Bio
Welcome! On behalf of the entire community and my co-founders Elisa Camahort, Jory Des Jardins, welcome to  BlogHer.com. As BlogHer's co-founde...
 
 
 
 

What’s Hot on BlogHer.com

Women bloggers to presidential candidates: Stop ignoring us and don't pander if you want our votes

  • Share This Post
  • submit
  • 10
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

In response to BlogHer's ongoing survey, "Should BlogHer interview presidential candidates or stick to their spouses?," women in this community have sent a clear message to presidential candidates to "wake up to the blogosphere" and answer 12 policy questions, either via video or the printed word.

In dozens of blog comments here, here and in this survey, respondents also urged candidates not to "ignore" women, and to start reaching out to existing and influential communities of women online (where most say they get their news), rather than creating candidate-specific sites that "pander" to women or moms specifically. Finally, the grand majority of women who voted reject interviews with potential First Spouses unless candidates participate too.

We gave women bloggers the final word on the survey, asking in our final question, "Do you have a message for the candidates about reaching women online that you'd like to share?" The answers are blunt and demanding; As of 10 a.m. Friday Dec. 21, members of this community cast 276 votes, including 118 open-ended comments to this question. Here's a representative sample of messages to candidates entered into the survey ( full survey results here):

Do you have a message for the candidates about reaching women online that you'd like to share?

"Yes. Stop expecting that we will be happy with hearing from your spouses and surrogates. If you have the time to talk directly with mostly male outlets, then you should have the time for us -- especially since we are 52% of the population and you need our votes to win this election."

"Women who are already online aren't looking for cutesy websites pandering to us. We're looking for you to come to us -- where we already are online -- and talk about real issues."

"I'm going to chalk it up to ignorance - we're not just women, we're women bloggers with the potential to reach tens of thousands more voters. Not just female voters either. Shockingly, I have male readers too."

"We (you and us) need this important opportunity to hear on another. We are women that wear many hats and part of a unique generation - mothers, businesswomen, wives (sometimes all!) who carry our weight in this country. We need to understand who you are because we're going to talk about you one way or another, and we are LOUD."

"To ignore organizations like BlogHer is to ignore the power of women who blog. Candidates, you're underestimating this important group if you think we have short memories and no influence!" Read all responses

When I announced the survey on BlogHer.com last week, I wrote that "our political team is confused by the response of presidential candidates to BlogHer, and to some other organizations and blogs by women. For the past six months, BlogHer has invited seven leading presidential candidates -- Democratic and Republican, we're non-partisan -- to participate with BlogHer's influential, passionate community of now 7.6 million techno-savvy women, who write and read thousands of influential blogs. While our editors, Morra Aarons-Mele and Mary Katharine Ham have made in-roads with the campaigns and we do have another year until Election Day, at this point we've been told no, both in words and in actions, as have some other women's blogs and political groups."

Fully 94 percent of respondents to this survey indicated that, one way or another, they want to hear from the candidate whose name is on the ballot. Of this 94 percent, more than 64 percent of respondents said they prefer BlogHer to talk with the candidates only, followed by bloggers who said "Both" candidates and spouses (nearly 30 percent),. The answer "Spouses and supporters" earned only 2.6 percent of respondent support:

Do you want BlogHer to talk with the candidates themselves -- Obama, Hillary, Mitt, etc.-- or will their families and supporters -- Oprah, Chelsea, Ann, etc. -- do? Full survey results

Candidates 64.73%

Spouses and supporters 2.55%

Both 29.45%

Other 3.27%

While bloggers were insistent in their survey votes and comments that they want presidential candidates to talk with the BlogHer community, bloggers hit an understanding note about how candidates could participate, with roughly the same number of bloggers saying they want candidates answer on video (44 percent) as bloggers who say they want candidates to answer in print (43 percent):

Do you want presidential candidates to answer policy questions in the Voter Manifesto? Full survey results

Yes on video 43.91%

Yes in print 43.17%

No, the candidates don't have to but the campaign should 10.70%

No, I have a

  • 10
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Catherine Morgan 5 pts

I think Hillary is not resonating with women the way she thought she would, and she may have even thought she didn't have to work for our votes. But, Iowa has changed all that...If she wants her message to get thru to the women she hopes will vote for her, she better get on the horn with Lisa Stone and talk to BlogHer ASAP.

Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan
also at CatherineBlogs.com ( http://www.catherineblogs.com/ ) and The Political Voices of Women ( http://politicsanew.com/ )

Jill Miller Zimon 5 pts

I see the widget on the right-hand side of the election 2008 page, with the headlines, right?

That's a great idea. Some kind of action-oriented widget that blog readers can choose from as far as adding it to their sites, pointing.

My learning curve on producing such a thing is rather steep (I call for my 13 year old when I need a lot of code-related help!) but there is this tool - I don't know if it would be helpful at all - Widgetbox. ( http://www.widgetbox.com/ ) I'm sure you have great resources.

But yes - a widget would be great for a sidebar. Or a banner - something that could emblazon 7.6 million women's blogs. OMG - could you imagine? lol Well, maybe not all 7.6 but...

Please let me know if I can help. TechPresident has some good ideas too of how blogs and the Internet are facilitating viral & word of mouth messaging.

Jill
Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.blogspot.com )

Lisa Stone 6 pts

Great point Jill -- I keep thinking that our best approach is some kind of widget that would
- Help us get the word out about our interest in these interviews
- Help us spread the word once the candidates participate
- Help us share the headlines of everyone blogging about the Election who wants to get their post headlines on other blogs by women.

If you check out our Election 2008 page ( http://www.blogher.com/special-events/election-200... ), you can see a couple of examples of these kinds of widgets. What think?

Lisa Stone
BlogHer Co-founder ( http://www.blogher.com/member/lisa-stone )
Surfette ( http://surfette.typepad.com )

Erin Kotecki Vest 5 pts

I skipped my first two classes in school to go register to vote. My mother proudly wrote me a note of excuse when I returned before lunch.

I tend to inform the men in my life facts on information I have seen and read on issues. I REMIND my husband to sign his absentee ballot and mail the darn thing for him.

Maybe they truly just don't get it, or maybe they do...and they are scared.

Politics & News Contributing Editor
Queen of Spain ( http://queenofspainblog.com/ )

Liz Rizzo 5 pts

It's really hard to believe that anyone doesn't vote in the presidential election, truth be told. I couldn't image missing it.

Liz Rizzo ( http://www.blogher.com/blog/liz-rizzo )

I blog at Everyday Goddess ( http://everydaygoddess.typepad.com/ ).

Debra Roby 5 pts

Morra, the media and anyone else who cares to listen...

I have voted in every local, regional, state, and national election since I gained the right (30 odd years ago). My female friends have all voted the exact same way. I advocate registering to vote to friends, acquaintances and near-strangers (suggesting that stores let my "I Voted" sticker earn me a discount on election day. I'd rather earn one for that than for simply getting older!)

So who are these women who aren't voting? Nobody that I know!

Debra
A Stitch In Time ( http://astitchintime.blogspot.com )
Deb's Daily Distractions ( http://debsdistractions.blogspot.com )

jennydecki 5 pts

we decide our votes based on the closest available male to ask?

I've always made it to the polls to vote. My great-grandmother used to take me with her when I was a child and I'd wait outside the voting booth, wishing I could be older so I could go inside.

Following issues and learning about candidates is something so many of the women I know are passionate about. I'm passionate about it too! We are being ignored because I honestly believe the political movers and shakers and organizers (men & women alike) think the majority of female votes are auxiliary votes, and if you can convince the men then you have the women near and dear to them.

It's so sad.

Morra Aarons Mele 5 pts

is full of messages that we don't vote! Or that to get us to the polls, we need extra, special coaching.

See pollster Margie Omero ( http://www.pollster.com/blogs/why_women_are_assume... ):
"But for years, there has been a lopsided amount of coverage about why women, in particular, aren't voting. Some stories cite studies of women only, but make conclusions about women-specific motivations for voting. Some use no data at all. Without comparing both genders' voting behavior, these conclusions are poorly drawn, and reflect biases of their own....It turns out that there are hardly any differences across gender in apathy or disinterest in voting. "

Barriers to voting are not about gender, or what many see as women's boredom, fear or, or lack of understanding of politics. The whole country needs to vote more- but the real storyline is not about women not getting out to the polls. Although it would be easy to think it is, given press and campaign coverage of women voters.

Jill Miller Zimon 5 pts

There's a lot to digest here but it seems like a pretty clear message from a place where there is such vibrant diversity!

I really want to thank you, Lisa (and whomever else helped) for tabulating and summarizing.

Besides being signed up for RSS feeds and newsletters from BlogHer, what do you suggest as the best way to followi the progress of BlogHer's appeal to the candidates to address the community? Are there any steps you would recommend to us to help (and not hinder) the effort to get the candidates to address the BlogHer community?

Thanks again.

Jill
Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.blogspot.com )

nellewrites 6 pts

of what I've seen hosting a feminist board and politics board. First, women who comment absolutely do not wish for anyone to assume Hillary gets their vote, or that they should feel some obligation to vote for her. Overwhelmingly they advocate for gender not being an issue at all in voting, in whom they support, for a candidate, etc.

Which in turn leads me to wonder if men are questioning gender based campaign/vote issues to the extent women are. My sense at this time is no.

Women are by and large taking this very, very seriously, trying to get it all right. And that to me is significant, because women are engaged and actively pondering the power of their vote - no matter who we support.

nelle ( http://www.nelle2nelle.org/ )