't think. To make things fair.

I agree with you, Leslie -- to make things fair, you should boost up everyone to get the same access to science, not take it away.

Rita Arens writes at Surrender Dorothy ( http://surrenderdorothy.typepad.com ) and BlogHer and is the editor of Sleep is for the Weak ( http://tinyurl.com/9pg62e ). She is BlogHer's assignment and syndication editor.

Elisa Camahort 5 pts

Way to degrade public schools and just widen a class-based gap...at least that's my gut instinct about what will happen.

Elisa Camahort Page BlogHer elisa@blogher.com My BlogHer profile ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... ) truly shows you everything I do online...Check it out!!