- Share This Post
- Pin It
- 18
-
Sparkle (0)
So, a long time ago, we had these people called wet nurses. If for whatever reason you couldn't nurse your own baby, another lactating woman would do it. Maybe it was for status. Maybe you had no milk. Maybe you wanted to get pregnant again and didn't want the lactation to get in the way of heir production. According to Wikipedia, Napoleon had one, and so did Mohammad.
Today, in developed countries, we don't really seem to approve of nursing another person's baby, though it's still not unusual in developing countries. Why not? What's changed?
As I was flipping through blogs, I was surprised to see one school of thought says nursing another's baby is like having sex with another's husband. Que? Seriously? This is a hard one for me. I've written in the past about how I struggled with breastfeeding because of my association between breast and sex, but I viewed this as a personal, culturally-brought-on problem that had nothing to do with my relationship with my daughter. I'm surprised that someone who is okay with breastfeeding and is totally able to separate breasts-as-mammaries from breasts-as-sex-toys suddenly brings sex back into it when discussing wet nurses.
Kaui writes on BlogHer: in response to a scene in a book about one woman breastfeeding another woman's baby:
I loved the ickiness of this scene, the abstract problem. The women liken the act to coming into a room and seeing someone giving your husband a blowjob, but I'm not sure I feel that way. If someone were to occassionally do my breastfeeding and blowjobbing for me, I think I'd feel pretty lucky.
Methinks Kaui writes in jest.
Another school of thought revolves around medical risk. What if the other mother is taking (even legal) drugs that pass through to breast milk? What if another mother has a disease that can be passed through body fluids? Like so many things in parenthood, YOU JUST DON'T KNOW. I'm sure I'm not the only person who's heard of one baby being accidentally given another woman's breast milk at daycare. But would you let a complete stranger breastfeed your child, or would it be more like a friend whom you know pretty well? I would think most people who are okay with cross-nursing (as it's apparently called) know their fellow nursers pretty well. Maybe even well enough to share a toothbrush or a lipstick with.
Mom's Tin Foil Hat, who has actually breastfed someone else's baby in her lifetime, writes:
There are definite ethical and medical reasons why it is taboo in this society and it doesn’t happen commonly. Like any other health decision, it should be entered to with a good deal of consideration. Just doing it for some sort of companionship would not be worth the risks, in my judgment.
Some women are more than willing to nurse another's baby but aren't sure if they would want someone else nursing their own child. This might be a case of trusting ourselves more than we trust other people. Judi writes:
So, I'm left with trying to understand why I would cross nurse another baby but reluctant to have another nurse Max. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm. A little of my concern is with the health factors. Is her milk clean, HIV free, etc. I think the crux of my issue is sharing that intimacy of having my child breastfeed with another woman. I hate to even write that.
Some take their derision further. From The Blog That Ate Manhattan:
I see no reason why, in today's society, a nursing mother needs to share nursing with anyone. There are potentially serious risks and no proven benefits.
So, I don't know. We've decided not to have another child, so I'll never find out on my own what I would do under the circumstances, but I'm guessing if it was between my baby nursing from someone else or not eating at all, I'd vote for my baby eating. If the circumstances were not so dire, I'd give my baby formula before letting another woman nurse my child.
What do you think?














