Bio
I'm the Family, Moms...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

How Season 2 of Glee Really Let Me Down

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

I initially balked at season 2 of Glee. I argued in a few early season posts with some other Gleeks. I claimed that the writer's total lack of attention to Quinn's post-relinquishment issues was a slap in the face to every birth mother (and adoptee) who watches the show. Others argued back that it was early in the season, that I should give it time. I eventually gave up on the season -- mainly because of the torture that was the Rocky Horror episode but also because I was peeved about the Juno treatment that they gave the show.

But I sat down a few weeks ago to catch up on the season when the Oxygen network ran a marathon. I also watched the finale on FOX when it ran.

And I maintain what I said. I was told that I was over-reacting when they didn't address it in the first episode. But they didn't address it for the rest of the season. There were a couple of minor undertones, a glance here or there. In the "Original Song" episode, also known as the Regionals episode, Rachel makes a brief mention of how her biological mother ended up adopting Quinn's daughter Beth. She said something about it bonding them together, but Quinn didn't even blink. Not once. It was ignored. It wasn't even an elephant in the room. If you were new the show and missed that scene in that episode, you really wouldn't know that good girl cheerleader Quinn got knocked up while cheating on her quarterback boyfriend Finn with the bad boy rebel Puck during the first season. It's the baby that never was.

I recognize that the show isn't about adoption. I am still forcing myself to recognize fiction for what it is: fiction. And I may have even felt some renewed love for the show by the finale, though I screamed and cried along with other fans when they decided to kill of Sue's sister. I'll watch season 3, but I won't expect to see anything about how Quinn is doing post-placement.

And it's disappointing. The show does so much for other issues. They've got the PSA going to end the r-word, something I fully support. They deal with everything from homelessness to the bullying of gay teens to trying to figure out as a gay teen when and how to come out to everyone else. They deal with some heavy freaking stuff. But we can't dedicate ten minutes of one season to talk about how relinquishment forever changes a girl/woman/mother? We couldn't even have a moment, one year after Quinn gave birth, where she was simply sad?

It's a shame. I don't expect Hollywood to ever get it right as there is no one "right." But the total lack of anything? It's just a shame. Heck, I'd even accept seeing her lash out about how she doesn't care about the baby and, darn it, leave her alone -- because at least it would be an emotion to revisit later. I don't know. Perhaps they're going with the whole First Year as the Year of Denial theme, but even then they would have done the storyline better by at least having someone ask about the baby or a song or something more than what was offered.

As it stands, I'm disappointed in the writers. They missed an opportunity to do something real, like they've done with other issues. But I can't hate the show. I can hate episodes of the show (oh, Rocky Horror horrors!). But, I mean, come on. We all know there's a little bit (or, uh, more) of Rachel in me.

I wonder when the writers (of this show or any) will get it right.

Of note: I don't address any father/birth father issues regarding Puck in this post simply because I am a woman and a birth mother. My heart breaks for Puck as well just as it does for my daughter's biological father.

Family Section Editor Jenna Hatfield (@FireMom) blogs at Stop, Drop and Blog and The Chronicles of Munchkin Land. She is a freelance writer and photographer. She is also a birth mother and works very hard not to take things personally.

  • 5
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Jane Byers Goodwin 8 pts

My college students are telling me that Quinn's seeming lack of "reaction" to giving away her baby is actually quite typical these days. In fact, they tell me that the only thing they have trouble believing is that she dropped the baby weight in a week.

I've been teaching at the college level for seven years now, and each semester I get at least three essays from both males and females about what they are calling a "narrow escape," ie being tied down with a child...being a single mom or a dad whose money all goes to the Pampers factory.

Yes, I find this attitude very selfish, but I also find a little understanding inside my head - these teens, whose experience was recent - and these older adults - who are looking back - all agree that people other than themselves would do a better job at raising their babies.

After teaching in the public schools for over twenty years, and seeing first-hand all the "parents" who put themselves first, smoked & drank instead of buying socks and mittens, moved back and forth across county lines twice a year so they could renew their benefits, exposed their innocent children to "Uncle Daddies" and "This is your new mommy" over and over and over until the kids learned not to trust anybody, kept their poor kids out of school and away from a life of their own to babysit younger half-siblings, never attended anything their child was in, came to conferences only to abuse the teachers and whine about the 'system,", and horrifically abused their kids when the pressure mounted, I can only say to any teen who gives up parental rights because she knows someone else will be a better parent, "Thank you."

Sometimes, it takes more courage, guts, heart, and honesty to let someone else do it than to be resentful and ineffectual, yourself.

Yes, many teen parents make it. Equally yes, many don't, and those who KNOW they're not going to be able to give it their best shot would be better off, and so would their baby, to let someone else do it.

As for the remorse, etc? My students tell me they honestly don't feel much of that. They're mostly full of relief that their childhood isn't completely over with in spite of their hormones, and happiness that their innocent child won't have to live the results of a teenage romp in the hay.

Do I get essays from students full of angst about giving away a baby? Occasionally, but the other far outnumbers those.

I was surprised, too. Surprised, and uplifted.

And once again reminded that just because one person feels a certain way, that doesn't mean everyone is supposed to feel that same way.

So let's not judge Quinn (I don't like her, either) and Puck (love him) just because they're apparently exhibiting feelings that over half my college students are also feeling: Relief, reprieve, lesson learned, and "I did the right thing."

Seriously, you all should read some of the essays I get from these students. They've certainly changed my own way of thinking about a LOT of issues.

"Don't be content with being average. Average is as close to the bottom as it is to the top."

Jane blogs as "Mamacita" at Scheiss Weekly, ( http://janegoodwin.net/ )hitting the fan like nobody can.

JennaHatfield 40 pts

Jane Byers Goodwin Ugh. This comment contains every reason why I continue to blog: to combat the belief that if I wouldn't have relinquished, my child would have been doomed to a life of "Uncle Daddies."

WhitneyD 8 pts

Quinn was the biggest disappointment. While I can understand she might have been hiding pain or in denial about anything with giving away her baby- there weren't any scenes to support either.

Worst of all, she reverted back to the girl she'd been at the beginning of the series without any real reason why. Her friendship with Mercedes? Ignored. What happened to the girl who sang "It's A Man's Man's Man's World"?

Sadly though, it's a show written by three men. While they've capably handled a lot of tricky material, they showed that they really don't understand much about the emotional toll of giving up a child for adoption.

LibrarianLizy 5 pts

I kept wondering when they were going to bring up the baby issue again too. I'm not a very observant tv watcher, so if I noticed it, I KNOW others did too.

I don't know if I wanted it to be a teaching/statement moment, but I did want something mentioned. Even if they didn't address the baby at all, stuff like how Quinn was feeling, how she lost the baby weight, did she have any postpartum issues, etc, could have gone a long way in making me feel like the whole "nice girl gets knocked up by bad boy" story line wasn't such a huge waste.

As it stands now, I don't like Quinn anymore than I did before she had the baby, nor do I understand what the point of having that story line was if they weren't going to carry it over to season two.

tiaras-and-trucks 16 pts

I also think it's a little strange that the subject of the adoption has never been addressed. I agree that if you were a new watcher, you would never know about the pregnancy/relationship between Finn & Puck/adoption of their baby.

I do love the show, and I think they do an excellent job looking at so many important teen issues. I wish they would revisit the adoption/aftermath at some point, because there needs to be something about teen pregnancy on TV other than Teen Mom.