Why Can't the Obama's Send their Kids to Public School





Apparently the Obama's send their daughters to a private schoolin Chicago.
I find it tre interesting that we are questioning whether his daughters should go to private or public schooland what it says about Senator Obama as a leaderwhen we don't question the decisions of our elected leaders, school teachers and administrators to send not send  their children to the public schools that they work for.
Chicago schools have been in the news lately.Last week, in order to bring attention to the inequity in schoolfunding, 1000 Chicago Public School students boarded buses
and headed to a suburban school district and attempted to enroll to shed light on inequitable funding between schooldistricts. In New Trier, a suburb, spending tops at $17K per student,whereas in Chicago, it tops off at $10,400K per student.
In light of this funding discrepancy, why is Senator Obamaexpected to send his kids to schools, that teachers,white Teachers (the majority of public school teachers in this countryare white women) would never send their children to?
I am torn on this. As a product of both public and private institutionsthey both have their merits and drawbacks. What I do know, isthat education is expensive, and that until we acknowledge thatnothing will be done and analyze why what stops folks fromacting, nothing meaningful will be done.
I also know that failure creates jobs and that people would rather talk about "a culture of poverty" rather than abouthow many people pay their mortgages off of jobs relatedto the academic failure of low income students.
As parents, we all want to give our children better than what we had.However, public servants are obligated to serve not only their families
interests but the interests of the public as well.
Perhaps, the question then becomes, where does Obama's public lifeend and his private life began.
Rather than be interested in where the Obama daughters attend school,perhaps we should be more interested in how inequitable schools are funded in Chicago between low income districts and affluence districts.
Providing quality education to all is a benchmark of a healthy democracy.As a rule, I listen to a persons words, and I also watch their actions.It is clear that commenter's are interested "they own", the rest be damned.It ain't blatant neglect, but it is neglect just the same.
Look at the following comments it appears that folks want a better educational system. In the meantime, their children are enrolled in Chicago Day Prep school. No time for fake ones. Check out some of the comments for the Times article,

"Any parent who doesn't send their child to the school that bestmeets their needs is irresponsible"
"I am not a believer in sacrificing my child for the potential- but notcertain- benefit for society"
"Children are not the sacrificial lambs for the greater good. As someonewho attended public school all her life, and managed to get into and graduate from The University of Chicago...I would have loved to haveattended the Lab School". 

What would happen of all the parents of students at underfunded schoolssaid that they wouldn't send them there any longer unless they were funded equitably.Logistically, it would be a nightmare, but it would sure bring attention to the situation.
Black people in this country have a had a real tenuous relationship with education. Throughout history, we have always been fighting to learn.At first it was illegal for us to read. Then we were allowed to read but in our sub par schools, just the same, we made do with what we had.Then the schools were "desegregated", but first little Black boys andgirls had to be escorted to schools by the national guard because racistswhere not interested in going to school with them.
Implicit in the spirit of many of the commenter's messages from the quoted above is that the lives of some children are worth more than others.A few weeks ago, Nat Hentoff of the Village Voice cited a report thatstated that only 32 percent of Black men enrolled in high school inNew York graduated on schedule. Yes. 32 percent. If this is the case inNew York City, then I wonder what the case is in say, LA, Chicago, Baltimore and Philly.
The bottom line is until we treat the education of ALL children the way we treat the education of "our" children the 2008 Jim Crow system of education will persist.
As long as we have two educational systems we will have two America's.
Where is the Democracy in that?

Comments

In order to comment on BlogHer.com, you'll need to be logged in. You'll be given the option to log in or create an account when you publish your comment. If you do not log in or create an account, your comment will not be displayed.