Bio
Shireen Mitchell is known for her provocative and insightful style of engaging audiences. She speaks with energy and enthusiasm on the wide array...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

A Woman's Right to Vote: What Would You Ask the White House 90 Years After the 19th Amendment?

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 14
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

It's been 90 years since women earned the right to vote. Yes! I mean earned it.

The suffragettes -- Alice Paul, Susan B. Anthony, and many more -- rallied, marched, were imprisoned, starved themselves in order to have a say in the way our government votes. The final voting by the Senate was after the National Women's Party urged voters not to vote for anti-suffrage candidates.

American suffragist Alice Paul (1885 - 1977) unfurls a banner after receiving the news of the Tennessee suffrage vote, Washington, DC, August 18, 1920. The banner has thirty-six stars, one for each state that had voted for a national admendment guaranteeing women the right to vote, and the 19th Amendment was ratified after the agreement of three-fourths of the states was obtained. (Photo by FPG/Getty Images)

Although the amendment was finally passed, it didn't mean ALL women could vote. There were suffragettes who weren't allowed on the front lines because of race, but who still supported the fight in passing the amendment -- Ida B. Wells, among others. Due to the tensions of that time among those who were also abolitionists, challenges about race after slavery made their contributions very complicated. Wells formed the first Black women's suffrage club in 1913 and created a stir when she refused to stay in the back of the lines during the March on Washington. Maya Angelou shares her perspective on why she believes there were challenges during this time, describing some of the simple differences that black and white women experienced in this video.

An American suffragette with an umbrella stands next to a baby carriage and wears a sign proclaiming 'Women! Use your vote,' circa 1920. (Photo by APA/Getty Images)

Now that a woman's right to vote has progressed to a woman's right to run for office, we see new challenges. We make up only 18% of political leaders, as reported by the White House Project. Most women can come up with plenty of reasons why they shouldn't run, but even bloggers can become political leaders, such as Jill Miller Zimon, who shared her story recently at the 2010 BlogHer conference.

Rallying women's voices in the blogosphere to affect policy is a recent phenomenon, but it's just as important as rallying in the field. Many political candidates are very engaged and eager to talk with bloggers and other online community organizers. However, we must remember not every community member is online. Many people struggle in impoverished environments, and as such, are typically the most affected by political decisions. Access to the power of social media can determine who can influence voting and which issues will be addressed and/or recognized.

As a call to action, this is your opportunity to get some answers to questions important to you! I have been given the chance to visit the White House Council on Women and Girls as a BlogHer interviewer, moderating a 30-minute chat with Tina Tchen, Deputy Assistant to the President & Director of the Office of Public Engagement. We'll talk about honoring the historic moment of the 19th Amendment and celebrating the 90th anniversary of a women's right to vote, and I'll be asking her your questions.

What questions would YOU like to ask the administration? What changes would you like to see for women?

Here are the key areas I would like you to focus your questions:

  • The history of women's suffrage and the accomplishments and the challenges of the past 90 years.
  • The view of the power of bloggers and their social capital, particularly women, as influencers in the political process by the Administration.
  • The Administration's -- and the Council for Women and Girls' -- goals on listening to the voices of non-middle-class women who don’t necessarily have tools to build social capital.
  • The Administration's plans to address the issues for women and the economy including equal pay, small business owners, flexible work, et cetera.
  • Are there any issues that are important to you as a woman voter that this administration should know about?

Please have your questions submitted no later than 7pm EST Tuesday, August 24.

  • 14
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Deb358 5 pts

Many divorced women may never know about all the financial instituations their ex-spouses have, prior to and during a divorce. During the divorce, the ex-spouse hides these financial assets. The spouse who is hiding the assets benefits; and the spouse who has no idea; also has no financial means to pursue the hidden assets with her/his attorney; because the "money holding" spouse has all of the funds tied up. The spouse who has hidden the assets is not punished with Contempt of Court! A new law needs to go into affect, wherein spouses who are business owners, need to have "joint" signatures on any withdrawals over $1,000. If I never recover from my losses, I wish to let others know of this horrible and selfish act spouses will pursue before and during a divorce.

bendygirl 5 pts

Women in unions make more than women not represented by a union. The Employee Free Choice Act provides women with greater opportunity to join a union when there are 50%+1 signed up to join the union. In addition, Employee Free Choice has actual requirements for enforcement of labor laws with real penalties, stuff that really protects us from firings and retaliation.

I've been a member of 3 unions now, I'd like to know when my mother, a waitress, will be able to sign a union card and join a waitress union, like the one Maud Younger signed nearly 90 years ago. Many of our suffragist heroes were also leaders in the labor movement. They believed in equal access, not just to the vote, but to good jobs, equal pay and better living conditions for all women. I believe the Employee Free Choice Act brings us so much closer to those goals.

Solidarity forever, 'cause the union makes us strong!

JennaHatfield 27 pts

Amen.

Until adoptees are given rights to their Original Birth Certificates -- which is a human rights issue -- our country will continue to treat them like second-class citizens.

It is unfortunate that the big pockets are too afraid that granting adoptees this right somehow would lower the number of expectant mothers relinquishing (and thus remove money from their pockets). Considering the majority of mothers placing in this era are actively pursuing open adoptions (which still aren't legally binding in most states), they don't care if their last name and other identifying information are known. In fact, they do care: they want it known.

I'd love for someone in a law-making position to realize that providing adoptees with their OBC's is what is first needed in order to start the ball rolling with ethical adoption reform. We have a deeply flawed system on so many different levels and something desperately needs to change.

Contributing Editor Jenna Hatfield (@FireMom ( http://twitter.com/FireMom )) blogs at Stop, Drop and Blog ( http://stopdropandblog.com ) and The Chronicles of Munchkin Land ( http://thechroniclesofmunchkinland.com ). She is a freelance writer and newspaper photographer.

craftyb 5 pts

There are so many women who are ready, willing & trained to work- but have been forced out of the workplace simply due to the high cost of quality child care--entrepreneurial women who would build businesses and create the jobs we so desperately need. Women who could even work part time to contribute to their household's income, and maintain their skill-sets while their children are too young for public school (when the need for childcare is significantly reduced)

Currently there are no grants available (at least that I could find!)to offset the costs of child care for women owned businesses to get off the ground.

I know countless women who were employed (office managers, secretaries, designers etc) left work to care for young children, and then were unable to return to those positions because technology had changed over those few years, and they had not been able to maintain their skills.

We could invest in programs that allow women who choose to work- we would reduce their need for expensive re-training. We would increase their lifetime earning potential and reduce the risk of their needing costly assistance later in life.

Will this administration invest in mothers now- so we can support our families now, and ourselves later?

digitalsista 5 pts

Thanks everyone for all your comments. We have an hour left. Looking to hear what other ideas our community wants to ask.

Shireen
@digitalsista 
( http://www.twitter.com/digitalsista )shireenmitchell.com
( http://www.shireenmitchell.com )

TW 11 pts

I can't help it, but I must ask about White House Support for the Equal Rights Amendment. I want to ask if they are doing anything to encourage the states yet to ratify it to bring a long withheld amendment to the country.

The President's home state counts among those states who have failed since 1923 to ratify the ERA.

Retro-Food.com

Erin Kotecki Vest 6 pts

I want to hear why we continue to need legislation like Equal Pay, Title IX etc when those 'conservative' feminists on the other side of the aisle seem to believe we need to worry less about 'equality' and more about things that affect men and women. I would love to hear the Administration's response to the idea we are, in fact, equal and don't need 'Big Government' to help level any playing fields.

Politics & News Contributing Editor
Erin Kotecki Vest ( http://queenofspainblog.com/ )

Mrs.Diane 5 pts

In America, the right to vote is a fundamental right and the cornerstone of what America calls democracy. I have noticed many young people of color denied jobs because of past failure, reality shows reflecting how difficult it is to move foreword once a past life brought into the now. Watching and listening to these miseries will cause despair.
I do believe all Americans’ should vote no matter the color, religion and creed, the problem that I see within many minorities communities are the decrease of the voters numbers with in minorities neighborhood due to felony charges.
The issue of felons not allowed to redeem themselves made more difficult by the denying of the felon their basic right to vote.
The citizen has enough limitation --- low income and minority communities represented by poor cities services and poor consumer protection, irresponsible rental communities with poor management etc…
The judicial system is unfair to those of low income and of color with these understanding, abuses made and allowed---to many cases, I know personally of people behind bars with no evidence of wrongdoing but there because of the color of skin and income.
The felon charge are just one way of denying a voice from the communities of the disenfranchised so this attack has interfered in the reintroductions or progress of those who truly want to change their lives for the better---
Allow felons to participate in the democracy of America by voting while in prison and soon out of prison.
Just want good are the rights of women to vote when that right easily taken away---we need to follow that direction our fore fathers developed create a constitution that includes all so that we the United States will have that perfect nation. Right now, denying anyone the right to vote is just wrong and in the new revise, effort to gain full rights includes the right to vote for those felons.

kbojar 6 pts

Many women, particularly women of color, are locked in low wage service sector jobs. Passage of the Employee Free Choice Act would be a major step forward in addressing this problem.

Given that President Obama campaigned on support for EFCA and appointed a Secretary of Labor, Hilda Solis, who is on record as a strong supporter of EFCA, what can we expect of the President?

I realize the President has accomplished a great deal in his 18 months in office and that this is a very difficult time. However, many of his strongest supporters (women, people of color, organized labor) are supporters of EFCA and expected leadership from him on this issue.

I’m convinced that an alliance between feminists and the labor movement is the best way to help low-income women who have not been among the main beneficiaries of the feminist movement. See my post, "Is the future of feminism Meg Whitman, Carly Fiorina and Sarah Palin ? Or is it Hilda Solis, Mary Kay Henry, and the Coalition of Labor Union Women?" at
http://www.the-next-stage.com/2010/06/is-future-of... ( http://www.the-next-stage.com/2010/06/is-future-of... )

Karen Bojar

http://www.the-next-stage.com/

DeclassifiedAdoptee 5 pts

What I would like to know is when the U.S. Government will own up to its mistakes and horrible treatment of women in the 1940's-1970's (and even, believe it or not, even still today).

Single and divorced women were often told their babies were stillborn when they were not--they were being adopted out. They were told by their families never to darken the family doorstep with their illegitimate child in their hands or they would be homeless. They signed surrender papers under the influence of strong medications, sometimes even during labor, not knowing what the papers were. As individuals familiar with Women's History in the U.S. may know, women who bore children out of wedlock in the not-so-distant-past were often perceived as "feebleminded" and/or severely morally flawed for doing so.

The fact that 46 states still discriminate against an adoptee obtaining access to their Original Identity has been influenced, in many states, by trying to cover these misdeeds up. It was also initially fueled by hiding illegitimacy and then later promoted as a way to keep Adoptive Families "safe" from Original Mothers who were seen as having the potential to be distruptive to the new family.

We know now (and should have known then) that none of this is OK. Yet the United States has yet to acknowledge or apologize for the mistreatment of women or the inequality of Adult Adoptees. It has yet to acknowledge its mistakes and make an official plan to keep unethical practices from continuing on into the future.

Western Austrailia just did it. They have an official apology and an official memorial to the over 300,000 women of forced and manipulated adoptions and they allow their Adult Adoptees unconditional access to their own Original Birth Certificates.

There is no reason why the U.S. cannot do this for our women and Adult Adoptees too.

"You can only understand the difference between relinquishment and surrender by considering the cruel truth that is at heart at the illusion of choice. Relinquishment is something you can choose, surrender is something that you have to give in to because the forces weighed against you are much too powerful to give you any choice." --Rickie Solinger, Leading Historian & Author

www.declassifiedadoptee.com ( http://www.declassifiedadoptee.com )

teacherchat2334 5 pts

I'd like to know:

What is the current administration, and political sphere at large, doing to create equal job opportunities and equal pay for women in the workforce?

ThankfulPeach 5 pts

My First Mother died at the age of 32 of breast cancer while searching for her "son" she had to give up for adoption in the 60's. I was blessed to find her entire family as well as my First Father 10 years later. She was told she had given birth to a son and was not allowed to see me, so mutual consent registries would never have worked to "match" us. I had to have my obc to find my origins.
I would ask the White House WHY adoptees are the only Americans who don't have the right to access their original birth certificate? Six U.S. states have passed legislation restoring this important right that even the Child Welfare League of American strongly supports.
My First Mother was a passionate writer and activist. I have a treasured article she wrote about the life of Alice Paul. I feel she is spurring me on in this next issue regarding women and children in American ~ the release of factual birth certificates for millions who are affected by archaic adoption laws.
I write at:
www.PeachNeitherHereNorThere.blogspot.com ( http://www.PeachNeitherHereNorThere.blogspot.com )

Melissa Ford 10 pts

I'd like to know what ideas are being floated in order to get feedback and hear the voices of those who do not have access to the channels already in place in order to have their ideas reach government.

Melissa writes Stirrup Queens ( http://stirrup-queens.com ) and Lost and Found ( http://lostandfoundandconnectionsabound.blogspot.c... ). Her book is Navigating the Land of If ( http://thelandofif.blogspot.com/ ).