Bio
I'm an editor in Iowa. I used to live in Chicago, hence the BlogHer name.
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

[Updated] Amanda Knox - Not Guilty

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 44
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Updated 10/3/11 - Amanda Knox has been found not guilty!

Who is Amanda Knox? If you don't know the answer, you aren't alone. But this blogger feels you should read up before you travel to a foreign country and end up convicted of murder.

I, for one, will NEVER travel to Italy. Mostly because I can't afford it, but also because after following the Amanda Knox case for the last few years, I'm terrified that someone will accuse me of a crime I didn't commit and lock me up for the rest of my life. The Italian justice system? Wackadoo.

In fact, Amanda's parents, Edda Mellas and Curt Knox, were charged with libel for saying that Amanda was mistreated by the police during her interrogation. Their case has been postponed until January 2012. So see? You don't even have to physically do anything in Italy to cause a problem. You can just speak your own truth and wind up in court. Me and my big mouth are not going to take that risk. Which is sad because I would lurve to travel to Italy. Oh well.

Amanda Knox
© Iberpress/Settonce/Caters News/ZUMAPRESS.com

So yeah, I'm all worked up about Amanda Knox. I want so badly for her to be released and allowed to come back to the United States. This week, after a bazillion delays, her appeals trial is continuing in Perugia. It's thought that this may all wrap up by the end of the month. Yesterday, an Italian judge ruled that new DNA testing of the evidence would not be allowed, which is good news for Amanda and Raffaele. If there is no hard evidence, how can the courts possibly uphold the convictions?

Here is the case in a nutshell (see a good collection of the facts on Wikipedia's page about the Meredith Kercher case and the New York Times coverage of the case.

  • In 2007, 20-year-old Seattle resident Amanda Knox moved to Italy to attend college in Perugia. She lived with 3 housemates, including Meredith Kercher (21 years old).
  • She started dating a guy named Raffaele Sollecito (23 years old).
  • A few weeks later, Raffaele and Amanda arrived home to find something amiss in the house. Meredith had been brutally murdered.
  • Amanda and Raffaele were arrested.
  • Amanda was interrogated for so long (4 days), without a lawyer present, in a language she didn't fully understand, that she cracked when they asked her to "imagine" the crime or some such thing and she ended up putting herself at the scene of the crime.
  • The interrogation of Amanda Knox was NOT recorded. No record of any of this exists to this day. And in fact, her interrogation confession was thrown out by the Italian Supreme Court but allowed in by the presiding judge as part of the concurrent civil case as "trial documents."
  • Let's remember the poor dear was 20 years old.
  • Let's also remember that she was in a foreign country trying to understand a new language.
  • Let's also remember that confessions that fail to pass the Voluntariness Test, which includes length of interrogation and state of mind of the suspect, would not be admissible in U.S. courts.
  • In the process, Amanda mentions her boss at the bar she's working at and falsely accuses him of being there. BAD IDEA, but I don't really blame her for freaking out and losing it given what was going on.
  • So Amanda and Raffaele are charged with Meredith's murder.
  • Meanwhile, Rudy Guede's DNA is found INSIDE of Meredith. Also? His sh*t is in the toilet. You can't make this stuff up. Rudy pooped in the toilet and LEFT IT THERE. DNA match? Check. Also, his bloody footprints, hand prints, and fingerprints were left at the scene. Not the smartest criminal. He was also arrested and charged.
  • Amanda and Raffaele were given 25 years in prison (a form of "life" in Italy). Amanda was given an extra year for lying about her boss, which bumped her up to 26 years. Rudy Guede? He got 30, but now he worked it down to 16 years.
  • There are currently appeals for Amanda and Raffaele going on because the evidence is shoddy. They can't retest the DNA found on a knife in Raffaele's place (which did NOT match the bloody imprint on the
  • 44
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
fmaggi 6 pts

The latest update as of Feb 15, 2012 is that the prosecutors have decided to appeal the case. They insist that there was a miscarriage of justice, despite many of your accounts.

As someone living in Italy for 20 years, it's true about them locking you up without trial, but...I seriously wouldn't disregard an entire country because of their justice system. Check out America's sometime.

As to my take on the Amanda fiasco, go to my blog, Burnt by the Tuscan Sun:

http://burntbythetuscansun.blogspot.com/2011/10/di...

It's The Elliot Way 8 pts

What a fabulous recount of events! I'm glad to hear that so many Bloggers were on the edge of their seats yesterday when the verdict was being read. I read the Monster of Florence, too and saw so many frightening similarities. That prosecutor seems so corrupt. The thought that this was all a sex game gone bad is absurd. I'm so relieved that she is on the plane home right now.

StrivingforSimple 5 pts

Unfortunately these things happen and all you have to do is be in the wrong place at the wrong time. I traveled to Rome, Italy. It was beautiful, but you know when you are in another country, believe me. You mind your business, do your tourist thing, and try your best not to break the law. When you are in another country it is definitely different from what you are used to. I hope she and boyfriend can finally get a fair trial and be on their way to their homes.

Denise 982 pts moderator

BlondieChicago I'm pleasantly surprised. I really was not sure this would be the verdict!

Denise

JennaHatfield 150 pts

BlondieChicago Whew. I was hoping for this verdict, but I'm always cautious with my hope when it comes to juries.

BlondieChicago 22 pts

Denise and JennaHatfield : Totally agree. I am surprised, too, to be honest. I was worried she would be staying in jail.

ebyrdstarr 18 pts

The legal observers I had been hearing from (I was following this trial much more closely than I should probably admit) had been predicting for months, really since May, that the verdict would go her way this time. So I wasn't surprised. But I was definitely still holding my breath. Watching the verdict live on the internet was maddening, though, as I couldn't hear the verdict, I could only see her reaction. For half a minute, I wasn't sure if her reaction was good news or bad.

BlondieChicago 22 pts

Here comes the verdict today! Tuned in to the news. What will happen? Will be announced soon--2:30CT; 3:30ET.

Giancarlo 6 pts

Troy Davis....about to get executed in georgia. on september 21. 7 witnesses out of 9 retreacted, they never found a dna trace either they found the "smkoing gun"...no crime weapon. Believe me i have no anti-american feelings...i have tons of american ffriends and i lvoe your country. But look inside your hosue before talking about us.With RespectGiancarlo from Italy

MoreThanMommy 12 pts

It's a bit dramatic to say that you'll never go to Italy over this one case. It's a beautiful country with wonderful people and rich culture. In fact, if you're going to get worked up over people being wrongly convicted, I'm not sure where you could live, as it happens around the world. A system based on human decisions is open to human error and lapse of judgement.

While I agree that the evidence in the case is sorely lacking based on the information we have, I also agree that Knox and Sollecito behaved in a strange way in terms of how they handled things. I don't think that it means they're guilty, but I don't know how any of us can say for certain that they are innocent.

I hope that Knox and Sollecito receive a fair trial for their appeal. I can't imagine how terrifying it must be to be locked up in the first place, never mind away from home and everything familiar. Being falsely accused is one of my worst fears, but it's far more likely to happen close to home than anywhere else.

Sylver Blaque 8 pts

Is it possible this American girl was convicted of something other than murder? It's something to think about...

http://sylverblaque.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/amand...

BlondieChicago 22 pts

I just randomly happened to see a US passport the other day and thought of Amanda Knox again. The inside of US passports says:

"The Secretary of State of the United States of America hereby requests all whom it may concern to permit the citizen/national of the United States named herein to pass without delay or hindrance and in case of need to give all lawful aid and protection."

Even in the travel document itself, our country is requesting lawful aid and protection on our behalf, which is a nice touch. But it's true that we need to UNDERSTAND what laws we may encounter in foreign countries. And it's a good point to always know the number of the local consulate when we're abroad.

Apron Appeal 5 pts

The irony...When in Rome do as the Romans do. U.S. Jurisdiction has no place in this argument. It's not about what we would do here, because the crime didn't happen here. I 'm confident that she has a US Consulate assigned to her case and has let her know all about the process, what she can expect and how she can or cannot beat this. People don't need to live in fear over traveling to a foreign country, you just need to know your american "rights" mean jack and you should probably read up on the laws of the land in which you will be traveling. My friends who work for the American Consulate in foreign counties are always astounded at how American's who have been arrested are so unwilling to cooperate with the system they are in. (oh and in case anyone is wondering. This article is the first thing I've heard about the story and I have no opinion as to whether she is guilty or not)

101intutive 5 pts

I am a psychic that works in Montana. I have been following the Amanda Knox trial for only a few months but have been able to look into various aspects of the case to try and see what is actually afoot. I grew up in a household with very successful lawyer parents, surrounded by constant law and order discussions. When looking at the various elements completely separate from any intuitive knowing it is obvious she should be walking in the free world. From an intuitive knowing place her inner mind is that of an innocent. I have worked with several law enforcement cases as well as spiritual and political leaders to try to bring underlying elements into play when faced with serious decisions in which the human mind can become confused. Looking at the case from this point, in retrospect,it is easy to see how smoke and mirrors stopped intelligent people from making good decisions on Amanda's behalf. Something has got to be done. The evidence is in, our hope is the trial will reflect the truth and she will be able to step outside the prison into a new life. I have to say though that, as it is with most cases, Amanda is learning something where she is. Almost all the time when unfortunate things occur we learn things we could not otherwise and the same is true for her. I am grateful that her spirit is as strong as ever and she is making something out of a difficult situation. She is developing into a beautiful young woman, shedding some of her child like innocence. Because of her unique experience Amanda will bring a truth and wisdom to the world without judgment or execution like anger. Her particular job is to emerge unscathed by the ridiculous accusations and move toward transcendence of judgment. Prosperity is always present for those that do not believe that which is not true. She knows what happened that night, she will need to keep that clear from what is being said and stay herself.

JoliOwl 5 pts

The evidence against Amanda and Raffaele is insufficient and causes me to seriously doubt they had anything to do with Meredith's murder. Theories of the murder that Giuliano Mignini came up with have their basis in something that was preconceived, (The Monster of Florence.) I have studied abroad for 2 months and 3 months at a time, and it was life-changing, but I seriously doubt it can change a person's core and turn them into a killer. Read what Amanda's friends and family say about her, I did, and I am baffled. How could her character change so much in two months, from the time she moved in with Meredith, to the time Meredith's murder was discovered and Amanda was charged with murder and portrayed as a killer. It seems like witch-hunter mentality spurred accusations against Amanda and Raffaele.

I shudder to think what could have gone wrong for me if I was in the wrong place at the wrong time, or if I hadn't had an experienced traveler and locals looking out for me while I was in South America. I don't think I would travel to Italy either.

BlondieChicago 22 pts

I must admit, I'm surprised that so many people who are commenting think she's guilty. Fascinating. But I'm happy to hear the opinions--keep it up!

WritingJoy 6 pts

Innocent. I'm surprised you didn't mention her behavior and reputation in prison -- she is NOT sassy at all. She's above reproach and highly respected. I think this speaks to her character.

BlondieChicago 22 pts

Good point there, too! She's been studying, learning to play guitar, and is well liked by staff and other prisoners. I don't think I would be able to handle the situation with such grace. I AM very sassy. WritingJoy

CandyR 5 pts

I won't make a judgement on her.. but one thing I know for sure is that our justice system here in America has more holes in it than the Italians'.. they have a series of hearings and depositions, more than one jury per case and many more chances to appeal than in the US.. their system is more sound to ensure the right outcome... they are more likely to let a guilty person free than to convict an innocent one. If she is innocent, she will be found as so. I think this blogger makes it out to be like the Italian justice system to be somewhat barbaric.. to say you'd never go to Italy because of this? How completely moronic. To try to suggest she was interrogated in a "language she doesn't understand"... even more moronic... Italy is not perfect, but this is not some third world country. This is a civilized country with an admirable justice system. I have been following the case too, and from what I understand, she dug her own hole by not being honest.. she told different stories and changed her story once she found out they had certain evidence. Who knows what happened, but I have faith that the result will be fair and just. I ask the question, "if she was ugly, fat white trash, would people still have sympathy for her?" I think she deserves a fair trial, but I think the media is going overboard, because she is pretty and has a doe-eyed innocent look to her.

BlondieChicago 22 pts

I definitely agree that the US justice system has some SERIOUS problems. Amen. The Italian justice system isn't "barbaric," but I do feel that the prosecutor has some issues. Also, as someone who writes for English as Second Language students, I know that anyone trying to communicate in a second language without help from a good translator can end up saying all kinds of things or hearing all kinds of things that are inaccurate. I for one would still be defending her no matter what she looked like. It's a shame her beauty has become a central part of her case. I appreciate your thoughts even though we disagree. CandyR

Pearl87 5 pts

I think she is very likely to be guilty. I am sorry as she is very young ... hopefully if convicted they will show some leniency and not give her a life sentence which would be sure in the US (they do not death penalty in Italy). I think they are both guilty. Recent DNA discussions were not so relevant and took place even in first trial. She told the police she was there and subsequently she wrote it in a memorial in both cases accusing an innocent man, she said "i was there" to her mum, the other perpetrator Guede confirmed in Court she and her boyfriend were there, they found her DNA mixed with that of the victim on foot traces which were cleaned and found by police with luminol, there are mixed blood traces, there is a footprint in blood not compatible with Guede on the bathmat, she lied about whereabouts that night and morning after as computers and phones show well, her boyfriend lied repeatedly and admitted he lied (by the way her boyfriend last version was she was not in the flat that evening so she does not have alibi), there is a proven staged break in that was proven and no other person but her had any reason to do, there are witnesses who say many people run out of the cottage after the scream, there is a witness who says he saw the couple in the piazza above at the time of the murder (she says she was at his home and he says she was out and he was in) .... She has little chances of acquittal ... may God pray for her.

BlondieChicago 22 pts

I'd love to see any links to new reports about these issues. Please share if you have! I do know that one homeless man's testimony was disproven because he got the night wrong--the one that said he saw buses. That was the night before because it was all hallow's eve in Italy, right? Pearl87

ebyrdstarr 18 pts

Most of what Pearl has written is, sadly, not accurate. There are so many lies, myths, half-truths, and distortions around this case. For starters, the thing where she told her mom "I was there" she was clearly talking about Raffaele's apartment. The footprints found in luminol on the hallway floor tested negative for blood and for Meredith's DNA and yet somehow the court that convicted her still decided those footprints were made with Meredith's blood. The footprint on the bathmat is Guede's. She did not lie about her whereabouts. Her boyfriend's version was not that she was not there, but that he was asleep so he can't definitively say she didn't leave. (She could say the same thing about him.) The witness who claims he saw the couple in the piazza has been thoroughly discredited. For starters, he clearly described the night BEFORE the murder. And second, IF he had been describing the night of the murder, his timeline for seeing the couple would pretty clearly give them an alibi for the time of the murder. A far more credible witness confirmed that the couple were at Raffaele's house at 8:45 when she buzzed at his apartment and heard them both on the intercom.

This case has taken on a bizarre life of its own on the internet, with an odd sub-culture of people convinced beyond all earthly reason of Amanda and Raffaele's guilt. (They are commonly referred to as guilters.) They find blogs and news sites all over the internet world and continue to clutter up these sites with the same tired, fully debunked myths about the case. I have no idea why they do this.

BlondieChicago 22 pts

I know you are reading, wise women. Speak your minds! Guilty? Innocent? Should we get involved or not? I think we should. Why aren't we?

ebyrdstarr 18 pts

Anyone who has looked at this case at all objectively and bothered to find out what is the truth and what are the lies can see the pair are completely innocent. It's frightening, really, how much misinformation respected news organizations can spread that become gospel, no matter how untrue they are. Last I checked, the BBC's web archives still have stories up that proclaim Amanda lied about her alibi even though the supposed lie was known all along by investigators to be the truth. BlondieChicago

hausfrau 11 pts

I've been following it off and on since it happened too. I think one of the things they held against her in the papers was that she was smiling at her boyfriend after the murder. And I feel like there was something about underwear shopping. None of which is really evidence of a crime and could be explained away as nerves and trying to present some semblance of normalcy to a loved one - the panties I think were because hers were either confiscated and they wouldn't let her in her apartment to get something to put on or because she'd just come home from her boyfriend's after a good romp..I can't remember and feel free to correct me. I have always thought she was innocent - mostly because of the pretty clear shoddy work done by the Italian police. And I think the embarrassment of that shoddy work is why they pressed so hard to make her the criminal in the papers..international fame for shoddy police work just isn't acceptable for anyone's pride even in the US (*cough*OJ SIMPSON*cough*). Gotta say, the shiz in the toilet is news to me, though. Wow.

BlondieChicago 22 pts

Good point! When my house burned down in college, I had to go buy new underwear because it was that or borrow from friends--gross. Everyone need undies, right? hausfrau

ebyrdstarr 18 pts

The underwear thing is that her house was a crime scene so she couldn't go in. She had been wearing the same clothes for something like 48 hours. The media proclaimed that she was buying "sexy" lingerie. But the store she was at was similar to a Target and she bought plain cotton underwear. Right next to this store was a store more like Victoria's Secret. I'd say if she'd really wanted sexy underwear, she would have gone there instead of buying a cotton 3-pack. BlondieChicago

LadyAnne 27 pts

I don't think she's guilty of murder. BUT, I do think that she and her family made a lot of very bad decisions. One thing that I keep hearing is "if this was in a US court...." But that's the thing - it's NOT in a US court. Like it or not, different countries have different judicial systems. Studying abroad can be a lot of fun, but as soon as you get off the plane in Rome, you have to abide by their laws and play by their rules. Just like when Italians come to the US. To be perfectly blunt, I think that all of the "if this was in the US...." talk from Amanda's family and the US media only made things worse for her. Again, in a like-it-or-not situation, the US is generally perceived internationally as being a bit of bully. In this case, while US media pundits were railing against the Italian judicial system, I think it only made them dig their heels in more.

BlondieChicago 22 pts

That's a very good point, indeed. We in the US need to reach out to legal support in different countries if we are ever under fire to ensure we understand what is legal/not legal BEFORE we open our mouths. It's time to educate our kiddos BEFORE they go off to study abroad! LadyAnne

Conversation from Facebook

Mama's Losin' It
Mama's Losin' It

Not Guilty!! Wahoo!

Michelle Ng-Whitehead
Michelle Ng-Whitehead

Regardless she deserves a fair trial. I would think that the victim's family would want to be sure the right person be convicted based on evidence and not by public opinion driven by what the media portray.

Julie Gordon
Julie Gordon

I believe she is not guilty!

Nika B
Nika B

its a good thing Italy isnt Texas ...

Summer Bert
Summer Bert

They never had concrete evidence in the first place. She is unlucky she is in Italy cause they evidence they had would have never flown in the US

Candy Lütz Rosenbaum
Candy Lütz Rosenbaum

she is lucky this crime occured Italy.. if it was Texas she's be on death row by now. if they cannot prove her guilt, they will set her free.. the blogger needs to stop blaming Italy.

Simona Lee
Simona Lee

oh please. she did it.

Carolyn Schofield
Carolyn Schofield

I am not convinced she did this. Time for her to be released.

Lauren Byrd
Lauren Byrd

I know that a lot of evidence was messed up during the investigation, but I think she's guilty.

Tina DaBella
Tina DaBella

I think she was railroaded