Blog
Parentopia
Bio
I am excited to be a Family CE at BlogHer! My primary blog is www.Parentopia.com/blog . I am an author of the award winning book "Mommy Guilt:Learn t...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Which Head Is a Man Using When He Cheats? According to a New Book, It's Not the Little One

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Patti Stanger, a third-generation yenta who can be found on Bravo TV's The Millionaire Matchmaker, makes it a point to tell her clients "The penis does the picking!" when looking for love and romance. However, Dr. Louann Brizendine's latest book, "The Male Brain", takes Stanger's theory and bangs it ... straight into the ground.

At Salon.com, Mary Elizabeth Williams writes:

Brizendine explains guys can't help themselves: "Men have a sexual pursuit area that is 2.5 times larger than the one in the female brain." I had never realized there was a sexual pursuit area of the brain, so I Googled it to learn more about this plush lair of gray matter, stockpiled with R. Kelly CDs and Courvoisier. And what do you know? Almost all the references out there are from Dr. Louann Brizendine!

This isn't the first time Brizendine has popped up, with dubious science according to Williams, presenting a medical model to explain a social behavior. Brizendine is -- I know, shocker -- the author of The Female Brain, and in that book, she brought forth her theory that women speakmorequicklyandusemorewordsthenmen. Um.Yeah.Okay. What.ev.er.

Having not read either of Brizendine's books, it would be completely unfair for me to argue that Brizendine's research is bullshit. Maybe it is maybe it's not. But I admit I am having a hard time wrapping my own brain around the concept human behavior and brains should be treated as separate entities. Call me crazy, but I think how we think determines a hell of a lot about how we behave, regardless of gender. I've met men who "think like women" and women who "think like men." I am not a fan of sweeping generalizations, or in this case maybe it's a sweeping genderization. I guess this is why I am less likely to consider Brizendine's hypothesis reality, but I do agree with one assertion she has about men and women:

We are the same species, after all.

I believe there are quite a few in our species, male or female, who ask, "What the hell was he thinking?" and "Has she gone completely nuts?" when we turn on the TV and see folks like Tiger Woods admitting he did it or Jesse
James
all but admitting he did. And there are millions of couples dealing with a deceptive mate and questioning their own sanity too. So maybe there is something to this, that it is the brain all out of whack. However, does this mean, as Brizendine suggests in her CNN piece, we should just accept our brains for what they are and don't mess with Mother Nature and thus the male brain gets a "pass"?

The human brain is the best learning machine on the planet and human beings are capable of making major changes in our lives. But there are some things that the male brain and female brain are not likely to change anytime soon. And it makes more sense to deal with these brain realities, than to argue with them or ignoring them.

The best advice I have for women is make peace with the male brain. Let men be men.

Really? Why do we women need to "let" men be anything? Men aren't our pets or our house plants. I find this tone of Brizendine's, that women are somehow responsible for restricting the men in our life from being manly, patently ridiculous. Usually there are two brains in a relationship, so why should one be permitted to check out and do whatever it is supposedly designed to do, while the other brain in the relationship should "make peace?"

It's no big secret men and women are wired differently, or we have different chemistry coursing through our bodies (hello estrogen, hello testosterone), so it makes sense we may have some gender-specific behaviors, but philandering being one of them is a hard one for me to accept. I am uncomfortable with Brizendine blaming the tissue. Because if it were a matter of fact, and there is no gray area including human behavior and choice, then why is it that some men cheat and others don't? Each has the same male brain.

Or do they? Could it be argued that men who don't cheat have superior brains and men who are sleeping with Abby Normal in their head are the ones who are going astray and are powerless over their own thought process? Is cheating a malfunction of the brain? Can we even go there?

  • 4
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Devra Renner 5 pts

Bossy,
Exactly! If it were merely the male brain being hard wired to cheat, how does this then explain women who are unfaithful to their partner? Maybe human beings just weren't meant to live this long and so now monogamy has become much more of a challenge. When our life spans weren't as long, maybe it was easier to stay with the same person for 20 year. Now that we are living into the 80's and 90's, it could be too much to expect to stay with the same person for over 30 years. I dunno the answer, just thinkin' out loud.

Maybe we need to get Patti Stanger to weigh in on this...

www.parentopia.com/blog ( http://www.parentopia.com/blog )

Devra Renner 5 pts

Laura,
There was an interesting review on Amazon.com about Bizendine's "The Female Brain" where a reviewer went through all of the research and called it out as basically junk science. Here is the link, http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/AKRIIM... ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/AKRIIM... )

Would love to know your thoughts.

www.parentopia.com/blog ( http://www.parentopia.com/blog )

iamBOSSY 5 pts

Bossy thinks men have different physical triggers -- and sorry but was that nasty?

However Bossy thinks it's been pretty well documented that cheaters have a need to feel needed, attractive, and special. That crosses gender lines, for sure.

But back to Patti Stanger...

You can find Bossy over at her place, i am bossy ( http://www.iambossy.com ). Don't even knock, she's always there.

lauracarroll 5 pts

Ok gotta read her new one...I read the Female version and found it very enlightening. No blaming going around. Only criticism on the Female is she sure recommended medications a lot -- keeping that pharmacutical industry going...so on to the guys..I say the more info to understand them the better!

Laura Families of Two http://lauracarroll.com