Why Does My State Have A Law Banning Me From Holding Public Office?
By postmormongirl on October 11, 2012
I have never considered going into politics as a serious career option. Given my diverse background, I’ve always thought I could add something to the public sphere. As a person with a Mormon family and Hindu in-laws, respecting religious differences is a part of my day-to-day life. I understand what it means to worry about paying for college and what it means to grow up in a family without money or connections. Watching my husband – a very remarkable individual – navigate the murky immigration system of this country has given me a deeper sympathy for the realities of immigrant life. I have a deep respect for education; I believe no individual should be held back from pursuing educational opportunities because of an inability to pay. I am a wife, a daughter, a neighbor, an intellectual, and a dreamer. I am, at my core, an American; I believe that people should be given the opportunities to work hard and succeed in life. However, there is the reality of being elected; I have never considered myself to be a serious candidate for public office.
Why then, does it hurt so much to find out that the state I live in has a clause in their state constitution that bans a person like me – a nontheist – from holding public office? Article 1, Section 4 of the Texas Constitution states “No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.”
So, in theory, if I were to run for public office in Texas and win, I would be required to acknowledge the presence of a Supreme Being. I am an agnostic; I don’t know if there is a higher power or not. I do believe, however, that lying is wrong. I cannot see myself acknowledging something that I do not believe to be true. In my mind, that is a lie.
Throughout my life, there have been many obstacles to becoming the person that I am today. As a girl being raised in the Mormon faith, I was told not to dream of higher education or a career; as a woman, becoming a mother and a housewife was my duty in life. As someone who decided to leave the Mormon Church, I ran up against the many prejudices against people who make the decision to leave. As the seventh child in a lower middle class family, I had to fight to make it through college without financial assistance from my parents. This fight was ultimately successful through a combination of hard work and the generosity of scholarships.
For every road-block in life, there was a solution available to me. I spent a lot of time thinking about who I was and what I believed in; when I figured out the answer, I acted in a manner that was true to who I am as a person, in spite of the negative consequences. But never, in all of my years, have I come up against a law that specifically bans someone of my beliefs from a career choice. And that is what hurts the most; that the state I have chosen to reside in has taken the official stance that, as a non-theist, I am not capable or worthy of holding public office.
I may never be in a position where this law becomes an issue. However, I can verify that there are many other non-theists out there who can contribute to the public sphere in a valuable and lasting manner. Why is my state banning them from holding a public office?
Rachel Velamur is the author of the blog "A Post-Mormon Life", where she writes about what life was like as a Mormon and what her life is like after leaving the Mormon Church.
(VIDEO) Arizona Governor Jan Brewer and President Obama Meet After Tough Talk About Immigration, Lawsuits
More Like This
Recent Posts by postmormongirl
Most Popular on BlogHer
Most Popular on News & Entertainment
Recent Comments on News & Entertainment
By Rita Arens