Bio
Unwilling to fully abandon my Chicago-area upbringing, I live in Manhattan with my husband, my teddy bear, and a 10 lb. rabbit, but insist on calling...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Women Are "So Beautiful as To Not Be Human," Killer Says

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 8
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Almost three years ago to the day, I wrote a post called, "Shooting Girl-ery," which recorded my reaction when a man "apparently nursing a 20-year-old grudge, walked into a one-room Amish schoolhouse here Monday morning and systematically tried to execute the girls there." Now I'm facing another horrible tragedy which resulted from a man feeling slighted by women decided that the reasonable way to deal with his emotions was to walk into an aerobics class and spray the room with bullets.

Three years ago, I wrote:

It is my wholehearted belief that our culture fosters tragedies like this by emphasizing that it is critical for men to be manly and not suffer slights from girls or women, which are the ultimate insult. The degradation of any "feminine" emotions as valueless doesn't help (i.e. - only girls and babies cry).

I am hard pressed... to think of a time when a woman took out her anger at men by randomly killing a bunch of people. Yet how many times do we hear about men or boys going on shooting sprees to avenge a wrong that has been done to them?...Even if boys and men are more physical due to biology, we make the situation worse by encouraging them to act on their aggression. Women, who are plenty aggressive, are encouraged to suppress it or express anger in non-physical ways. No one wins.

As families and friends mourn the deaths of three women (and the injuries - physical and mental - of others), I wonder if we will ever learn any lessons from incidents like these. Certainly - fortunately - they do not happen often. But neither are the (mass) murders of women by angry men isolated incidents. We live in a world where we constantly receive messages that men and women are different. When George Sodini, the perpetrator of this massacre, lamented that the women in the aerobics class appeared "so beautiful as to not be human," he encapsulated exactly what happens when we focus on gender differences instead of common humanity.

Since this gender binary defines people as "either/or" - either a person is male or female - and since men are somehow considered the default for being human/a person, women are dehumanized. We are not people. We are there to prop men up; to serve them; to be treated as property; to be degraded or cherished as men see fit. Whether this plays out in America as a man who insists on dating only women who are ten to twenty years younger than him, who is then so enraged by their lack of interest in him although he has matching furniture (because, thanks to other gender binaries, of course that is what women seek in men - material goods and good looks - not companionship and respect) that he feels entitled to end their lives when he decides to take his own, or in Pakistan when mobs hurl acid into the faces of girls on their way to school, it is the same problem: gender binaries create false dichotomies that make women objects rather than people.

I am not saying that men and women are exactly the same. We have different physical components which require different types of care. Once again, the gender binary fails women when it comes to how we treat our differences. Because we are not human, our unique needs are not prioritized the way men's are. Gynecology services are termed "women's health care," but men's prostate care is never called "men's health care" - it is just health care, since men by default are people and thus their care is just health care, not a special health care different from the norm. As Nicholas Kristof wrote last week:

If men had uteruses, “paternity wards” would get resources, ambulances would transport pregnant men to hospitals free of charge, deliveries would be free, and the Group of 8 industrialized nations would make paternal mortality a top priority. One of the most lethal forms of sex discrimination is this systematic inattention to reproductive health care, from family planning to childbirth...

Whether we let women die in childbirth or in fitness centers (and I can't help but wonder how many of the women were there in an effort to comply with society's unrealistic beauty standards, which by achieving, they then rendered themselves "not human" in the eyes of their killer), it comes down to a world in which we let this happen by

  • 8
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Suzanne 5 pts

First, I think it is important to distinguish a mass murderer, who kills (or intends to kill) at least 4 people in one incident and then stops, from a serial killer, who kills one or two people at a time over several incidents. Aileen Wournos is not a mass murderer, but a serial killer. I know that seems like a ridiculous distinction, but it is how the crimes are defined. Since you mention Wournos, I point out that research indicates that only 10% of serial killers are female, so your own anecdotal evidence does not hold up to statistics anyway.

As for numbers of female mass murderers, there is not a lot of data. I found a NY Times article from 1984 ( http://www.nytimes.com/1984/08/27/us/traits-shared... ) that noted that only 10 out of the 156 mass murders in the FBI database were women. More recently, ABC News ( http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=2872452&page... ) interviewed Dr. Michael Welner, a forensic psychiatrist, about mass murderers. Dr. Welner "is chairman of the the Forensic Panel, a national forensic science practice of psychiatrists, pathologists and toxicologists. He is an associate professor of psychiatry at New York University School of Medicine and... is also developing an evidence-based test to assist criminal sentencing , the Depravity Scale, (depravityscale.org), which invites Americans to participate in surveys that are used to form a legal standard of what represents the worst of crimes." Welner discussed how our society encourages men to assert masculinity through violence, and ABC News asked him if this is "why we don't see female mass killers." Welner replied:

Absolutely. There is nothing in our society that would elevate a woman's identity or her femininity through her ability to destroy. This truth reinforces my opinion of how important it is for us as a society to repudiate the connection between destruction and masculinity in order to develop the values we want our young people to carry with them even in times of emptiness and despair.

I think the bigger point of my post from three years ago (which is the one you seem to object to) is that we live in a world that encourages men to act violently to prove their manliness, which as Dr. Welner also said, is why so few women are mass murderers. The point of this post is that women are generally not thought of equally as people, which makes it easier for men to get angry when slighted by a woman and also to take out anger on them. Fortunately, most men do not do this, but it is far too common and won't change until we can get past gender stereotypes and false dichotomies.

Suzanne Reisman ( http://www.blogher.com/member/suzanne-reisman ), Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender ( http://blogher.org/topic/feminism-gender )
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants ( http://cussandotherrants.com/ )

SaveOurSkyline 5 pts

Your argument would be far more compelling if you had some actual statistics to back up your assertions, rather than just your personal feelings about it. The fact that you're "hard pressed" is really quite meaningless, as it's quite plausible that you're more focused on one side of the issue.

SCanon 5 pts

The argument being made is not about men and men only going on murderous rampages, it's about the randomness of these male murderers.

Aileen Wuornos is an anomaly and every expert across the board is fascinated with her for that very reason.  And the Oxygen Network's show "Snapped" IS about women murderers, but they are murdering people they know.  Husbands, friends, mistresses.  They are not walking into public places and spraying the place down with bullets, as these male cases do.  

The point being made here is that in these cases of random shootings, it's most likely to be a man rather than a woman; and that is very true.  

Somer blogs at Merry Wife of Canon ( http://www.merrywifeofcanon.com ) as well as Smell My Plate ( http://www.smellmyplate.com ).

B_houseoverflowing 5 pts

Regardless of gender or racial oppression, I am just sad that yet another person felt the need to deal with the pressures of their world by spraying bullets through a crowd of people.We have become such an insular society.  We don't know our neighbors despite having great friends who live a thousand miles away thanks to the Internet.  We don't stop to help someone who is stranded by the side of the road for fear it might be a set up for a carjacking or worse.   Our lives are so fast and busy, we live and die by the calendar feature of some software or carry a datebook everywhere or log everything into our cell phone.   And the "we" here is generalized.  So of us live more bravely.  Some of us live outside the societal norm.But nonetheless you will hear neighbors, co-workers; team members say "They were such a quiet person." "They seemed so nice" "They were very private" "I didn't know them very well"So maybe the lesson here or “teachable moment” is for us to live more bravely – personally know people – become involved – step in when we see potential trouble.BTW – Lizzie Borden took an axe………

B

SaveOurSkyline 5 pts

I am hard pressed... to think of a time when a woman took out her anger at men by randomly killing a bunch of people.

Aileen Wuornos... Amy Archer-Gilligan... Anna Marie Hahn... I could go on and on. Have you ever watched the Lifetime network's show "Snapped"? Your argument is totally specious.

Liz Henry 5 pts

If we look at Sodini's writings his racism as well as his misogyny is really clear. And have a link to womanist musings ( http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/08/george-sod... ) who points out some of the ways media coverage reflects racist thinking -- a very good post.

I also found myself thinking further about aesthetics in general and how it contributes to oppression. It's so important because it's all about hegemony & enforcement of race, class & gender oppression. Anyway... back to work for me.

-----------------
Liz Henry ( http://www.blogher.com/haystackprofile/viewprofile... )
Composite: Tech & Poetics ( http://liz-henry.blogspot.com/ )

lizzard@bookmaniac.net

avengingophelia 5 pts

You are, I think, horribly and completely correct. This is one of the things about being a woman and fighting for women that I can least get my head around--how do you fight the basic belief that you just aren't quite human?

Denise 9 pts moderator

Killed people shew knew and had a relationship with. (or rather it is assumed that she did...)

Suzanne's point was in reference to the random killings of large numbers of people - random being the keyword.

~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager

Flamingo House Happenings ( http://www.flamingohouse.net/ )