Most Popular

Wimp Out: Obama's Squandered Chance at Post-Racialism

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Alternatively titled, "The post which may earn me a generous pelting with produce." Obama's speech? What can I say? I didn't like it. Squirrely where it should have been sincere, evasive where it should have been honest. It was tripe he was selling, not transcendence.

Look, there are things I like about Barack Obama. Until the most vitriolic of the Jeremiah Wright sermons surfaced, Obama's post-racial rhetoric was appealing to me. I believed that he believed it, and that his candidacy really did have the power to lift the nation and the Democratic Party, which has trafficked shamelessly in racial demagoguery for decades, above the "racial stalemate" he speaks of.

The new revelations of Rev. Wright and the fact that Obama chose him as a close spiritual adviser for 20 years makes it nearly impossible for me to buy what the Messiah is selling.

Today, his distancing speech was more a justification speech than anything else. Rev. Wright and other, older black citizens are understandably still angry about discrimination they experienced, he said, and those frustrations are given voice at dinner tables and in fiery sermons. This is all right, Barack posits, because white people are angry, too, for much less justified reasons, like affirmative action.<

Barack Obama is uniquely positioned to talk about race in America in a new way. It would have served his post-racial aspirations to do so today. He did not take that opportunity.

He was more eloquent than most, and less overtly divisive than other black leaders would have been, but the message was the same. Black people are angry because they were mistreated, and hateful people like Rev. Wright are only guilty of not understanding that the country can change, and has changed. Obama gives Wright a pass on perpetuating the pernicious notion that the Man is keeping his parishioners down, despite the fact that one of those parishioners is quite conspicuously running for President of the United States of America and winning.

The truth is that the firm belief of preachers and leaders like Wright in the perpetual victimhood of the black community, the sheer audacity of their hopelessness, has arguably done more to injure the black community over the past 20 years than many other things, including white racism. How many young black men, pray tell, has the good Reverend convinced that the American dream is irredeemably corrupted by white racism, and therefore not worth pursuing?

Rising above all that racial resentment cannot be achieved by one politician taking the high road and covering over the sins of those who divided before him. If Obama were serious about post-racialism, he would have spent many of his words today on castigating men like Wright, who preach the very division he wishes to rise above.

But what does he ask in this speech and of whom does he ask it? How will we form a "more perfect union," according to Obama, and who needs to do the forming?

For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances – for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives – by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.

I appreciate the nod to personal responsibility in the black community at the end of that paragraph, but it's overshadowed by the fact that Obama refuses to condemn those who have risen to power preaching the systematic abdication of exactly that responsibility. Note that while Obama conceded that not all of whites' race issues are entirely unjustified ("And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns – this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding."), he did not ask the black community to try to understand them.

But he did ask that of

  • 13
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Kim Pearson 5 pts

If you want to hear what he actually said, it's here ( http://essence.typepad.com/news/2008/03/listen-to-... ). It turns out that the quotes that everyone has been condemning where not his words. He was quoting a former Reagan administration ambassador to Iraq, speaking on Fox News. Might not change any opinions about Wright or Obama, but you'll know what he actually said.

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://blogher.org/blog/kim-pearson )|Professor Kim ( http://professorkim.blogspot.com )|

katstone 5 pts

I just love BlogHer. I love the fact that women feel completely comfortable saying exactly how they feel. No equivocating. What great discourse.

Katherine Stone
Postpartum Progress

Leslie Madsen Brooks 5 pts

The white "resentment" that Obama speaks of does not primarily come from direct effects of affirmative action or the welfare state. It comes from the societal message that the majority of white people, who have had no part in oppressing anyone, are asked again and again and again to take responsibility for ills they did not cause (and, in many cases have been caused by earlier attempts at assuaging white guilt, like paternalistic welfare). They are lectured about creating a healing "dialogue" in which they don't feel free to speak, lest they employ the wrong politically correct buzz word and confirm their "inherent prejudice." They must feel guilt for "institutional racism" when many of them have never been a part of any racist institution. They're flagellated for benefiting from "white privilege" when many of them don't feel terribly privileged at all.

When you write "they" above, I can't help but think you mean to include yourself in this group of fearful people.

It troubles me that more white people don't join in these conversations about race. Is it really a matter of whites being silenced by external forces of political correctness? Or is it that many whites are unwilling to learn the discursive conventions of this conversation--or, worse, they repudiate those conventions altogether?

Whites may not feel privileged, but the very nature of whiteness in the U.S. is such that privilege is conferred whether we feel (or even want) it or not. And like it or not, we're all part of racist institutions and systems, from the local school district that doesn't allocate resources equally to all children, to the university that doesn't promote its faculty of color at the same rates as its white faculty. I may not feel complicit in these actions, but as a white person, I can say I definitely have benefited from these unasked-for privileges.

I don't resent African Americans' asking whites to take responsibility for our acceptance and perpetuation of our own privilege. I do resent it when anyone assumes that I don't see that privilege, or that I don't want to participate in a conversation about race because I'm white. I like that Obama is sparking these kinds of conversations, and I hope that we don't try to move into a "post-racial" era too soon--because we still have a hell of a lot to work through as a nation.

Leslie

BlogHer Contributing Editor, Research and Academia ( http://blogher.org/topic/research-academia )
Proprietor, The Clutter Museum ( http://cluttermuseum.blogspot.com )
I also blog at MuseumBlogging ( http://www.museumblogging.com )

Yvette Perry 5 pts

The truth is that the firm belief of preachers and leaders like Wright in the perpetual victimhood of the black community, the sheer audacity of their hopelessness, has arguably done more to injure the black community over the past 20 years than many other things, including white racism.

If you truly believe this you really really really need a history lesson or two. (Or three or four...) How unfortunate.

Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast ( http://blog.lib.umn.edu/perry032/impossible/ )

Kim Pearson 5 pts

According ( http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/rod_parsleys_free... ) to the Columbia Journalism Review:

Meanwhile, John McCain has a Christian ally of his own. At a rally in late February, McCain appeared with Rod Parsley, the pastor of an Ohio mega-church, and called him a “spiritual guide.”

Parsley has his own history of controversial statements. As David Corn reported this week for Mother Jones, Parsley has called for Christians to wage war against the “false religion” of Islam, in order to destroy it. He does not distinguish between Islamic extremists and ordinary Muslims. “What some call ‘extremists’ are instead mainstream believers who are drawing from the well at the very heart of Islam,” he has written.

And it’s not just Muslims he’s got it in for. Last year, Parsley’s organization called for people who commit adultery to be prosecuted, and in January he compared Planned Parenthood to the Nazis.

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://blogher.org/blog/kim-pearson )|Professor Kim ( http://professorkim.blogspot.com )|

Jill Miller Zimon 5 pts

Mary Katherine -

I think you were trying to be very thoughtful here but I also sense that like the football QB who loves running down the field and the girl who works in the library re-shelving books so no one ever has to see her, the expectations you set up with the title of your post aren't fair - you write nice things about Obama but did he ever really have a chance with you? Or any other portion of the US population that thinks as you do?

There was no chance squandered with certain segments of Americans - because there was no chance to begin with.

Did he ever have a chance with you? Really?

Jill
Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com )

DrumsNWhistles 5 pts

As soon as I saw this phrase: "what the Messiah is selling" , I held very little hope for intellectual honesty in your arguments, and sure enough, there wasn't any.

Whether you buy it or not isn't the point. Do you buy that race is still a huge issue in this country? I gather you do, but don't think any reaching-out should be done by anyone other than blacks.

I'll be very interested to read your take on Rev. Hagee's incendiary comments and how they can somehow be justified coming out of a white pastor. You don't have to justify his endorsement of McCain because, of course, he isn't McCain's pastor. No, I'm much more interested in how you would compare Hagee's remarks to Wright's, and why it's okay for a white pastor to say what he says but not okay for Wright.

Wright's timing sucked on his 9/11 remarks, but he wasn't all that inaccurate. Nor is he inaccurate about the simmering resentment from whites, blacks, Asians, and Hispanics.

This isn't a conversation about blacks and whites. It's a conversation about race -- all races. It's ironic to me that we're claiming some high-and-mighty moral authority to force reconciliation between groups with long-standing resentment in Iraq when we can't even have an honest conversation about race in America.

But of course, as long as some conversants insist on hyperbole and ridicule in their opening salvo, it's more or less impossible.

karoli (odd time signatures ( http://drumsnwhistles.com ))

Lovebabz 5 pts

And so Obama not only has to carry the weight of Africans in America for the last 4oo years, on top of the middle passage, jim crow--lynchings, civil rights, Black anger, is he to repent for the Black Panthers too! Maybe he can also figure out where Jimmy Hoffa is buried.

I hate this notion that somehow Reverend Wright is speewing hate speech. If Black folks in America are unhappy...well then we are unhappy with America. America has not been the most welcoming of homelands, but we have made our peace. We have built this country on the backs of Black mothers and fathers and children.

If I hear one more well meaning white person say they now don't like Obama, I will scream. Because White and being White affords even the poorest among Whites a place of priviledge. No one is asking Hillary Clinton this mess. No one is asking her to disavow all the color arousal garbage she has put out.

I will say this Obama has forced the issue of race to the forefront in a way that has never been done before. It is forcing White folks to mask their racsim under separate cover and to really be more thoughtful about how they illuminate their predjudices. It certainly has forced me to look at race in America in a more intimate and personal way. I am not sure it is good or bad. It just is and maybe that's all it can be for the moment.

I do know He is being asked to overcome a lot more than anyone else. But then my Mama always said you had to be three times as good as a White person and you had to be always ready for whatever they throw at you. And they are throwing stuff at him. And yet he still stands. Hhmm were we this invested with George W. Bush ran for office? were we this invested when Bill Clinton ran. Oh right, now we have a Black Man and a Woman and the conversation has to be different, somehow the stakes are higher? or Maybe we all have Jungle Fever!

Obama can't solve the problems of race in America and to put that squarely on his back is insulting and ridiculous. But so what who cares, this is the season of insanity and all bets are off. hhm what will it be tomorrow.

Love,
Babz

webmonkey 5 pts

The GOPers fall all over each other to get the endorsement of folks like Pat Robertson and before Falwell... folks who blamed gays for 9/11 and whose comments regarding ethnic and religious minorities are nothing less than reprehensible and far worse than anything Rev. Wright said. Worse yet, the association isn't a personal one like in the case of Obama and Wright...it's AN INSTITUIONAL ONE between complicit conservatives, the GOP institution, and these religious bigots. The very hypocrisy that angers many minorities is being revealed by silly rather ABSURD posts such as this one. A good flame it up discussion on this can be found at skewz.com. A list of all the crazy things these GOP power brokers have said is listed there in detail...along with all the detail of association. Let's be frank, Guliani was tripping all over himself to get Robertson's endorsement. Robertson who along with many of his racial slurs said Hindus are not fit to govern. But , of course, the true wells of hate are the conservatives that can't see past their own glaring and monumental hypocrisy. It's such a monumental hypocrisy that their missing it (like this writer) is a significant reflection their fundamentally flawed and duplicitous character which is likely beyond redemption because it is in no longer capable of being self-aware.

webmonkey 5 pts

Good examples of how silly this blog post really is:

http://www.skewz.com/link/link_details/5144

http://www.skewz.com/link/link_details/5103

http://www.skewz.com/link/link_details/5143

All goes to say that conservatives have such fundamentally tortured logic that they can no longer see that they are that which they seem to hate. Divisive politics is something perfected by the right in recent years. That perversion of self has them so focused on appealing to division that they begin to do it reflexively.

Atena 5 pts

In an attempt to be constructive:

I disagree. I don't think Obama asks white people to atone for anything, and I would challenge you to refer to a quote (not one of your own interpretations) that indicates that he does. I understood him to be asking white people to recognize that the anger that many, many, many black people feel about past and PRESENT injustices is real and has real roots and cannot be ignored if progress is to be made.

Also, I challenge you to explain how you interpret Obama's ideas about what "should be the white community's first priority." And furthermore, I see nothing in that quote you provide that is unreasonable, or shouldn't be done. Do you?

I also wonder if anyone that you love and care about has ever said anything that you don't agree with. That you would never repeat, and hope none of your friends or associates ever hear? Yes he's running for president, he's in the public eye, he should set an example. Fine. But you know what? He and his family deserve to have a spiritual home and adviser, and you can't abandon your spiritual home and adviser every time they say something that someone or even a lot of people find offensive. There's a lot that goes on in a lot of black churches that many people (especially - but not limited to- a lot of white people) would find shocking and offensive, which are really pretty ordinary and not terrible.

I recently learned that Rev. Jesse Jackson was the Clinton Family's spiritual advisor during the time of Bill Clinton's infidelity scandal. He went to their home, prayed with them, watched the Super Bowl with Bill, and counseled them personally, as a man of faith. All of this happening while Jackson was cheating on his wife. Is anyone asking how Hillary would be influenced by Rev. Jackson's influence? Obviously this situation isn't completely analogous, but my point is that everyone has kept company that others find questionable or inappropriate. Everyday people and politicians alike. Whether or not these associations are TRULY inappropriate is a matter of interpretation. Because you better believe that there are plenty of people who aren't that concerned about Rev. Wright, and I'd wager that most of those people (myself included) aren't hateful or anti-American.

I take issue with many of your comments here, because it appears to me that you are taking too much license in interpreting Obama's comments without justifying your restated interpretations. This kind of commentary is sloppy, and distorts the information that you claim to be analyzing.

Assumptions, Biases & Irrational Fantasies ( http://antibias.wordpress.com )

Kim Pearson 5 pts

Mary Katharine,

I suppose I should thank for your honesty. But I have a request. When you make a statement such as this:

How many young black men, pray tell, has the good Reverend convinced that the American dream is irredeemably corrupted by white racism, and therefore not worth pursuing?

Would you please provide evidence that Wright or TUCC has done what you say, or even attempted to do what you have said? Here's a list ( http://www.tucc.org/ministries.htm ) of the church's ministries. They say they've doled out $300,000 in scholarships. They talk about the numbers of young men and women who have taken advantage of their education, housing, counseling and other programs. The 990 for their child care center is online ( http://www.guidestar.org/pqShowFastResults.do;jses... ).

Finally, a question -- have you read Claude Steele's work? Unlike his twin brother Shelby, his empirical research ( http://steele.socialpsychology.org ) on stereotype threat is fascinating.

Katstone -- As for Obama's inability to disown Wright, I feel the same way. I have watched TUCC services for three years now. Wright has said things I don't like, but I have communicated directly with the man, read his books, and generally found him to be an honorable man and a helpful counselor. The services at Trinity speak to my spirit in a way that very few churches do. I am not an Afrocentrist, and I think enough people know me to know that I am not a racist or separatist.

Obviously, I'm not running for President, so I suppose you don't care. I don't know that I ever would have wanted to, but I do know that whenever I heard someone say that in America, anyone can grow up to be president, a voice in the back of my head say, "only white men need apply." Consequently, I never formed that ambition. But Barack Obama has, and with that comes some particularities of his experience that are different, perhaps from yours, but not so different from many of us who live and work alongside you every day.

I would leave you with the words ( http://www.somethingwithin.com/blog/?p=129 ) of Rev. Dr. Renita Weems:

Even though I am a supporter of Hillary Clinton, it pains me to stand by and watch the right wing media, in its effort to discredit Barack Obama, mobilize its forces against Obama’s home church Trinity United Church of Christ and pastor, the Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright (now Pastor Emeritus). I have spoken at Trinity Church many times over the years and know Jeremiah Wright, the minister and the man, very well. I can not stand by and watch in silence while a church and a pastor I know and love become collateral damage in a political battle. Trinity Church has long been a standbearer there on the southside of Chicago of what it means as a black church to combine charismatic worship, prophetic preaching, and social justice outreach. Jeremiah Wright is one of our modern day prophets, a long time advocate of gender justice and critic of homophobia in the black church..."

Peace,

Kim
BlogHer Contributing Editor ( http://blogher.org/blog/kim-pearson )|Professor Kim ( http://professorkim.blogspot.com )|

katstone 5 pts

Obama's speech actually made me dislike him, and that's the first time I've felt that way. Though I'm a conservative I've always found him refreshing and smart and a highly interesting person. But yesterday just pissed me off.
Are people really buying that Obama can no more disavow his pastor than his grandmother? REALLY???!!! My grandmother and my pastor are two very different things. I know plenty of people who have left churches because they didn't feel their minister was a good representative of their views. It happens all the time. In fact, my husband and I left an Episcopalian Church a year or so ago because the pastor was so vehemently vocal against gay people. I have many gay friends who I adore and I couldn't continue to go to that church and listen to that type of rhetoric when it was against my values. (Yes, I'm conservative and I like gay people. What's it to you?) I left. Easy as that. I cannot begin to understand what would have made Obama feel he couldn't leave that church. And if he disagreed with Wright's views, why couldn't he have at least spoken with Reverend Wright about them and been able to share those conversations with us yesterday? Why did he never speak up about things like white America creating the AIDS virus and causing 9/11? Was it because he attended that church more for political reasons, to connect more deeply to the black community in Chicago?

Somebody needs to give me a MUCH better answer than what he said yesterday. Because I am not interested in having a leader of the United States who doesn't have the backbone to immediately speak up when such egregious things are said. He's been the first to call Clinton's team to the carpet every time they say something sideways about him -- maybe he should take some of his own medicine.

I thought he had some interesting things to say yesterday, and I'm glad that the race issue in the United States was so openly discussed, but hidden with in that were some ridiculous excuses that don't work for me. I really hope someone will talk about this in the media rather than fawning all over hm.

Katherine Stone
Postpartum Progress