Blog
PunditMom
Bio
Joanne Bamberger is a recovering attorney, writer, political analyst and political/media consultant living in the shadow of the nation’s capital....
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Will Michelle Obama Spark the Next 'Mommy Wars' Skirmish?

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Loads of media types are already wondering aloud, what kind of parents the Obamas will be. For me, that question is sort of silly -- won't they continue to be the same kind of parents they've always been?

My question, hopefully not as silly, is whether Michelle Obama's presence in the White House as a highly-educated, accomplished professional woman who is now, in essence, a stay-at-home mom, will re-ignite the whole Mommy Wars/Get to Work/Feminine Mistake debate?

There's no doubt that she'll help bring more attention to the issues of work/life balance so many of us struggle with every day:

She is a get-it-done-efficiently Rachael Ray type, they say, not given to elaborate Martha Stewart-like efforts.

As first lady, Mrs. Obama has said, she plans to make herself an advocate for working parents, particularly military families, urging better access to child care for all. Trying to juggle public duties with two young children, she will be a living illustration of the very issue she describes.

“She’s going to be engaging in the balancing act herself,” said Doris Kearns Goodwin, the presidential historian.

Which leads some to ask, is this the "momification" of Michelle?

When I lamented to a friend about how it seemed that both the media and Michelle have been downplaying her accomplishments -- wouldn't it be great for our daughters AND sons to hear more about that? -- my friend wondered whether our country, for all its advances, was ready to accept her as a professional woman or whether we still need to see our first lady, especially the first African American First Lady, as less threatening. After all, it didn't go so well for Hillary Clinton when she made it clear she wasn't exactly going to hide her professional self.

So, Rebecca Traister at Salon wonders, how does it feel to put your ambition on the back burner? How many of us have gone through that same calculation:

In all the worrying about how Sasha and Malia will adjust to having their lives turned upside down, in all the fretting about how [Barack] Obama will move his Chicago-style shop to Washington, why is there so little curiosity about how Michelle will adjust to the loss of her own private, very successful, very high-profile and very independent identity? How will Michelle Obama feel as she becomes what she has long resisted -- an extension of her husband?

Traister also points to the recent More magazine profile of Michelle, that ponders the same question:

In one of the smartest pieces that has been written about the next first lady, Geraldine Brooks' profile of [Michelle Obama] in the October issue of More magazine, Brooks writes that while you can see Michelle's life as the quintessential modern woman's success story, the trajectory can also be read as a "depressingly retrograde narrative of stifling gender roles and frustrating trade-offs." In serious ways, Brooks writes, "it is her husband's career, his choices -- choices she has not always applauded -- that have shaped her life in the last decade."

For some reason, it's almost media sport to publicly question how high profile women define their roles as mothers. As Meredith O'Brien wrote earlier in the campaign, that's not good for any of us:

I’ve got a solution. How ’bout you make your own, personal and career decisions. I’ll make mine. [Sarah] Palin and [Michelle] Obama will make theirs. And we’ll just agree that we don’t all see eye-to-eye on work and parenthood, that we all stand alone in our own shoes. If the mothers who are so quick to attack one another’s choices instead channeled their energies into something other than insulting one another, think of all the time that’d be left to do something more constructive.

 Ah, if only it was that simple. I think one reason this whole tableau gets so much play is because it's a quick and easy one to write about that editors know people will be drawn to. It's not really about the debate, but about the ratings and the ad revenue.

There was bound to be some discussion of all this as the educated, accomplished mother of two young children enters the White House. But I'm really keeping my fingers crossed that it isn't fodder for four years of renewed border skirmishes in the Mommy Wars.

Contributing Editor Joanne Bamberger specializes in punditry with

  • 7
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
susiej 5 pts

www.susiej.com ( http://www.susiej.com )

You are so right. The media will definitely zero their magnifying glass on Michelle, evaluating her role as a mother and wife  under the feminist microscope.  Michelle, as I'm would any woman put in the shoes as a "first time" first lady, will react and respond, and learn as she moves along through the years.  Interesting to guess, however, how much of her choices will eventually altered by how the media judges her.  I for on, am rooting for her -- regardless how how the media will portray  her choices. 

Wilma Ham 5 pts

Choice comes from being confident in oneself and making decisions with a clear intent to go beyond  *What Is In It For Me* and arrive at a bigger *For the Sake Of What?*.

We are so used to a whole competitive model, that having coordinated action based on a bigger *We* paradigm and abundance principle that will serve both parties, seems currently beyond the scope of many.

If the Obamas have managed to come to a clear intent about their role in office, then why do we assume that one is sacrificing oneself for the other, they are both intentionally going to do their choice.

Even if it looks that everything is based on the choice of the man's position, I too feel that the Obamas are more aware of choice than many of us might think.

I am with Laura that a paradigm shift is in order to learn at every level to live together in such a way that there is no compromise or competition or one winner and one loser, just a great playground where everybody wins.

As long as we think that is impossible, we are not even going to try.
I believe the Obamas have a chance because of the people they are, they are being intentional and know they have a choice.

Let's support them as that will serve us as well. 

Wilma Ham

www.wilmasblog.com ( http://www.wilmasblog.com/ )

ChristineMM 5 pts

Is this not a perfect time to discuss that women have flexibility and can have different seasons in their lives?

It is also a good time to discuss marriage and how it is a negotiation and sometimes a compromise. President Elect Obama did not get to where he is without buy-in from his wife. She gave him her blessing to pursue the office of the Presidency.

I am sick of the black and white, all or nothing talk about women. Our lives shift and change over the years depending on our situation, our needs, our desires, our husbands (if we have one) and our children (if we have them).

A similar thing that doesn't get discussed enough is how when one of the couple gets transferred for work the other must uproot themselves too. That gets hard if the woman is working also and it is her husband whose employer is making him relocate. Actually I know some couples who chose to not move and the husband commutes out of state, lives elsewhere Monday morning-Friday evening and even one husband who did 2 weeks in CA then 2 weeks back in CT, rotating, while wife and kids remained in CT.

Life gets complicated nowadays.

http://www.thethinkingmother.blogspot.com/

Amanda_Magee 5 pts

Would that I could decide to focus my 9 to 5 attention on my girls for a time, I would. A pause, a redirect, a restructuring of focus, these are not concessions to success, but choices made as a result of success. I look forward to watching, knowing full well that no matter where she spends her "work day" she will have an impact; on her children, her husband and our society, just like every other woman in this country, just by being.

Amanda

http://lifewithbriar.blogspot.com

http://toddlywinks.blogspot.com

Crimson Wife 5 pts

As a career sequencer myself, I resent this idea that just because Mrs. Obama has taken some time off from paid employment that she has somehow "lost" her identity or become an extension of her husband. PUH-LEEZE. She's still just as much of a successful and independent woman as she ever was. She doesn't need some fancy title or fat paycheck to prove that.

Her identity hasn't been "lost", it's just evolved. And when her daughters are older and her husband isn't in such an all-consuming job, I'm sure it'll evolve again. 

Feminism was supposed to be about empowering women to make their OWN decisions about career & family based on what THEY feel is best given their own personal circumstances. It was never supposed to be about forcing all women to conform to the traditional "male" career model. That's just as repressive as the bad old days of patriarchy...

rebellious thinker 5 pts

I'd love the conversation to develop into how a woman--and a man--can better integrate home life with work life. These are parents of young children who both seem pretty involved in their lives, I would love to see both of them balancing things better.I think we need to develop a whole new paradigm to represent those two roles so many of us fill--and need to fill, both from a financial and a personal fulfillment point-of-view.

I don't care what job she takes, either informal or formal, but as long as she shows a woman trying to find the path that is right for all of her roles.

Laura, www.RebelliousThoughtsofaWoman.com ( http://www.rebelliousthoughtsofawoman.com/ )

RenaissanceTrophyWife 5 pts

I agree, I hope people can move past the "should she/shouldn't she" debate and concentrate on how modern women can make their own choices.

The Obamas have publicly discussed how important their family is, and
given Barack's respect and love for her, such a historic moment could
not have happened without both of them on board.  Obviously in any relationship the parties are not going to agree 100% of the time, but that is what makes complementary individuals work so well in concert. Given all her education and savvy, don't you think Michelle has an excellent head on her shoulders?  If she doesn't want to become an extension of her husband, I see no reason why she should be-- and frankly, I see little risk of that.

I'm with Meredith on this one-- to each their own.

We should by no means feel *obligated* to take a path just because it is available to us. Different things are right for people at different times. Having a high powered degree and a fantastic career doesn't mean that children have to be an afterthought. Forging a strong family bond and concentrating on your children doesn't necessarily translate into oppression and "oh-women-are-moving-backwards" panic.

Women are lucky to have choices today that did not exist only a few decades ago, and I am going to take full advantage of that by making the choices that are best for myself and my family.  Just because I have an MD doesn't mean I'm going to forgo staying at home with my kids when I start a family.  Sure, I may screw up sometimes, and have to adjust for unforseen circumstances, but at least I don't have to do it under the scrutiny of the entire world.

Michelle is a terrific role model and I wish her and the Obama family all the success in the world as they enter an exciting new phase in their lives!

RTW

http://renaissancetrophywife.wordpress.com